Washington Week with The Atlantic full episode, May 8, 2026
Washington Week PBS
0:01 Tonight, big questions.
0:03 Is the United States still at war with Iran?
0:05 Is Iran still at war with the United States?
0:08 Does President Trump think the war is over?
0:10 Does the Supreme Leader of Iran think the war is over?
0:13 Is the Supreme Leader even alive?
0:16 If the war is over, who won?
0:18 And who actually controls the straight of Hermuz now?
0:21 Next,
0:25 this is Washington Week with the Atlantic.
0:29 Corporate funding provided by
0:32 In 1995, two friends set out to make
0:35 wireless coverage accessible to all with no long-term contracts,
0:39 nationwide coverage, and 100% US-based customer support.
0:44 Consumer Cellular Freedom Calls.
0:48 Certified financial planner professionals are proud
0:50 to support Washington Week with The Atlantic.
0:53 CFP professionals are committed to acting in their clients best interest.
0:57 More information at let'smakeplan.org.
1:02 Additional funding is provided by Coup and Patricia Euan
1:07 for the Euan Foundation committed
1:09 to bridging cultural differences in our communities.
1:12 Sandra and Carl Delay Magnus,
1:15 Rose Hershel and Andy Shrieves, Robert and Susan Rosenbomb,
1:20 Jay and Sharon Rockefeller, Charles Hamoy through the Charles Hamoy Fund,
1:27 Steve and Marilyn Kerman, Leonard and Norma Chlorifine,
1:32 and by contributions to your PBS station from viewers like you.
1:37 Thank you once again from the David M.
1:41 Rubenstein studio at Weta in Washington,
1:44 editor-inchief of The Atlantic and moderator Jeffrey Goldberg.
1:49 Good evening and welcome to Washington Week.
1:52 The Iran war is in a kind of state of suspended animation.
1:55 On Thursday, US forces actually struck Iranian targets after
1:59 two US destroyers were attacked in the straight of Hormuz.
2:02 But President Trump called this US response a quote love tap and said
2:06 that the exchange of fire did not represent a break in the ceasefire.
2:10 Even though ceasefires in general don't include
2:13 two waring parties firing missiles at each other,
2:15 what we can take away from this episode is that Trump,
2:18 who initiated the latest round of fighting
2:20 in the 47year-old war between Iran and the US, would like to do something else.
2:24 Now, I'll talk about this confusing situation as well
2:27 as some large domestic political developments with Peter Baker,
2:31 the chief White House correspondent at the New York Times.
2:34 Jonathan Lamir is a staff writer at The Atlantic
2:36 and a co-host of Morning Joe on MS Now.
2:39 Amna Nas is a co-anchor and co-managing editor of the PBS
2:43 NewsHour and Vivian Salama is a staff writer at The Atlantic.
2:48 Thank you all for joining me.
2:49 Amna, thank you for staying up late.
2:51 I appreciate it.
2:53 You're outing me as an old person.
2:54 I'm not outing you as an old person.
2:56 I just think we, you know, the NewsHour audience needs you to be rested.
2:59 That's right.
3:00 Um so I appreciate you being here.
3:01 So let me start with you, give you the first question.
3:04 Great.
3:04 Um uh the So am I wrong to say that the Iranian regime has won this war?
3:10 First by surviving and second by maintaining more
3:14 or less control over the straight of Hormuz.
3:17 I mean that is their main leverage point right now.
3:19 And I think it depends on who you ask who's winning or who's losing.
3:22 Certainly you can't say the United States has
3:24 won the war as President Trump has said.
3:27 And look, the president has become sort
3:28 of an unreliable narrator to all of this.
3:31 Right.
3:32 As you mentioned, he calls these strikes a love tap.
3:34 He said it's a diversion, a military incursion.
3:38 We are at war.
3:39 And I think we need to be clear about
3:40 that in whatever this state of a ceasefire actually is.
3:44 And I think we need to look at what we've actually
3:46 seen happen rather than what the president says is going to happen,
3:49 which was a punishing US bombardment.
3:52 The Ayatollah killed, his successor put into place,
3:55 and the Iranian foreign minister told me as a continuation of the Ayat Kamei.
4:01 So, that wasn't really a regime change,
4:03 but we've also seen a throttling of the Iranian economy.
4:05 The president says it's going to them soon.
4:08 And now we have a new analysis that suggests that the regime could actually
4:11 last months in this new phase of sanctions and the blockade on their economy.
4:16 So, Vivian, if if it does la it does only last for months
4:20 and Trump has the staying power to see
4:22 through the throttling of the oil economy,
4:25 wouldn't that then count as a victory for the United States?
4:29 It depends how you measure victory, right?
4:31 I mean, politically he is suffering.
4:33 The longer this war goes on, the more that he and sensibly the GOP suffers.
4:39 Um, you have midterm elections later this year,
4:41 and they could really take a shellacking if they do
4:43 not uh have the ability to uh lower oil prices,
4:47 lower gas prices specifically, and just uh moderate the the impact of this war.
4:52 But even just the depletion of uh assets, military assets,
4:57 um the the sort of mental state of the country in terms
5:00 of having to go to war at a time where a number of people,
5:03 especially some many of Trump's supporters did not support this war.
5:07 All of that has a cost ultimately and so
5:10 President Trump is and the GOP will have
5:12 to reckon with that moving forward regardless of whether
5:14 or not there is an end date to this war.
5:17 So the question here is is staying power.
5:19 John, uh, you just wrote in the Atlantic today,
5:22 quote, "Trump is left with a vexing question.
5:25 How do you end a war when your opponent
5:26 won't budge?" And while Trump grasps for an exit,
5:29 the hardliners in Tran have used the war to tighten their grip on power.
5:32 Iran seems hellbent on pulling off something it's historically done well,
5:36 humiliating an American president.
5:39 So to win here, does Iran just have
5:41 to outlast a person with an historically limited attention span?
5:47 Yeah.
5:47 And President Trump is very ready to turn the page.
5:51 As one former adviser told me,
5:53 he's bored of this conflict, but also because it's not,
5:55 the word they use was literally bored.
5:57 Bored in part because it's not going the way he thought it would.
6:00 He thought this matter of days, a matter of weeks at most,
6:03 and it would be a resounding victory like he says we saw in Venezuela.
6:06 That has not been the case.
6:07 And instead, he's been made to look sort of weak on the global stage.
6:11 already Iran has even if the war were to end tomorrow, which it will not,
6:14 that Iran has more control of the trade of moves
6:16 now than it did at the start of the conflict.
6:18 They have shown they can shut at any time
6:19 and the pain that would accompany that to the global economy.
6:22 As Vivian said, the president is in a tough political situation here at home.
6:26 Gas prices are up.
6:27 His poll numbers uh are down.
6:29 Very few of the US military goals
6:31 have actually been accomplished there in Thrron.
6:34 And the president is looking for desperately for an off-ramp,
6:39 some sort of deal here.
6:40 And that's why in part we see him continuing to extend
6:43 the ceasefire even with incidents like this week where clearly,
6:47 you know, there was hostilities, but he won't escalate.
6:49 He keeps pushing it further on.
6:50 Right.
6:50 I'm I'm very interested in how Iran
6:52 is responding to his idiosyncratic methodology here,
6:56 but I'm also interested in in understanding how China is understanding this.
7:01 China's clearly watching this very closely, right?
7:03 And you're talking about how the Iranian economy continues to chug
7:06 along while there's other countries like China continuing to buy that oil.
7:09 This also really complicates the president's upcoming visit to China.
7:12 There's a lot of other conflicting narratives and issues that they
7:16 have to deal with at a time that the US
7:17 and China have other things that they need to be
7:19 talking about that deal directly with the US economy.
7:22 That's a real challenge for the president.
7:24 Right.
7:24 And Vivian, from a defense standpoint,
7:26 obviously the US is uh depleting its stocks
7:30 of weapons that could be used theoretically to defend Taiwan.
7:34 So China has to be looking at that.
7:37 China is definitely looking at that.
7:38 Um realizing also military assets that had
7:41 been stationed in the Asia- Pacific that had
7:43 been shifted to the Middle East so that it could support the war effort in Iran.
7:47 a number of um you know just diverted interests that China sees
7:51 as a door opening and its intense interest in securing its position in Taiwan.
7:56 Um especially since President Trump has not been
7:59 sort of orthodox about wanting to outwardly defend
8:03 the sovereignty of Taiwan even though officials tell
8:05 me that privately the administration's policy hasn't changed.
8:08 He hasn't really been bullish on that because
8:10 he's so keen to maintain good relations with China,
8:13 perhaps um extend some sort of a trade deal with China.
8:16 And so he's looking at the economic the trans transactional opportunities
8:19 with China less so than say the future of Taiwan all
8:25 the while this war in Iran is going on and it really
8:27 opens the door for China to do what it wants to do.
8:30 Peter stipulating that go anyway and that Iran
8:32 could collapse tomorrow and and etc.
8:34 The the story is not done.
8:37 stipulating all that u who in the White House now has a realist
8:45 view of what's going on or realistic view of what's going on in terms
8:50 of the the the duration the impact on America's global standing the weapon
8:56 the the the the depletion of assets etc what's the fight inside the White House
9:01 well I mean you'd have to believe Dan Kaine the chairman
9:02 of the joint chiefs has a pretty realistic view of this thing
9:04 he told them from the beginning it wouldn't be as easy
9:06 as the president said it was he he's getting the numbers.
9:08 He's the he's getting the numbers and he's the one who told the president even
9:11 before the started that the Iran could take
9:13 the straight of horm moves and create problems.
9:14 The president brushed it off according to reports saying well that won't happen.
9:18 They'll collapse before that happens and even if
9:20 they do you guys can take care of it.
9:21 Obviously that's not the case.
9:23 You have to look at JD Vance who
9:24 said from the beginning he didn't want this war.
9:26 He didn't think it was a good idea.
9:28 He has stuck to that even as he has been
9:30 publicly supportive of the president and participated in these peace talks.
9:33 But I think that his point of view looks a little
9:36 stronger in some of these internal uh discussions than this point.
9:39 But he doesn't have an out for them either.
9:41 I don't think that any of them has the clear path
9:44 to a resolution of the war that allows the president to claim
9:47 victory given the things that Jonathan
9:49 just outlined given the intelligent reports
9:51 we've seen saying that they still have most of their ballistic missiles.
9:54 They're still as close to a nuclear weapon as they were when
9:56 the war started and they have increased control over the street of Hormuz.
9:59 What does that look like?
10:00 Right, John?
10:00 When did the president decide that he was done?
10:03 He's been done for a few weeks now.
10:04 I mean, I I mean, the war has only even been gone on for a few weeks.
10:07 Well, the, as you say, a legendary short attention span.
10:09 He thought this would be days.
10:11 Um I mean, he's looking for a deal even now.
10:13 Washington awaits a response to a from Iran on a one-page memorandum,
10:17 which at best is like kicking the can down the road.
10:20 It just extends the ceasefire further.
10:22 They're they're nowhere near any sort of negotiation.
10:24 And it's not clear that Iran is incentivized to deal with him right now.
10:27 That they think, yes, maybe there will be economic pain.
10:30 Maybe the people will suffer.
10:31 Well, the the IRGC running the place don't really care about that.
10:34 They feel like this is a moment to make a stand
10:36 and they are making the president of the United States look weak.
10:40 And Jonathan and I have actually written together that uh you know,
10:43 President Trump explored an off-ramp weeks ago,
10:46 but of Gulf allies in particular had been
10:49 extremely alarmed at the situation that he would have
10:51 been leaving behind had he pulled out a few
10:54 weeks ago because it's right on their doorstep.
10:56 Stay on that.
10:56 if if he continues in the pattern that he's he's going in in the direction
11:00 he's going which is finding any reason in the world not to re-engage
11:06 and even when he has to re-engage calling it a love tap uh
11:09 where does that leave Saudi Arabia United
11:13 Arab Emirates Qatar Israel for that matter
11:16 all of them have been shown the very harsh
11:19 realities of their vulnerabilities with the closure of the straight
11:21 of Hormuz and the inability for them to export oil
11:24 which is their the primary uh generate a fund generator
11:28 for their for their economies and so this has
11:30 been an eye-opening experience for them but beyond that even
11:33 if the straight of Hormuse were to open tomorrow they
11:36 still have to reckon with the fact that Iran's nuclear
11:39 program is still an open question and that is
11:42 not going to be solved anytime soon there could be
11:44 a migrant flow at any moment because of the battering
11:47 that Iran has taken they're right there on their doorstep
11:50 Bahrain is less than 60 kilometers from Iran they have
11:54 a very real the a very harsh reality in front
11:57 of them after this war ends of what the future
12:00 of Iran looks like in the region as a whole.
12:02 One more question on this, Peter.
12:03 I assume this is the subject of your next book in 2029 or whatever,
12:06 but you try to answer it now.
12:08 Pre-order now, but pre-order it.
12:10 Yeah.
12:10 Uh uh but uh h how did this happen given and answer it in 12 seconds if you can.
12:18 How did this happen in the sense that
12:22 Iran is very good over the last four decades?
12:26 decades of messing with American presidents,
12:30 the Iraq war, which was extremely well planned compared to this.
12:36 How how do they just drive right into this
12:41 culde-sac?
12:40 I think what you see here in in his second term is a president who feels
12:44 more comfortable with power and bolden to do
12:46 the things he didn't do in the first term.
12:48 Remember in the first term he launched a strike
12:49 against Iran over a relatively modest uh incident
12:53 and then pulled back 10 minutes before the bombs
12:55 were to hit because he just felt uncomfortable about it.
12:57 This time he feels comfortable.
12:58 He's emboldened by Venezuela.
12:59 He thinks that worked out really well.
13:01 He's emboldened by the strikes last June which did seem to work out pretty well.
13:05 He did it for 12 days.
13:06 No damage much damage anyway to America or its allies.
13:10 And in theory, according to him,
13:11 he obliterated the nuclear program that we now had to go back in and do again.
13:14 So I think he felt emboldened.
13:16 I think he felt um empowered and I think they obviously misjudged
13:20 the the total cost of how this was going to work out.
13:22 Jeff, I'll say one more thing because a former
13:23 US negotiator with Iran put it to me this way.
13:26 There's two different pain right in Iran.
13:28 They are fine to cause pain to their own population.
13:31 That's not an issue for the regime.
13:32 Here the president has to deal with surging energy prices,
13:35 low approval numbers, and midterms.
13:36 In fact, it's interesting.
13:37 Our definition of pain is gas at $450 or $5 a gallon.
13:41 Their definition of pain is mass death.
13:43 But even there,
13:45 the regime does not care about mass death on the part of their their people.
13:48 I'm going to pivot now to landscape design, if you will.
13:53 Um, so yesterday, ABC's Rachel Scott,
13:56 who accompanied the president on this visit to the reflecting
13:59 pool between the Lincoln and the and the Washington Monument,
14:02 asked Trump, uh, you were here against the backdrop of the war in Iran.
14:06 Why focus on all these projects right now?
14:08 projects.
14:08 She meant the fixing the Kennedy Center,
14:12 building an arch near the Arlington Cemetery and and re
14:16 uh repainting the the base of the reflecting pool.
14:20 And then the president insulted Scott in very nasty terms,
14:23 but the question remains, and all of us who cover him know this very well,
14:28 he seems much more engaged in um architecture,
14:33 interior design, exterior design, landscaping, heartscaping.
14:37 um than he is in managing the globe.
14:42 Yeah.
14:42 What what's going on?
14:43 Well, he's a developer at heart.
14:45 Um but I think it's more just his eye towards
14:47 legacy that he does feel like he's looking beyond the midterms.
14:50 He's looking beyond the election.
14:51 He's looking for the history books.
14:53 And I think that is in part connected to Iran.
14:55 He's trying to redraw the world's maps.
14:57 Greenland was like that.
14:58 Venezuela, hey, maybe Cuba next.
15:00 But here in Washington, he's trying to leave his physical imprint.
15:03 That is what he cares about.
15:05 the arch, the ballroom,
15:07 uh now perhaps uh costing the taxpayers a billion dollars.
15:10 Uh and yes, and that's why he's he's so
15:12 sensitive to it because it's not just reporters questions.
15:14 There are Republicans who have raised the same issues.
15:17 You've taken your eye off the ball, uh sir,
15:19 would they say with tears in their eyes,
15:21 uh to say this is not what got you and all of us elected last time around.
15:25 You've you you've misplace what Americans care about.
15:29 Right.
15:28 There's two things going on here.
15:29 Can I just point out one is the president has
15:31 a tendency to attack female reporters in a particularly brutal way.
15:36 Black female reporters in particular.
15:38 Rachel Scott as we all know is a fabulous
15:40 reporter and a wonderful person and doesn't deserve that.
15:42 No one does.
15:43 The other to Jonathan it was particularly nasty.
15:45 It was to Jonathan's point there's two ways
15:48 you can create legacy as a president, right?
15:49 One is through policy.
15:50 President ran on changing the American economy.
15:53 That is not going well.
15:54 seems like he's leaning into the part that he can control,
15:57 which is this idea of monument to self with a build oval office,
16:01 a paved over rose garden, his name on buildings.
16:04 I want to I want to stay along this theme about
16:06 the president and and the way he's evolving uh in this term.
16:11 There was this very odd encounter in the White House this week.
16:13 It was an event about youth fitness.
16:15 Um and the president had this to say to a group of young people.
16:20 Just watch this.
16:21 We would have had a ran an Iran with a nuclear
16:25 weapon and maybe we wouldn't all be here right now.
16:28 I can tell you the Middle East would have been gone.
16:30 Israel would have been gone and they would have trade
16:33 their sights on Europe first and then us because they're sick people.
16:38 These are sick people.
16:39 And we're not going to let lunatics have a nuclear weapon.
16:43 The power of a nuclear weapon is something I don't even want to talk about.
16:48 It's not going to happen.
16:51 Vivian, the the sense of appropriateness is is is interesting here.
16:55 Um, I want to ask you about it, but I I want to read something that Peter
17:01 wrote last month, and you could comment on it.
17:03 I love that.
17:04 I know you get the chance to like comment on Peter.
17:06 Peter wrote Peter wrote, "Democrats who have long challenged Mr.
17:10 Trump's psychological fitness have issued a fresh fresh chorus of calls
17:13 to invoke the 25th Amendment to remove the president from power for disability.
17:17 But it is not just a concern voiced by partisans on the left,
17:19 late night comics, or mental health professionals making long-distant diagnosis.
17:23 It can be heard now among retired generals, diplomats, and foreign officials.
17:27 And most strikingly, it can be heard now on the political
17:29 right among one-time allies of the president.
17:33 Um that was Peter writing uh last month.
17:38 You watch is always right.
17:39 You watch the that's not true.
17:41 Um but well, that'll be the subject of our next episode.
17:43 Um, but I want I I I I talk about that particular episode.
17:49 It's this the sense of appropriateness of place of of being
17:53 totally discordant of talking about nuclear
17:56 destruction with a group of eight-year-olds.
17:57 What What are we seeing these days?
18:00 Most of us have been in the room with the president where we see that he tends
18:03 to kind of drift into his own thoughts oftentimes
18:06 um often out loud regardless of who's in the room.
18:09 Um he goes on tangents.
18:11 He has questioned the existence of Santa Claus
18:14 in front of children uh visiting the White House.
18:16 So, this is not particularly surprising,
18:18 but you could see it is definitely um a good uh window into his thought process.
18:24 Not only was he talking about the Iran war and potentially,
18:27 you know, nuclear uh war as a result of the Iran war,
18:31 he also um went into a riff about how he um made peace
18:36 in eight different countries and yet he was deprived of the Nobel Peace Prize.
18:39 All the while these children were looking around the room
18:42 completely distracted a by the grandeur of the Oval Office,
18:45 the gold grandeur of the Oval Office and also um just the fact that they had
18:49 no idea what he was talking about and it's just a frame of mind at this point,
18:52 right?
18:53 Seeing a yeah a difference in in in the quality of thinking or appropriateness.
18:58 He also asked one of the kids if he thought he could take him in a fight.
19:00 Uh I mean that that's where this was.
19:02 He whether it's changed or not, I'm not sure.
19:05 It's may have certainly people do think he has,
19:07 but at the very least he's even less burdened.
19:10 Not that he ever was burdened to like keep a thought to himself.
19:12 Yeah.
19:13 Uh you know, wherever he is, he feels like I'm in charge.
19:16 I can say what I want.
19:17 I don't care who's here.
19:18 And I also think he doesn't suffer any sort of consequence.
19:20 He doesn't even have an aid afterwards telling him, "Sure,
19:22 you shouldn't have said that." Like that just doesn't happen.
19:24 Yeah.
19:24 You could find episodes obviously in his first term,
19:26 you could find plenty, you know, to to raise questions about stability.
19:30 But I think what is uh striking is it happening more and more, right?
19:34 I every week seems to bring another example of people look
19:36 at that and they they scratch their head and say my goodness what
19:39 is that because of decline or because there's no John Kelly or Jim Madison
19:42 it could be both right but there's a clearly a lack
19:45 of inhibition right you know in fact none of us
19:47 is a medical professional but there is a term called
19:49 disinhibition which increases with age and you see other things uh
19:52 that have increased in the second term more use of profanity
19:55 he speaks longer uh and obviously he is less uh
20:00 uh inhibited from doing some of the things he talked
20:02 about doing the first term but didn't actually follow through on.
20:04 Now he's following through on them.
20:06 Maybe because he doesn't have a John Kelly or a Jim Mattis or an HR McMaster.
20:10 Maybe because he's looking at his legacy and thinking
20:12 about uh what history will remember about him, right?
20:14 His 80th birthday is a month away, right?
20:16 Um I I want to pivot to I mean maybe
20:19 this is a dissentition question in a in a kind of way,
20:22 but you know there's always drama around uh his cabinet, his top officials.
20:28 Uh, as you all know, The Atlantic has been reporting on Cash Patel,
20:31 the head of the FBI for the past several weeks, raising concerns.
20:34 Uh, people around Patel,
20:35 people in the FBI raising concerns about erratic behavior,
20:38 about excessive drinking charges he's denied.
20:41 Obviously, he's also filed suit against us.
20:43 Um, and and this week,
20:45 our reporter Sarah Fitzpatrick reported that Patel um has been
20:48 commissioning and distributing cash uh cash Patel branded uh bourbon bottles.
20:55 Um and uh here's here's one of them actually.
20:59 Uh this is something that uh we acquired.
21:02 This is the first use of a prop
21:04 on Washington week in approximately 60 years by the way.
21:07 I can give you his
21:08 uh No, we are not discussing where this came from, but it is real.
21:11 It is absolutely real.
21:13 Um and John, let's talk about um how this sort of behavior
21:19 and these kind of stories in another kind of administration would be dealt with.
21:22 Oh, I mean he would have been gone long ago.
21:24 I mean for the and not just well beyond we got to this particular
21:27 moment and it is a magnificent prop there in front of you Jeeoff.
21:30 Thank you very much.
21:31 Um you know but even in Trump 1.0
21:34 he probably wouldn't have had patience for this.
21:36 We know was prone to a lot of turnover.
21:39 This time we have seen a few dismissals just in the last couple
21:41 of months but his first year was very much the no scalps policy.
21:45 Don't let the media get a win.
21:46 Don't let Democrats say you should fire this person and then do so.
21:50 Um, and I think with Cash Patel, though we should be clear,
21:52 there's not exactly been a viciferous defense
21:54 from the president for the FBI director,
21:57 but he also still has his job despite questions about about his job performance,
22:02 including raised within the ranks of the FBI.
22:05 Right.
22:05 Right.
22:06 Omna, um, give us your sense of this tension
22:10 in the White House between no scalps, I'm not firing anyone,
22:14 versus people who are highly controversial and diversionary.
22:19 Well, I think that's a calculation the president
22:21 has to make person by person, right?
22:23 The the folks along the way where he has changed path on immigration,
22:27 for example, at DHS,
22:28 pulling Gregory Bo from the field and replacing him with Tom Holman,
22:32 the the effort to have Mr.
22:34 Bovina out in front was a very aggressive sort of messaging
22:37 machismo sort of take no prisoners approach to immigration enforcement.
22:41 When that backfired and that he faced backlash from the public in particular,
22:45 there was a replacement there.
22:47 And so I think in some ways if there is
22:49 a line to be drawn or one we should be looking
22:51 for, it's when there is that kind of backlash and more
22:53 of a public sentiment shift that the president is responsive.
22:56 I want to shift to another topic although I'm going to leave
22:59 the bottle here because it goes so well with the table.
23:01 Uh the the Virginia Supreme Court struck down a congressional
23:05 map that would have added four Democratic seats in Congress.
23:08 It's obviously a big win for the Republicans.
23:11 Uh John, 2026 is really turning into the hunger games of redistricting.
23:16 Yeah, started with the president asking Texas to do so.
23:19 Uh we saw Democrats respond with California and then it's been tit for tat.
23:24 It is an arms race if you will.
23:26 Um and this was a de Democrats were
23:28 really invested both financially but also psychologically in Virginia.
23:32 So that was seen as a real blow today uh for that.
23:35 And then you on top of that we of course have a decision
23:37 from the Supreme Court last week which has now given a green light
23:40 to seemingly most of the South to suddenly try to redistrict uh all
23:44 all of their congressions as well from Alabama to to Florida and beyond.
23:48 Right.
23:48 Uh Vivian in Indiana Trump just had a big victory in the primaries.
23:52 He wanted to knock off some state senators,
23:56 Republican state senators who did not go along with the redistricting map.
23:59 And and that seems to show us that he's got some juice.
24:04 Yeah, he's still got some juice within
24:05 the party for for sure and especially in certain
24:07 parts of the country where they do
24:09 believe that Trump's support is the ultimate support.
24:12 And so for them, you know,
24:14 siding with Trump's chosen candidates against who those who
24:18 have supported his agenda was a priority regardless
24:21 of whether or not in some cases you
24:23 had these lawmakers that were there for for decades.
24:25 Um they they did not fare as well and it's
24:29 because they spoke out against redistricting other political priorities.
24:32 What Peter, last word to you.
24:34 What what does uh what does 2026 or 2028
24:37 look like if this trend continues in terms of polarization?
24:40 Yeah, I mean you can understand why Democrats decided to respond to Republicans,
24:44 but basically the bottom line of this is
24:46 we have made Jerry mandering even worse.
24:49 The polarization that has been afflicting our politics now for some
24:52 years will only get worse because you're going to have seats
24:55 that are all uh conservative or all liberal and you're not
24:58 going to have people having any incentive to move to the middle.
25:01 Well, fascinating conversation.
25:03 We are going to have to leave it there for now.
25:05 Thank you for joining me at the Woodford Reserve.
25:07 Uh, thank you to our guests for joining me
25:09 and thank you at home for for watching us.
25:11 For more on what the president really thinks of the Iran War,
25:14 please read John's story at theat atlantic.com.
25:17 I'm Jeffrey Goldberg.
25:18 Good night from Washington.
25:21 Corporate funding for Washington Week with the Atlantic is provided by certified
25:27 financial planner professionals are proud
25:29 to support Washington Week with the Atlantic.
25:32 CFP professionals are committed to acting in their clients best interest.
25:36 More information at let'smakeup plan.org.
25:41 Consumer Cellular.
25:44 Additional funding is provided by Coup and Patricia Euan through
25:48 the Euan Foundation committed to bridging
25:50 cultural differences in our communities.
25:53 Sandra and Carl Delay Magneson,
25:56 Rose Hershel and Andy Shreves, Robert and Susan Rosenbomb,
26:01 Jay and Sharon Rockefeller, Charles Hamo through the Charles Hamo Fund,
26:08 Steve and Marilyn Kerman, Leonard and Norma Chlorifine,
26:13 and by contributions to your PBS station from viewers like you.
26:19 Thank you.
26:43 You're watching PBS.