The Billion Dollar Decoy GPU Smuggling Scheme | Supermicro Staff Indicted
Gamers Nexus
0:00 Following up on our investigation into the GPU
0:02 black market and smuggling operations last year,
0:04 there's been some developments recently including prosecution and arrest.
0:09 Nvidia says that there's no chip diversion.
0:12 This is a stance it has maintained for a while now.
0:15 The US government has different opinions.
0:17 That's the alleged scheme federal prosecutors laid out just
0:19 last night charging three people tied to server maker Supermicro,
0:22 including the co-founder you're seeing on your screen
0:25 and board member Wally Liao with conspiring
0:28 to illegally divert billions in AI servers to China
0:32 in of course violation of US export controls.
0:34 Prosecutors say the company sold Nvidia's high-powered AI chips [music]
0:38 that were banned from China bringing in more
0:41 than $2 billion in sales for Supermicro.
0:43 [music] The Justice Department has charged several now former
0:46 Supermicro employees with violating US export control laws.
0:50 The government said the defendants sold high-performance chips
0:52 to China by using a quote web of lies, obfuscation, and concealment end quote.
0:58 To support the deception, the government says that the smugglers
1:01 staged warehouses full of what they called
1:03 dummy servers and employed the most sophisticated
1:06 technology available for sticker removal, hair dryers.
1:11 At some point it's like they're just mocking me.
1:14 As for Nvidia, its claims are becoming, we think, more far-fetched.
1:17 Jensen Huang was seen with one of the defendants a few days before
1:21 the charges in Supermicro's posted and now
1:23 deleted photo of Jensen Huang with Wally Liao,
1:27 one of Supermicro's co-founders, at Nvidia GTC together.
1:31 Nvidia's denials are even frustrating policy makers.
1:34 Two US senators said Nvidia's claims are a quote public
1:38 relations posture designed to protect Nvidia's export licenses end quote.
1:42 But that assumes the government has its
1:44 act together to approve export licenses anyway.
1:46 While Nvidia has avoided admitting to GPU smuggling even existing,
1:50 even outside of its own control, despite reported evidence of chip diversion,
1:55 the Department of Justice keeps arresting chip smugglers,
1:58 including allegations of multi-million dollar GPU smuggling operations.
2:02 The elaborate scheme currently being investigated by the Department of Justice
2:05 contradicts Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang's prior statements about GPU smuggling.
2:10 Nvidia's chips are not little tiny potato chips.
2:13 These are 2 tons.
2:16 Each one of our GPUs is a rack that's 2 tons, 2 tons large,
2:20 or the even the smaller versions of our racks are hundreds of pounds.
2:24 And so it's not easy to smuggle
2:26 Every so often somebody says, you know, these GPUs are being smuggled.
2:31 I really would love to see it.
2:33 Not to mention, you have to smuggle enough of them to fill a football field full
2:41 of these [music] things so that you could run it it as an AI data center.
2:45 Over the years people have speculated about diversion.
2:48 We've chased down every single concern and we've [music] repeatedly tested
2:56 and sampled data centers around the world and found no diversion.
3:01 People talk about smuggling, but it's incredibly hard to do
3:04 and it's [music] we chased down every opportunity,
3:06 every single time that somebody's reported
3:08 something and it's just not been true.
3:10 Not to mention, we bought a smuggled RTX 5090 GPU in China last year.
3:16 We were offered smuggled RTX 6000 Pro GPUs
3:19 with 96 GB of memory while in China last year.
3:23 And this was without any issue whatsoever because there it's not a black market.
3:29 It's just a market.
3:30 And we have a whole documentary on that.
3:32 But if you ask Nvidia the GPU smuggling is fake news.
3:38 Something that we've reported on as well.
3:40 As our sources in the documentary said though Indeed.
3:46 Indeed.
3:47 Nvidia can keep turning a blind eye to GPU smuggling,
3:50 but now one of Nvidia's major OEM partners, Supermicro,
3:54 is tied to a smuggling case worth billions of dollars
3:57 in one of the most complex cases of it yet.
3:59 Today, we're going to go over the Supermicro case
4:01 and the latest update on the GPU black market.
4:04 Before that, this video is brought to you
4:06 by Thermaltake and the TR200 WS micro chassis.
4:09 A micro ATX stout case.
4:11 It includes an optional 5 and 1/4 bay for either a screen or 5 and 1/4 drives.
4:16 The case has a highly perforated side panel,
4:18 a color accent front styled like other popular cases,
4:21 can fit radiators and closed-loop liquid coolers
4:24 in the top up to 360 mm claim support,
4:27 and a total of seven 120 mm fan mounting locations between the top,
4:31 bottom, and rear of the case.
4:33 Max CPU tower cooler clearance is claimed at 175 mm and GPU clearance at 365 mm.
4:39 The chassis provides a portable, highly compatible box for your builds.
4:42 Learn more at the link in the description below.
4:44 Since we posted our GPU black market documentary in August of 2025,
4:49 and then we got Bloombergs, and then we un-Bloombergs ourselves,
4:51 the US government has had some updates on its GPU smuggling control attempts,
4:57 where it's arrested criminals on multiple occasions for smuggling
5:01 GPUs or conspiring to divert AI GPUs into China.
5:05 The US government's rules for chip exports
5:07 to China have changed over the last 4 years,
5:09 with the government and Nvidia engaged
5:11 in a cat-and-mouse game that's become weirdly collaborative.
5:15 It'd be like cat and mouse,
5:17 except if the mouse is the more powerful one ultimately,
5:21 and if the mouse sometimes gave the cat a 15% cut
5:25 of its sale of cheese on the side in the cheese smuggling market.
5:30 To understand Supermicro's involvement, or in the very least,
5:33 the alleged involvement of its leadership at this point,
5:36 we need a recap of GPU export control rules and why
5:39 they're treated similarly to other export controlled items, like guns.
5:44 Beginning in In during the Biden administration,
5:47 the Department of Commerce restricted certain high-performance chips
5:50 that the US companies are allowed to export to China.
5:53 The Biden administration kept adding rules to limit
5:55 which chips could be sold to China,
5:57 and Nvidia would subsequently create new products
6:00 that wouldn't be affected by export controls,
6:02 such as the natural problem of an entity that doesn't
6:05 really understand the technology trying to police the technology.
6:08 You make the technology, in this case GPUs, you tweak a few dials,
6:12 get the performance you want, but technically still comply.
6:15 During the second Trump administration,
6:17 the US export controls have been similarly confusing.
6:20 And Jensen also has a new chip, the Blackwell.
6:22 Do you know what the Blackwell is?
6:23 The Blackwell is super duper advanced.
6:27 I wouldn't make a deal with that, although it's possible I'd
6:30 make a deal a somewhat uh enhanced in a negative way Blackwell.
6:39 Federal policy maker discussions within the last
6:42 6 months have focused on whether the government
6:44 would allow Nvidia to sell the Hopper or Blackwell generation of chips to China.
6:48 In December 2025, President Trump said the government would
6:51 allow Nvidia to sell the H200 to customers in China,
6:54 with the government taking a 25% cut from the sales.
6:58 This is more than the prior news we covered
7:00 of a 15% cut for H20s and MI308s from AMD.
7:05 The same rules would apply to AMD and Intel for similar chips, Trump said.
7:09 The president said Nvidia's more advanced Blackwell
7:11 and Rubin chips aren't part of this deal.
7:14 The post also suggested that the export controls,
7:17 the very ones that Trump's own administration furthered in 2025,
7:21 documented in our article detailing the full timeline,
7:24 were implemented by Biden and harmed national security and American jobs.
7:28 But again, both administrations administered export controls,
7:32 and Trump's in particular added,
7:34 removed, and changed them several times in the span of 1 year.
7:37 The Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry
7:39 and Security provided more details in January 2026.
7:43 The agency would review licenses for the Nvidia
7:45 H200 and AMD MI325X on a case-by-case basis.
7:50 However, for licenses to be approved,
7:52 the government would require that the products
7:54 are sufficiently available for US customers,
7:56 that end customers in China have adequate compliance measures,
7:59 and that the chips have undergone
8:01 independent testing to verify security and performance.
8:04 So, Nvidia is now allowed to sell some chips to China,
8:07 but the rules are onerous and the revenue split has increased.
8:12 In a March SEC filing we dug up,
8:14 Nvidia called the US export rules complex and said its,
8:17 quote, competitive position has been harmed by export controls, end quote.
8:22 At Nvidia's GTC press conference in March,
8:24 Axios reported Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang as saying,
8:27 quote, We've been licensed for many customers in China for H200.
8:31 We've received purchase orders from many customers,
8:33 and we're in the process of restarting our manufacturing, end quote.
8:36 But while the government changes its export control rules,
8:39 smugglers have become better at evading them altogether.
8:42 This brings us to Nvidia's partner Super Micro and its accused employees.
8:46 Super Micro isn't exactly a beacon of corporate responsibility.
8:50 The SEC charged Super Micro with accounting fraud in 2020,
8:54 and the company faced allegations of export violations in 2024
8:57 relating to exports to Russia after the invasion of Ukraine.
9:00 Super Micro's then auditor Ernst& Young,
9:03 a firm very familiar with accounting controversies,
9:06 even stopped working with Super Micro in 2024 after saying that it was,
9:10 quote, unwilling to be associated, end quote, with its financial statements.
9:15 We might be seeing why they said that, as Super
9:17 Micro today finds itself connected to GPU smuggling allegations.
9:21 On March 19th, the Department of Justice
9:23 announced that it had charged three people
9:25 for violating US export control laws and diverting
9:28 high-performance servers with Nvidia chips to China.
9:30 The government named Wally Liao, Steven Chiang, and Willy Suen as defendants.
9:36 The government did not name Supermicro itself
9:39 as a defendant or in the indictment,
9:41 but all three individuals have been at points associated with Supermicro.
9:45 On the same day, Supermicro acknowledged the indictment and issued
9:48 a statement with more information about the three individuals.
9:51 According to Supermicro, Wally Liao was a senior vice president of business
9:55 development and a member of Supermicro's board of directors,
9:58 and Steven Chan was a sales manager in Taiwan.
10:01 Willy Swen was a contractor.
10:03 Supermicro also said it maintains a quote robust compliance program
10:06 and quote and is committed to adhering to US export rules.
10:10 Despite Supermicro's assurances,
10:12 the company's robust compliance program missed the compliance
10:16 the the non-compliance alleged in the large-scale GPU smuggling operation.
10:22 In a press release from the Department of Justice,
10:23 a US attorney said that the quote defendants participated in a systematic scheme
10:27 to divert massive quantities of US
10:30 artificial intelligence technology to customers in China.
10:32 They did so through a tangled web of lies, obfuscation,
10:35 and concealment all to drive sales and generate
10:38 revenues in violation of US law and quote.
10:41 The Justice Department describes a comprehensive scheme.
10:43 They say that Liao and Chan directed
10:45 executives of an unnamed company in Southeast Asia,
10:49 which the Department of Justice called Company One,
10:51 to place [music] orders for GPU servers from an unnamed US manufacturer,
10:56 presumably Supermicro.
10:57 The US manufacturer assembled the servers in the United
11:00 States before shipping them to their facilities
11:02 in Taiwan and then subsequently sent them
11:05 to Company One in [music] Southeast Asia.
11:07 From there, Company One would ship the servers
11:09 to their final destination in China in unmarked boxes.
11:13 Company One concealed the true destination and the purpose
11:16 for the servers to avoid regulatory scrutiny and pass the compliance checks.
11:20 Now, this might actually sound familiar to a lot of you.
11:23 We broke news on a similarly designed scheme in August of last year.
11:28 Here's what we said at the time.
11:30 A B2B company in Taiwan noted to us that it's commissioned
11:32 by Chinese companies to import servers
11:35 for pre-testing and pre-assembly and setup steps.
11:38 When we asked what the GPUs were that the servers ran,
11:41 having just done all the rest of this, we
11:43 realized that all of the hardware is export controlled.
11:46 Once the B 2 B agency completes its testing,
11:48 it ships the system out to the original buyer.
11:50 Basically, they act as an intermediary to buy the machine, mark it up,
11:54 and reship it to the original purchaser, maybe with actual testing.
11:58 We also spoke with a company that conducts business in Singapore.
12:01 The company informed us that they are also aware
12:03 of similar pass-throughs for so-called testing or data services.
12:07 This was also the subject we went to Washington, D.C.
12:10 last year to talk with congressional staff about,
12:12 although we still can't share anything further on that.
12:14 Per the Justice Department,
12:16 the defendants worked with company one to prepare false documents
12:19 and trick auditors into thinking company one was the final destination.
12:24 The Department of Justice said, quote,
12:25 "At the defendants' direction, between 2024 and 2025,
12:29 company one purchased approximately two and a half
12:31 billion dollars worth of servers from the U.S.
12:34 manufacturer." End quote.
12:35 Between late April 2025 to mid-May 2025 alone,
12:39 the alleged smugglers diverted an estimated $510 million in servers to China.
12:44 As the smuggling operation expanded in 2025,
12:47 the defendants took more elaborate measures to avoid detection.
12:50 In the indictment that we found on PACER,
12:53 the Justice Department said the defendants
12:54 staged dummy servers for inspection at locations
12:57 where company one was purportedly storing
12:59 the servers it had bought from the U.S.
13:01 manufacturer.
13:02 The defendants are said to have worked with other
13:04 individuals to repackage the servers with the U.S.
13:06 manufacturer's labels and boxes to deceive inspectors
13:10 for an audit in, you guessed it, August 2025.
13:14 Some things just line up that way.
13:16 Company one and the defendants needed to stage fake servers
13:20 since the real ones had already been shipped to China.
13:23 Per the indictment, Swin, the contractor identified by Supermicro,
13:26 estimated that it would take about 100 people,
13:29 including a forklift operators, to set up the warehouse and pass inspection.
13:34 The indictment included photos of the final staging
13:37 with fake servers stuffed inside a large warehouse.
13:40 The scheme began attracting more attention.
13:41 On August 20th, 2025,
13:43 3 days after we published our documentary on GPU smuggling on the black market,
13:48 and immediately after being copyright struck by Bloomberg,
13:51 the Bureau of Industry and Security quote
13:53 informed the US manufacturer that it had reason to believe that company one was
13:58 diverting the US manufacturer's servers to China,
14:01 and that BIS therefore had requested a compliance hold on all
14:05 shipments from the US manufacturer to company one, end quote.
14:08 Government officials continued to investigate.
14:11 In December 2025, regulators visited company
14:13 one's warehouse for a compliance check.
14:15 The defendants once again staged the dummy servers.
14:18 This time, the defendant Swen and an unnamed
14:21 broker unboxed the dummy servers, they said,
14:24 and used a hair dryer to quote remove and affix labels and serial
14:28 number stickers to the server boxes and to the dummy servers themselves,
14:32 end quote, per the filing.
14:33 The two then allegedly repackaged the fake servers in the boxes.
14:37 After the December inspection,
14:39 Super Micro co-founder Liao is said in the indictment to have
14:42 asked an executive at company one to order more servers.
14:45 The legal documents include other interesting details.
14:47 According to the indictment,
14:48 company one became more important to the US manufacturer's revenue over time.
14:52 The indictment says company one ranked
14:54 as the US manufacturer's 11th most profitable customer worldwide,
14:58 along with customers like US cloud companies and hyperscalers.
15:02 However, the indictment reads quote company one
15:04 did not have the capacity to store or use the massive quantities of servers
15:08 it was purchasing from the US manufacturer,
15:11 and most of the servers that it ordered
15:12 at the direction of the defendants were instead
15:14 diverted to China through a network of third-party
15:17 brokers who worked closely with the defendants, end quote.
15:19 In other words, smugglers.
15:21 Company one was also important for the US
15:24 server manufacturer to maintain its GPU allocation from Nvidia.
15:28 In one example, in December 2024,
15:30 the indictment says that Liao pressured an executive at company
15:33 one to place more substantial orders with the B200.
15:37 Per the indictment, one of Liao's texts said, quote,
15:40 "This is the only way to have Nvidia to promise
15:43 the B200 allocation so far as I know." End quote.
15:46 Super Micro described itself as a victim.
15:48 In a letter to its shareholders on March 26th,
15:51 Super Micro CEO Charles Liang said, quote,
15:54 "It appears that Super Micro has been a victim
15:56 of the elaborate schemes orchestrated by these individuals,
15:59 which deceived both federal authorities
16:01 and our internal compliance team." End quote.
16:03 It's the classic, if only some some thief hadn't put this in my bank account.
16:12 I just I don't know how this got there.
16:15 Liang's letter also said Super Micro would implement,
16:17 quote, "even more rigorous oversight." End quote,
16:20 of its export control system, which is a great idea,
16:23 considering the indictment said one
16:25 of the US manufacturer's compliance officers was, quote,
16:28 "offsite enjoying entertainment paid for by company one." End quote,
16:33 instead of doing their job during the August 2025 audit.
16:36 On April 7th, Super Micro announced an independent investigation to look further
16:41 into the matter and said it won't
16:43 comment further until the investigation is done.
16:45 We found Wally Liao's alleged involvement in this to be the most surprising.
16:49 Liao co-founded Super Micro in 1993 and served
16:52 on the board of directors from '93 to 2018.
16:55 He resigned from his Super Micro positions in 2018 after
16:58 the company admitted that it wasn't current in its SEC filings.
17:02 But Liao returned to Super Micro as a consultant in 2021.
17:06 Super Micro hired Liao back full-time in 2022
17:09 as a senior vice president of business development.
17:12 And he again joined the board of directors in December 2023.
17:15 Liao made millions while working at Supermicro.
17:18 Supermicro's 2025 annual report said it compensated Liao
17:21 with more than 1.8 million dollars in salary,
17:25 bonus, and stock in the fiscal year 2025.
17:28 Liao's primary stake in Supermicro came in the form of equity.
17:31 According to an SEC filing from Supermicro,
17:34 Liao owned more than 15 million Supermicro shares.
17:37 Liao and his spouse served as trustees for the Liao family trust,
17:41 which held the majority of the 15 million shares.
17:43 In total, Liao's stake in Supermicro amounted to 2.6%
17:48 of the company's common stock as of July 31st, 2025.
17:52 Now, due to the alleged crimes,
17:53 Liao is no longer employed by Supermicro or on its board of directors.
17:57 Liao has pleaded not guilty to the charges
18:00 and is free on a 5 million-dollar bond, according to Bloomberg.
18:03 The case will go to trial in November.
18:05 Interestingly, Liao rubbed shoulders with Jensen
18:08 Huang just days before the indictment.
18:10 GN Friend and professional Oracle antagonizer at Citron wrote it on Twitter
18:15 that Supermicro's social team had posted a photo on March 16th with Jensen,
18:20 Liao, and Supermicro's CEO Liao at its GTC booth.
18:24 Citron said, quote, "Cannot wait for Jensen Huang to try
18:27 and pretend he had no idea about Wally Liao's GPU smuggling operation.
18:32 I hope he tries to pretend they didn't talk much." End quote.
18:35 [music] The federal indictment came out on March 19th, 3 days later.
18:39 A few days after that, Supermicro deleted the Twitter post with Liao in it.
18:43 Nvidia has distanced itself from smuggling reports.
18:46 Jensen Huang has repeatedly done so to the extent of even just outright
18:51 denying that smuggling exists in any capacity in interviews when asked about it.
18:55 There's no evidence of any AI chip diversion.
18:58 Every so often somebody says, you know, these GPUs are being smuggled.
19:03 I really would love to see it.
19:04 People talk about smuggling, but it's incredibly hard to do.
19:07 And as we chase down every opportunity,
19:10 every single time that somebody's reported something,
19:13 and it's just not been true.
19:14 The Super Micro case where smugglers work
19:16 in Southeast Asia to get GPUs into China by working around regulators is one
19:22 of the exact scenarios that Nvidia has downplayed.
19:25 For example, in August 2025,
19:27 the Department of Justice arrested two Chinese nationals for shipping tens
19:31 of millions of dollars in export controlled AI chips to China.
19:34 Their operation concealed shipments to China by first exporting the chips
19:38 to shipping and freight forwarding companies in Singapore and Malaysia, it said.
19:42 In a statement published on TechCrunch, Nvidia said,
19:45 quote, "This case demonstrates that smuggling is a non-starter.
19:48 We primarily sell our products to well-known partners, including OEMs,
19:52 who help us ensure that all sales comply with US export control rules.
19:56 Even relatively small exporters and shipments
19:58 are subject to thorough review and scrutiny,
20:01 and any diverted products would have no service,
20:03 support, [music] or updates." End quote.
20:05 Except, it's not a non-starter.
20:08 Because an actual non-starter wouldn't start with being worth
20:11 tens of millions of dollars before even getting caught.
20:15 And that's just the ones that got caught.
20:16 Additionally, in November 2025, the government charged four people [music]
20:20 with conspiracy to violate US export control laws.
20:23 The government's indictment said the defendants communicated
20:26 with co-conspirators in Malaysia and Thailand to, quote,
20:29 "facilitate the transshipment of Nvidia GPUs exported
20:32 from the United States to the PRC." End quote.
20:35 In response to an inquiry about the case,
20:37 an Nvidia spokesperson told The Verge, quote,
20:39 "Even small sales of older generation products on the secondary
20:42 market are subject to strict scrutiny and review.
20:46 Trying to cobble together data centers from smuggled products is a non-starter,
20:50 both technically and economically.
20:52 Data centers are massive and complex systems,
20:55 making any smuggling extremely difficult and risky,
20:58 and we do not provide any support
20:59 or repairs for restricted products." End quote.
21:01 Nvidia repeatedly misrepresents the difficulty of smuggling, we think,
21:05 by leaning on the size and scale of data centers.
21:07 We think Nvidia sees GPU smuggling
21:09 as a significant credibility and reputational risk.
21:12 In an SEC filing from March 2026 that we dug up, Nvidia said,
21:16 quote, "While we seek to strictly
21:18 comply with all applicable export control regulators,
21:21 reports of diversion of controlled products,
21:23 even when unsubstantiated and untrue, may negatively impact our business,
21:28 relationships with partners and customers, and our reputation." End quote.
21:32 Nvidia's statements are catching up with them.
21:34 A few days after the government arrested the former Super Micro employees,
21:38 Senator Jim Banks, a Republican of Indiana, and Senator Elizabeth Warren,
21:42 a Democrat from Massachusetts,
21:43 asked known Epstein associate and Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick,
21:48 in a letter, to think twice about approving export licenses for Nvidia.
21:51 Dated March 23rd, the senators wrote, quote,
21:54 "We urge all necessary and appropriate actions,
21:56 including the immediate pausing, suspension,
21:58 or other reconsideration of all active export licenses covering advanced Nvidia
22:03 AI chips and server systems destined for the People's Republic of China,
22:07 as well as for intermediaries in Southeast Asia." End quote.
22:10 Additionally, the senators accused Nvidia and Jensen of misleading the public
22:15 about GPU smuggling and pointed to media reporting on the topic.
22:18 The two legislators wrote, quote,
22:20 "Claims that there was no evidence of a diversion appear to have been
22:23 part of a public relations posture designed
22:26 to protect Nvidia's export licenses." End quote.
22:29 They suggested the Department of Commerce look into whether
22:31 Nvidia's public statements and posture about the absence of, quote,
22:35 chip diversion were materially false
22:38 or misleading and whether those representations, statements,
22:41 or certifications influenced licensing decisions in a way
22:44 that warrants further investigation or referral." End quote.
22:47 The senatorial letter concluded by saying the Super Micro indictments,
22:50 quote, "raise serious questions about
22:52 Jensen Huang's public assurances." End quote.
22:55 Nvidia doubled down on its compliance measures in response.
22:58 On March 24th, Tom's Hardware quoted an Nvidia spokesperson who said quote,
23:03 "Strict compliance is a top priority for Nvidia.
23:05 We continue to work closely with our customers and the government
23:09 on compliance programs as export regulations have expanded." End quote.
23:12 Further, the outlet quoted Nvidia as saying quote,
23:15 "Unlawful diversion of controlled US computers to China
23:18 is a losing proposition across the board.
23:20 Nvidia does not provide any service or support for such
23:23 systems and the enforcement mechanisms are rigorous and effective." End quote.
23:27 But, this kind of ignores with the support and service
23:30 that there's a lot of money to be made.
23:32 One day later, the US government
23:34 announced more arrests for attempted GPU smuggling.
23:36 On March 25th, the Department of Justice charged
23:39 three people for conspiring to commit export control violations.
23:42 In a press release, the agency said the defendants are quote,
23:45 "Alleged to have sought millions of dollars
23:47 worth of export controlled computer chips
23:49 from a California-based computer hardware company for illegal
23:52 shipment to China through Thailand." End quote.
23:55 Ultimately, the defendants didn't ship any high-end GPUs to China that time.
23:59 Nvidia claimed victory in a statement to PC Mag saying quote,
24:03 "The complaint shows that our due diligence process worked well.
24:06 Despite several efforts,
24:07 the would-be smugglers failed to clear our diligence process
24:11 and did not receive GPUs from us." End quote.
24:13 It's sort of like the you can't fire me,
24:16 I quit approach to comment on the situation
24:19 where uh Nvidia takes every development in this case
24:24 and does its best to spin it as if
24:26 that's what their master 5D chess plan was all on.
24:30 But, the Department of Justice at this point,
24:33 it's arrested people for conspiring to violate US export controls.
24:36 It has arrested people for violating US export controls,
24:40 uh mostly relating to shipping high-end GPUs to China now on multiple occasions.
24:45 And a lot of these go back to August 2025.
24:49 The smuggling operations include extensive schemes
24:51 like with the former Supermicro employees,
24:54 and they also scale down to smaller operations like the back
24:57 of the Prius one that we showed in our documentary.
25:00 Yet, despite these developments, these arrests,
25:03 Nvidia has repeatedly distanced itself from smuggling
25:06 and claims over and over that it's a non-starter.
25:10 And often now using the phrase "fake news"
25:14 for some of its statements that it's put out.
25:15 So, we think it's a great time to revisit Jensen's wish.
25:19 Every so often somebody says, you know, these GPUs are being smuggled.
25:23 I really would love to see it.
25:25 The US government arrested someone whom Jensen
25:27 Huang was hanging out with just days before.
25:29 So, Jensen, we wonder if you'd love to see it now.
25:34 That's it for this one.
25:35 To get the full detail on this, again,
25:37 check out our smuggling documentary on GPUs from late last year.
25:42 It's actually still getting a lot of views.
25:43 Thank you all for that, especially after the whole getting Bloomberg situation.
25:46 But, shockingly relevant,
25:48 a lot of this is like real interesting timelines, you'll notice.
25:53 Around that timing, it was just just you know, it's just interesting.
25:59 So, you can subscribe for more.
26:01 You can go to store.gamersnexus.net to support us directly.
26:04 And right now we still have the code "puckgamersnexus" active
26:08 for 10% off for all the companies who say "puck us".
26:12 You can also go to patreon.com/gamersnexus to support us there.
26:15 Thanks for watching.
26:16 That's your update on the GPU smuggling situation following the documentary,
26:20 all the stuff that's happened since then, I mean.
26:22 And we'll see you all in the next one.