The Wire Problem Nobody In AI Is Talking About
Tiff In Tech
0:00 Nvidia just committed $4 billion to two photonics
0:03 manufacturers that most people have never heard of.
0:07 And when I read the press release, I obviously went straight to Jensen's exact
0:11 words because I really wanted to understand
0:14 what he was actually saying about this, what he actually thought about this.
0:18 Now, he called it building the next generation of gigawatt scale AI factories.
0:23 Gigawatt scale AI factories built on light.
0:27 Now, if you know what that phrase means,
0:29 you already know why this is one of the most
0:31 significant infrastructure bets Nvidia [music] has ever made.
0:36 And if you do not know what it means yet,
0:38 I mean, well, that is exactly what this video is about.
0:42 I went into this video thinking the story was going to be about chips.
0:45 I mean, that is where every headline points.
0:47 Transistors are shrinking more slowly.
0:50 The 3-nanometer wall is real.
0:52 And I did cover the whole Dennard
0:53 scaling breakdown in my Nvidia Blackwell video,
0:56 which is linked [music] down in my description if you haven't seen it already.
0:59 It's a really interesting I mean, I think so.
1:02 I made the video.
1:03 But it's very interesting and really worth considering watching.
1:06 But the deeper I got into the engineering literature,
1:08 the more I kept hitting a different word.
1:10 And it wasn't chip.
1:11 It wasn't transistor.
1:13 It was interconnect.
1:14 [music] The connection between chips kept coming up as the actual
1:18 binding constraint in the next generation of AI clusters.
1:21 [music] And when I finally understood why, it reframed the entire story.
1:27 [music] So, here's what is happening inside a modern AI training cluster.
1:30 First off, you have tens of thousands of GPUs working together.
1:34 Each one is doing an extraordinary amount of computation on its own.
1:39 But training a frontier model means those GPUs are in constant conversation.
1:44 I mean, passing gradient updates, synchronizing parameters,
1:48 moving activations across the network billions of times per second.
1:53 Now, engineers call this collective communication.
1:56 It is the invisible architecture underneath every
1:59 large language model you have ever used,
2:01 which [music] is kind of wild to think about.
2:03 But it brings up a question.
2:04 What carries all those signals between the GPUs?
2:08 Copper traces.
2:09 Electrical signals moving through the [music] metal.
2:12 And copper, at the speed and density
2:15 that the next generation AI clusters require,
2:18 runs into physics that it just can't, [music] frankly, negotiate with.
2:22 Let's talk about the first problem.
2:23 The first problem is resistance.
2:25 Every electrical signal moving through copper converts
2:27 some [music] of its energy into heat.
2:29 I mean, at a small scale, it's manageable.
2:32 At the scale of a 100,000 GPU training clusters, [music]
2:36 that heat becomes a dominant engineering variable.
2:39 The thing that every hardware decision [music] downstream has to account for.
2:43 Now, the second problem is signal loss.
2:45 You see, so electrical signals lose
2:47 fidelity over distance and at high frequencies.
2:50 So, engineers face a real trade-off.
2:53 Faster or farther, but not both without adding regeneration
2:58 hardware that brings its own cost and its own heat.
3:02 Now, the third problem,
3:03 the one that really stopped me when I was reading these numbers,
3:07 is [music] energy per bit.
3:09 Moving a single bit of data electrically has an energy cost.
3:14 Small, but real.
3:16 When you're moving petabytes of data per second inside a training cluster,
3:19 the energy cost of the wires alone starts to show up,
3:23 frankly, meaningfully on the operating budget.
3:26 Now, the analogy I kept on coming back to was this.
3:29 Moving electrons through copper is kind of like pushing water through a straw.
3:34 You can widen it, you can push harder,
3:37 but friction [music] is a physical property of the medium itself,
3:41 and no engineering decision removes friction from a [music] physical medium.
3:45 Now, photons, what this video is all about, they work differently.
3:49 Particles of light carry no electrical charge.
3:52 They generate no resistive heat as [music] they travel.
3:55 They also do not degrade over distance the way electrical signals do.
3:59 And through a technique that's called wavelength division multiplexing, [music]
4:03 you can send dozens of completely independent data
4:05 streams through a single optical channel all at once.
4:08 Each one riding a different color
4:10 of light with [music] no interference between them.
4:13 I mean, that is why a single strand of fiber
4:15 optic cable can carry the internet traffic of an entire continent.
4:19 [music] That physics has existed for decades in long-haul telecommunications.
4:24 But what's happening right now is that engineers are building
4:26 that same physics down to the scale of a chip,
4:29 down to the inside of a server rack.
4:32 I mean, frankly, down to the connection
4:34 between two GPUs sitting centimeters apart.
4:37 So, before we go any further, here is exactly where we are.
4:40 First of all, the chips are doing their job.
4:42 The wires, copper wires, they're the constraint.
4:44 And replacing those wires with light is
4:46 a product roadmap with real money behind that.
4:49 Keep that in mind because it changes everything that we are about to cover next.
4:53 A conventional GPU processes data electrically.
4:56 Transistors switch on and off billions of times per second.
5:00 And the data, it moves through
5:02 copper interconnects between compute [music] cores,
5:04 between memory, between GPUs in the cluster.
5:08 And basically, every hop over copper costs latency.
5:11 [music] Every hop generates heat.
5:13 And the more you scale the cluster,
5:15 the more both of those costs stack against each other.
5:18 [music] Now, an optical processing unit,
5:20 engineers are starting to call these OPUs,
5:23 restructures this chain at a fundamental level.
5:27 [music]
5:26 Instead of encoding information as electrical voltage, data is encoded as light.
5:32 [music] It's intensity, its phase, or its wavelength.
5:35 So, basically, instead of copper traces,
5:37 signals travel through silicon waveguides,
5:40 which are microscopic channels etched into a photonic chip
5:44 that guides light the way a fiber optic cable does,
5:47 but at scales measured in micrometers.
5:51 Now, here is the part of the MIT research
5:53 that really made me stop and had to reread the paragraph.
5:56 The core mathematical operation in virtually every neural network,
6:00 the operation running inside every transformer, every diffusion model,
6:04 every I mean, every large language model you have ever used,
6:07 is called the multiply-accumulate operation.
6:10 And it's basically matrix multiplication.
6:12 Billions of these per forward [music] pass.
6:14 The intelligence of a model is, I mean, at the hardware level,
6:17 an enormous amount of this one [music] operation repeating.
6:21 Photonic hardware can perform matrix multiplications in the optical domain.
6:24 Basically, [music] light passing through a series of tunable components.
6:28 And it's able to do this, I mean,
6:30 at the speed of light without ever converting to an electrical signal.
6:34 Now, the energy reduction that MIT's research group published is
6:37 over 90% for certain operations compared to electronic [music] equivalents.
6:43 Now, I really want to stay on that for a second here.
6:45 Let's take it up a beat.
6:46 We were really down in the weeds.
6:47 I want to stay on that number for a second because I think
6:49 it [music] is easy to just kind of let it wash over you.
6:53 We spend so much time in this community, I mean, in Tiffin Tech,
6:57 talking about model architecture improvements that deliver 3%,
7:00 5%, I mean, maybe 10% efficiency gains, anyways.
7:04 And those matter.
7:05 I mean, people build careers on them.
7:07 But 90% [music] is a different category on its own.
7:11 That is a different physical substrate doing the same work entirely.
7:16 I do also, though, want to be careful with those because
7:18 those figures come from lab conditions and specific workloads.
7:22 [music] Real-world numbers will land a lower,
7:25 of course, as these systems mature.
7:27 But even at 50% or 60%, consider what that means at a moment when
7:32 AI energy consumption is becoming a grid-level policy concern,
7:37 as we just heard recently, anyways, for national governments.
7:40 The economics of inference change in a way that compounds every deployment.
7:45 Okay.
7:46 Back to where the market is moving, though.
7:48 Now, let's talk a little bit about Lightmatter.
7:49 It's one of my favorite companies.
7:51 I'm sure you've heard me speak about it a lot.
7:52 [music] Now, Lightmatter was actually founded out of MIT,
7:55 and it has built a photonic inference accelerator, which is called Passage.
7:59 And it replaces copper interconnects inside a server with optical ones.
8:03 They have raised over $400 million
8:05 and moved from prototype to customer deployments.
8:08 I mean, they are from a university lab bench to production infrastructure,
8:13 and it happened in under 7 years, which is pretty incredible.
8:17 [music] There are some other labs
8:18 as well that are working on co-packaged optics.
8:20 Another one is AR Labs.
8:22 It is working on co-packaged optics.
8:23 [music] So, basically,
8:24 integrating optical input and output directly into the chip package itself.
8:29 So, the data leaving a GPU travels optically
8:31 from the moment [music] it exits the die.
8:34 Nvidia, Intel, I mean, and several other major hyperscalers are investors.
8:39 And then, recently, with Nvidia,
8:42 it was literally as I was finishing research on this this topic, actually,
8:45 when they announced something that really just kind of puts a bow,
8:49 or a punctuation mark, if you will, around it all.
8:52 With Jensen committing $4 billion across two photonic companies.
8:56 $2 [music] billion into Lumentum, and $2 billion into Coherent.
9:01 Two optics in laser component manufacturers.
9:05 [music] And Nvidia just made them two
9:06 of the largest infrastructure bets in its portfolio.
9:08 [music] Now, Jensen's exact words were, "Together with Lumentum,
9:12 Nvidia is advancing the world's most sophisticated silicon photonics to build
9:17 [music] the next generation of gigawatt scale AI factories." Now,
9:21 what really makes this investment so credible to me,
9:24 and what I think gets missed most in the coverage of this all,
9:28 is that Nvidia has actually been cautious about
9:30 photonics in specific parts of its own [music] architecture.
9:34 Jensen previously noted that sticking with copper on their rack-scale GB200
9:38 systems actually shaved down 20 kW off of a 120 kW system.
9:44 [music] So, this is a company that weighed photonics carefully
9:46 against copper and chose copper where copper made sense.
9:50 The $4 billion commitment tells you, though,
9:53 where and when copper stops making sense.
9:56 And markets read it the same way.
9:58 Lumentum closed up to nearly 12% on the day it was announced.
10:02 Same with Coherent at 15%.
10:05 All right, let's take another breather here.
10:07 So, that is a science and that is the market
10:09 signal landing on top of it in the same week.
10:11 It's kind of huge.
10:13 It's It's wild.
10:14 All right, but let me tell you why I think the combination
10:16 of those two things matters more than either one of them alone.
10:19 Because this is really where the real
10:21 scale of what is happening becomes so clear.
10:25 We tend to think about technology improvements as [music] incremental.
10:28 A chip gets faster 20%.
10:30 Bandwidth then in turn doubles.
10:33 Important, I mean, it's expected.
10:35 We hear about it.
10:35 We move on.
10:36 Photonics though is a phase [music] change.
10:39 And the reason is that the problems it solves are
10:41 compounding constraints that get worse together with every hardware generation.
10:46 Here's exactly what I mean though.
10:49 [music] Every generation of AI models has been larger than the last.
10:52 The compute [music] required to train and run them scales with parameter count,
10:56 data volume, and cluster size.
10:59 [music] Under electrical architectures, so does the heat and energy cost.
11:03 And these are problems that multiply across every dimension simultaneously.
11:07 Where pressure builds with every generation.
11:10 There is a point on that curve where you simply cannot build the next model.
11:14 The physics of moving [music] electrical signals at that density
11:18 and speed will not cooperate with the ambition
11:22 regardless of how good the software is
11:24 or how intelligent the architecture team really [music] is.
11:28 Photonics though, it moves that point.
11:31 It removes the ceiling that copper imposes on how large
11:34 a cluster can be and how efficiently it can operate.
11:38 And that matters tremendously for where AI capability goes from here.
11:43 Now, the map from the AI systems of say 2025 [music]
11:47 to the AI systems of 2028 may have less to do
11:51 with the transformer architecture improvements and more [music] to do
11:55 with whether photonic interconnects reach production scale in time to support
12:01 [music]
12:00 the training that runs the next generation of models and what it will require.
12:04 Now, this is a hardware story, but it's also a capability story.
12:09 An energy story, I guess, if you will.
12:11 Really a national infrastructure story.
12:13 Both [music] Lumentum and Coherent are now committing to expand
12:16 US manufacturing capacity [music] as part of their Nvidia agreements,
12:20 which really tells you this is being treated as a strategic infrastructure play.
12:25 Not just a supply chain decision.
12:27 And the fact that it touches all of those dimensions at once is exactly
12:31 why the largest compute companies on the planet
12:34 are funding it and taking it seriously.
12:37 And also too, why it deserves more attention than it is currently getting.
12:41 Nvidia just invested 4 billion into [music] this.
12:45 So, let me put that into plain terms, if you will.
12:47 The models you will use in 2028,
12:50 the ones that will feel qualitatively different from what exists today,
12:55 may owe a significant part of their capability to the fact
12:59 that the wires [music] finally got out of the way.
13:02 That is what this transition means at scale.
13:04 Now, let me get specific about what this means for [music] you.
13:08 Every major hardware transition in computing history
13:11 has created a new class of engineers who understood the new substrate before
13:15 [music] most people even knew it existed.
13:18 And those engineers shape what came next.
13:21 For example, when computing went multi-core,
13:23 the people who already understood the concurrent
13:25 [music] programming and memory models became disproportionately valuable.
13:29 I mean, when GPUs became AI infrastructure,
13:31 it was once again the people who understood
13:34 CUDA and kernel optimization who wrote the playbook.
13:38 Everyone else eventually had to learn.
13:41 When cloud replaced on-premise infrastructure,
13:43 it was [music] the distributed systems thinkers
13:45 who helped entire industries make the transition.
13:49 Photonics is the next [music] substrate shift.
13:52 And really the window where understanding it early is
13:55 a genuine differentiator [music] that is open right now.
13:58 But I want to be clear about something before I give you specific advice here.
14:01 I'm saying this because I think this is one of the most [music]
14:05 interesting skill gaps to close right now.
14:07 And I want to be very honest about what closing it actually can look like.
14:12 Because well, first of all, it is more accessible than maybe it sounds.
14:15 The role that becomes increasingly valuable over the next few
14:18 years [music] is what I would call the AI systems architect.
14:21 Someone who holds the full stack hardware and software together.
14:24 [music] Now, don't worry, you don't need to be an expert per se in all of this.
14:28 But someone who understands how light moves through silicon wave guides,
14:31 how that affects the memory [music] bandwidth and latency at the cluster level,
14:35 and how those physical properties cascade [music] into how you
14:39 structure a distributed training job or an inference serving system.
14:44 That is the difference between being carried along by a transition
14:47 [music] and understanding it well enough to shape what comes next.
14:51 All right, as we wrap up this video,
14:53 here is a thought I keep coming back to after
14:55 spending the last few weeks really deep in this research topic.
14:59 Now, every time computing has approached a physical limit,
15:02 the story gets written as a dead end.
15:04 Each one really described as the thing that finally stopped progress,
15:08 no matter what story you're talking about.
15:10 We are in such a monumental, such a pivotal moment right now.
15:13 The engineers working on photonic computing are doing it because light
15:17 is genuinely better physics for what AI infrastructure needs to become.
15:22 No resistive heat, no signal degradation, no charge.
15:25 The fundamental speed limit of the universe, which sounds crazy to say,
15:29 carrying dozens of data streams simultaneously on a single physics path.
15:34 These are structural advantages,
15:36 the kind that compound across every generation of hardware that follows.
15:40 The infrastructure industry is really starting to act like it.
15:42 I mean, MIT research is in production, startups are deploying,
15:46 and recently Nvidia put 4 billion dollars behind it.
15:50 This is what I genuinely find interesting and so exciting about this moment.
15:53 We did not hit a wall, we found a better medium to think in.
15:57 So, here is what I want to hear from you in the comments.
15:59 As photonic interconnects change the data movement architecture of AI clusters,
16:03 do you think it forces a fundamental rethink
16:06 of how we write distributed training systems and inference pipelines?
16:10 Or does the software abstraction layer hold and most
16:13 engineers never really need [music] to care about it?
16:16 I mean, clearly I have a strong view on this.
16:17 I think we need to care about it.
16:20 But drop your comments down below.
16:22 I always read every response that is left on these videos and a lot
16:27 of the videos I structure come from what you suggest for me to do.
16:30 I mean, photonics was brought to my attention
16:32 by some comments in my last [music] video, so thank you for that.
16:35 So, let me know what other topics you're interested in.
16:37 I love these deep dive tech videos that lets me do
16:41 a ton of research and then get to share with you my findings.
16:44 [music] And hopefully help you stay ahead
16:47 in tech and better understand what is happening.
16:50 All right, I'll see you in the next video.