Extended interview: Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch
CBS Mornings
0:00 I thought that if it's all right with you,
0:02 we would start by how you start the book.
0:06 All right.
0:06 I was hoping you might just read that for us.
0:08 Sure.
0:10 You will never know how much it
0:11 cost the present generation to preserve your freedom.
0:15 I hope you will make good use of it.
0:17 John Adams.
0:19 Why'd you start the book with that quote?
0:21 We wanted to show the kids the kind of courage
0:23 it takes not just to realize the Declaration's promises,
0:28 begin to realize them through the revolution,
0:30 but to carry them forward and to realize them in our own times.
0:34 Do you think that we've taken some of those sacrifices for granted?
0:38 Yes.
0:38 I I think that we take our life,
0:42 liberty, property rights, the right to rule ourselves,
0:47 and we don't realize that most people through history did not have those rights.
0:53 Most people in the world today don't have those rights.
0:57 And it wasn't inevitable, either.
1:00 Right?
1:01 We almost lost the revolution.
1:03 The vote for the Declaration of Independence was initially not unanimous.
1:08 One of the Declaration's three big ideas
1:10 that we're all created equal, all of us,
1:14 that we have rights that are given to us by God,
1:17 not government, and that we have the right to rule ourselves.
1:20 And yes, we take those things as given.
1:22 We take them as the air we breathe, but they're not.
1:25 They don't preserve themselves.
1:26 We're not a nation united by religion or by culture, by heritage.
1:32 That's our creed.
1:34 And each generation has to choose that as their creed.
1:37 And it has to be passed on for each generation to choose it anew.
1:42 And I want kids today to see the challenge they face.
1:46 The torch is about to pass to their hands.
1:48 Are they going to carry it?
1:50 Are they going to drop it?
1:51 The ideals in the foundation set in the Declaration paved
1:54 the way for women to vote, the end of slavery.
1:58 Yes.
1:58 Why do you think people don't appreciate that?
2:01 Nations across the world have used it
2:03 as a model of their own because it is perfect.
2:06 The ideas are perfect.
2:08 Why do we take it for granted?
2:10 We don't teach the kind of civic virtues
2:13 that are necessary for a republic to sustain itself.
2:17 Do you worry about that?
2:18 Sure, I worry about that.
2:20 More so now than ever?
2:21 Well, I try to remind myself that democracies are supposed to be a messy place.
2:30 All right.
2:31 That we're supposed to disagree.
2:33 But you know, even America 250 is divided.
2:37 We've got competing events.
2:38 How did we get to this place?
2:40 we've all What I guess I'm saying is we've always been that place.
2:44 Am I here to tell you that it's uh no worse um No,
2:49 I'm not here to tell you that.
2:50 But we're not living through the American Civil War.
2:53 We're not living through the Revolutionary War.
2:56 So, yeah, we have our hard times,
2:58 but they feel hard to us cuz we're living them.
3:00 I do feel like there's a a moment now where people feel like hopeless,
3:05 like our country is in trouble.
3:07 And what I say way?
3:09 No, I don't.
3:10 I mean, Jan, when when I look at young people and talk to young people,
3:13 I say you are the luckiest people alive.
3:17 Not just now, in the history of the world.
3:21 Where would you rather have been born and when would you rather have been born?
3:26 You live in the freest nation in the world, in the history of the world.
3:30 Is it perfect?
3:31 No.
3:32 I'm not here to tell you it's perfect.
3:34 But I'm here to tell you it's awful good.
3:36 What is your goal here in doing this book
3:38 and and sitting down and doing these interviews?
3:41 to inspire young people to realize what a heritage
3:43 they have and what a responsibility they have.
3:45 Right?
3:46 And do I worry, Jan?
3:47 Yeah, of course I do.
3:48 I worry when I see that maybe 13% of eighth
3:54 graders are proficient in American history, 22% in civics.
3:58 Of course I worry.
3:59 I worry about America fulfilling its own promise.
4:03 Right?
4:04 And we are our own worst enemies.
4:06 And but are these things fixable?
4:08 Of course they're fixable.
4:09 Of course they're fixable.
4:11 Teachers, parents, children, we can do this.
4:14 You know, polls show that most Americans have lost faith in their institutions.
4:19 Does that trouble you?
4:22 I think that same thing was true again back back in 1776.
4:26 Only 40% of Americans wanted to declare independence.
4:30 We are a disagreeable lot.
4:33 We're also incredibly litigious.
4:35 I mean, 50 million people file lawsuits in this country every year.
4:38 Yeah, that's part of the American culture.
4:41 That's part of who we are.
4:42 What about at the court?
4:43 I've covered the court a long time.
4:46 And it does seem more divided now.
4:48 I do see justices writing a little
4:52 differently and saying things publicly a little differently.
4:55 Do you feel that at the court?
4:58 Do we disagree on hard cases?
5:00 Yes, Jan, we do.
5:02 You give us the 70 hardest cases in the entire American legal system every year.
5:08 That's our diet.
5:09 There are nine of us appointed by five
5:12 different presidents over the course of 30 years.
5:16 Can you get nine of your best friends to agree on where to go to lunch?
5:20 Okay.
5:20 All right.
5:20 So, you give us those 70 cases, we're unanimous about 40% of the time.
5:26 Where lower court judges have
5:27 Sometimes higher than that.
5:29 agreed.
5:29 How does that happen?
5:30 It happens cuz we listen to one another.
5:32 Go around the room, each of us has our say.
5:35 I've never heard a voice raised in the conference room.
5:38 Never.
5:38 Never.
5:39 And wait for it.
5:40 In 1945, the numbers were almost exactly the same what I've given you.
5:45 Nothing has changed around here.
5:47 Nothing.
5:48 So, if we're doing as well as they did then, I think we're doing okay.
5:52 And for whatever whatever disagreements we have about law, and you're right,
5:57 uh Justice Breyer is never going to convince me not to be an originalist.
6:00 Okay?
6:01 It's not going to happen.
6:02 What unites us far outstrips what divides us.
6:06 Each of my colleagues loves the Declaration of Independence.
6:10 Loves the Constitution of the United States and is eager
6:13 for young people to take up the challenge to learn about them.
6:16 What are some of those things that you do that we
6:19 don't see at the court where you do have agreement?
6:22 Yeah, I often think that how much I'd like for you
6:25 to have some of these cameras in our conference room.
6:28 I would like that, too.
6:29 you would.
6:31 [laughter] I'm sure you would.
6:31 And even in the courtroom.
6:32 It would be a terrible idea in in the conference room
6:35 because the conference room's where we speak most freely about law.
6:38 That's where the nine of you sit around the table,
6:40 no law clerks, no secretaries, just the nine of you.
6:43 That's right.
6:43 It's just the nine of us.
6:45 And it's where we're talking about the case after we've heard argument,
6:48 read briefs, and done all our homework.
6:51 And we listen.
6:53 And it goes around one by one.
6:55 You don't interrupt one another.
6:57 You listen.
6:59 Everybody gets their say.
7:01 And it's remarkable as as the conversation progresses,
7:05 you'll see the idea getting narrower to the nub
7:09 of the issue to where where we can all find some agreement.
7:13 And often times I walk into the conference room
7:15 thinking I don't know where this thing's going to land,
7:17 what the and it winds up nine to oh.
7:19 Okay.
7:20 40 to 50% of the time.
7:21 Yeah, right.
7:22 So much.
7:23 And if you had a camera and the American
7:26 people could see that, I think they'd be enormously proud.
7:32 There's something magical about it.
7:35 Magical.
7:38 It works.
7:39 We're very different people from very different parts of the country
7:42 who believe in how to interpret law very differently.
7:45 Not politics, law.
7:47 Originalism versus living constitutionalism, textualism versus purposivism,
7:51 a bunch of isms that nobody cares about,
7:53 but they have to do with how we view our jobs.
7:55 We view them differently.
7:57 But it works.
7:58 It's worked for 250 years.
8:01 You know, the president is constantly taking shots
8:03 at the court and especially the three of you.
8:06 Uh and you because you off I mean,
8:08 there are times where you are not in lockstep, as you've said.
8:12 Um he is constantly tweeting things.
8:14 The other day he said uh you're showing very little
8:17 loyalty to the man who appointed the three of you.
8:22 I mean, just Does a justice owe a president loyalty?
8:26 No.
8:25 My loyalty is the Constitution, the laws of the United States.
8:29 That's the oath I took.
8:32 It's really just that simple.
8:34 Yeah, there's a reason why our Constitution is set up the way it is, right?
8:38 Think about it.
8:39 You You've given nine old people uh life tenure.
8:44 But you give them life tenure if you believe their job is only to apply
8:47 the law fairly without regard to anybody or anything
8:50 else or politics or any of the noise.
8:54 And then they can be immune from external forces.
8:57 it.
8:57 Yeah.
8:58 That's why the Constitution is set up the way it is with respect to judges,
9:02 and I think it works.
9:04 And so, do I care people say left, right, center about me?
9:07 Nah.
9:08 There's been tremendous pushback.
9:09 And now we have calls for reform.
9:12 We have calls for additional justices.
9:14 This a court of nine.
9:15 Uh is that the way it should be?
9:18 It's not always been that way.
9:19 We've had nine since about 1860-something.
9:23 And it's worked reasonably well, as Ruth Bader Ginsburg said.
9:27 It's like all of our institutions that we've been talking about here.
9:30 Do you know their history?
9:32 You may have some great ideas about reforming things, and they might be right.
9:36 But make sure you know what you're reforming before you tinker with it.
9:40 Cuz once you start tinkering
9:42 And once you start tinkering, you expect other people to tinker.
9:45 And then where does it end?
9:46 Same with the issue of life tenure.
9:49 I mean, we've seen term limits proposed.
9:52 Sure.
9:52 Sure.
9:53 All anything.
9:54 The Constitution all of those decisions were made thoughtfully and for reasons.
9:59 If you don't know them, if you haven't thought about them
10:01 and understood their history and the consequences,
10:04 be careful about what genies you let out of the bottles.
10:08 Well, let me just get back to the children's book.
10:10 Why are justices writing children's books now?
10:13 You're not the only one.
10:14 No, I'm I take my inspiration from Sandra Day O'Connor,
10:17 who during her tenure in the court, uh fellow Westerner,
10:21 became concerned about the state of civic
10:23 education in this country and decided dang it,
10:26 she's going to do something about it.
10:28 And she wrote children's books and she set up an organization to teach children.
10:32 And I can't pretend I'm Sandra Day O'Connor, all right?
10:35 Nobody is.
10:36 But I sure admired her.
10:38 And so I guess I'm taking a bit of a cue from her.
10:40 And trying to take that message
10:42 that civics are important to the American people, starting with the kids.
10:46 Yeah.
10:47 That's right.
10:48 And I think that's something if you pulled the nine
10:50 of us in our conference room, we'd all agree on.
10:53 You would be unanimous on the importance of civics.
10:56 Yeah, I believe so.