Trump’s Worst Nightmare Is About to Come True…

0:00 They have spent $10 against you.

0:04 So I don't think anyone would dispute that.

0:06 That's the difference the money poured into this race from outside of Kentucky

0:10 is basically pushing you to the point of almost losing and you may lose.

0:15 Where did that money come from?

0:17 Well, it didn't come from regular people.

0:21 It's come from billionaires and it 95% of it

0:25 at least 95% has come from the Israeli Lobby.

0:29 So I'll give you their proxies the RJC

0:32 which is the Republican Jewish Coalition APAC

0:35 the American Israel Public Affairs Committee Miriam

0:39 Adelson Paul Singer and John Paulson went together.

0:41 They funded a pack called Maga Kentucky which is neither Maga nor

0:46 Kentucky but when the ad you know who are those three people?

0:51 They have been Miriam Adelson is the gambling magnet who ironically

0:55 makes money from the Chinese now gambling and not in Las Vegas.

1:00 And she's literally an Israeli.

1:01 Yeah, she was born there.

1:04 She's given over $200 to the president.

1:07 He puts her on the stage.

1:08 He says that she's influenced his own policy and attitudes

1:11 toward Israel and so she's trying to buy a congressional

1:15 seat in Kentucky along with the rest of these groups

1:18 that are probably by the way getting her money as well.

1:21 There's there's also another interesting

1:23 faction called Christians United for Israel.

1:26 They're really just another wing of APAC and RJC

1:30 that's been used to co-opt Christians into supporting their position.

1:36 And their position is more war.

1:38 It's more strife.

1:40 It's more bombs.

1:41 It's send more foreign aid and those are

1:44 the things that I've been voting against.

1:46 So the real reason that this race is a serious

1:50 race and I may lose is because a foreign Lobby

1:55 is has fully funded it to the extent that they've

1:59 never done in any Republican race ever before my opponent.

2:05 [clears throat]

2:04 It's interesting because you're not I don't think of you as an opponent

2:07 of Israel or a hater of Jews an anti-semite a man

2:10 with hate in his heart or anything I don't I don't think

2:13 those topics have defined your terms in Congress so far have they?

2:17 No, you can't go find even a xenophobic tweet

2:20 or Facebook post for me in my entire life.

2:23 I I'm the least xenophobic.

2:26 You know, I went to MIT which is

2:28 a real melting pot of of different nationalities and races

2:33 and ethnicities and it was a meritocracy and that's

2:37 what I'm used to is just you know, come to me with your ideas.

2:40 I don't care what color your skin is or who your parents were and let's

2:46 talk about things but it turns out that I've never voted for foreign aid.

2:51 And in fact I've for Israel for Egypt, for Ukraine for anybody.

2:57 In fact, I've offered amendments as soon as I got to Congress in 2013,

3:01 I had an amendment to defund the foreign aid to Egypt which seemed like

3:05 a good idea at the time because they were in the middle of a coup.

3:08 This is how ridiculous our foreign aid is.

3:10 We didn't even know who was going to control the capital.

3:13 There were tanks in the streets and we didn't know who the leader

3:16 was and my colleagues insisted on sending

3:19 the billions of dollars to Egypt anyway.

3:22 The question is who's going to cash the check when it gets there.

3:26 So, I've got a complete track record of voting against all foreign aid.

3:31 But it turns out there's one Lobby that's

3:35 very upset about that and that's Israeli Lobby.

3:38 And so, you're right.

3:39 This is a referendum.

3:40 It's a referendum.

3:41 The question we're putting to the people is are you

3:44 going to let a foreign country or lobbyists for that foreign

3:47 country buy a seat in Kentucky from and and displaced

3:53 the one congressman who will tell you what's in the bills,

3:57 who will explain his votes.

3:59 I explain all of my votes, especially on controversial bills,

4:03 on social media, to where anybody can see.

4:07 So, your position is that it's not your position as much as it's

4:11 the fact you're willing to disclose what's actually happening behind the scenes.

4:15 Correct.

4:15 So, to add evidence to that claim,

4:19 the last time you were on this show was almost exactly 2 years ago.

4:23 It was a little later in May, I think.

4:24 You had just won your primary.

4:26 75%.

4:27 Yes.

4:27 And so, you decided to come up here

4:29 and we have this amazing conversation mostly about you

4:32 and your life and the self-sufficiency with which you

4:34 live and how you built your house and amazing story.

4:37 We're going to repost that video soon cuz

4:40 I want people to see it before the primary.

4:42 But, in the middle of that conversation, you said, "Yeah,

4:45 there's this group called AIPAC and here's how

4:48 they go about corralling support in the Congress.

4:50 And they have minders that follow you around and I just don't hate Israel.

4:54 I don't support foreign aid to anybody and I

4:57 don't have an AIPAC minder." And I remember thinking, "Boy,

5:01 I've never heard anybody explain how this works in the way that you

5:05 did." I felt like that conversation was a pivot point in your political life.

5:11 It was and you know what's interesting

5:13 in the 2 years that have transpired since then,

5:15 not one of my colleagues has said, "I'm wrong." Right?

5:20 Did anybody come out and say, "Oh, he's full of it.

5:23 I don't have an AIPAC person that I go to dinner with every

5:26 time they come to DC and back in the district." Nobody said that.

5:31 They I mean, they all have an AIPAC person.

5:34 Now, some of them may not, you know,

5:35 know it's their AIPAC person, but they've all got an AIPAC person.

5:40 And by by the way, I I have a lot of Jewish friends and since that interview,

5:45 they joke that they're they're secretly my AIPAC person, right?

5:48 [laughter] When in fact they're not.

5:51 But that It wasn't just that you voted against

5:54 AIPAC's priorities or some of them anyway, which you did.

5:59 Because there are people who have done that before.

6:01 But you described and you opened to public view the process.

6:06 You pulled the curtain back.

6:07 Correct.

6:08 And that was the crime.

6:09 Right.

6:09 The crime is transparency.

6:11 It's not obstructionism.

6:13 Because the votes they're most upset about me for were 420

6:18 to 1 or 421 to 1 or 410 to 5, right?

6:24 Like show me in any of those cases where my single vote out of you know,

6:28 435 if everybody had been present was obstructionist.

6:33 It wasn't.

6:34 What happened though is people said,

6:35 "Who's the one person that voted against that?" And then they go to my social

6:39 media and then they read the bill and then they're like, "What the hell?

6:43 Why did my congressman vote for that?

6:45 What's What are the other 420 smoking,

6:47 right?" And so or what are they getting for that vote?

6:51 Why did they take that vote?

6:52 Why Why were they intimidated into taking that vote?

6:55 And that's the problem that I'm causing this foreign lobby

6:59 is I'm causing people to ask questions for the first time.

7:02 Who is my congressman's AIPAC person for instance?

7:06 How much money do they get from AIPAC?

7:08 Why did they vote for that bill

7:11 that bans passages in the New Testament you know,

7:14 that infringement on the first amendment?

7:18 So because you revealed that, you got this swarm of big donors laying down big

7:26 money to get you out of your seat

7:28 and you said basically it revolves around three.

7:32 Paulson, Singer and Adelson.

7:36 Have they described why they're doing this?

7:37 Why would a casino magnate or a hedge fund manager Hedge fund

7:42 private equity guy, distressed debt buyer like Paul Singer.

7:46 Like why would they care what happens

7:48 in a Republican primary in Kentucky of all places?

7:52 It's It's um to silence me.

7:55 It's so that I've shut up.

7:56 Look, if I lose on May 19th,

7:59 I'll be out of Congress on January 3rd of next year,

8:03 and nobody's going to follow my Twitter,

8:05 nobody's going to go to my Facebook page to see what's going on.

8:08 I won't be invited down into the secret

8:10 skiffs to read the secret interpretations

8:13 of the laws that the uh that the executive branch is using to spy on you.

8:18 I'll be gone.

8:19 The The one whistleblower, if you will, in Congress will be gone.

8:23 And let me tell you who's on the other side of this, who's funding me.

8:27 I've got And this is miraculous.

8:29 I think, you know, you called it a referendum,

8:32 I think it may be a movement within the MAGA

8:35 movement is what we're seeing because I've got over 33,000 donors,

8:39 and the average donation is less than 94 bucks.

8:43 These people, they don't have a lot of money to give,

8:45 but they can't be intimidated, right?

8:47 By the White House, they can't have

8:49 their environmental permits pulled on a big data center.

8:53 The The The government of Washington D.C.

8:57 doesn't have that kind of leverage on individual normal people.

9:00 So, those are the people who are funding me in this race.

9:04 And if you And if you want to be one of them, you can go to massiemoneybomb.com.

9:08 massiemoneybomb.com Yeah, because we're we've raised almost $200,000 in the last

9:13 2 days just by going out there and saying, you know, help me fight back.

9:18 Um we've got to have some ads to run against these billionaires.

9:23 So, what do you think the the full money breakdown is?

9:26 And without getting boring about it,

9:27 I don't think people understand exactly how these campaigns are funded.

9:30 So, there's you can send money to someone running for office,

9:33 but there are limits to how much you can send.

9:35 You can send to something called a super PAC, and there are no limits at all.

9:39 So, it's hard to kind of figure out, isn't it, I I think it's being spent.

9:42 Yeah, I think it'll be after the race when people finally

9:45 are able to compile the spreadsheets and look at the money.

9:48 A lot of the donors won't be disclosed until July,

9:51 the super PAC donors, because they're on a 6-month reporting cycle,

9:55 whereas I have to disclose big donors every 2 days

9:58 now once we get inside of a window with a campaign.

10:01 But, um you got super PACs on each side and there's a super PAC helping me,

10:06 not as large as the Israeli super PACs, which of which there are three.

10:11 Um but, there's a super PAC helping me.

10:12 Now, as far as hard dollar campaign money from real people,

10:17 I've raised over $5 million this election cycle,

10:21 which is probably more than I've raised

10:23 in the entire time that I've been in Congress.

10:25 Really?

10:26 Oh, yeah.

10:26 I usually raise a couple hundred thousand, maybe $400,000 an election cycle.

10:31 This time I've raised over 5 million.

10:33 It's because this situation is dire.

10:36 Now, the other side, you might say, "Okay, well,

10:38 how much money has he raised for his campaign?" He's

10:40 raised about 1 or 1.2 million per quarter for two quarters.

10:45 So, he's maybe raised two and a half million dollars at most.

10:48 But, if you go look at where did that money come from?

10:51 Um I think because of the show I did with you 2 years ago,

10:55 AIPAC sort of gone in hiding and they're

10:57 trying to secretly funnel money to campaigns.

11:01 And what we've uh realized and deduced is that they're funneling money,

11:06 hard dollars, not the super PAC dollars,

11:08 but they're funne- funneling money from their donors

11:11 to his campaign through a uh vendor, a payment vendor called Democracy Engine.

11:17 It was started by one of the people who started ActBlue.

11:20 It's not a conservative, if you will, ActBlue, the Democratic Yep, bundler?

11:24 Yeah.

11:25 So, this primarily a left-leaning payment vendor.

11:28 I use a payment vendor called Anedot and some people use WinRed,

11:32 probably you're familiar with that.

11:34 So, when you see something come through

11:36 a a payment vendor called uh Democracy Engine,

11:40 you you particularly $50,000 per quarter.

11:44 So, if somebody's reported $50,000 of expenses to Democracy Engine,

11:50 and if the payment vendor Democracy Engine has been charging 5%,

11:54 that means a million dollars of money came through that payment vendor.

11:58 And we've seen that in both of his quarters.

12:01 So, basically, as as far as we can tell,

12:04 um about a million dollars of his 1.2 million every

12:08 quarter that you would think may have come from grandmas

12:11 who are digging deep in their pockets when they get

12:13 a email from Trump that says give to this guy,

12:16 that's not where his money's coming from.

12:18 It's coming from AIPAC donors.

12:20 And then AIPAC donors were using a Democratic fundraising

12:23 operation to get the money to your opponent.

12:26 Correct.

12:26 And by the way, one of these super PACs that's aligned against me,

12:29 United Democracy Project, UDP, they are a pro-abortion, pro-gay rights,

12:37 um left like not just left-leaning, like majorly leftist super PAC.

12:43 And they are full-on in my race funding my opponent against me.

12:49 This is insane.

12:50 It is insane.

12:52 I do think it might be a couple years from now when AI

12:55 gets smart enough and honest enough in the in the competition of AIs,

13:00 that it will tell you exactly what happened in this race.

13:04 Whether whether I win or lose, it can go back,

13:06 look at the data, and and tell you, "Well, here's what happened.

13:10 A congressman from Kentucky was challenged and 95

13:14 or 99% of the money came from an Israeli

13:17 lobby to take him out for merely telling

13:20 the truth." If you think companies like Dr.

13:23 Squatch and Burt's Bees are small and wholesome, think again.

13:26 Like so many great companies,

13:28 they've now been bought by mega corporations and private equity firms who hijack

13:33 the brands and fill them with the same

13:34 corporate garbage that everybody else sells.

13:38 That's why we're excited to partner

13:39 with a company that is doing things differently, The Van Man Company.

13:43 What a cool name.

13:44 They started the tallow trend a few

13:45 years back with their grass-fed [music] tallow moisturizers.

13:48 They've been crushing it ever since.

13:51 Clean, nearly edible solutions to your everyday product needs.

13:55 Here's the thing about tallow,

13:56 it's the best moisturizer on Earth because the fatty acids in tallow

14:01 [music] are pretty much identical to the oils in your own skin.

14:04 Your body recognizes that.

14:06 Use it once and you feel the difference.

14:07 Your skin feels softer and smoother than anything you've

14:09 gotten from a bottle full of chemicals and fillers.

14:12 Cuz there's nothing in there that's bad for you.

14:15 You can practically eat it.

14:16 And the stuff actually lasts.

14:18 Tallow balm isn't just a moisturizer though.

14:20 It can replace your lotion, your night cream, even Neosporin and diaper balm.

14:24 It is powerful enough to heal the skin, yet safe enough to spread on your toast.

14:29 Not that you should, but you could because the ingredients are real.

14:34 So, if you're ready to ditch corporate chemicals, visit vanman.shop/tucker.

14:39 Use the code Tucker for 15% off your first order.

14:42 That's vanman.shop/tucker.

14:45 Code Tucker, 15% off your first order.

14:47 Real ingredients, zero exceptions.

14:54 Thanks for watching our YouTube channel.

14:55 We hope you'll subscribe to it.

14:57 And by the way, you can hit the little bell

14:59 on there and get notifications every time we produce a video.

15:02 We hope you'll do that also.