Canada's New Evidence-Based ETFs
Ben Felix
0:00 Canada just got a new suite of ETFs that could
0:02 change how a lot of Canadian investors build their portfolios.
0:05 They have all the good aspects of index funds, low fees, low turnover,
0:09 and broad diversification while making some
0:11 evidence-based tweaks to improve expected returns.
0:15 If you've been watching this channel, you've heard me talk about ETF slop.
0:18 These ETFs are not slop, and I'm going to tell you why.
0:22 I'm Ben Felix, chief investment officer at PWL Capital,
0:25 and I'm going to tell you about the new Avantis ETFs from CIBC.
0:33 This video is not meant to make you drop
0:35 your index fund strategy and go allin on these new ETFs.
0:38 These funds won't be for everyone,
0:40 and lowcost index funds are still a sensible option for most people.
0:44 All I'm aiming to do in this video is tell you what these new funds are,
0:47 the theory and evidence supporting them,
0:48 and why they are an interesting development for Canadian investors.
0:52 That said, if you're currently holding VEQT or XEQT
0:55 or any of the other EQTs in your RSP,
0:57 TFSA, or or whatever, you'll want to pay attention.
1:01 I want to note this video is not sponsored.
1:03 I have no financial relationship with CIBC or Avantis
1:06 and have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
1:08 Before we can get into the funds themselves,
1:10 we have to talk about why they're worth talking about.
1:12 A lot of Canadians still invest in old school actively managed funds,
1:16 which represent over 80% of the Canadian
1:18 fund market based on year-end 2024 data.
1:21 Active management is, broadly speaking, a losing game.
1:24 Active managers rarely outperform the market,
1:26 especially over longer time horizons.
1:28 That means the vast majority of Canadian investors
1:30 are still paying well over 1% in fund fees,
1:33 probably to one of the big five Canadian banks,
1:35 to probably underperform the market.
1:38 Not a great situation,
1:39 but there are better alternatives increasingly gaining traction today,
1:42 like lowcost index funds.
1:44 Lowcost index funds have been consistently gaining market share
1:47 since they were first launched by Vanguard in 1976.
1:50 An index fund simply replicates the holding of an index,
1:53 which is a list of stocks designed to represent a stock market.
1:57 Index funds make sense because they keep costs
1:59 low and capture the returns of the broad
2:01 market rather than unsuccessfully trying to beat
2:03 it like act like actively managed funds do.
2:06 This works as long as markets are efficient.
2:08 And active managers, to their credit,
2:10 actually keep markets efficient through all the analysis, trading,
2:13 and stock selection they do in their effort to outperform,
2:17 even though that effort doesn't usually
2:18 deliver excess returns after fees to investors.
2:21 Active investors effectively pay for the cost of keeping
2:24 markets efficient in exchange for a tiny chance of outperformance,
2:27 while index funds reap the benefits.
2:29 Index funds are the investing equivalent of never
2:32 interrupt your enemy when they're making a mistake.
2:34 All that said, index funds, well, in my view,
2:36 a huge upgrade from traditional active management for most
2:39 investors most of the time, are not perfect.
2:41 Many index funds track an index
2:43 that weights its holdings by their market capitalization.
2:46 They are cap weighted.
2:48 This means that index funds will hold more weight
2:50 in the biggest stocks and less weight in the smallest stocks.
2:52 There's nothing inherently wrong with market capitalization waiting.
2:55 Owning the market gives you exposure to the equity risk premium,
2:58 which has historically delivered solid long-term returns for investors.
3:02 But since index funds were first created in the 1970s,
3:04 financial economics has identified other return premiums.
3:08 Premiums the typical index fund Canadians
3:10 are increasingly investing in do not capture.
3:13 Basically, we've known for a long time
3:14 that stocks have higher expected returns than bonds,
3:17 which makes sense in theory and has worked out in practice.
3:20 But we also know that certain types
3:22 of stocks have higher expected returns than others.
3:25 By tilting your portfolio toward these types of stocks,
3:27 you can capture higher expected returns.
3:30 The same theoretical principles that explain why stocks should outperform bonds
3:35 also tell us that some types of stocks should outperform others.
3:38 I did a deep dive on this in a recent video about the famous
3:41 1993 FMAN French paper on the common risk factors in stocks and bonds.
3:45 In short, theory supports different expected returns across
3:49 stock types and the empirical data backs it up.
3:52 The other issue is that index funds also by their nature
3:54 of tracking an index trade when the composition of the index changes.
3:58 For example, if there is an initial public offering,
4:01 shares of the newly listed company will be added to many
4:04 indices and index funds will then buy them to match the index.
4:08 There are other examples too like existing companies
4:10 issuing more stock and companies buying back stock.
4:13 These are all changes in market composition.
4:15 Research on this suggests that the systematic
4:17 trading done by index funds to match
4:18 changes in market composition results in an implicit
4:21 cost of somewhere around 0.5% per year.
4:24 I did a whole video on this too if you want to learn more.
4:26 Between there being multiple known drivers of expected
4:29 returns that go beyond what cap weighted index funds
4:31 capture and index funds having their own implementation
4:34 quirks with implied costs that far exceed their fees.
4:37 Constructing a portfolio that improves on indexing
4:39 is an interesting premise that might
4:41 sound like active management which I just finished telling you does not work.
4:45 But unlike trying to pick stocks or time the market,
4:47 this approach is like a slightly more advanced version
4:50 of the principles behind market cap weighted index funds.
4:53 Investing this way still results in lowcost, broadly diversified portfolios,
4:57 but rather than just trying to capture
4:58 the equity risk premium while mechanically following an index.
5:01 It aims to capture multiple return
5:03 premiums while being intentional about implementation.
5:06 Dimensional Fund Advisors has been a leader in this space since 1981,
5:09 but their funds are not super accessible to Canadians.
5:12 Their products are mostly limited to financial advisors.
5:14 My firm PW Capital does make extensive use of Dimensional funds,
5:18 and I invest in them personally.
5:20 As always, Dimensional did not pay me to say any of this.
5:22 Dimensional did launch publicly available ETFs
5:25 in the US in 2020, but not in Canada.
5:27 As a result, Canadian investors without a financial
5:30 adviser had been left out in the cold.
5:32 With respect to this investment strategy,
5:34 I put together a model portfolio for Canadian investors back in 2020,
5:38 consisting of Canadian listed ETFs and two US listed ETFs.
5:42 I'll be the first to admit that the model portfolio was a bit clunky.
5:45 I think a lot of people might have tried to implement it and then abandoned it.
5:48 It did mean buying and rebalancing multiple ETFs,
5:51 dealing with currency conversion to purchase
5:53 US-listed ETFs and considering the foreign withholding
5:56 tax implications of US listed ETFs
5:58 of foreign stocks in some Canadian account types.
6:01 Blogger Rob Enen, who's a friend of mine,
6:03 predicted that there would be thousands of Ben Felix investing refugees who
6:08 tried to implement my model and then realized it was too much work,
6:11 later abandoning it in favor of easytouse asset allocation ETFs.
6:15 That's the good news is that a direct
6:16 competitor to Dimensional Fund Advisors, Avantis Investors,
6:19 has now launched Canadian listed ETFs,
6:22 including a single ticker asset allocation ETF like the EQT ETFs through CIBC.
6:28 Avantis has been around since 2019 when they
6:31 were launched by a group of former Dimensional employees,
6:34 including their former co-CEO and CIO, Eduardo Rapedto.
6:38 Avantis is sort of a new fund company,
6:40 but they exist inside of American Century Investments,
6:43 which has been around since 1958 and manages more than $300 billion today.
6:48 Avantis is cut from the same cloth as Dimensional
6:51 and is backed by a long-standing and a large asset manager.
6:53 Like, I think they're not going to disappear is the point there.
6:56 Dimensional and Avantis do each have their own flavor of the approach,
6:59 but the underlying principles are fundamentally similar.
7:02 This CIBC ETF launch is a big deal for a few reasons.
7:06 The Canadian listed products mean that Canadian investors don't
7:08 need to convert currency to buy them, which is great.
7:11 The Canadian listed ETFs hold securities directly,
7:14 which eliminates the double withholding tax concern for foreign stocks in TFSA,
7:19 RSP, and taxable accounts.
7:21 And the Canadian listed international funds carve out the Canadian
7:24 allocation while Canada is included in Aventus' US listed international funds.
7:29 Small detail, but it does matter.
7:31 What this means is that Canadian investors get a hassle-free way
7:34 to invest in this type of strategy without needing to use USlisted funds.
7:39 In the remainder of this video,
7:40 I want to walk through what some of these funds look
7:42 like and how they compare to market cap weighted index funds.
7:45 Then I'll get properly nerdy and explain
7:48 the underlying principles behind this approach in more detail,
7:51 which is important to understand for anyone
7:53 who wants to pursue this investment strategy.
7:55 One thing to note is that as I have mentioned,
7:56 these are not index funds since they don't track an index.
7:59 They do address one of the current concerns that many investors have.
8:02 They do not mechanically invest in the shares of newly
8:05 listed IPOs just because an index told them to.
8:08 I talked to Avantis about their approach here.
8:10 They don't have a blanket exclusion for newly listed companies,
8:13 which Dimensional Fund Advisors does,
8:15 and they will include them if they have enough information on their full set
8:18 of financials and the company trades
8:20 at an attractive price relative to those financials.
8:23 They are well aware of the issues around index
8:25 inclusion that I mentioned in my last video on IPOs,
8:28 and they're careful not to get caught up
8:29 in the mechanical price increases following index inclusion.
8:32 Before I walk through each fund, here's the mental model.
8:35 Every one of these funds does the same basic thing.
8:37 They tilt toward smaller, cheaper,
8:40 and more profitable stocks relative to their benchmarks.
8:42 The difference is how aggressively each one tilts
8:45 and which part of the market it covers.
8:47 The more aggressive the tilt, the higher the expected return,
8:50 but also the bigger the tracking error.
8:52 That's like performance that's different from the index.
8:55 Keep that trade-off in mind as I go through
8:57 each one because it does matter for investor psychology.
9:00 Okay, let's dig into what these funds look like under the hood.
9:02 Starting with CACE, the Avantis CIBC Canadian Equity ETF.
9:06 It has a management fee of 0.19%.
9:09 Note that the management fee is not the MER,
9:12 which can't be calculated until the fund has been operating for a while.
9:14 The ME will be slightly higher, but not too much,
9:17 roughly just by the amount of sales tax on the management fee.
9:20 This is a Canadian total market fund
9:22 that tilts moderately toward higher expected return stocks.
9:26 The way that this shows up in the fund's characteristics is that it
9:28 has a lower average market capitalization than the market cap weighted index,
9:32 meaning that it underweights larger stocks and overweights smaller stocks.
9:36 It has a higher average booktomarket ratio,
9:39 meaning that it overweights lowpriced stocks and underweights highric stocks.
9:43 and it has a higher average profitsto book ratio which means
9:47 that it is underweight less profitable
9:49 stocks and overweight more profitable stocks.
9:51 Overall you can see that the portfolio tilts smaller,
9:53 cheaper and more profitable than the Canadian market.
9:56 The biggest underweight is in mega cap
9:58 stocks with high prices and low profitability
10:00 and the biggest overweight is in small
10:02 cap stocks with low prices and high profitability.
10:04 This reflects the underlying principles of Avantis.
10:06 As I described earlier, this ETF's sector mix is generally pretty close
10:10 to the Canadian market with some overweights and underweights.
10:13 Before I continue, I do want to reiterate one
10:15 of the big trade-offs of setting portfolios up this way.
10:17 Being different from the market means you will perform differently from it.
10:21 Obviously, and increasingly so, the more different you are.
10:25 In the long run, we expect that difference
10:27 to be positive from the tilts that Avantis supplies.
10:29 But the reality is that there can be
10:31 long periods where tilting a portfolio towards smaller,
10:34 cheaper, and more profitable stocks leads to underperformance.
10:37 The US market has been a recent example
10:39 of this where the largest companies in the market,
10:41 often companies with high prices, have delivered exceptional returns.
10:45 Tilting away from those stocks and towards smaller and cheaper stocks,
10:49 has been painful for many years now in the US market.
10:51 Though it has paid off in other markets,
10:53 those performance differences relative to market indexes can
10:56 be really hard for some investors to live through.
10:59 If you're worried about short-term underperformance
11:01 and even the possibility of long-term underperformance,
11:03 this approach may not be for you.
11:06 If you're wondering whether this kind
11:07 of approach makes sense for your specific psychology,
11:09 account types, tax brackets, time horizon, all that kind of stuff,
11:13 this is the kind of question a good portfolio
11:14 manager can answer in the context of a financial plan.
11:17 There's a link in the description if you want
11:18 to talk to someone at my firm, PWL Capital.
11:21 Okay, onto the US equity funds from Avantis.
11:24 CLV, the Avantis CIBC US large cap value ETF.
11:28 It has a management fee of 0.25%.
11:31 It focuses on large cap stocks as the name suggests, but tilts towards smaller,
11:35 cheaper, and more profitable large caps while
11:37 excluding small stocks and high price stocks entirely.
11:40 Calv is similar to the USlisted AVLV,
11:43 which has beaten the US market since it launched in September 2021.
11:47 I know that's too short of a horizon to tell us anything useful,
11:50 but it's the data we have, and it's worth mentioning.
11:53 CAUS, the Avantis CIBC US all cap equity ETF has a management fee of 0.19%.
12:00 It's a US total market fund with moderate
12:02 tilts towards cheaper and more profitable stocks.
12:05 This is an interesting fund for total US
12:07 market exposure without taking on too much tracking error.
12:10 That's the performance differences relative to the market
12:12 since its tilts are not that aggressive.
12:14 Its USlisted equivalent has beaten the US
12:17 market since it it launched in September 2019.
12:20 C AUV, the Avantis CIBC US Small Cap Value ETF, has a management fee of 0.35%.
12:28 It's heavily tilted toward the smallest, cheapest,
12:30 and most profitable stocks in the US
12:31 market while excluding large stocks entirely.
12:34 This fund, while having high expected returns,
12:37 should be expected to have lots of tracking
12:39 error since it's very different from the market.
12:41 Its USlisted equivalent, AVUV,
12:43 has beaten the US market since it launched in September 2019.
12:47 But you can also see in the chart how
12:48 significant the performance difference has been over intermediate periods,
12:52 including some periods of underperformance.
12:54 The international funds follow a similar logic.
12:56 So I'll move through them a bit faster before getting to what is,
12:58 in my opinion, the most exciting fund in the lineup.
13:01 CADE is the Avantis CIBC International Equity ETF.
13:05 It has a management fee of 0.29%.
13:07 It invests in total market international developed
13:10 market stocks with a moderate tilt towards smaller,
13:12 cheaper, and more profitable companies.
13:14 It doesn't have an exact US-listed equivalent since CAD
13:18 as I mentioned earlier excludes Canada while the US listed
13:21 AVDE includes it but AVDE for what it's worth has
13:25 beaten international developed markets since it launched in September 2019.
13:29 CASV is the Avantis CIBC global small cap
13:33 value ETF with a management fee of 0.39%.
13:36 It offers exposure to a globally diversified portfolio
13:39 of small cap value stocks that emphasizes the smallest,
13:42 lowest priced and most profitable company.
13:44 Again, this fund should be expected to perform
13:46 very differently from the global stock market due
13:48 to its exclusion of the largest stocks and emphasis
13:51 on the lowest price and highest profitability small caps.
13:54 There's no US equivalent for CASV,
13:56 which includes US and international developed stocks.
13:59 But AVDV, the Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF,
14:03 which excludes US stocks,
14:04 has beaten international developed markets by a wide margin since it launched.
14:08 There's also an emerging markets fund CAEM with a management
14:11 fee of 0.39% for which the characteristics details have
14:15 not yet been published but it follows the same principles
14:18 of tilting toward higher expected return stocks across emerging markets.
14:22 The US listed version of this fund AVM
14:25 has outperformed cap weighted emerging markets since inception.
14:28 All those performance histories were short
14:30 since Avantis hasn't been around that long.
14:32 But if you want to see how
14:32 this investment approach has performed over the long run,
14:35 I detailed Dimensionals's long-term performance relative
14:37 to comparable Vanguard funds in another video, and they have decades of history.
14:41 I know that was a lot of tickers,
14:42 and your head might be spinning wondering how to use them,
14:44 which is why C A, the Avantis CIBC all equity asset allocation ETF,
14:49 is probably the most exciting product in the lineup.
14:51 It's like VEQT, Vanguard's equity asset allocation ETF,
14:54 but made up of the ETFs I just described.
14:57 So, you get exposure to a globally
14:58 diversified portfolio of stocks with a Canadian
15:01 home country bias and built-in tilts toward
15:03 the type of stocks I've been talking about.
15:05 This is a one-stop shop for a lowcost,
15:07 broadly diversified portfolio that takes full advantage of the last
15:10 30 years of financial economics research and mitigates the nuance downsides
15:13 of index funds all in a single ticker just like VQT
15:17 and XQT and all the other EQs that we have in Canada.
15:20 It even has its own subreddit just like the others.
15:22 To understand whether you should care about this, I'll get a little nerdy.
15:26 And by that I mean excessively nerdy since I
15:28 know you guys are into that kind of thing.
15:29 In their 2015 paper detailing their five factor asset pricing model,
15:33 Eugene FMA and Ken French explain the theoretical rationale
15:36 for the factors in their empirical asset pricing model.
15:39 The dividend discount model which is a model
15:41 for what the price of a stock should be says
15:43 that the theoretical value of a share of stock
15:45 is the discounted value of expected dividends per share.
15:48 Equation one here shows that the price M at time t is equal
15:51 to the expected future dividends per share discounted
15:54 at the long-term average expected stock return R.
15:57 Miller and Mediglani's famous 1961 paper showed that given investment
16:01 policy dividend policy is irrelevant to the valuation of shares.
16:05 Yes, this is the same reason that dividends are
16:07 irrelevant when evaluating the expected returns of a stock.
16:10 With dividend policy irrelevance, the value of expected dividends is
16:13 equal to expected earnings minus expected investment.
16:16 Following Miller and Mediglani,
16:17 the total market value of the firm stock is given by equation two.
16:21 Here we have the expected earnings and the expected change in book equity,
16:24 which is another way of saying asset growth or investment.
16:28 Scaling both sides of equation two by the book value of equity,
16:31 equation three gives the theoretical valuation equation as presented
16:34 by F and French in their 2015 paper.
16:37 This valuation equation makes three statements about expected stock returns.
16:40 One, if we hold everything in equation three constant except for the market
16:44 value of the stock M and the expected stock return R,
16:47 then a lower ratio of market value to book
16:50 value must imply a higher expected stock return.
16:53 All else equal, a company with a lower price must have a higher discount rate.
16:57 This is called the value premium.
16:58 Two, if we hold everything in equation three constant
17:01 except for expected future earnings and the expected stock return,
17:05 then higher expected earnings must imply a higher expected stock return.
17:08 All else equal, if two companies trade at the same price,
17:11 the company with higher profits must have a higher discount rate.
17:14 This is an expression of the profitability premium.
17:16 The discount rate is sort of interchangeable with the expected return.
17:20 Three, if we hold everything in equation three constant except for the expected
17:23 growth in book value of equity and the expected stock return,
17:26 then higher expected asset growth must imply a lower expected stock return.
17:31 All else equal, if two companies trade at the same price,
17:33 the company with higher investment must have a lower discount rate.
17:37 This is an expression of the investment premium.
17:40 To bring it back to the Avantis ETFs, they use these valuation concepts
17:43 to systematically tilt their holdings towards smaller,
17:46 cheaper, and more profitable companies,
17:48 targeting companies with quantifiably higher expected returns.
17:52 While the theory is there to support it,
17:53 the reason that these ideas are interesting
17:55 to investors is that these premiums have
17:57 existed in stock returns around the world as far back as we have data.
18:01 That does not mean that stocks
18:02 with these characteristics will always outperform.
18:05 They can have and have had some periods of severe underperformance,
18:09 but they have outperformed in the long
18:11 run and over most historical time periods.
18:13 An important insight from the valuation
18:15 equation and the observed empirical characteristics
18:17 of stocks is that the premiums should not be considered in isolation.
18:21 For example, a portfolio that focuses
18:23 on profitability without controlling for relative
18:25 price is likely to result in a portfolio of highpriced growth stocks.
18:29 Think overpaying for growth.
18:31 And a portfolio that focuses on value without controlling for profitability
18:35 is likely to result in a portfolio of stocks with weak profitability.
18:38 Think cheap for a reason.
18:40 These characteristics are related to each
18:42 other and those relationships can't be ignored.
18:45 The stocks with the highest expected returns in the market will tend
18:47 to be the stock with both low relative prices and robust profitability.
18:52 This makes targeting value and profitability jointly one of the most
18:55 important aspects of managing a portfolio
18:57 targeting these expected return premiums.
18:59 And it is exactly what Avantis is doing.
19:02 This isn't only about earning higher expected returns either.
19:04 It's about targeting multiple return premiums
19:07 that may show up at different times.
19:09 For example, over a period where the equity risk premium,
19:12 that is what you get with a market cap weighted index fund, does poorly.
19:16 Other premiums may do well.
19:17 It's not really diversification since we're not adding any new assets,
19:21 but it is providing access to more sources of expected return,
19:24 which can mean a more reliably positive long-term outcome.
19:28 One notable example is the US lost decade from 1999 through 2010.
19:33 The US market was flat for more than a decade, but small cap and value stocks
19:37 in the US delivered meaningfully positive returns.
19:40 There are other historical examples like this.
19:42 Japan being at least as interesting,
19:44 though it's important to keep in mind that small
19:45 cap value can also go through long periods of underperformance.
19:49 Lowcost market cap weighted index funds are sensible
19:51 investments for most people most of the time,
19:54 much more sensible than the traditional actively
19:56 managed funds that many Canadians still invest in.
19:58 But market cap weighted index funds are not perfect.
20:01 They offer exposure to a single expected return premium, the market premium.
20:05 But they ignore other wellestablished return premiums that can
20:08 be pursued systematically and at a low cost.
20:11 For many years, Canadians had to jump through hoops to invest this way.
20:14 But the launch of CIBC's Avantis ETFs
20:16 has made this investment approach more easily accessible.
20:19 One thing I mentioned earlier is that unlike index funds,
20:22 these Avantis funds don't mechanically buy IPO
20:24 stocks just because an index tells them to.
20:26 If you're holding VEQT or any cap weighted index fund in your RSP,
20:30 TFSA, or whatever account, that distinction may matter now more than ever.
20:34 Some of the largest private companies in the world, SpaceX,
20:37 OpenAI, and Anthropic among them are set to go public.
20:40 And when they do, your index fund may be
20:42 forced to buy their shares very likely at high prices.
20:47 It's worth understanding how that works and what
20:49 it could cost your portfolio in the long run.
20:51 That video is right