The CIA's new tech doesn't make sense
Veritasium
0:00 Could the CIA really track your heartbeat from kilometers away?
0:03 On April 3rd, 2026, Iranian forces shot
0:06 down an American fighter plane just over Isfahan.
0:10 Inside were a pilot and a weapon system officer, and both ejected successfully.
0:16 The US forces located the pilot quickly
0:18 and rescued him only seven hours after the crash,
0:22 but they couldn't rescue the weapon system officer.
0:24 He landed elsewhere deep within hostile territory.
0:27 And, worst of all, he was injured.
0:30 With the Iranian forces on his tail,
0:32 the officer needed to hide quickly, so he disappeared into the mountains.
0:39 to rescue an aviator buried deep behind enemy lines.
0:43 Fortunately, the officer had a rescue beacon
0:45 that could signal his location to the US.
0:48 The problem was that he not only had to step
0:50 out of his hiding spot to transmit the signal,
0:52 Iran could potentially intercept it and get to him first.
0:55 So he could only use the beacon sparingly.
0:57 With enemy forces getting closer every hour,
1:00 how is the US going to pinpoint his location in the middle of a desert.
1:09 [Gregor] A blind sweep of the entire area could take days or even weeks,
1:13 but, surprisingly, just 40 hours after the crash,
1:15 the US announced the officer was rescued.
1:18 Still invisible to the enemy, but not to the CIA.
1:22 So how did they do it?
1:24 Well, according to a New York Post article,
1:26 the CIA deployed a futuristic device to rescue him.
1:29 Reportedly they were able to detect the magnetic
1:31 field produced by his heartbeat from kilometers away.
1:35 Such a device would have to overcome
1:36 the magnetic signatures from other soldiers,
1:38 vehicles, and animals in the region, let alone Earth's magnetic field.
1:42 It's like listening for a murmur in a crowd.
1:46 So the technology was appropriately called Ghost Murmur.
1:51 Immediately this kicked off a media frenzy.
1:54 Ghost Murmur.
1:55 This is science fiction.
1:56 Ghost Murmur.
1:56 Did you hear about what the CIA tech that they have called the Ghost Murmur.
2:00 Called the Ghost Murmur.
2:01 All of this sounds too good to be true,
2:02 and there seemed to be no other sources beyond this New York Post article.
2:06 So we dug deep to find out whether
2:09 this supposed technology really exists and what its limits are.
2:12 I very rarely believe things I read in the New York Post.
2:17 Okay.
2:17 I find it extremely difficult to believe.
2:19 Many of these researchers in the NV diamond area, are having to sign NDAs.
2:23 The fact that the CIA is involved in leveraging
2:27 technologies consistent with their mission and their charter.
2:30 So is Ghost Murmur fact or fiction?
2:34 There are two lines in this New York Post
2:35 article that hint at what this device can be.
2:38 First, normally this signal is so weak that it can only be measured
2:42 in a hospital setting with sensors pressed
2:44 nearly against the chest, the source said.
2:47 But advances in a field known as quantum magnetometry,
2:50 specifically sensors built around microscopic defects in synthetic diamonds,
2:55 have apparently made it possible to detect
2:57 these signals at dramatically greater distances.
3:00 We're gonna break this down bit by bit.
3:02 First, does the heart actually create detectable magnetic fields?
3:07 Second, what are these synthetic diamonds that could potentially detect them?
3:11 And third, is it all possible at these distances?
3:15 Let's start with a heart.
3:16 Now, if you type heart magnetic field into Google Images,
3:19 you will get a bunch of questionable-looking graphs.
3:24 So is it a real thing?
3:26 Well, whenever current flows through a conductor,
3:28 it generates a magnetic field around it.
3:31 And since our bodies run on electrical impulses traveling through neurons,
3:35 our tissues and organs generate faint magnetic signals.
3:38 But because the heart muscles fire in a coordinated way,
3:41 the magnetic field they produce is the strongest in the body.
3:45 It's around 50 to 100 pico Teslas,
3:48 10 to 100 times more than the next strongest field produced by the brain.
3:52 But even then, this is still a million times weaker than Earth's magnetic field.
3:57 So it's no surprise that we only detected
3:59 the magnetic field of the heart in 1963.
4:03 It had to be done in a remote field
4:05 away from the magnetic noise produced by lab equipment, elevators, and cars.
4:09 And the setup had to be incredibly still.
4:12 Even the slightest vibration of the detector would corrupt the measurement,
4:15 not something that could work on a helicopter or a military drone.
4:19 But, pretty soon, magnetometers got better.
4:22 By the 1970s, we got superconducting quantum interference devices, or SQUIDs.
4:28 These magnetometers were incredibly sensitive,
4:30 detecting fields as weak as a few femto Tesla.
4:33 To no surprise, the US military quickly
4:36 strapped these SQUIDs to planes and helicopters,
4:38 and they tried to use them to detect
4:40 large magnetic signatures like submarines in the ocean.
4:44 But the project never really picked up.
4:46 Nonetheless, SQUIDs also made it easier to detect the heart's magnetic field,
4:51 but with a key caveat.
4:53 They typically need to be operated under a very tightly controlled conditions,
4:58 often inside of shielded rooms.
4:59 They can't handle large dynamic range
5:02 of background fields and electromagnetic interference.
5:05 Future magnetometers offered solutions, but they also had their own drawbacks.
5:09 There were always issues with either shielding or sensitivity or dynamic
5:13 range that made them impractical for detecting heartbeats out in the field.
5:18 Until the 1990s when physicists started
5:21 looking into diamonds that might eventually
5:23 be able to sense magnetic fields while potentially getting around the drawbacks.
5:29 These new quantum magnetometers work at room temperature operation,
5:33 and that's what's really exciting about them.
5:35 They're also a solid state sensor, which, you know,
5:38 can be very practical for some applications and can
5:42 be made into like a more robust kind of sensor.
5:45 These are the diamonds mentioned in the New York Post article.
5:48 So how do they work?
5:51 Now, the overall coverage of the story is
5:53 actually very interesting because this tech is supposedly classified.
5:57 There's a lot of uncertainty about
5:58 whether what's being reported is actually real.
6:00 And depending on which outlet you see first,
6:03 you might arrive at completely different conclusions.
6:05 For example, if you saw this headline first,
6:07 you might be really impressed with the technology,
6:10 but this one you'd be a bit more skeptical,
6:12 and the last one might not even make you care about the tech.
6:15 So three headlines, three completely different conclusions,
6:19 and that's where today's sponsor Ground News comes in.
6:21 They're a website and an app designed
6:23 to make reading the news easier and more data-driven.
6:26 Each day they round up stories from thousands of outlets all
6:29 around the world and give you a visual breakdown of the story,
6:32 including its political leaning, factuality rating, and even ownership,
6:36 all backed by ratings from three independent media-monitoring organizations.
6:41 In case of this Ghost Murmur story,
6:43 you can see that it's been reported on by 65 sources,
6:46 but the coverage is pretty lopsided.
6:48 So if you only get your news from right-leaning outlets,
6:50 there's a chance you've seen the story.
6:52 But if you only get it from the left, there's a chance you haven't.
6:55 And below that, you can also see
6:56 the factuality rating and the ownerships of the sources.
6:59 They also have this blind spot feature,
7:01 which highlights stories like the Ghosts Murmur one that were
7:04 under reported on by either side of the political spectrum.
7:07 Staying up to date and well-informed with accurate
7:09 information has almost become a full-time job.
7:12 And that's where Ground News's approach is so valuable.
7:14 They make reading the news more digestible and accessible,
7:17 and you can see all of the information within moments, not hours.
7:20 So if you, like us at Veritasium, care about getting to the truth,
7:24 you can go to ground.news/ve or scan this QR code
7:27 and our link will get you 40% off their vantage plan.
7:30 So I wanna thank Ground News for sponsoring this part of the video,
7:33 and now let's go figure out how those diamonds actually detect magnetic fields.
7:37 Well, for something to function as a magnetometer,
7:40 it needs to respond to a magnetic field in a way that we can detect.
7:43 Now, a pure diamond is just an ordered lattice of carbon atoms,
7:47 so it doesn't react to magnetic fields in a meaningful way.
7:50 But this changes when you start adding defects to the lattice.
7:54 You can replace one of the carbon atoms in the lattice with, say, a nitrogen.
7:58 And if you remove one of the carbons next to it completely,
8:01 well, that creates a vacancy.
8:03 This defect is called a nitrogen vacancy or an NV center.
8:08 And these NV centers become particularly
8:11 useful when they trap two unpaired electrons.
8:14 That's because electrons have this intrinsic property called spin.
8:18 A simple and flawed analogy is that spin is kind of like a tiny bar
8:22 magnet that gives electrons their own magnetic signature
8:25 and it can point either up or down.
8:28 So when an electron is exposed to an external magnetic field,
8:32 this magnetic signature will either align itself with the field or against it.
8:36 Also note that particles that have no net
8:39 spin will not respond to an external magnetic field.
8:43 Now, the two trapped electrons can arrange their spins in the following way.
8:47 They could both point up, which would give you a spin magnetic number of 1.
8:52 They could both point down for a quantum number of -1,
8:56 or they could point in opposite directions for a quantum number of 0.
9:00 We'll denote this spin magnetic quantum number with ms,
9:04 and it essentially acts as a bar magnet for the whole NV center.
9:08 And just like for individual electrons,
9:10 this bar magnet is also sensitive to external magnetic fields.
9:14 So now that we've created a diamond that responds to magnetic fields,
9:19 the challenge is, how do we measure this response to detect a heartbeat?
9:25 Okay, so I reached out to experts to try and figure this out,
9:29 but basically out of the 20 or so emails that I sent,
9:31 I only got a few responses,
9:32 but then I got an impromptu call from one of these experts who said
9:36 that many of these researchers in the NV diamond area are having to sign NDAs.
9:40 This is getting a lot more interesting.
9:42 But with how secretive everyone was being,
9:43 I had to use publicly available research.
9:46 And I think the key idea is
9:48 to figure out how diamonds respond to magnetic fields, you have to use light.
9:53 When you shine light at an atom,
9:55 the atom can either absorb the light or ignore it.
9:58 An absorbed photon of light will excite an electron
10:00 within the atom to a higher energy level.
10:03 You can think of these energy levels
10:05 as discrete platforms that the electrons can jump between,
10:07 just like in a video game.
10:09 All atoms of the same element, for example, carbon,
10:12 have the same energy levels when the atoms are far enough apart.
10:16 But when you bring them together,
10:18 like inside a diamond lattice, their energy levels shift.
10:21 They come together to form a series
10:23 of closely spaced energy levels or an energy band.
10:27 Now, an electron will only ever absorb a photon if the photon has
10:32 enough energy to move the electron across the gap to a higher band.
10:36 This gap between the last electron occupied band and the first
10:40 empty band above it is called the band gap.
10:43 In a pure diamond, it's big.
10:45 It's around 5.5 electron volts, which means that only ultraviolet photons
10:49 have enough energy to excite the electrons.
10:52 All lower energy light, including visible light,
10:55 will mostly be ignored by the diamond and just pass through.
10:58 This is why a perfect pure diamond is transparent.
11:02 It doesn't absorb any of the light,
11:03 but if you start adding defects, they disrupt that organized lattice.
11:08 The defects unlock different energy levels.
11:10 Secret platforms within this band gap for nearby electrons to jump to.
11:15 A boron defect, for example,
11:16 creates a low energy level at only 0.37 electron volts.
11:21 This is a platform that electrons can
11:22 jump to by absorbing infrared or red light.
11:25 And with enough boron defects,
11:27 a significant amount of red light gets absorbed this way.
11:31 The rest of the visible spectrum mostly makes it through.
11:34 So without this red, the diamond appears blue.
11:37 Similarly, a nitrogen vacancy defect unlocks other secret platforms.
11:42 And these can help us detect how the NV center responds to a magnetic field.
11:47 At first glance, it looks like
11:49 the nitrogen vacancy generates a few unique levels,
11:51 and these are exclusive to the two unpaired electrons trapped within the defect.
11:56 But if you look closer at, for example, the lowest level,
12:00 you'll notice that it actually contains
12:02 three closely spaced but separate energy levels.
12:05 The second and third levels are actually at the same height,
12:08 but will draw them separately.
12:10 And the fact that there are three isn't a coincidence.
12:13 Remember, the NV center can adopt one of three ms numbers, 0, -1,
12:18 or 1, depending on how the spins of the two electrons inside are arranged.
12:23 If you think of the two spins as bar magnets, the most relaxed,
12:27 lowest energy way for them to sit is this, one pointing up and the other down.
12:33 This is analogous to the ms= 0 state, which is why it has the lowest energy.
12:38 Forcing both magnets to point down together or up together,
12:41 like the ms= 1 or -1 states requires more energy.
12:45 They oppose you.
12:46 So these two states are at an equal, slightly higher energy sub level.
12:51 These differences are tiny.
12:52 Jumping from the 0 to the +/-1 levels requires only a small amount of energy.
12:57 A microwave photon of 10.4 centimeters will be enough.
13:01 Now, these secret energy platforms of NV centers were mapped out by the '90s.
13:06 But for a long time, no one thought to use them as magnetometers.
13:09 There was a decade before the light bulb went
13:12 on for a bunch of us to think about them as sensors.
13:14 It takes a mindset switch to think differently.
13:17 And once you do, you realize, "Oh my goodness,
13:19 this could be useful."- So let's apply a magnetic
13:22 field to this diamond and see what happens.
13:25 If we slowly turn up the field strength,
13:28 you'll see that the +1 and -1 levels are starting to shift.
13:32 To understand why, we can use a compass needle as an analogy.
13:36 Naturally, a compass needle will align itself
13:38 with the magnetic field of the Earth.
13:41 And this is the lowest energy relaxed state that the needle can be in.
13:46 And it's analogous to the behavior of the system in the ms= -1 state,
13:51 which is why its energy level drops slightly.
13:54 But if ms= 1, the system flips.
13:57 This would be like taking an external
13:59 magnet and applying it to this compass needle, flipping it 180 degrees.
14:04 And then if I'm careful in retracting this magnet,
14:07 I can actually get the needle to stay in this place.
14:11 And this is the highest energy this needle
14:14 can have sitting in this unstable position.
14:17 Now if I tap it, it will actually go back.
14:19 It's possible, but it's a higher energy state.
14:22 So the ms= 1 level slightly rises.
14:26 And if ms= 0, it doesn't react to the field,
14:28 which is why this level hasn't changed.
14:31 Now, if you keep turning up the magnetic field strength,
14:34 you'll notice that the levels get further and further apart.
14:37 This phenomenon is called Zeeman splitting.
14:39 It's described by a simple formula that gives you a direct
14:42 link between the energy split and the magnetic field strength.
14:46 So in the presence of a periodic
14:48 magnetic field like that generated by the heart,
14:50 we would theoretically see a rhythmic separation of these lines.
14:55 And these two energy levels absorb light at two different microwave wavelengths,
15:00 which change depending on the strength of the field.
15:03 So what we can actually measure is
15:05 which microwave wavelengths the diamond is absorbing.
15:08 When there's no magnetic field, the levels are fused and produce a single
15:12 absorption line at the wavelength of 10.4 centimeters.
15:15 But when there's an external magnetic field,
15:17 they produce two separate absorption lines.
15:20 Now, we've simplified it a bit,
15:22 but by measuring how spaced apart these lines are, you get the field strength.
15:27 This is how an NV diamond magnetometer works.
15:30 Was the diamond magnetometer ever used to detect a heartbeat?
15:33 So what has been done for sure is, you know,
15:35 for certain is detection of magnetic fields generated by neurons.
15:39 Yeah, I mean, which is to some extent connected to the heartbeat question.
15:44 Neuron activity, to my knowledge, has been first seen in 2015.
15:48 Okay, well, that's, wow, that's impressive.
15:52 So could it pick up a heartbeat from kilometers away?
15:55 Well, in 2022, researchers were able to pick
15:58 up the magnetic field of a rat's heart, but it was done using a thoracotomy,
16:02 which means the rat's chest was open and the diamond
16:05 was less than two millimeters away from the heart.
16:08 Okay, but the human heart produces a stronger magnetic field.
16:11 And the tech, the CIA might have deployed,
16:13 could be decades ahead of what is publicly known.
16:16 You're former CIA operations officer and you've
16:19 worked in the Middle East, right?
16:21 So what was your first reaction to this news?
16:24 Well, the fact that the CIA's involved in leveraging
16:28 technology is consistent with their mission and their charter.
16:32 But I defer to smarter people in engineering and science like
16:35 yourself to figure out the exact technique that might be used.
16:39 But the processes, of course, are consistent for what we've done.
16:42 We can't say for sure whether the CIA has this tech,
16:45 but we can use physics to estimate how sensitive it would need to be.
16:49 Well, the strength of a magnetic field falls off
16:51 with the cube of the distance from the source.
16:54 So if the magnetic field of the heart
16:55 when measured at the chest is 50 pico Tesla, or 5 times 10 to the -11 Tesla,
17:01 well, then just 100 meters away,
17:04 this falls off by a factor of a billion to 5 times 10 to the -20 Tesla.
17:09 And at 50 to 100 kilometers,
17:11 this could drop to as little as 10 to the -30 Tesla.
17:15 The most sensitive measurement ever made at the frequencies that the human
17:20 heartbeat work at is at the 10 to the -15 Tesla level.
17:25 And that's in a shielded room.
17:27 So you'd need a system that is 15 orders of magnitude more sensitive than
17:33 the superconducting quantum interference devices and 18 orders
17:38 of magnitude more sensitive than diamond NV sensors.
17:43 18 orders of magnitude is a lot, sounds quite unfeasible.
17:48 It's not like the hills of Iran are devoid of animal life.
17:52 They also have heartbeats and possibly larger hearts than humans.
17:57 There's also the magnetic field of the drone
17:59 or the helicopter the device might be mounted on.
18:02 And, finally, there's the fact that a magnetic field of 10 to the -30
18:06 Tesla is weaker than a magnetic field an electron will give you a meter away.
18:11 The New York Post is notoriously a very good place for amusing fiction.
18:17 On the day before we saw this article,
18:20 we also saw an article about how they had a technology where it was a beeper.
18:28 and that was one way that they were able to detect him.
18:34 And these are things that we know about already.
18:37 We also know that there may well have been other intelligence methods used,
18:44 but this isn't really necessary.
18:46 And then that brings you to the point of like, why would they make this up?
18:50 I think New York Post is known to print a lot of stuff.
18:53 I'm not a real fan of the credibility of the press to report things,
18:59 having seen reality and then seeing what the press reports.
19:02 How about deception stories and like false narratives
19:05 published by not only the CIA, but other agencies?
19:09 Is this often the case?
19:11 If you look historically, the idea of fooling your enemy,
19:15 particularly when you have some vulnerability to protect,
19:19 goes back thousands of years.
19:21 During World War II, German bombers frequently attacked Britain at night.
19:25 And to retaliate, the British would fly up to intercept and somehow
19:28 kept finding these bombers in the dark and would attack them.
19:32 Now, UK officials told the press that the pilots were
19:34 able to do this because they ate a lot of carrots,
19:37 which was improving their vision at night.
19:39 But some experts believe that this was actually a cover story meant
19:43 to distract the Germans from the fact
19:45 the British installed radars on their planes.
19:48 Is that where the idea that carrots give you good eyesight comes from?
19:52 I think so.
19:53 I think this is the original, yeah, the original myth.
19:55 That is crazy.
19:57 Yeah.
19:57 But, okay, there's one thing that still bothers me.
20:00 If this is likely fake,
20:02 then why is everyone saying no comment and declining to talk?
20:06 There must be something here, you know?
20:08 Well, these NV centers and diamonds are also used for quantum computing.
20:11 But the more interesting,
20:13 probably confidential way they could be used is as navigation devices.
20:17 The Earth's magnetic field creates a unique pattern all across the globe.
20:22 Then to place an object into this map,
20:26 and if you know all of these perturbations and in homogeneities,
20:31 you can infer where you are without having any GPS reception anymore.
20:36 With the rise of GPS spoofing and jamming over the last couple of years,
20:41 that could be incredibly powerful.
20:43 So NV magnetometers do exist with these synthetic diamonds,
20:47 and they do have potential military applications.
20:50 It's just that detecting heartbeats kilometers away probably isn't one of them.
20:58 I wanna give a shout-out to a great Scientific American article on this story
21:02 by Deni Béchard that initially expressed skepticism
21:05 in Ghost Murmur as a potential technology.
21:08 It's a great read and you check it out.