I Got SHADOWBANNED on YouTube To Prove It's Not luck
vidIQ
0:00 So, in this video, I'm opening a brand new channel,
0:02 and I will go viral in 7 days.
0:04 Within the next 30 days, I'm going to try posting on a brand new
0:06 shorts account with the goal of getting it monetized.
0:08 This is a YouTube channel I started just 10 days ago to buy my dream car.
0:13 But to be honest, it was kind of easy.
0:15 Mhm, yeah.
0:16 If you're a YouTube creator and you've been looking to grow your own channel,
0:20 but I'm sure through your research,
0:21 you've come across these types of videos on a platform already.
0:24 The ones that have titles along the lines of I did something incredible
0:27 on YouTube in a very short space of time to prove it's not luck.
0:31 And let me be clear,
0:32 I'm not here to discredit any of these videos because if I'm honest,
0:36 we've used the same title ourselves.
0:37 But there is a harsh reality to all of this, isn't there?
0:41 For the vast majority of creators,
0:44 blowing up on YouTube just ain't going to happen.
0:47 So, I thought to myself, what if I did the complete opposite?
0:53 Okay, let's check out my analytics.
0:57 And oh, there we are.
0:59 One of 10 with zero views.
1:01 That's right.
1:02 What if I could get my channel shadow banned to prove it's not luck.
1:07 So, in this video, I'll show you the channel I created, the videos I made,
1:11 and the analytics that led to YouTube obliterating the reach
1:15 of every single piece of content I tried to publish.
1:18 But first, how do we get here?
1:20 Well, it came from a request from our boss,
1:23 who you may have seen on our YouTube channel audit
1:25 live streams or other places on YouTube many, many years ago.
1:30 Fixed camera somersault.
1:33 Yeah.
1:35 [laughter]
1:35 Now, he thought it would be good idea to start YouTube all over again,
1:39 a brand new channel completely from scratch to try and understand
1:43 and empathize with the plight of the new creator on YouTube.
1:47 Now, I'll be honest with you,
1:48 I was just too damn busy to take this project seriously.
1:51 So, I took the 2026 solution to this YouTube dilemma.
1:57 AI slop.
1:58 Page three says the dials go in first.
2:00 No, that's page four you're looking upside down.
2:02 I'm not upside down.
2:03 The paper is
2:03 pick a side and stop doing it?
2:05 After all, a lot of these videos that prove
2:07 it's not luck are based around generating AI shorts videos.
2:11 And if this video about cats, which,
2:14 if you remember, cats are stupid, got 41 million views,
2:18 then a YouTube short about man's best friend is bound to do better, right?
2:22 And with that, we already have the three
2:24 major pillars of this YouTube channel solved.
2:26 The next thing I had [music] to do is come up with a channel name.
2:29 And since this channel was going to be
2:31 all about the weird and wonderful life of dogs,
2:33 I thought it would be a nice play on the term it's a dog's life.
2:38 It's an AI dog's life, Jasper.
2:40 You get it?
2:44 Clearly not.
2:44 Content, we need some for our new AI channel,
2:48 and it's easier than ever to generate videos in 2026.
2:51 And that's exactly what I did with a simple and single prompt.
2:56 Pixar style animation dogs playing poker.
2:58 All right, let's see what you mutts got.
3:00 I'm raising.
3:01 Bold move, short legs.
3:03 I'll call that.
3:04 Wow, that was surprisingly quite easy.
3:06 I don't think I've ever made a video faster than that in my entire life.
3:10 But to be honest, I'm not sure how I
3:12 should feel about that as a creator on YouTube.
3:17 Okay, remix this video.
3:19 Same dogs at shopping sale.
3:22 Check out that sign, 70% off.
3:24 We're hitting the jackpot, pups.
3:26 Extra 20 if we buy two?
3:27 Done.
3:27 Same dogs stuck in commuter traffic.
3:31 I swear [music] we've moved 10 ft in the last 15 minutes.
3:34 10?
3:34 You're being generous.
3:35 Try five.
3:36 Same dogs walking their own dogs.
3:39 Yes.
3:39 Never thought I'd be out here doing this on a Saturday morning.
3:42 Walking a dog while you walk your dog?
3:44 It's a workout and a half.
3:45 Mhm, that's it.
3:46 I can't really think of anything else that goes on in a dog's life.
3:51 But since I am trying to outsource as much
3:54 of this as possible to my good friend here, let's try this.
3:57 The prompt to generate videos is same dogs playing poker.
4:01 Come up with 50 more prompt ideas for the same dogs doing everyday activities.
4:13 A few minutes later.
4:15 Okay, let's see what we have here.
4:19 Oh.
4:20 Mhm, all right.
4:22 Yeah.
4:23 Mhm.
4:24 Mhm.
4:25 Let's get it quickly.
4:26 Now, by accidental luck more than anything else,
4:28 because I had remixed all of my videos from that one source video,
4:33 the dogs had retained their character.
4:35 And that meant I was able to get AI to generate
4:38 a circular image with those dogs as my channel logo.
4:42 And with that, we're just about ready to kick off with this thing.
4:47 And that is when I bumped [music] into my first big problem.
4:51 If you've just started a brand new YouTube channel, you need to know this.
4:54 There is a limit on how many videos you
4:56 can upload to your new channel in a 24-hour period.
4:59 I just created a brand new channel
5:01 and was uploading shorts when I hit the limit, which was 10 videos.
5:05 Now, this channel was literally brand new,
5:07 not even a day old, and it wasn't even verified.
5:12 Yeah.
5:13 I didn't think of that.
5:14 Now, I did quickly realize that actually publishing 10
5:17 videos a day on this channel would be absolutely ludicrous.
5:20 So, what I did is uploaded my 30 or so videos over a few days
5:25 and then scheduled one video to go out
5:27 per day with the same type of titling strategy.
5:32 It's a dog's life {dot} {dot} {dot} whatever the dogs were doing,
5:36 and use three really popular dog-related hashtags.
5:40 So, I would say up to this point that the total
5:42 time spent on the channel was maybe around about an hour,
5:47 and that was mostly waiting around for videos to be generated.
5:49 And I suppose at this point, it's important to remind ourselves of what
5:52 the actual objective of this challenge is.
5:55 It's not to go viral, it's not to get monetized, it's not to build a community.
5:59 It's quite the opposite, in fact, to get as little views as possible
6:04 and to find out whether YouTube actually does,
6:07 quote unquote, shadow ban channels.
6:09 And at first, that didn't actually happen.
6:12 The first video published on the channel got
6:14 a very respectable 2 and 1/2 thousand views, which quite frankly surprised me.
6:18 And it continued like that for a couple more weeks.
6:20 Some videos got a few hundred views,
6:22 others around about [music] a thousand views,
6:24 and people were actually subscribing to the channel.
6:27 And it was very obvious from the moment
6:29 the channel was launched who was its biggest fan.
6:33 So, this initial success seemed to confirm two things.
6:36 Yes, YouTube will give your brand new channel
6:39 a chance to get discovered on the platform.
6:42 20,000 views in 3 weeks confirms that.
6:44 And furthermore, because these are YouTube shorts,
6:47 YouTube is pumping them through the shorts feed.
6:50 And that means there are any impressions because
6:53 there's no thumbnails or titles to click on.
6:56 [music]
6:55 So, instead, YouTube has to test new shorts with what we call a seed audience.
7:01 That is around about 1,500 to 2,500 viewers.
7:05 And this is why you'll typically see in the first 24 hours
7:08 of YouTube shorts life this surge in views seems to come out of nowhere.
7:13 It truly is the only way for brand new content
7:16 from a brand new channel to be seen on YouTube.
7:18 And quite astonishingly, when people did see a short from It's AI
7:22 Dog Life and decided to stick around to watch it,
7:25 they watched the entire thing and a little bit more.
7:29 As any creator starting out on their YouTube journey,
7:32 they would be delighted to see audience retention
7:35 of above 100% for most of their initial shorts, right?
7:39 Well, hang on, hang on.
7:40 We're getting a little ahead of ourselves here.
7:42 Isn't this all too good to be true?
7:45 Yes, yes, it is.
7:46 We need to remind ourselves of the type of content
7:49 and the volume of content this channel is pushing out.
7:52 Here comes the drop.
7:53 Hold on to your ears.
7:55 Tails in zero gravity.
7:57 So, yeah, it does look as if YouTube is
7:59 testing this content with thousands and thousands of people.
8:02 And if you was decide to stick around and watch the short,
8:06 they do stay until the end.
8:07 But there is a critical word in that sentence that we haven't yet addressed.
8:14 If.
8:14 From day one and indeed video one,
8:17 the It's AI Dog Life channel was doomed because
8:20 of two critical data points we haven't yet dived into.
8:24 The first one being engaged views.
8:27 Because while indeed this short did get 2
8:30 and 1/2 thousand views in its first 24 hours,
8:34 far more importantly, only 500 of them were classed as engaged views.
8:40 And the best way to demonstrate what I'm talking about is to do this.
8:44 It's clear at the speed that I'm skipping
8:46 through these videos that I'm not watching them, right?
8:48 I'm flicking through the shorts feed until I find something to watch.
8:51 But despite the fact that these clearly
8:53 aren't views as we would understand them, YouTube counts them as views.
8:59 Look, all of these Z's in the real-time
9:01 stats are a result of what I've just done.
9:03 An engaged view, on the other hand, would look more like this.
9:06 I'm watching it for a period of time,
9:08 essentially [music] engaging with the content itself.
9:11 And that engaged view metric leads us directly
9:14 onto the next mission-critical data point, stayed to watch.
9:19 This is set directly against swipe away.
9:22 So, think of it as engaged views versus views in total.
9:26 And for this first short on the channel,
9:29 it got a stay to watch percentage of just 25%.
9:33 I recommend, right now, if you make YouTube shorts to go look at that metric
9:37 because I guarantee you it won't be as disgraceful as 25%.
9:42 This is where I can explain the second part of that graph you saw earlier.
9:46 Absolutely, YouTube is going to test your short
9:49 with a seed audience to get the critical data it needs.
9:52 From that data, it's going to take the appropriate action.
9:54 And in In case, three out of every four
9:57 viewers flicked through the short without a moment's notice,
10:02 which told YouTube to Yeah, just kill it.
10:06 And that's where we hit this, what is often referred to as a views ceiling.
10:11 According to YouTube,
10:11 over 20 million videos are uploaded to the platform every single day.
10:16 And you can bet your bottom dollar that most of them are YouTube shorts.
10:19 As a result of this, YouTube doesn't want
10:21 to waste time with shorts that it's already tested
10:24 with a seed audience that's reported back
10:26 to the algorithm that they're not interested in the content.
10:29 There are tons more shorts ready to serve up to viewers.
10:31 And it worked all of this out within 24 hours of a video being published.
10:35 On day one, the short got 2,400 views.
10:39 Then, in the following 60 days, just 100 more.
10:42 It would seem as though the YouTube
10:43 algorithm is incredibly efficient or terrifyingly ruthless.
10:49 Choose your point of view.
10:50 But that is just video one.
10:51 And we already know that it's AI dog life has at least one super fan.
10:56 So, what about the other 30?
10:58 Well, as mentioned earlier, the first few weeks did bring views.
11:02 And as with any other channel,
11:03 there was a bit of views variance between each short,
11:07 but each one did get its shot in the shorts feed.
11:10 But inevitably, due to the nature of each of these shorts,
11:13 they had the same problem.
11:16 Each and every one of these shorts performed in exactly the same way.
11:19 The stay-to-watch number never climbed above 35%
11:22 and tanked to as low as 15% at times.
11:26 As a quick comparison,
11:27 the stay-to-watch percentage for the main VidIQ channel is 70%,
11:31 and the best shorts channels often see numbers north of 80%.
11:35 And so, as predictably as night following day,
11:37 the short would get its views often
11:39 in the first 12 hours and then completely flatline thereafter.
11:43 Now, if you've learned anything over the years here at VidIQ,
11:46 it's consistency in all its forms rewards success.
11:49 So, that can also work both ways.
11:51 If you are consistently uploading AI slop that an audience
11:55 clearly isn't interested in, something is eventually going to give.
11:59 And the first red flag on the It's AI Dog
12:02 Life channel came with the 17th video that got 16 views.
12:08 And it got just five views in the first 24 hours,
12:12 or 485 views less than typical,
12:15 or just 1% of the views you would typically expect
12:21 on this channel for a short in the first 24 hours.
12:24 Now, I think we'll all agree that this doesn't feel like
12:26 the typical peaks and troughs of video performance on a channel, does it?
12:32 [snorts] Oh, yeah, that smells like a shadow ban to me.
12:34 But hang on, hang on, we're not there just yet.
12:37 A few more shorts afterwards returned to the typical numbers.
12:40 But not long after that, the views really started to slide.
12:44 And then, from the 26th video onwards,
12:47 the It's AI Dog Life channel got well and truly savaged.
12:54 Let me just read off the view counts for every short from here onwards.
12:58 Six views, seven views, eight views,
13:00 five views, three views, one view, three views,
13:03 four views, three views, four views,
13:05 six views, no views, two views, three views.
13:10 And to be quite honest, many of those views will have come from me just
13:12 casually swiping through the shorts around about five minutes ago.
13:15 The channel seemed to go through three stages of life: the testing stage,
13:20 the suspicious stage, and finally, the shadow ban stage,
13:24 which it's been in ever since.
13:26 And all of this has allowed me to enjoy a most unique YouTube experience.
13:35 A few moments later.
13:37 Okay, I think it's time to check the studio once again.
13:41 Uh oh, look.
13:42 There we are.
13:44 I appear to have done it again.
13:45 This is a literal cheat code to get one of 10 on your videos every single time.
13:52 And I've proved it's not luck.
13:58 So, to summarize my achievement here,
14:00 I've basically managed to shadow ban a brand
14:03 new YouTube channel in 25 days with 25 videos.
14:07 And I did it by basically provoking the most
14:10 dangerous word in the YouTube lexicon right now.
14:14 Inauthentic content.
14:15 It is content that is essentially made with a simple prompt template
14:18 with little to no variation across videos
14:21 that could easily be replicable at scale.
14:23 This channel would absolutely,
14:25 positively never get monetized for those reasons alone.
14:29 But to be honest, it would never reach the monetization
14:32 requirements of 10 million shorts views because it's been shadow banned.
14:37 But let's look at it from this point of view.
14:39 As YouTube creators, as viewers on the platform,
14:43 we actually want the algorithm to do this, don't we?
14:45 To identify trash content, AI slop,
14:49 and given how the audiences reacted to the content so far, remove it from view.
14:55 I know shadow banning, or shadow ban, is a filthy word at YouTube headquarters.
15:00 But this test does seem to suggest that there is some sort of trigger,
15:05 some sort of switch that suppresses the reach of content
15:10 if the audience has already decided it's very unsatisfactory.
15:15 And all of this leaves me with just one final task.
15:19 Hello, everybody.
15:21 This is Jasper, the mastermind behind It's AI Dog Life channel.
15:27 And he would just like to apologize profusely
15:30 for the aggravation he has caused to the YouTube users,
15:37 YouTube creators, and YouTube themselves.
15:42 He did not realize he was going to get his channel shadow banned so quickly.
15:47 And he's just pleading with anybody out there who
15:51 will listen to reinstate the algorithm to his content.
15:58 Jasper, do you have any final words?
16:07 Thank you.
16:09 Look, Jasper, you got some views.
16:11 You fixed it.
16:14 You just don't care, do you?