Does the language you speak change how you think?
Tom Scott
0:00 In George Orwell's 1984, the government is trying to force Britain, or rather,
0:05 "Airstrip One", to use Newspeak:
0:07 a constructed language that would end "thought-crime".
0:09 The goal, so the story goes,
0:11 is to make it impossible to form ideas that could challenge
0:14 the ruling Party by taking away the words to think them with.
0:19 Linguists often cringe when they hear people talk about the idea
0:23 that the language you speak determines how you can think.
0:25 Because it's… well, it's not really a thing.
0:29 It's been called the "Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis",
0:32 because it's associated with Benjamin Lee Whorf,
0:34 an early 20th century linguist, and his mentor, Edward Sapir.
0:37 They weren't the first, the last, or the loudest linguists to ask the question,
0:42 and they never wrote anything even close to a hypothesis about it together.
0:46 They wondered how language could impact thought,
0:49 and vice versa, but no more than that.
0:51 The concept is known as linguistic determinism in its strong form,
0:55 and linguistic relativism in its weak form.
0:57 Determinism, the "strong" version,
0:59 is a popular trope in fiction, particularly science fiction.
1:04 Which is where it belongs!
1:05 The film Arrival made it a major plot point and actually name-checked it.
1:09 "If you immerse yourself into a foreign language,
1:11 that you "can actually rewire your brain?" "The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis."
1:16 "Hmm." The short story it's based on is much better.
1:20 Linguistic determinism is not taken very seriously by the linguistics community,
1:25 as it's easily disprovable.
1:26 Either by attending a Philosophy 101 course, or just thinking about the phrase,
1:30 "I wish I could find the words to explain how I feel." But the weak form,
1:36 linguistic relativism, is much more broadly accepted.
1:38 It is a difficult and messy thing to test for and prove, though.
1:42 You can find a lot of people claiming
1:44 that the Russian language has no word for "privacy",
1:46 because the concept of 'privacy' isn't part of traditional Russian culture?
1:49 That might be true, I'm not Russian, I couldn't tell you,
1:52 but that wouldn't be language limiting the way you think,
1:55 that would be language reflecting the way you think.
1:58 There have been studies that show things like: German speakers,
2:02 whose language says that 'key' is 'masculine',
2:04 are more likely to describe a key as 'jagged',
2:07 'rough', and 'hard', whereas Spanish speakers, where 'key' is 'feminine',
2:10 would be more likely to use 'golden' or 'intricate'.
2:13 I've referred to that exact study here in the past.
2:16 But when other researchers tried to replicate that study,
2:19 they didn't find the same result,
2:21 which is something that keeps happening across psychology and other fields.
2:25 And besides, it's very difficult to tease apart the impacts
2:28 of your culture and the impacts of your language.
2:30 Even if that result is true,
2:32 which it's probably not… is the gendered language the cause, or the effect?
2:38 There are some clear impacts on how different languages,
2:41 not cultures, affect the brain.
2:43 For example, our hearing tunes into the phonology,
2:45 the sounds, of the languages we speak.
2:47 In Hindi, for example,
2:48 [tʰal] and [tal] are two different words, platter and rhythm,
2:52 because [tʰ] and [t] are considered different sounds,
2:55 based on the aspiration, that air that comes out.
2:58 That's not a cultural value, that's not ideology,
3:01 it's not passed down deliberately to children.
3:04 That's just language.
3:05 If you speak a language with that distinction,
3:07 your brain will hear it automatically and unconsciously.
3:10 And if you don't, you have to try to actively listen for it.
3:13 That's a pretty clear way that languages impact thought.
3:16 But that doesn't feel close enough to the science fiction, does it?
3:19 It's not like it's changing your understanding of the world.
3:23 Science fiction wants the language you speak
3:25 to affect the categories in your head, the way you understand the world,
3:29 particularly for abstract concepts, rather than actual physical things.
3:33 So what about emotions?
3:36 Emotions do get categorized in different ways
3:39 by different humans all over the world.
3:41 In English, we can use the same word for two different feelings.
3:44 If someone says "I'm sad",
3:45 do they mean "crying in the corner" or "depressed, tired, and staying in bed"?
3:51 Those are both sad in the same way that the sky and the ocean are both blue.
3:55 But even if a child only knows the word "sad",
3:58 they've not heard of "despondent' or 'listless' or 'morose' or 'ennui',
4:02 well, the underlying emotions are still different,
4:03 they can still tell whether someone's grieving the devastating loss
4:06 of their cartoonishly large lollipop or whether
4:09 they're just tired and generally down.
4:11 Having the different words is really helpful for expressing yourself,
4:14 but they don't determine your ability to feel emotions.
4:18 And Ancient Greek had a lot of words for love:
4:21 in English those are all basically translated
4:24 as 'love' with a lot of extra notes, but even though we only have one basic
4:28 word to explain all those feelings and emotions, we still experience them,
4:32 and we can communicate them without knowing Ancient Greek.
4:35 It just takes a few more words.
4:37 Until recently, English did not have a word
4:39 for "feeling joy at someone else's misfortune",
4:42 but we still definitely experienced it
4:44 before we borrowed "schadenfreude" from German.
4:47 So the simple answer to the question is: no.
4:50 Not really.
4:51 It might change how you listen to sounds,
4:53 it might make some things easier to explain,
4:55 but the idea that you can stop people
4:57 bringing down the government by changing their language is,
5:01 thankfully, just fiction.
5:03 And if you want even more linguistics,
5:05 my co-author Gretchen McCulloch has a podcast called "Lingthusiasm".
5:09 The link is on screen and in the description.