The 5 Sentences That Turn The Tables
Chase Hughes
0:00 You're sitting in a doctor's office.
0:02 You've been waiting for a minute.
0:03 The door opens,
0:06 [music]
0:05 the doctor walks in, sits down,
0:07 looks at the chart for a second, not at you, and says,
0:12 "It looks like we've been dealing with this for a while
0:14 [music] now." And then the doctor looks up and says,
0:18 "What are we hoping to accomplish today?" Nothing aggressive, kind of standard,
0:23 [music]
0:22 nothing weird really happened, but something moved there in your psychology.
0:29 I want you to catch [music] what it was.
0:31 That first line that the doctor said to you, that is a frame.
0:34 It plants the idea that this this problem is ongoing.
0:38 It also says that that everything is shared.
0:40 It says we, [music] not you.
0:42 So that situation carries weight.
0:44 You didn't agree to any of that stuff,
0:46 but your nervous system filled in all the blanks as truth.
0:51 So then the question the doctor asks,
0:53 "What are we hoping to accomplish today?" That's obviously not a real question.
0:57 It tells you the the scope of what you're allowed to desire, what you can want.
1:02 It already assumes there's a shared goal with a little fence around it.
1:09 [music] So you walk in as this person with a body and a question or two.
1:14 10 seconds later, you are a collaborative patient that was
1:18 working on a team managed problem with very limited objectives.
1:23 So all those moments [music] used the exact same architecture to come together.
1:29 So a statement that sets the [music] frame
1:32 and a question that locks you inside of it.
1:35 We did it for years, hundreds of rooms, thousands [music] of conversations.
1:39 So by the end of tonight, you will see it,
1:41 and you're going to see it everywhere.
1:48 Here's where most people start off when
1:51 they try to take control of a conversation.
1:54 They ask a question.
1:57 [music] It's usually the whole move.
1:59 They walk into a room, a doctor's office, negotiation,
2:02 a meeting with somebody who outranks them, let's say.
2:05 So what are we told by so many leaders and stuff?
2:09 Ask better questions.
2:11 The person asking [music] the questions controls the conversation.
2:13 You've heard that before, probably every sales book out there,
2:17 every leadership seminar, all that kind of communication course kind of stuff.
2:20 [music] And it's absolutely wrong.
2:22 It's it's totally wrong.
2:26 Questions do matter,
2:28 but a question by itself and is [music] what I will call a naked question,
2:33 strip naked question with nothing in front of it.
2:36 It doesn't really control [music] anything.
2:39 So all the naked question does is operate
2:42 [music] inside of whatever frame is already running.
2:46 And in most places, that frame doesn't might not belong to you.
2:50 And if you think about this for 1 second,
2:52 you walk into a doctor's office and say,
2:53 "Can you explain what's going on with my blood work?" Great question, right?
2:58 It's reasonable, it's super clear,
3:01 and it does just about nothing to really change the dynamic.
3:04 You're a patient requesting information from an authority.
3:07 So the frame was set the moment you sat down on that chair,
3:10 and your question is confirmed.
3:12 So you're asking from below.
3:15 It's the same thing in a corporate environment.
3:16 You're in a meeting at some VP, senior person, and you say,
3:21 "You know, what's the priority on this project going forward?
3:24 Or what's what's the deadline here?" Great question,
3:27 but all it does is reinforce that the VP decides the priority,
3:31 and you are the one receiving an answer, right?
3:34 So the question didn't take anything.
3:36 It gave something away.
3:38 Gave away your your frame, your position.
3:41 And if you go somewhere higher stakes, blah blah blah, and you say, you know,
3:45 "What would it take to settle this before we
3:49 go to trial?" So you just showed your hand, right?
3:54 [music]
3:52 That's a naked question.
3:57 All five of these kind of do something different.
4:00 They kind of set someone up for a different [music] type of frame,
4:03 and each one of these kind of makes a category of question possible.
4:09 So the first type is pacing.
4:13 And pacing is the simplest and probably the most powerful.
4:19 So a pacing statement describes what is already observably true.
4:24 That's all it does.
4:25 You're stating a reality as it is.
4:29 It's something the other person can they can see it, they can feel it,
4:32 they probably already know it, or they're absolutely going to agree with it.
4:36 The reason that this is so powerful is is kind of simple [music] here.
4:40 You say something true, the nervous system says, "Yep." Internally,
4:43 there's this little micro agreement that happens below our awareness.
4:48 And once that little yes is running,
4:51 whatever comes next can ride on it, especially if it's a question.
4:55 So an example [music] of this might be a boss coming in and saying, "You know,
4:58 we've we've been going back and forth
5:00 on this for a couple of weeks now." That's pacing, right?
5:04 So you just you call it whatever you want, but it's just true.
5:07 And because it's true, there's nothing to resist.
5:09 [music] The other person's critical faculty has
5:11 no desire to activate or turn on.
5:14 They hear it, they agree internally,
5:16 and whatever comes next is kind of already in agreement mode a little bit.
5:20 And when they realize it's a question, they get forced [music] into the frame.
5:24 Let's do a corporate setting really quick.
5:27 So let's say a boss comes in, or let's say you are walking in talking to people,
5:31 you say, "You know, the team hit every benchmark
5:36 on the last two quarters." And now you've [music] asked,
5:39 "What would need to be true to expand the budget for next quarter?"
5:44 So that question without the pacing
5:46 statement sounds like you're asking for money.
5:49 [music] With the pacing statement, it sounds like the logical next step.
5:52 So the brain kind of grabs onto it a little bit.
5:55 The statement did all the work, the question just walks through the door.
5:59 [music] Type number two is alignment.
6:03 And you're like, "Oh, you know, alignment kind of sounds like pacing." [music]
6:06 It's different because pacing is describing reality.
6:11 Alignment describes a shared intent or a common desired outcome,
6:15 if you want to say it that way.
6:17 You're telling the other person before they've committed to anything
6:21 that both of you are on the same side.
6:23 So what this does neurologically, it collapses that adversarial frame.
6:30 [music] So the moment someone hears, you know,
6:31 "We're trying to solve the same problem."
6:34 Even if they haven't agreed to that yet,
6:36 their nervous system starts orienting, framing into cooperation mode.
6:41 And they [music] didn't decide to.
6:44 The frame told them to do that.
6:47 So like an example is like, [music]
6:48 "I want to make sure we're both getting what we need out of this." Simple,
6:52 calm, does something very specific.
6:54 It makes it almost impossible for the other
6:58 person to be really adversarial without looking stupid.
7:01 Cuz you basically just shared a declared purpose.
7:05 So if they push back, they're pushing pushing back against collaboration.
7:09 And right after that, [music] "What would it look like if we cut one
7:14 initiative to protect the other three?" But with that statement,
7:18 you become a strategic thinker type of person.
7:21 An alignment statement doesn't mean that they agree that we're sharing a fact.
7:25 They'll agree that we have something [music] in common.
7:30 All right.
7:30 So type number three is resonance statements.
7:32 [music] And this is the one probably I
7:35 would assume most people will probably [music] mess up.
7:38 Because it requires you to actually see the other person.
7:43 [music] Like to see what they're carrying into the room
7:44 and name it before that person names it.
7:47 So what we're really doing is reflecting the other person's internal state,
7:53 [music] their priority, their frustration,
7:55 maybe something they're pissed off about, showing that to them.
7:59 And when you do that [music] accurately,
8:01 something happens that you can literally watch.
8:03 Their shoulders are going to drop.
8:05 You can see this.
8:08 [music] Their breathing changes because somebody just told them
8:10 they don't have to fight to be understood,
8:12 because that's what most of us walk into a room hoping.
8:15 So the fight that they were preparing for kind of evaporates a little bit.
8:19 In a corporate world, you might hear something like, "I could be wrong,
8:23 but I think you're frustrated because this is
8:25 the third time the scope of this project has changed,
8:28 and nobody has acknowledged that it cost you something
8:31 every [music] single time." And right after that, "What
8:35 would make this version feel worth committing
8:38 to for you?" So they were ready to fight, right?
8:41 But we take it out of the room by naming what nobody else is going to name.
8:45 Resonance is the most powerful of these five in my opinion.
8:51 The fourth decision type.
8:52 This is concession.
8:54 This one's great, especially if you want to take
8:56 authority [music] and make it sound like you're not,
8:59 but the frame is more powerful than everything.
9:02 So we're basically giving up a little bit of [music] ground.
9:06 We're acknowledging some kind of cost that we had
9:09 to pay or a limitation that [music] we have, maybe a mistake that we made,
9:13 or that we're going through something difficult
9:15 or having a hard time doing something.
9:17 And we're doing it before the other person forces us to.
9:21 That means we're in charge.
9:23 The reason this works so well, I think,
9:26 is because it disarms a counterattack [music]
9:29 before the counterattack can be launched at all.
9:32 So most people that work in super high
9:35 frame environments are always ready for [music] a fight.
9:38 If you think of like the show Suits,
9:40 which is about a lawyer who spends his life posturing
9:46 [music] in full posturing pretend alpha mode.
9:48 But but these people walk around braced.
9:52 They have their objections,
9:53 they have like a full magazine of objections ready to go.
9:57 You say, you know, what would need to be true
10:01 for you to say [music] yes to to me anyway on this?
10:05 So, that's a question that you cannot
10:06 ever ask without that concession first, right?
10:10 It would sound arrogant, super arrogant.
10:12 But after the concession,
10:13 it sounds like the kind of [music] direct thing that gets respect because you
10:17 earned the respect first in like 10 seconds it took you to make that statement.
10:21 So, the concession is never weakness.
10:24 That's the one thing I just want to leave you with on this one.
10:26 It's the thing that [music] kind of earns you
10:28 the right to ask a deep question or a hard question.
10:32 So, concession should always come before hard questions.
10:38 The fifth is presupposition.
10:40 And this is the sharpest tool in the kit and I think it's
10:45 the one that people underestimate cuz it looks like it's doing very little.
10:49 A presupposition statement embeds an assumption as a fact
10:53 by treating it like it's already been established.
10:56 So, the assumption lives inside the language like a foundation under a house.
11:01 You might say, since we're moving forward with the expansion
11:05 even though nobody said we're moving forward just yet.
11:08 Hasn't been decided, but your brain kind of treats
11:11 the sentence as settled depending on the environment.
11:14 The other person might have to stop, back up, and explicitly challenge you.
11:18 And in a corporate world, the presupposition is like, you know,
11:22 now that we've established this team can deliver at this level,
11:26 what is the argument against giving us more runway on the next phase,
11:30 on the next [music] project that we do?
11:32 That's why these questions become so massively powerful [music]
11:36 in setting a frame and controlling the frame and getting outcomes.
11:39 Presupposition does the selling, the question just ask them to argue
11:43 against something [music] that feels already decided.
11:48 Look, I know you don't want to watch another ad.
11:51 I don't blame you, but I have seen this change
11:54 too many lives to just let you scroll past it.
11:56 There's a moment that most people have where something
12:00 feels off in a conversation [music] and we ignore it.
12:04 And it's not because you're wrong,
12:05 but it's just cuz we don't trust what we're seeing.
12:09 [music] And that's where all of this starts.
12:09 NCI level one isn't about learning a bunch [music] of tricks.
12:13 It's about finally understanding what you've
12:16 been noticing your whole life already.
12:19 You start to see behavior a lot more clearly.
12:22 The body language, the emotional shifts,
12:24 the intent [music] that's behind someone's actions.
12:28 So, you don't guess anymore.
12:29 You read what's going on.
12:30 You understand what's going on and you can actually respond with precision.
12:35 Most people ignore what they see.
12:38 This is where you learn to trust it.
12:40 [music] NCI one is a foundational course in behavior
12:43 profiling and the link is right down in the description.
12:47 So, the statement [music] by itself, obviously, not going to do very much.
12:50 It might land, it might not,
12:52 [music] but it doesn't require anything from the other
12:54 person till we get to the question phase.
12:57 [music] The question is what forces participation.
13:00 We're making the other person step [music] inside the frame and act
13:03 like it belongs to them like it has the whole time.
13:06 There again, [music] there's five types here.
13:08 They move faster than the statement because
13:10 once the statement's [music] done the work,
13:12 the question doesn't need to be really complicated.
13:14 Doesn't need to be a complex question.
13:18 So, the first question is directional.
13:21 And a directional question, and I know this sounds like, oh,
13:24 I'm I've got to mix up these two different sets of five,
13:27 which could be, I guess, 25 possible scenarios.
13:30 I promise you'll have a a framework [music]
13:32 for this and even if you screw this up, you're going to learn it in no time.
13:37 It's going to be your go-to technique.
13:39 Okay, so directional question points toward
13:43 [music] a conclusion without stating it.
13:45 So, we're building a little hallway that only goes one
13:48 direction and then asking [music] them to kind of walk.
13:51 What do you think happens to the team if
13:53 we keep running at this pace for another 6 months?
13:56 We don't [music] say the team's going to burn out.
13:58 They arrived at the answer themselves.
14:01 [music] It's their conclusion now, they're going to own it.
14:03 So, you didn't argue anything, you're not you're not [music] pushing anybody,
14:06 you're just pointing and letting their brain do all the rest of the work.
14:10 It's the power of a [music] directional question.
14:12 If you say, if we don't address this in the next quarter,
14:14 where is that going to leave us going into the next fiscal year?
14:19 All right, so type number two is the assumptive question.
14:23 The assumptive question jumps over the decision
14:26 [music] and ask about what comes after it.
14:29 So, the decision itself that I want
14:31 this person to make is never even questioned.
14:33 It's treated as already made.
14:35 So, we might say, when we roll [music] this out next month,
14:38 do you want to start with the East Coast
14:40 team or go like company-wide with all [music] this?
14:43 Or instead of do you want to, uh you ask advice.
14:47 So, like when we roll [music] this out next month,
14:49 do you think it'd be the wisest to do a little bit
14:52 at a time [music] or launch company-wide all the all the fastest?
14:55 I'm just curious cuz I've seen you do a lot of [music]
14:58 interesting stuff that seemed to work out before.
15:00 So, nobody said we're rolling this out.
15:02 Nobody said it's happening next month,
15:03 but the question blew past that stuff and they kind of accepted it.
15:07 That's the the question type that pairs [music]
15:10 probably most naturally with presupposition, right?
15:13 And then this which probably makes sense to everybody.
15:15 The statement installs a little assumption and then
15:17 the assumptive asks them to operate inside of it.
15:23 [music] But number three is elicitation.
15:25 Elicitation is the art of getting information.
15:28 So, that's your seven NLP technique.
15:30 What I I think you misspelled Plato.
15:32 Is the art of getting data from people without
15:35 the other person feeling like they're giving it to you.
15:39 So, most questions feel like extraction, interrogation.
15:41 You know what they do?
15:42 They shine a light on your intent.
15:44 So, if you need to be a little bit more indirect,
15:48 this is what you're going to do.
15:50 So, we [music] don't want to get someone's guard up,
15:52 we don't let them filter, and we don't let them manage what they share.
15:55 We make them less [music] cautious about management.
15:58 Elicitation should feel more like a conversation,
16:00 like thinking out loud together.
16:03 So, it's not that somebody decides
16:05 to hand [music] you something because you asked.
16:06 The question made it feel or the statement made it feel like a natural thing.
16:10 And you might And these sound
16:12 similar to the questions except they're statements.
16:14 You might say, you know, I've been trying to figure out how teams like
16:18 yours [music] usually handle the budgeting on something this massive.
16:22 So, no question mark and that's [music] part of the point.
16:28 So, number four is the reframe, my favorite.
16:31 [music] And the cool thing about number four is it
16:32 it's like a Lego that fits all of the statements.
16:36 So, a reframe question takes [music] a current lens,
16:39 whatever the other person is kind of looking through,
16:42 and then kind of swaps [music] it without announcing it, obviously.
16:44 So, the question itself is the lens change, not statement.
16:49 So, you might say, you know, what if this isn't a budget problem?
16:53 What if it's a sequencing problem?
16:55 And then they're going to be like, what?
16:56 Explain.
16:57 What do you mean?
16:57 Everything up to this point has been about money.
16:59 [music] Everybody in the room is thinking about
17:01 money and in one sentence you can pick up the lens they were all looking through
17:05 and replace it in one little [music] question.
17:08 So, now anyone who keeps talking about a budget
17:09 sounds like they missed the real issue here.
17:12 Or you might say something like, you know,
17:14 what would we be doing differently if we knew this deal was going to close?
17:19 So, that shifts the entire frame.
17:20 And that would be like an internal team.
17:22 Like I'm not going to say that to a client.
17:25 Number five is diagnostic, a diagnostic question.
17:28 And this is kind of like power position.
17:31 And a diagnostic question puts you in the role of the one evaluating.
17:35 This is the most powerful when you need to like slap a frame down
17:39 and not trigger that person's ego at all cuz it's in the form of a question.
17:43 So, the moment you're in that little role,
17:44 the other person's role of being assessed,
17:47 whether they realize it or not, and typically they won't.
17:50 So, you might say to somebody, you know, I'm just curious,
17:53 walk me through how how you arrived at that number.
17:56 And notice how just the phrase I'm just curious allows you to be able
18:00 to say whatever you want even if
18:01 it's [music] to somebody that's an authority figure.
18:04 It positions you as the one who needs to be satisfied.
18:07 And the other person's kind of justifying, explaining,
18:10 and maybe just building a case for you.
18:13 Or you might say, help me understand the thinking behind that that timeline.
18:17 Exact same move.
18:18 Ask him to show their work just like in high school, right?
18:22 And the person showing their work is never ever the one holding the frame.
18:26 The person asking to see the work, that's where the authority sits.
18:30 And you're doing that covertly.
18:34 [music] I want to talk about what happens when this doesn't work really quick.
18:37 Inevitably going to happen.
18:38 So, everything I just showed you does work.
18:41 Trying is the opposite of having.
18:43 So, the moment they can see effort, [music] the game is over.
18:46 And if you're in a relationship or you
18:48 know a narcissist or you work with a narcissist,
18:50 you become the person reaching and they become the person
18:53 like sitting back watching you do all the reaching, right?
18:56 So, here is what you do instead and I guarantee you this will work.
19:00 Step one, you read the miss.
19:04 You read what did I miss [music] a little bit.
19:06 So, before you do anything,
19:08 you need to know what happened cuz not all misses are the same.
19:12 Sometimes it's cuz the other person wasn't listening.
19:14 They're in their own head.
19:15 They're already three moves [music] ahead in their own agenda in their mind.
19:19 So, your statement was technically perfect and absolutely well executed.
19:23 It just showed up in a empty space.
19:26 Nobody was home to really receive it cuz [music] they were in their head,
19:29 which means I have a focus generation problem.
19:33 Right?
19:33 So, the statement was fine.
19:36 [music] The tactic was fine.
19:36 I have a problem generating focus in human beings.
19:39 Sometimes it's not going to land because they
19:42 heard it and maybe they rejected the premise.
19:45 You've tried to pace reality and their version of reality is just way different.
19:49 Uh you You try to talk to a schizophrenic [music] and say, "Dude,
19:52 I promise you they're not sending radio
19:54 signals through the cavity fillings in your teeth.
19:57 It's not real.
19:58 It's not happening." And you're an idiot.
20:01 You're just an idiot who doesn't know.
20:02 You tried an argument, they want to be aligned with you,
20:04 you try to presupposition, maybe they caught it.
20:07 This is a different problem.
20:09 They're not like tuned out or absent in any way at all.
20:11 They're actively [music] holding a different frame and yours just bounced off.
20:16 Step two here, if the thing doesn't work,
20:18 is release [music] the frame to the universe.
20:21 Set it free.
20:22 You don't care about the frame.
20:24 Let it go.
20:24 Whatever the hell you just tried to install, drop it.
20:27 [music] Don't reference it again.
20:29 Don't try to build on top of it.
20:31 It didn't take and going [music] back to it makes you
20:34 look like somebody with a plan that sucks or no skills.
20:38 And this is the hardest [music] part for most people cuz you prepared,
20:41 you had a statement, you had the question loaded up and the instinct,
20:44 I need to salvage [music] the approach.
20:47 And how do I salvage it?
20:48 Everything I planned for.
20:49 The willingness to let go is what keeps you in the game here.
20:53 So, the person [music] who drops it without
20:55 flinching at all and then moves is dangerous
20:59 cuz they showed you that they have more
21:01 than one way in, which brings us step three.
21:03 [music] We shift the class.
21:07 Change it.
21:08 So, we tried one class of statement and it
21:10 didn't land and we try [music] a different one.
21:13 Not a different version of the same thing, a different class of statement.
21:18 So, if you open with pacing and they rejected your version of reality,
21:22 you don't pace harder.
21:24 Think about that really quick.
21:25 Like pacing got rejected and you're like, "No, no,
21:27 no, I'm going to pace hard I'm going to 10x.
21:29 [music] I'm going to 10x this thing." That idea.
21:32 So, instead of that, I move to resonance.
21:35 Name what you see in them instead [music] of describing the situation.
21:39 That's a completely different entry point.
21:41 So, if you try alignment [music] and they didn't want to play on the same team,
21:44 we move to concession.
21:46 This makes sense?
21:48 So, we give ground, acknowledge [music] something that's real
21:50 that does something that alignment can't do against a hostile frame.
21:55 And step four, you would kind of deploy that new player pairing,
21:59 a new statement class,
22:00 a new question type, exact same destination, totally a different door this time.
22:05 And here's the thing I think you're your brains are
22:07 all forgetting right now or not aware of right now.
22:11 Not forgetting.
22:12 Is the second attempt actually has a huge advantage.
22:16 I think the first attempt doesn't have an advantage because now you have data.
22:21 You know what didn't work.
22:22 You know something about how they hold their frame, what they protect,
22:26 what they dismiss, what they're going to try to counter offer.
22:29 So, your first attempt was just a read
22:31 and your second attempt is uh the way more well-informed.
22:34 So, the best operators that I've ever watched in my life,
22:37 they don't land the frame on the first try.
22:40 That's fine.
22:41 They use the first statement the way a boxer uses like a a jab.
22:45 I'm not trying to do a knockout with a jab.
22:47 I'm going to see how the other person moves.
22:49 What do they protect?
22:50 Where are they going to shift their weight?
22:52 What opens up as [clears throat] they're as they're starting to react?
22:55 All right, let me keep this simple.
22:56 You probably don't want to be watching an ad right now,
22:58 but if you stay with me for 1 minute, this could change your entire life.
23:03 It's already changed tens of thousands of people's lives all around the world.
23:07 Most people try to influence by pushing harder, pushing harder.
23:11 They say more, they explain more,
23:13 and it rarely works the way that they want it to.
23:16 This is because influence doesn't happen on the surface.
23:20 Influence happens way underneath that.
23:23 NCI level three is where you learn how behavior
23:26 actually moves and how to guide it without any resistance.
23:30 You start designing outcomes in your life instead of hoping for outcomes.
23:35 You understand how decisions are made and then you learn how to shape them.
23:40 This is where all those things stop [music] feeling random.
23:44 NCI three is the most advanced behavior course in the world,
23:49 I guarantee [music] it.
23:50 I just want you to check it out.
23:52 I put the link right down below in the description.
23:54 So, we have these five things.
23:57 There's not a right way to do each one.
23:59 There's not some like flowchart to where you can select everything.
24:03 Every room that you walk into is going to have
24:04 a frame that was there before you got there.
24:07 [music] Everywhere.
24:07 Sometimes that's positional.
24:08 The doctor holds authority.
24:10 The attorney has [music] leverage.
24:13 That's they specialize in leverage.
24:15 The executive has What does he specialize in?
24:18 Resources.
24:19 Sometimes it's emotional.
24:20 Someone's pissed off, they're scared, they're they're just checked out.
24:25 And maybe there's narrative.
24:26 There's a story that everybody in the room uh
24:28 has agreed to about what the meeting is about,
24:31 what the problem is, who's to blame, who's responsible [music] for it.
24:34 You need to see that frame before you try to replace it.
24:37 And you can see frames.
24:38 We've done so many classes like here's
24:40 the basic types of frames, how to spot them.
24:42 If the frame that exists is built on authority,
24:46 resonance and concession are your pretty much your only way in.
24:50 You're not going to out authority somebody with more authority.
24:54 [music] You've got to go under it.
24:56 Somebody holds some positional power and the room is organized around that.
25:01 So, resonance [music] says, "I see you." Concession says,
25:05 "I'm not here to fight you." Both of those bypass [music]
25:09 the authority frame without uh like challenging it to a fight.
25:13 If the existing frame is adversarial,
25:16 both sides are braced, there's tension in the room,
25:19 nobody should assume you raise the tension,
25:21 alignment has to be your opening move.
25:24 And whoever installs first tends to own the the conversation.
25:29 The second question is, "What do I need the other person to do next?"
25:34 Do not assume that this technique is about the outcome.
25:38 99% of techniques that you will learn,
25:40 if you watch almost every [music] grad school
25:41 except for maybe three or four of them, it's not about achieving an outcome.
25:46 It's what do I need them to do next?
25:48 Cuz if I can always know what what needs to happen next,
25:51 [music] you don't need to close sales anymore,
25:52 you don't need to do anything anymore.
25:54 It's never outcome based.
25:58 So, what do I need them to do in the next 30 [music] seconds?
26:03 That tells you what question type to use.
26:05 And remember, the first one we just talked about statements,
26:07 now we're talking about questions.
26:08 If I need I need them to arrive at a specific conclusion all by themselves,
26:13 I'm going to go directional.
26:15 If I need them to act like a decision's already been made,
26:19 I might go with the assumptive thing.
26:20 If I need information without them knowing,
26:22 I got it I know I have to use elicitation.
26:25 If I need to shift the way they're looking at something,
26:27 I'm going to reframe it.
26:28 And if I need to establish myself as the one evaluating,
26:31 I'm going into the diagnostic part of this.
26:36 [music] So, two questions.
26:37 What frame is already running?
26:38 What do I need them to do next?
26:40 [music] Once you've drilled this a little bit, it takes about 2 seconds.
26:44 And right now it feels like a lot, I'm sure.
26:46 I [music] promise you if you practice this, you're not
26:48 going to get good at it by sitting on your couch,
26:50 printing this [music] out, getting some Scotch tape,
26:53 putting it up on the wall in your office.
26:55 And you did.
26:55 Doctor didn't learn this in med school, I guarantee [music] you.
26:58 This thing built itself through 10,000 patient interaction.
27:02 And then they had the boss.
27:03 "I appreciate [music] how hard everybody here has been kind of stretched
27:07 thin over these past few weeks." That's What kind of statement is that?
27:11 [music] It's a concession, right?
27:11 It gives ground before he's asking for anything.
27:15 It acknowledges some kind of cost.
27:17 It names the difficulty.
27:19 And it does it [music] with enough warmth that it feels generous.
27:23 And then the boss says, "So,
27:24 what is realistic for everybody to for a delivery date on this?" [music]
27:28 What kind of question is that?
27:29 It's a directional question.
27:31 Realistic points in [music] one direction
27:33 towards something conservative and and and manageable,
27:37 something that doesn't [music] sound like
27:39 you ignored what they just acknowledged.
27:41 So, the question has this like built-in gravity.
27:43 It pulls your answer toward what?
27:45 Moderation.
27:47 And it was that [music] fast.
27:48 Concession plus directional.
27:50 And you think of the parent example.
27:52 Let's go back to that when I asked you to feel what that felt like.
27:55 Parent says, [music]
27:57 "The only thing I've ever wanted in my life is what's best for you.
28:00 And I hope you know that." This is a presupposition statement,
28:03 but it's it's a deep one.
28:05 But she's not talking about a business decision or some corporate timeline.
28:09 [music] But the presupposition here is about identity.
28:13 I am the one who loves you.
28:14 I am the one with good intentions and you know that.
28:19 [music] Parent, mom or dad says, "I just want you to help me understand what
28:21 you're thinking here." What kind of question is that?
28:24 Diagnostic.
28:26 It makes you become the one who is evaluated.
28:29 It puts the parent in the evaluator role and you
28:31 in the role of the one who needs to explain.
28:34 And that's just presupposition plus a diagnostic question.
28:37 And that, [music] sadly, maybe beautifully,
28:40 is a combination that some of you have been living inside of for maybe decades.
28:44 Those three examples, doctor, boss, mom, dad,
28:48 none of those people were trying to manipulate you.
28:51 The doctor was being a doctor.
28:53 The boss is managing uh a team.
28:56 The parent was being a loving parent.
28:58 This isn't like they read a [music] playbook.
29:00 And do you think any of them are thinking actively about frame control?
29:04 Why is there still frame control going [music] on?
29:06 Cuz that architecture runs 24 hours a day in every situation
29:10 you will ever be in for the rest of your life.
29:12 [music] Frame control is there.
29:13 It's always there.
29:15 Everywhere.
29:16 Statements set frames.
29:19 Questions lock people inside of them.
29:22 And if you can control that sequence,
29:23 you can control where any conversation goes and what's possible inside of it.
29:27 Authorities are reporting a citywide manhunt [music] underway.
29:36 [music] [music] The world is breathing a fragile song.
29:51 [music] No echoes here.
29:57 On sacred ground.
29:59 [music] A quiet pulse.
30:03 The steady [music] beat.
30:05 The truth we feel in simple heat.
30:11 [music] Bare footsteps on hollowed ground.
30:17 [music] A sacred rhythm we have found.
30:23 [music] [music] The world just breathes and I can feel it.
30:42 [music] A perfect [singing] promise can't conceal it.
30:45 Just [music] shadows leaning on [singing] the light.
30:49 Another beautiful, [music] quiet night.
30:57 [music] [music] The past is [music] gone, but we remain.
31:13 [singing] Washing [music] over all the pain.
31:20 A simple truth.
31:22 A feeling [music] pure.
31:24 A soft connection to endure.
31:31 [music] [music] [music] The world just breathes and I can feel it.
31:50 A perfect promise [music] can't conceal it.
31:54 Just shadows leaning [singing] on the light.
31:59 Another beautiful, [music] quiet night.
32:10 [music] [music] [music] [music] This quiet night.
32:44 [music] What makes it right?
32:53 And the world just breathes.