Of kings and other Trump whisperers... | Inside Eruope
DW Podcasts
0:06 Hello and welcome to Inside Europe,
0:08 the weekly current affairs podcast and radio program from DW,
0:13 Germany's international broadcaster.
0:15 I'm Kate Lok in Bon.
0:17 This week on the show, Trump whispering and the push to save NATO,
0:22 Georgio Maloney's bid to reassert political dominance,
0:26 and a conversation with Mark Leonard,
0:29 author of the new book Surviving Chaos: Geopolitics: When the Rules Fail.
0:34 You know, a lot of Europeans thought we were at the end of history,
0:37 that we'd reached the end of our of our evolutionary journey, and that
0:40 and that Europe was it, right?
0:42 We were living it.
0:42 We were the ultimate goal at the end of the rainbow.
0:44 we were living it and that everyone else was going to become like us.
0:49 Those stories and more coming up on the program,
0:59 the alliance that our two nations have built over the centuries
1:04 and for which we are profoundly grateful to the American people.
1:07 The unmistakable voice of the UK's King Charles III there addressing the US
1:13 Congress as part of this week's 4-day state visit widely seen back
1:17 home in Britain as a damage limitation operation following the very public
1:22 souring of relations between President Trump
1:25 and the UK's belleaguered Prime Minister Kama.
1:29 Whilst the king mainly used his address to stress UK US relations,
1:33 Charles also made a direct appeal for NATO unity and the defense of Ukraine.
1:39 In the immediate aftermath of 911 when NATO invoked article
1:44 5 for the first time and the United Nations Security Council,
1:49 Charles's appeal to Congress comes at a time
1:51 when the future of NATO has been thrown
1:54 into doubt by President Trump's repeated suggestions that he
1:57 may withdraw the US from the transatlantic military alliance.
2:02 So far, NATO leaders have tried to pleate him with flattery and praise.
2:07 Secretary General Mark Hutter has led that effort with what some
2:12 believe has been excessive zeal while others praise him for it.
2:16 From Brussels, Terry Schultz takes a look at whether the Trump
2:20 whispering tactic is achieving its goal
2:23 of making the transatlantic relationship stronger.
2:26 It's called Trump whispering and there are several European leaders employing it
2:31 on a regular basis as they try to forge friendships with Donald Trump.
2:36 The chief practitioner, however, is NATO Secretary General Mark Route.
2:40 He's even created a subset of Trump whispering known as daddy diplomacy.
2:45 Last year at NATO summit in the HEG,
2:47 Route described Trump's involvement in the conflict between Iran
2:50 and Israel like a daddy needing to sort things out.
2:54 Route was heavily criticized, but asked about it earlier this month,
2:58 he's evidently come to embrace the fallout.
3:01 I own it and the president owns it because he brought up t-shirts.
3:04 He made a movie that he is home and he returned to the United States.
3:08 This was so funny and this is why I like him so much.
3:11 Trump also likes Rut personally and mentions that frequently
3:15 but it hasn't stopped him from continuing to trash NATO.
3:19 Despite all efforts, Trump says it's beyond reconsideration that he'll
3:22 pull the US out of the alliance after European nations declined to help
3:27 the US wage combat operations against Iran.
3:30 Very disappointed in NATO.
3:31 They didn't do the they weren't there for us.
3:34 We pay trillions of dollars for NATO and they weren't there for us.
3:38 Former NATO official Gerinda Nu says European leaders are taking
3:41 the wrong approach to such behavior from the US president.
3:45 History has told us and taught us that appeasement does not work.
3:51 So if you try to accommodate a bully,
3:53 whether that bully is President Trump or somebody like Putin or he,
3:58 I mean, the only thing you are doing is
4:00 you invite the bully to punch you harder next time.
4:04 Among Trump's fellow world leaders,
4:05 Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has come the closest to publicly taking him
4:10 to task in a speech he gave at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.
4:14 It seems that every day we're reminded that we
4:18 live in an era of great power rivalry.
4:22 That the rules-based order is fading.
4:25 That the strong can do what they can and the weak must suffer what they must.
4:31 There is a strong tendency for countries to go along to get along,
4:37 to accommodate, to avoid trouble, to hope that compliance will buy safety.
4:44 Well, it won't.
4:46 Carney urges what he calls middle powers to stick together against big bullies.
4:51 Gerinda Neos agrees this should be Europe's path.
4:54 I think what Europeans really start to learn
4:56 now is that uh they they need to take
5:00 their destiny in their own hand and also what
5:03 I find extremely important get out of this reactive mode
5:06 where every second tweet coming out of the White
5:08 House sends us in all directions like a bunch
5:11 of headless chicken and um and so we need
5:15 to change gear and uh define our own priorities, define our own strategy,
5:20 um define our principles and uh and interests
5:23 and then pursue them and pursue them also with uh some degree of hard
5:28 ball because uh that's the language Trump understands
5:31 and she insists it should not be done quietly.
5:35 Terry Schultz DW Brussels.
5:38 This is Inside Europe and I'm Kate Leok in Germany.
5:42 A month ago, Italians voted
5:44 in a referendum on Giorgio Maloney's signature reform,
5:49 a constitutional overhaul of the judicial system.
5:53 Voters rejected it, and it was the heaviest defeat of her premiership.
5:59 Now, under pressure from the courts, the opposition,
6:01 and parts of her own right-wing base,
6:04 Melanie is trying to reassert control through migration and security.
6:11 Megan Williams reports from Rome.
6:17 Italy's latest decreto secreta or security decree became law April 24th passed
6:23 under a confidence vote to chance of be laacho from the opposition
6:28 and buried inside it was a surreal measure a state payment
6:32 for lawyers who help migrant clients return voluntarily to their countries.
6:37 Opposition MPs called it a wild west bounty,
6:41 €615 for a lawyer who guided
6:44 a foreign client through so-called voluntary repatriation.
6:48 Originally paid only once the migrant had actually returned home.
6:52 The Italian bar council said it had not been consulted.
6:56 The criminal lawyers union called the measure unconstitutional.
7:01 And Italy's top anti-mafia prosecutor,
7:03 Nicolola Grati, said, "You're basically telling lawyers,
7:08 you're not working for a client, but the state."
7:13 Even Italy's president, Sumatarella,
7:15 took the unusual step of sending the government a clear warning,
7:19 signaling that a payment tied to the outcome
7:22 of a legal case risked undermining the right to defense,
7:25 a constitutional red line.
7:28 So before the final text was locked in, the government
7:31 moved to soften the most explosive part of the measure.
7:34 It extended the€ 615 payment beyond lawyers
7:38 to associations and migrant mediators and removed
7:42 the strict link between the payment
7:44 and the foreign citizen actually returning home.
7:49 This offer of 600 plus euros to help
7:52 migrants return doesn't interest me in the slightest,
7:55 says immigration lawyer Maria Vizentini.
7:58 She spent two decades in Rome helping migrants with legal problems.
8:02 She says she's actually tried before to help undocumented migrants return home,
8:06 but there is often no money for flights,
8:09 no real support for integration, and many people still owe money to traffickers.
8:14 They feel they have no choice but to stay,
8:16 she says, calling the 600 euro idea madness.
8:22 Beyond the frustration of those who work with migrants,
8:25 the security law also points to something larger.
8:28 A government trying to reassert control after a major political defeat.
8:33 A month ago, voters rejected a referendum on a constitutional
8:37 overhaul that would have separated the careers of judges and prosecutors.
8:41 Ricardo, head of the opposition party.
8:48 For the first time in more than three years in office,
8:50 he says Maloney is in a serious political and identity crisis.
8:55 Her political rhetoric is built around the idea
8:57 that she embodies the will of the people.
9:00 But when she tries to push through a constitutional
9:03 rewrite in their name and voters reject it,
9:06 the whole premise begins to crack.
9:09 Maji says the security decree is part of the response.
9:13 A hard right signal to her base,
9:15 a way to shift attention back to migration, order, and the courts.
9:20 But the pressure on Maloney is not only domestic.
9:22 She's also been hit from abroad by the leader
9:25 she once treated as her closest ideological ally, Donald Trump.
9:30 After she defended Pope Leo from Trump's attacks and refused
9:33 to let Italy be dragged into the Iran war,
9:36 Trump turned on her publicly, saying he'd thought she was brave but was wrong.
9:41 And now she's being squeezed from her own right.
9:44 General Roberto Vanachi, a former army officer turned hard-right politician,
9:49 has been pulling part of the nationalist
9:51 electorate towards even more aggressive language on migration,
9:55 identity, and security.
9:57 Maji says the economic picture is also closing in.
10:03 The economy is going badly.
10:04 He says Italy has a huge deficit.
10:07 Purchasing power is at rock bottom and gas prices are rising.
10:12 Then from Luxembourg came one piece of news Maloney could present as a win.
10:16 The advocate general of the European Court of Justice
10:19 issued an opinion on Italy's offshore migrant centers in Albania.
10:24 centers that have stood largely empty because
10:26 Italian judges refuse to send people there.
10:29 He said the scheme is in principle compatible with EU
10:32 law as long as migrants rights are fully protected.
10:36 Maloney called it a vindication, saying two years had been lost
10:42 to forced and unfounded judicial readings and what
10:45 she called a new model for the EU in how to handle migrant arrivals.
10:52 Still, it doesn't change the wider picture here in Italy.
10:55 Maloney is now facing resistance and failures on multiple fronts
11:00 with international stakes the highest they've ever been since her election.
11:05 Meghan Williams, DW, Rome.
11:08 Let's accept for a minute the thesis that we have moved
11:11 into a new age of unorder and that the old rules no longer apply.
11:17 In that case, what we need is a guide
11:20 to help us navigate our new volatile reality.
11:23 Surviving Chaos: Geopolitics: When the Rules Fail is just one such book.
11:28 Its author is Mark Leonard,
11:30 co-founder and director of the European Council on Foreign Relations,
11:34 the first panuropean think tank.
11:37 And at the heart of the book is a distinction
11:40 which I think I'm going to let Mark Leonard outline himself.
11:45 So my starting point is that the world's
11:48 going to be divided less between autocracies and democracies
11:52 or between east and west but more between
11:54 different ways that people are thinking about order.
11:57 And one way I think about order,
11:59 the the way that the architects think about order is you try
12:02 and design a perfect world with a set of rules and institutions and then
12:08 you work back from that and uh see how you can uh
12:12 mold the world that we're living in so that it meets that structure.
12:16 And the sort of classic example of that was came after
12:20 World War II where you get a bunch of very clever people.
12:24 John Maynard Kanes from the UK, Dean Herson from the US,
12:27 other people like that who set up the Breton Woods institutions,
12:31 the United Nations, the World Bank,
12:34 the IMF and then you carry on building lots of structures after that.
12:38 An alternative way of thinking about order is what I call the artisans approach.
12:44 So rather than building grand structures from scratch,
12:47 instead artisans improvise, they repair, they adapt,
12:52 they use old structures and institutions to do
12:55 new things rather than building new things from scratch.
12:59 So I kind of argue in the book
13:00 that for most of the last couple of hundred years,
13:04 it's been a great time for architects and architects
13:08 have have done very very well in the world.
13:10 But because we're entering a period where a lot
13:14 of really quite fundamental change is going to blow
13:18 through those structures and institutions and it's going
13:21 to be much less predictable than it was before.
13:23 This could be the hour of the artisan where artisans find that they're
13:29 in a a much better place than the architects and the architects get very
13:34 frustrated because their beautiful plans and grand
13:37 designs don't seem to have very much
13:40 purchase on a world that's going through
13:42 fundamental changes because of climate change because
13:45 of the creation of AI because
13:47 of big demographic changes because capitalism is becoming
13:51 much more crisisprone and and also just
13:54 because the the changes in power relations
13:57 is leading to new leaders like Donald Trump and and Vladimir Putin and Ci
14:01 Ping who just don't obey the rules and are doing things in different ways.
14:05 I learned so much, by the way, about Ti Jinping from this book.
14:08 Honestly, if ever there was a man in this book that comes out as, you know,
14:12 a man with a plan, it is him.
14:15 So, I I would have put him in the architect category.
14:18 So I was sort of wondering what qualifies him and his thinking as um
14:22 artisal and I think it it's sort of this thing that you unpick where
14:26 there is this taking from Confucious taking
14:30 from Markx this sort of theoretical almost
14:33 spiritual sort of mishmash that creates
14:36 a framework which enables his system to flourish.
14:39 Yeah.
14:40 So obviously Sigin Ping is not somebody who is well
14:44 known for for his less a fair approach to the world.
14:48 His rise to power has been associated with lots of attempts to crack down
14:53 on society and to introduce greater controls
14:57 on what people are doing on a day-to-day basis.
14:59 But where I do think he is open to the world is firstly that he has
15:07 a sense that the future isn't going to be
15:10 about preserving the existing structures and building an order.
15:13 It's more about surviving chaos.
15:16 And his favorite phrase which he uses all
15:18 the time is called great changes unseen in a century.
15:22 It sounds quite clunky to European ears,
15:25 but it's quite a resonant phrase to many Chinese people because it echoes
15:30 the language that people used in the lateqing era in the 19th century
15:35 when China had its first real encounter with Western modernity with uh British
15:42 and French people coming out who
15:44 overwhelmed China with their superior military technologies.
15:49 And this led to a massive crisis in China.
15:53 It was the beginning of what the the official
15:56 Communist Party calls the century of humiliation.
15:59 China found itself on the wrong side of what it saw as these great changes.
16:03 You know, the industrial revolution which led to these new
16:06 technologies which created a lot of of chaos and disruption.
16:10 And the Chinese thought that they had all
16:13 the answers that they knew how the world worked.
16:15 But none of the rules which they were relying on seemed to apply anymore.
16:19 So a lot of Chinese people went to Europe
16:22 to try and understand what was going on in the world.
16:25 And they came back and decided that they
16:29 actually not only didn't understand what was happening,
16:32 but they didn't even have the words to to explain it.
16:34 So they introduced a whole new vocabulary into the Chinese
16:37 language at the beginning of the 20th century.
16:40 words like science and democracy and the word
16:43 of progress which didn't exist before because
16:45 they had an idea that that history was
16:48 went in cycles that nothing really changed fundamentally.
16:51 So this idea that that history could have a direction and was was
16:54 moving forward was something which was quite alien to a lot of Chinese people.
16:58 So they had this kind of massive crisis and decided
17:01 that they needed to learn from from the west.
17:03 And since then they've been on the lookout for these big
17:07 great changes uh to make sure that they didn't miss
17:10 them and that they uh were on the right side
17:12 of future industrial or other kinds of revolutions that were going on.
17:17 This is Inside Europe and I'm Kate Leok in Germany.
17:21 When headlines get louder, we go deeper.
17:24 Say hello to Berlin Briefing.
17:25 Your guide to Germany's impact on the world.
17:28 Between East and West, autocrats and Democrats,
17:31 Germany's whole system is under stress.
17:34 Pressure from all sides.
17:35 And the world around Germany is getting more dangerous.
17:38 Is democracy glitching.
17:40 Too much noise.
17:41 Too little clarity.
17:42 We decode what it means for you.
17:45 From Berlin to right where you are.
17:47 It's all in Berlin briefing on YouTube and wherever you get your podcast.
17:52 I was thinking of something that um I
17:54 heard I think it was probably David Harvey say
17:56 and that is that when a British business person
17:59 goes into a meeting with a Chinese business person.
18:02 The Chinese business person knows that Britain
18:06 fought a war literally for the right
18:08 to get China addicted to opium because they didn't like the trade deficit.
18:12 And you know this this was this was this was uh this is this is part
18:15 of the sort of the the cultural and historical
18:18 knowledge with which that Chinese person enters the meeting.
18:21 the British person probably has no idea that's
18:23 not a history that they have been taught.
18:25 And so I suppose my question is about the stories
18:29 that we tell each other about ourselves and about our collective
18:33 past and whether you think that this is a moment
18:35 of alp of you know of change of disruption in that respect.
18:39 I think that's absolutely right.
18:41 You know, I think we've had a pretty remarkable few decades where, you know,
18:47 a lot of Europeans thought we were at the end of history,
18:49 that we'd reached the end of our of our evolutionary journey, and that
18:53 and that Europe was it, right?
18:54 We were living it.
18:55 We were the ultimate goal at the end of the rainbow.
18:57 We were living it and that everyone else was going to become like us.
19:01 And I think we forgot as you as you
19:03 know your British businessman did both how much
19:08 of the the rest of the world looked at us
19:09 and our kind of history and our impact on them
19:12 which is one of the reasons I think why
19:14 these universal institutions have got less legitimacy than we
19:18 thought they did because a lot of other people
19:19 think they were spread through empire and through violence.
19:23 But also they they kind of you know the period that we thought
19:25 of as order and as as the end of history you know for many other
19:30 people around the world was a period where there was a lot of violence
19:33 and war and and they didn't really think the order was working for them.
19:37 I think what's changed now is is you know firstly that there are a lot
19:42 of people within western societies that have
19:44 the same response to where we're at.
19:46 So, you know, 40% of Americans who voted for Donald Trump
19:51 actually think that they were the biggest victims of the American order.
19:55 So, that is leading to to different sort
19:58 of conversations within our societies about um you know,
20:02 who we are, where we've come from, where we're going to go.
20:05 So anecdotally um I was having a a sort of an editorial discussion
20:11 um the other day and it it was about terminology because um far
20:15 right it it's a term that's applied across the board but you know
20:18 within that you have all these different sort of distinctions between um you
20:23 know populist right between nationalist right and we were also saying that you
20:27 know we need we also need to be a lot more choosy about
20:31 the way in which we describe the far left because far left is
20:35 a term applied to Jean McMillan who
20:38 would represent a sort of authoritarian left,
20:40 you know, but it also gets applied to someone
20:42 like Zack Palansky who's an ecosist, you know,
20:45 and and I was just thinking in the middle of this discussion,
20:47 oh my goodness, history is here,
20:48 you know, that the end of history was predicated on the idea
20:51 that uh the big sort of ideological arguments had been settled and no,
20:56 we're we're we're right in the middle of it.
20:58 Yeah.
20:58 Well, I think we are at the edge of history now rather than the end of history.
21:02 And we're kind of realizing that a lot of the things
21:05 that we're living through have no real historical precedent.
21:09 Whether it's the extent of of climate change,
21:14 whether it is the idea of AI and quantum computing and new technologies which
21:19 are going to turn our societies and our labor markets and even the idea
21:24 of what it is to be human on their head or whether it is
21:28 the the way that our global economy is just changed in such a fundamental way.
21:33 I mean we know from Markx onwards that capitalism is is prone
21:37 to crisis but Marx didn't envisage an economy as connected as networked
21:45 as complex as the one that we have at the moment
21:48 that creates a whole series of massive crises which we've been dealing with.
21:53 I mean just the last decade we had a financial crisis.
21:56 We've had the global pandemic.
21:58 We've had lots of evidence of of of man-made climate change.
22:03 We've had uh the wars in Ukraine and Gaza
22:08 and Iran uh all reverberating through the the global economy.
22:13 We had a migration crisis in 2015.
22:16 And these things are are really big issues which
22:20 seem to overwhelm the the the sort of centrist
22:23 politics that we had beforehand are leading people towards
22:28 much bigger divides and to try new things out.
22:31 So you are seeing the emergence of a new right as you
22:34 said before with a radicalism to a lot of these farright parties.
22:38 But as you say, there also lots of new parties
22:41 that have come to occupy the left with with completely different visions
22:47 from the sort of centrist mainstream third-wave politics which was um
22:52 in the ascendant in the '9s and in the in the naughties.
22:56 And um it does mean that there's a lot to play for.
23:00 So, you know, increasingly when general elections happen,
23:03 people don't think it's just a question
23:04 of who's going to be governing the country,
23:06 but there is a often a sense that democracy itself is on the ballot.
23:10 You know, this could be the last election that we have.
23:12 And people very much felt that in the in the US elections,
23:16 um, in the Hungarian elections, and I'm sure,
23:19 you know, in the French presidential elections next year,
23:22 there will be a sense that there really big things at stake there.
23:26 It's not just a an election which um will have an impact for political experts.
23:32 It's something which which which could potentially
23:34 really define the identity and history of France.
23:37 We will be coming back to my interview with surviving chaos author Mark
23:42 Leonard after the break when our focus will shift from diagnosis to solutions.
23:47 If you're listening to us via a partner station that leaves us here,
23:51 you will find the full show wherever you get your podcasts.
23:54 This is Inside Europe and I'm Kate Leok in Germany.
24:33 Hey.
24:45 Hey.
24:46 Hey.
24:59 Welcome back to Inside Europe,
25:01 the weekly current affairs podcast and radio
25:03 program from DW Germany's international broadcaster.
25:07 I'm Kate Leok in Bon.
25:10 Back to my interview with Mark Leonard,
25:12 author of the new book, Surviving Chaos: Geopolitics: When the Rules Fail.
25:18 So, go on Mark, get out your democracy toolkit for me.
25:21 How how would an artist artisal approach work?
25:25 Well, I think that the way to to respond to that is
25:30 not to be nostalgic and to try and prop up the old system,
25:34 but to really understand the extent of these changes and to think
25:38 about how we can position ourselves to deal with them.
25:42 You lean into the changes and you try and make them work for you.
25:46 thinking quite carefully about who you buy
25:49 your energy from, how you make your energy,
25:52 who you uh buy technology from, whether you
25:54 trust countries that might use it to blackmail you,
25:57 you know, what kind of trait.
25:58 So, there's a a way that you build security
26:01 into a lot of the your connections with other players.
26:04 And then you also need to think about how you uh make people
26:08 feel uh safe again because one of the big dangers that we have
26:12 is that many people in our societies feel that they were big victims
26:18 of globalization and liberalization um because
26:22 the elites benefited from them but they didn't
26:25 and that's leading to you know big debates about immigration about trade about
26:31 other uh policies and I think part of what you need to do uh
26:36 if you want democracies to work well is to take those concerns very
26:39 seriously and try and come up with solutions to make people feel safer again.
26:43 Surely that would be redistribution, would it not?
26:45 Or you know a change in tax laws.
26:48 Yeah, absolutely.
26:49 That's exactly the sorts of things you do.
26:50 So you know we're seeing new debates emerging about redistribution,
26:55 about reinventing our welfare models so that people can be kept safe.
26:59 We're seeing new debates about migration taking place
27:03 where people understand that our economies are going
27:06 to need migration because of aging populations and because
27:10 you know a lot of our welfare states depend
27:12 on on people coming in from other countries
27:15 but at the same time they want to make sure
27:16 that it doesn't drive down uh wages that it
27:20 doesn't uh lead to big inflation of house prices.
27:24 So you just having much more control of these sorts of things.
27:28 You look to Australia and Denmark there which raised all sorts
27:33 of questions for me because uh I mean you know the the performative
27:36 cruelty of the Australian offshoring system um and uh also of you
27:43 know Denmark which has had um you know the so-called ghetto laws.
27:46 It's had uh officials given the ability to uh confiscate personal items,
27:51 jewelry and so on from asylum seekers at the border as well
27:56 as this uh you know extremely restrictive approach to asylum itself.
28:01 Um I did wonder well I did wonder whether
28:04 that was perhaps an architectural rather than an artisal approach.
28:07 Um but I also I I also I also wondered um about
28:12 the about the price I suppose and about um lines in the sand
28:19 and about what we are prepared to sacrifice in terms of our values
28:24 and our humanity in order to shore up those very things.
28:29 So um you know I wasn't trying to endorse every single
28:33 it it it's about a paragraph in the book to be fair.
28:36 I mean this is this is not a massive thesis.
28:39 Yeah.
28:39 But I also wasn't trying to endorse
28:40 everything about the Danish or the Australian systems.
28:43 But what I think I was trying to say and I
28:47 I do believe is that there are winners and losers.
28:51 They're positive things that come out
28:53 of migration and they're also um negative things.
28:56 And ideally what we want to do is to have
28:58 a politics which allows you to have the positive things.
29:01 So, you know, gives uh our economies the workers that they need,
29:05 gives us the skills that we need for our health services and for for other
29:08 areas and keeps us open to the cultural
29:11 richness that we get from having diverse societies,
29:15 but at the same time tries to mitigate
29:19 against the the negative aspects of of migration,
29:22 whether these are kind of economic uh negatives,
29:25 so people undercutting salaries.
29:28 So you have to think about the social infrastructure whether
29:31 you have a minimum wage to find ways of protecting workers.
29:34 You know if large numbers of people are moving around the country you
29:37 want to make sure that they have housing and schooling and health care.
29:42 So you need to know where people are moving and and be
29:44 able to shift extra resources to places where people are going.
29:48 But you also do I think need to to give the public
29:51 a sense that this is something that you're on top of and you're controlling.
29:55 What I think's wonderful about the the Australian model is every
29:59 year the Australian government goes to parliament and says, you know,
30:04 this is what our economic needs are for migration
30:07 and we're going to say we need x number of people in different areas and they
30:12 almost have like a budget for migration and it
30:14 but doesn't that sort of put us back
30:15 in the sort of extractative approach to the rest
30:18 of the world that we kind of you know saw in our China Britain example.
30:22 I think there's a difference between the the sort of migration uh you
30:26 know legal migration which I think that's a solution to and then what
30:30 we do with our asylum policies and I think asylum is you know
30:34 is something which is very different and that is something where we have
30:39 a an obligation to help people who are who are escaping from from horrible
30:44 circumstances and there you know I think there's also a legitimate debate
30:48 to be had in the country about how many people you want to welcome
30:51 and and how long And I think those are debates that are worth having.
30:54 We shouldn't run away from them because
30:56 ideally we'll come up with solutions which
30:59 can get the consent of society for a kind of positive and humane policies.
31:04 And if you do that, you can actually turn migration into something that patriots
31:10 believe in and actually take that card away from the far right as well.
31:13 And I think that is a that's an important thing.
31:15 I I you know I think those are the things I wanted to celebrate
31:18 not like snatching jewelry from people at the borders and things like that.
31:23 I'd like to end on a celebration too.
31:24 Can I can I make a nomination?
31:27 So I was I would love to nominate Ukraine as the ultimate
31:31 modern artisans because I feel like they just fit this category so well.
31:36 you know, everything from everybody, you know,
31:38 suddenly getting around attacks on power infrastructure by, you know,
31:42 having small solar modules on their balconies to, you know,
31:46 obviously there's drone tech and um uh you know, it you know, in Ukraine,
31:51 all your dealings with the the administration have gone digital,
31:53 you know, during a war.
31:54 I'll accept your nomination.
31:56 No, I think it's I think it's absolutely right.
31:58 They tick so many of the boxes.
31:59 Well, I really do hope that ECFR
32:01 will consider inaugurating the first ever artisan awards.
32:06 We must get you to present it to the Mark Leonard.
32:12 It's been an absolute pleasure.
32:13 Thank you so much um for your generosity with your time in talking to me.
32:17 Thank you so much as well.
32:18 It was really fun talking to you again.
32:21 Surviving Chaos: Geopolitics When the Rules Fail is out now.
32:27 Our poll of the week has an artisal flare,
32:37 although perhaps not quite in the sense that Mark
32:39 Leonard envisaged think French bungee and Swiss clock makers.
32:44 As for last week's poll, the correct answer was B.
32:48 Groping Neptune's genitals.
32:50 And no, I am not giving any more context than that.
32:57 How do artisans learn their trade?
33:00 With apprenticeships, of course.
33:02 In Germany, that usually means the duala building,
33:06 a blend of classroom learning and paid on the job training.
33:10 It qualifies young people for hundreds of skilled professions
33:13 and has long been a pillar of the German economy.
33:17 But the system, well, it's under strain.
33:20 Despite low unemployment and record work hours,
33:22 Germany faces a growing shortage of skilled labor,
33:26 worsened by an aging workforce
33:28 and fewer young people opting for apprenticeships.
33:32 Valerie Hamilton reports on how businesses are
33:35 trying to keep this once reliable pathway alive.
33:40 On a recent morning in Munich,
33:42 a group of teenagers are taking turns hanging from a pull-up
33:45 bar while music blares and an LED timer ticks off the seconds.
33:49 Whoever hangs in there the longest wins a prize.
33:52 An apt metaphor for the three-year commitment most apprenticeships require.
33:57 It's a school day.
33:58 And indeed, for the dozens of school groups at Munich's Convention Center,
34:02 this is an educational class trip.
34:05 It's meant to introduce young people nearing the end of their school
34:08 time to the idea of vocational training as a next step.
34:12 In Munich state of Bavaria,
34:13 nearly a quarter of apprenticeships in skilled trades went unfilled this year.
34:18 Bad news for the future labor supply.
34:20 So, professional guilds from upholsterers to car mechanics are
34:24 putting on a kind of skilled labor funf fair.
34:26 Emphasis on the fun.
34:30 Kids take turns welding scraps of sheet
34:32 metal into gothl looking black metal flowers.
34:36 Whizzing shiny brown leather through a sewing machine to make a cell phone case.
34:41 There's a virtual reality butcher counter where you put on goggles
34:44 to score points by choosing the right cut of meat.
34:49 Hang out with the bakers guild to make and eat cinnamon rolls.
34:53 Daniel Flatzinger is a member of the roofers guild.
34:55 They're responsible for the pull-up bar contest.
34:58 I ask him what pull-ups have to do with roofing.
35:03 Nothing, he says.
35:04 But roofing is critically short of apprentices,
35:06 so they need to get young people to talk to them any way they can.
35:11 That's why we have the loud music to get
35:13 them to stand and have some fun with them.
35:15 Then we can get into a conversation and then I can
35:18 tell them what we do and that it's actually a wonderful job.
35:22 Behind the soft cell is a hard reality.
35:25 Kids these days have more options than ever,
35:28 and their career expectations are changing with the times.
35:31 Like 17-year-old Demir, he's sitting at a bench trying out some roofers tools,
35:36 chipping away at a slate tile.
35:38 It's fun, he says, but as a career, probably not for him.
35:42 Computer market.
35:43 He prefers computers, he says.
35:45 He wants to be a programmer.
35:47 He's not alone.
35:48 In the 2022 PISA global survey of teenagers,
35:52 programmer was the number one job aspiration among German boys.
35:55 Girls wanted to be teachers.
35:57 Except for car and tractor mechanics,
35:59 the jobs you prepare for with an apprenticeship didn't make the list.
36:03 Yens is a spokesperson for the Bavarian Hanukkah,
36:06 an umbrella organization for 136 skilled trades.
36:13 Skill trades still have the image of being physically demanding,
36:17 dirty work, getting up early, physical labor.
36:20 You know, not many young people want to do that.
36:26 Businesses say that image is an old story,
36:29 so they're telling a new one in places where kids might hear it.
36:32 The German Chamber of Commerce and Industry is on Tik Tok
36:36 with a campaign of influencer apprentices showing off their cool jobs.
36:41 A video where restaurant apprentice Paul taps
36:43 his first beer keg Badly has 1.2 million views.
36:50 Trade groups built a new app that turns skilled
36:52 workers into gaming characters with wizard robes and magic tools.
36:57 Players win points by checking out realworld apprenticeship listings.
37:00 In the video game Minecraft,
37:02 groups have built a trades village and invested in live stream events
37:06 to draw young gamers to what
37:07 amounts to a virtual apprenticeship recruitment fair.
37:11 These efforts are popular.
37:12 One Minecraft live stream drew 700,000 viewers,
37:16 but they're not going to solve the apprentice shortage by themselves.
37:20 Sophie Schlingman is responsible for apprenticeship
37:22 policy at the German Trade Union Confederation.
37:25 She says what needs work isn't apprenticeships image, but their substance.
37:31 You can present it as nicely as you want and try to recruit people.
37:35 But if the quality of the apprenticeship isn't right, then that's the problem.
37:39 Apprentices are often relegated to menial work that because
37:42 it's classed as education is paid below minimum wage.
37:46 These conditions can drive young workers toward unskilled jobs that pay better,
37:50 at least in the short term.
37:52 In a survey last year, the top reason young people cited against
37:55 apprenticeships wasn't an uncool image, but low pay.
37:59 Indeed, when the Bakers Guild raised apprentice pay by more than 25%,
38:04 more future bakers signed on.
38:06 For now, Germany has the lowest youth unemployment rate in the EU,
38:10 so young people can afford to be choosy.
38:12 But as AI changes the future of work, their calculations may change, too.
38:18 Some of the jobs seen as least threatened
38:20 by AI are the same ones most lacking in apprentices,
38:23 like health care, construction, hospitality.
38:26 Yens Olrich from the Bavarian Hanukkam says that's
38:29 a reason for young people to take another look.
38:34 Does this mean that all non-craft professions will become obsolete?
38:38 Absolutely not.
38:40 If young professionals can no longer find their way
38:43 into the job market, what will they do?
38:48 Amid all the worries about the future, there's a joke that roofers like to tell.
38:52 Hey AI, build me a house.
38:55 And joking aside, their efforts to appeal to young people seem to be paying off.
39:00 After the roofing guild went on Tik Tok, raised apprentice pay,
39:04 and sponsored a poll showing roofing as the most AI resilient of trades,
39:08 the number of young people signing up to be apprentice
39:10 roofers has ticked up this year by more than 10%.
39:14 For DW, Valerie Hamilton, Munich.
39:18 Hi, it's Laura, Inside Europe's producer.
39:21 I'm just popping in here to ask you what kind of work
39:24 rellated topics you would like to hear more about on the program.
39:28 Are you a young person who's getting ghosted
39:30 from companies after taking hours to finish their application forms?
39:34 Are you worried about AI taking over?
39:37 Please reach out via inside Europe atw.com.
39:42 Fittingly, Friday is Mayday, International Labor Day.
39:47 In the Czech Republic, the giant parades of the communist era are long gone,
39:52 but left-wing groups still gather each year in the center of Prague.
39:57 This time, though, they do so under a controversial new law,
40:02 explicitly placing communist propaganda and symbols under
40:05 the same anti-extremism legislation used against Nazism.
40:10 From Prague, Rob Cameron reports.
40:18 There was a time when the Mayday parade was attended on mass in these lands.
40:22 The workers holiday in Czechoslovakia was once a mass
40:26 show of loyalty to the ruling communist party.
40:34 Hundreds of thousands filled Prague's squares.
40:37 Workers marched past party leaders on grandstands.
40:41 Attendance wasn't mandatory, but it was strongly encouraged.
40:46 Flags were waved, smiles were forced, slogans were chanted.
40:55 It's a very different picture these days.
40:57 Communists, social democrats,
40:59 and anarchists now take turns on one small Prague island,
41:04 and there are rarely more than a few hundred in attendance.
41:07 But this year, even those who do attend will
41:10 have to think carefully about their flags and slogans.
41:13 I think the the law wasn't uh useful, for example, police and and judges.
41:19 Camel Ned Viaditzki,
41:21 deputy director of the Institute for the Study of totalitarian regimes.
41:26 He was one of those advocating for this legal amendment,
41:30 which explicitly states that waving a hammer and sickle
41:33 around is the same as waving a swastika.
41:37 They were talking about the only Nazi
41:39 crimes or crimes connected with the Nazi regime,
41:43 not also connected with the communist regime.
41:46 And there are similar they have so many victims
41:50 and so many problems because they were totalitarian regimes against democracy,
41:54 freedoms and human rights and so on.
41:57 And I think it's necessary to do
42:01 with this two totalitarian regimes on the same level.
42:05 In the words of the legal amendment,
42:07 anyone who establishes, supports, or promotes a Nazi, communist,
42:12 or other movement which demonstrably aims at suppressing
42:16 human rights and freedoms is breaking the law.
42:19 In theory, anyone holding a loft images of Stalin,
42:22 Lenin, the first communist president of Czechoslovakia,
42:26 Clement got the flag of the Soviet Union and so on can now be prosecuted.
42:32 A court must decide whether by doing so that person was truly
42:36 advocating for a system that denies
42:39 people their fundamental rights and freedoms.
42:48 The communists were outraged when the legal change was
42:51 pushed through parliament last year by the previous centerright government.
42:56 Here's party chairwoman Katina Konchna speaking to TV Prima shortly afterwards.
43:06 Do you know who were the last people
43:08 to eliminate the communists and they truly eliminated them?
43:12 The Nazis.
43:13 And it started exactly with this.
43:15 They were not allowed to use certain symbols.
43:17 They were not allowed.
43:18 They were monitored and so on.
43:21 So it was the Nazis.
43:22 I'm not comparing them to anything.
43:24 I'm only saying that history showed us that 80 85 years ago this was the case.
43:30 As for why the government has done this, you
43:32 should ask them because it is total stupidity.
43:35 It is a complete denial of all historical facts.
43:42 Camil Nvidki conceds there are gray areas.
43:46 Shikavara, for example,
43:47 was he a romantic revolutionary or a cold-blooded murderer who
43:52 said violence and hatred were acceptable tools in the struggle?
43:56 Will people really be prosecuted for flying
43:59 the Soviet flag and so on and so forth.
44:02 Extremism expert Mirislav Mares says the courts
44:06 will have their work cut out for them.
44:08 If I can express my personal opinion towards this issue,
44:12 I don't think that we need such amendment.
44:15 We can discuss about the scope of freedom of speech.
44:18 We can we should of course discuss about the crimes of communism etc.
44:22 But I think that this amendment was not prepared properly.
44:29 Yeah.
44:29 From my point of view for now however it is having an effect.
44:36 There are reports that the Communist Party
44:38 has withdrawn books on Lenin from the display
44:41 case of the party bookshop for fear of falling foul of the law.
44:46 Marks apparently has been allowed to stay.
44:49 So there will be lots of detractors and potentially lots of challenges in court.
44:54 Supporters say the country is finally correcting a historical double standard.
45:00 For DW, this is Rob Cameron in Prague.
45:17 A quick reminder of our feedback address here, Inside Europe at DW.com.
45:22 I'm Kate Leok.
45:24 You're listening to Inside Europe.
45:30 Heat.
45:47 Heat.
45:48 N.
45:53 Heat.
45:55 Heat.
46:27 Ask pretty much any white collar worker
46:30 these days what the biggest threat to their job
46:32 is and the chances are they'll say AI and as journalists we're no exception.
46:38 In the Arctic Norwegian city of Tomza, however, LJ Bavanga met up with a group
46:43 of journalists who are turning AI to their advantage.
46:49 I'm browsing a website called Via Sport.
46:52 It's dedicated to football reporting,
46:54 but absolutely everything on here is created by AI, including the videos.
46:59 Here's one.
47:00 Atletico Madrid secured a first half lead over Barcelona.
47:04 Now, the images look relatively real,
47:07 but with that AI shine we're getting used to, and the text is pretty stilted.
47:12 Yet, this is the future many real journalists
47:15 fear that our skills will be replaced by machines.
47:22 But some journalists have figured out how to make AI their friend,
47:27 like those working here at the newspaper.
47:31 Its is a local newspaper, 125 years old.
47:36 We're pretty small, 22 journalists,
47:39 and we have about 10,000 subscribers in a city with 80,000 people.
47:46 And we are competing against our big brother, Nles,
47:51 a newspaper which is twice as big as ours.
47:55 We started to use artificial intelligence
47:58 to compete and to improve our journalism.
48:03 Runberg is the head of the data journalism lab at Erumser.
48:08 His team has developed an AI tool they've called Jin,
48:12 short for data journalism interface for news gathering and notifications.
48:17 Bit of a mouthful, but here's how it works.
48:20 We gather opensource information every night and then we make
48:24 rules for what kind of information we think is newsworthy.
48:28 In that way we have automated parts of the workflow.
48:31 We have changed the way we do research
48:33 from only analog to making more of a research digital.
48:41 I'm outside the Trumpso city hall right
48:44 in the center of Trumpser home to the municipal administration.
48:48 Now they put out a lot of information every
48:50 day which is accessible to anyone via their web page.
48:54 But for a journalist to go through all
48:56 that in the hope of finding a juicy story, it would simply take too long.
49:02 So what we did was that we build our own scrapers.
49:06 So we scraped the municipality web page several times a day
49:10 for all kind of new political documents and then we make a summary.
49:15 We use genative AI to make a summary of the document and if the journalist
49:19 think that this summary has some newsworthy content they will put the thumb up.
49:26 In that way we have trained
49:27 the algorithm to understand what is newsworthy content.
49:34 Most of the journalists at rooms are using the gin tool.
49:37 Leariel is the newspaper front page editor and he shows me how it's done.
49:43 So every morning, one of the first things we do is to check Jin.
49:47 Jyn will give from 0 to 10 a rating on how newsworthy anything is.
49:55 And you know this because you've been given the thumbs up or thumbs down before.
49:58 Yeah, exactly.
49:58 That's that's it.
49:59 That's how we train it to know what we are what we're interested in.
50:04 And I see it now just right away that one
50:08 of the top cases here is like I don't really need this.
50:14 I'm probably going to just give it thumbs down because it's not newsworthy.
50:18 And that's key.
50:19 The journalists themselves decide what's worth
50:22 covering and they write the actual copy.
50:25 Jyn keeps getting better the more they use it.
50:28 In the beginning it missed some very important news.
50:31 Variel tells me I remember one of the first things we kind of missed big news.
50:37 I think it was McDonald's coming to Tumsa.
50:40 I was that was a big news for people here that had
50:43 a very very very low rating 1.5 or something like that.
50:48 Uh but that should have been probably 10.
50:52 And the AI has helped find some really newsworthy stuff.
50:56 The harbor here in Trump is always teeming.
50:59 And this is one of Norway's busiest fishing ports.
51:02 When something is a miss in this industry,
51:05 it's big news, explains head of data, Runa.
51:09 5 to 10% of all fish catches in Norway are black.
51:14 They are illegal.
51:15 This a big problem.
51:17 So, uh, we wanted to find out which of the fish catches are illegal.
51:23 And it's 250,000 catches every year.
51:26 And we have downloaded for 20 years.
51:28 That's 5 million catches.
51:30 Even if I had 15 journalists,
51:32 I would use half a year to look for red alerts in these documents.
51:36 So what we did was we built an algorithm that could look for red alerts in 5
51:40 million documents and then we were able to pinpoint
51:44 some of the companies that um had red flags.
51:47 Uh so we went to one of these um big
51:50 companies outside Rona made a interview and the day before we
51:55 were going to publish the story police together with the coast
51:58 guard raided this company and they've been charged for illegal fishing.
52:03 So in fact the algorithm was able to detect that red flag company.
52:08 The there's a lot of talk about AI being a threat to democracy.
52:13 This is the opposite, isn't it?
52:16 I would say so.
52:17 I would say that we use AI to improve local democracy.
52:22 And what about that competition with Nulus,
52:24 the big brother newspaper they wanted to beat by using AI?
52:28 When I started, we had 7,500 subscribers.
52:32 Now we have 10,000.
52:34 And it's no other newspaper in Norway that has that kind of growth.
52:38 So, it's going pretty good.
52:40 This way of using AI is being repeated across many other
52:44 newspapers in the Polaris publishing group that Erumsa is part of.
52:48 Rather than doing away with journalists,
52:50 it has the potential to increase income and allow editors to hire more.
52:55 L Pavanganger DW Trumps.
52:58 Definitely the real Lajanga and not a friendly neighborhood chatbot there.
53:02 Bringing us to the end of the show.
53:05 It's tough being German.
53:06 People think I'm punctual, but I'm off late.
53:11 Let's do a quick check of stereotypes.
53:14 When you think of Germany,
53:15 you think of extreme punctuality, perfect planning, high-tech, and efficiency.
53:21 Well, think again.
53:23 Welcome to Delay Land, a podcast about a country that needs your help.
53:29 Available wherever you get your podcasts.
53:34 This is Inside Europe.
53:36 Our producers were Lara Cabelka and me, Kate Leok, assisted by Emma Meer.
53:41 Our sound engineer was Jurgen Kun.
53:44 Inside Europe comes to you from DW in Bon.