Everything you think you know about addiction is wrong | Johann Hari | TED
TED
0:12 One of my earliest memories is of trying to wake
0:15 up one of my relatives and not being able to.
0:17 And I was just a little kid, so I didn't really understand why,
0:20 but as I got older, I realized we had drug addiction in my family,
0:23 including later cocaine addiction.
0:25 I'd been thinking about it a lot lately,
0:28 partly because it's now exactly 100 years since drugs
0:31 were first banned in the United States and Britain,
0:33 and we then imposed that on the rest of the world.
0:36 It's a century since we made this really fateful decision
0:39 to take addicts and punish them and make them suffer,
0:43 because we believed that would deter them;
0:45 it would give them an incentive to stop.
0:48 And a few years ago, I was looking at some of the addicts in my life who I love,
0:53 and trying to figure out if there was some way to help them.
0:56 And I realized there were loads of incredibly basic
0:59 questions I just didn't know the answer to, like, what really causes addiction?
1:04 Why do we carry on with this approach that doesn't seem to be working,
1:07 and is there a better way out there that we could try instead?
1:10 So I read loads of stuff about it,
1:12 and I couldn't really find the answers I was looking for, so I thought, okay,
1:15 I'll go and sit with different people
1:17 around the world who lived this and studied
1:19 this and talk to them and see if I could learn from them.
1:22 And I didn't realize I would end up going over 30,000 miles at the start,
1:26 but I ended up going and meeting loads of different people,
1:29 from a transgender crack dealer in Brownsville, Brooklyn,
1:31 to a scientist who spends a lot of time feeding hallucinogens
1:34 to mongooses to see if they like them— it turns out they do,
1:38 but only in very specific circumstances—
1:39 to the only country that's ever decriminalized all drugs,
1:42 from cannabis to crack, Portugal.
1:45 And the thing I realized that really blew my mind is,
1:47 almost everything we think we know about addiction is wrong,
1:51 and if we start to absorb the new evidence about addiction,
1:54 I think we're going to have to change a lot more than our drug policies.
1:58 But let's start with what we think we know, what I thought I knew.
2:01 Let's think about this middle row here.
2:03 Imagine all of you, for 20 days now, went off and used heroin three times a day.
2:07 Some of you look a little more enthusiastic than others at this prospect.
2:10 (Laughter) Don't worry, it's just a thought experiment.
2:14 Imagine you did that, right?
2:16 What would happen?
2:17 Now, we have a story about what would happen that we've been told for a century.
2:21 We think, because there are chemical hooks in heroin,
2:23 as you took it for a while, your body would become dependent on those hooks,
2:28 you'd start to physically need them,
2:29 and at the end of those 20 days, you'd all be heroin addicts.
2:33 Right?
2:33 That's what I thought.
2:34 First thing that alerted me to the fact that something's not
2:37 right with this story is when it was explained to me.
2:40 If I step out of this TED Talk today and I get hit by a car and I break my hip,
2:43 I'll be taken to hospital and I'll be given loads of diamorphine.
2:47 Diamorphine is heroin.
2:48 It's actually much better heroin than you're going to buy on the streets,
2:52 because the stuff you buy from a drug dealer is contaminated.
2:55 Actually, very little of it is heroin,
2:57 whereas the stuff you get from the doctor is medically pure.
2:59 And you'll be given it for quite a long period of time.
3:02 There are loads of people in this room,
3:04 you may not realize it, you've taken quite a lot of heroin.
3:07 And anyone who is watching this anywhere in the world, this is happening.
3:10 And if what we believe about addiction is right— those people
3:13 are exposed to all those chemical hooks— What should happen?
3:16 They should become addicts.
3:18 This has been studied really carefully.
3:20 It doesn't happen; you will have noticed
3:22 if your grandmother had a hip replacement, she didn't come out as a junkie.
3:25 (Laughter) And when I learned this, it seemed so weird to me,
3:29 so contrary to everything I'd been told,
3:31 everything I thought I knew, I just thought it couldn't be right,
3:34 until I met a man called Bruce Alexander.
3:36 He's a professor of psychology in Vancouver who carried out
3:40 an incredible experiment I think really helps us to understand this issue.
3:43 Professor Alexander explained to me,
3:45 the idea of addiction we've all got in our heads,
3:48 that story, comes partly from a series of experiments
3:50 that were done earlier in the 20th century.
3:52 They're really simple.
3:54 You can do them tonight at home if you feel a little sadistic.
3:57 You get a rat and you put it in a cage, and you give it two water bottles:
4:00 One is just water, and the other is water laced with either heroin or cocaine.
4:04 If you do that, the rat will almost always prefer
4:06 the drug water and almost always kill itself quite quickly.
4:09 So there you go, right?
4:10 That's how we think it works.
4:12 In the '70s, Professor Alexander comes along and he
4:14 looks at this experiment and he noticed something.
4:17 He said ah, we're putting the rat in an empty cage.
4:19 It's got nothing to do except use these drugs.
4:21 Let's try something different.
4:23 So Professor Alexander built a cage that he
4:25 called "Rat Park," which is basically heaven for rats.
4:28 They've got loads of cheese,
4:30 they've got loads of colored balls, they've got loads of tunnels.
4:33 Crucially, they've got loads of friends.
4:34 They can have loads of sex.
4:36 And they've got both the water bottles, the normal water and the drugged water.
4:41 But here's the fascinating thing: In Rat Park, they don't like the drug water.
4:47 They almost never use it.
4:49 None of them ever use it compulsively.
4:51 None of them ever overdose.
4:53 You go from almost 100 percent overdose when they're isolated
4:56 to zero percent overdose when they have happy and connected lives.
4:59 Now, when he first saw this, Professor Alexander thought,
5:03 maybe this is just a thing about rats, they're quite different to us.
5:06 Maybe not as different as we'd like, but, you know— But fortunately,
5:09 there was a human experiment into the exact
5:11 same principle happening at the exact same time.
5:14 It was called the Vietnam War.
5:16 In Vietnam, 20 percent of all American troops were using loads of heroin,
5:20 and if you look at the news reports from the time, they were really worried,
5:24 because they thought, my God,
5:26 we're going to have hundreds of thousands of junkies
5:28 on the streets of the United States when the war ends; it made total sense.
5:32 Now, those soldiers who were using loads of heroin were followed home.
5:35 The Archives of General Psychiatry did a really detailed study,
5:38 and what happened to them?
5:40 It turns out they didn't go to rehab.
5:42 They didn't go into withdrawal.
5:44 Ninety-five percent of them just stopped.
5:47 Now, if you believe the story about chemical hooks,
5:49 that makes absolutely no sense, but Professor Alexander began to think there
5:53 might be a different story about addiction.
5:55 He said, what if addiction isn't about your chemical hooks?
5:58 What if addiction is about your cage?
6:01 What if addiction is an adaptation to your environment?
6:04 Looking at this, there was another professor
6:06 called Peter Cohen in the Netherlands who said,
6:09 maybe we shouldn't even call it addiction.
6:11 Maybe we should call it bonding.
6:12 Human beings have a natural and innate need to bond,
6:15 and when we're happy and healthy, we'll bond and connect with each other,
6:19 but if you can't do that, because you're
6:22 traumatized or isolated or beaten down by life,
6:25 you will bond with something that will give you some sense of relief.
6:29 Now, that might be gambling, that might be pornography, that might be cocaine,
6:32 that might be cannabis,
6:33 but you will bond and connect with something because that's our nature.
6:37 That's what we want as human beings.
6:40 And at first, I found this quite a difficult thing to get my head around,
6:43 but one way that helped me to think about it is,
6:46 I can see, I've got over by my seat a bottle of water, right?
6:49 I'm looking at lots of you, and lots of you have bottles of water with you.
6:53 Forget the drugs.
6:54 Forget the drug war.
6:55 Totally legally, all of those bottles of water could be bottles of vodka, right?
6:59 We could all be getting drunk— I might after this— (Laughter)— but we're not.
7:04 Now, because you've been able to afford the approximately gazillion
7:07 pounds that it costs to get into a TED Talk,
7:10 I'm guessing you guys could afford to be drinking vodka for the next six months.
7:13 You wouldn't end up homeless.
7:15 You're not going to do that, and the reason you're
7:18 not going to do that is not because anyone's stopping you.
7:21 It's because you've got bonds and connections that you want to be present for.
7:25 You've got work you love.
7:26 You've got people you love.
7:27 You've got healthy relationships.
7:29 And a core part of addiction,
7:32 I came to think, and I believe the evidence suggests,
7:34 is about not being able to bear to be present in your life.
7:38 Now, this has really significant implications.
7:41 The most obvious implications are for the War on Drugs.
7:44 In Arizona, I went out with a group
7:47 of women who were made to wear t-shirts saying,
7:50 "I was a drug addict," and go out on chain gangs
7:53 and dig graves while members of the public jeer at them,
7:56 and when those women get out of prison,
7:58 they're going to have criminal records that mean
8:00 they'll never work in the legal economy again.
8:02 Now, that's a very extreme example, obviously, in the case of the chain gang,
8:06 but actually almost everywhere in the world
8:08 we treat addicts to some degree like that.
8:10 We punish them.
8:11 We shame them.
8:12 We give them criminal records.
8:13 We put barriers between them reconnecting.
8:16 There was a doctor in Canada, Dr.
8:18 Gabor Maté, an amazing man, who said to me,
8:20 if you wanted to design a system that would make addiction worse,
8:23 you would design that system.
8:24 Now, there's a place that decided to do the exact opposite,
8:27 and I went there to see how it worked.
8:29 In the year 2000, Portugal had one of the worst drug problems in Europe.
8:33 One percent of the population was addicted to heroin,
8:35 which is kind of mind-blowing,
8:36 and every year, they tried the American way more and more.
8:39 They punished people and stigmatized them and shamed them more,
8:42 and every year, the problem got worse.
8:44 And one day, the Prime Minister and the leader
8:46 of the opposition got together, and basically said,
8:49 look, we can't go on with a country
8:51 where we're having ever more people becoming heroin addicts.
8:53 Let's set up a panel of scientists and doctors
8:56 to figure out what would genuinely solve the problem.
8:58 And they set up a panel led by an amazing man called Dr.
9:01 João Goulão, to look at all this new evidence, and they came back and they said,
9:05 "Decriminalize all drugs from cannabis to crack,
9:08 but"— and this is the crucial next step— "take all
9:12 the money we used to spend on cutting addicts off, on disconnecting them,
9:16 and spend it instead on reconnecting them with society." And that's not really
9:22 what we think of as drug treatment in the United States and Britain.
9:26 So they do do residential rehab,
9:28 they do psychological therapy, that does have some value.
9:31 But the biggest thing they did was the complete opposite of what we do:
9:34 a massive program of job creation for addicts,
9:37 and microloans for addicts to set up small businesses.
9:39 So say you used to be a mechanic.
9:41 When you're ready, they'll go to a garage, and they'll say,
9:44 if you employ this guy for a year, we'll pay half his wages.
9:47 The goal was to make sure that every addict in Portugal
9:50 had something to get out of bed for in the morning.
9:52 And when I went and met the addicts in Portugal, what they said is,
9:56 as they rediscovered purpose,
9:57 they rediscovered bonds and relationships with the wider society.
10:01 It'll be 15 years this year since that experiment began,
10:03 and the results are in: injecting drug use is down in Portugal,
10:07 according to the British Journal of Criminology,
10:09 by 50 percent, five-zero percent.
10:12 Overdose is massively down, HIV is massively down among addicts.
10:16 Addiction in every study is significantly down.
10:18 One of the ways you know it's worked so well is
10:21 that almost nobody in Portugal wants to go back to the old system.
10:24 Now, that's the political implications.
10:26 I actually think there's a layer
10:28 of implications to all this research below that.
10:30 We live in a culture where people feel
10:33 really increasingly vulnerable to all sorts of addictions,
10:35 whether it's to their smartphones or to shopping or to eating.
10:38 Before these talks began— you guys know this— we were told we
10:41 weren't allowed to have our smartphones on, and I have to say,
10:44 a lot of you looked an awful lot like addicts who were told
10:47 their dealer was going to be unavailable for the next couple of hours.
10:50 (Laughter) A lot of us feel like that, and it might sound weird to say,
10:53 I've been talking about how disconnection is a major
10:56 driver of addiction and weird to say it's growing,
10:58 because you think we're the most connected society that's ever been, surely.
11:02 But I increasingly began to think that the connections we have or think we have,
11:06 are like a kind of parody of human connection.
11:08 If you have a crisis in your life, you'll notice something.
11:11 It won't be your Twitter followers who come to sit with you.
11:14 It won't be your Facebook friends who help you turn it round.
11:17 It'll be your flesh and blood friends
11:18 who you have deep and nuanced and textured,
11:21 face-to-face relationships with, and there's a study
11:24 I learned about from Bill McKibben,
11:26 the environmental writer, that I think tells us a lot about this.
11:29 It looked at the number of close friends the average
11:32 American believes they can call on in a crisis.
11:34 That number has been declining steadily since the 1950s.
11:37 The amount of floor space an individual
11:39 has in their home has been steadily increasing,
11:42 and I think that's like a metaphor for the choice we've made as a culture.
11:46 We've traded floorspace for friends, we've traded stuff for connections,
11:51 and the result is we are one of the loneliest societies there has ever been.
11:54 And Bruce Alexander, the guy who did the Rat Park experiment,
11:57 says, we talk all the time in addiction about individual recovery,
12:01 and it's right to talk about that, but we
12:04 need to talk much more about social recovery.
12:06 Something's gone wrong with us, not just with individuals but as a group,
12:09 and we've created a society where, for a lot of us, life looks a whole lot more
12:13 like that isolated cage and a whole lot less like Rat Park.
12:16 If I'm honest, this isn't why I went into it.
12:19 I didn't go in to the discover the political stuff, the social stuff.
12:23 I wanted to know how to help the people I love.
12:25 And when I came back from this long journey and I'd
12:28 learned all this, I looked at the addicts in my life,
12:31 and if you're really candid, it's hard loving an addict,
12:36 and there's going to be lots of people who know in this room.
12:39 You are angry a lot of the time,
12:41 and I think one of the reasons why this debate is so
12:44 charged is because it runs through the heart of each of us, right?
12:48 Everyone has a bit of them that looks at an addict and thinks,
12:51 I wish someone would just stop you.
12:52 And the kind of scripts we're told for how to deal
12:55 with the addicts in our lives is typified by, I think,
12:57 the reality show "Intervention," if you guys have ever seen it.
13:00 I think everything in our lives is defined by reality TV,
13:03 but that's another TED Talk.
13:04 If you've ever seen the show "Intervention," it's a pretty simple premise.
13:08 Get an addict, all the people in their life,
13:10 gather them together, confront them with what they're doing,
13:13 and they say, if you don't shape up, we're going to cut you off.
13:16 So what they do is they take the connection to the addict, and they threaten it,
13:20 they make it contingent on the addict behaving the way they want.
13:24 And I began to think, I began to see why that approach doesn't work,
13:27 and I began to think that's almost like the importing
13:30 of the logic of the Drug War into our private lives.
13:34 So I was thinking, how could I be Portuguese?
13:37 And what I've tried to do now,
13:39 and I can't tell you I do it consistently and I can't tell you it's easy,
13:43 is to say to the addicts in my life
13:45 that I want to deepen the connection with them,
13:48 to say to them, I love you whether you're using or you're not.
13:51 I love you, whatever state you're in, and if you need me,
13:55 I'll come and sit with you because I love you
13:58 and I don't want you to be alone or to feel alone.
14:01 And I think the core of that message— you're not alone,
14:05 we love you— has to be at every level of how we respond to addicts,
14:09 socially, politically and individually.
14:12 For 100 years now, we've been singing war songs about addicts.
14:16 I think all along we should have been singing love songs to them,
14:20 because the opposite of addiction is not sobriety.
14:24 The opposite of addiction is connection.
14:28 Thank you.
14:30 (Applause)