The Pitt Is The Best LEGAL DRAMA We’ve Ever Reviewed
LegalEagle
0:00 The Pit is a harrowing drama about doctors,
0:02 and it's also the most honest legal drama we've ever reviewed.
0:05 But the legal issues that underline the show's major plot lines do
0:09 not play out in real life entirely like they're depicted on screen.
0:12 So, let's lawyer up and get to work.
0:18 Do you know what this is?
0:20 Nope.
0:20 You ever seen anything like this before?
0:22 Nope.
0:22 Me neither.
0:24 Well, that just goes to show you how old I am.
0:26 This looks like measles.
0:28 Many people get better on their own like Georgia.
0:30 However, as many as one in 20 kids
0:32 that get measles get pneumonia, like your son.
0:35 Are your children vaccinated against measles?
0:39 No.
0:38 The MMR vaccine is perfectly safe.
0:41 Measles is not.
0:43 I've read about kids who've been paralyzed from a spinal tap.
0:45 There is zero risk of paralysis.
0:47 He could die from this.
0:48 One in five.
0:49 Do the spinal tap.
0:51 No.
0:51 Can't you just give him steroids without the spinal tap?
0:54 If there's no Adam, the steroids could suppress his immune system,
0:57 making it harder to fight off the pneumonia.
0:59 But it says here that
1:00 Can you put your damn phone away?
1:02 Your son is critically ill.
1:04 The longer that we wait, the higher the risk of permanent brain damage.
1:07 What is not clear here,
1:08 Hillary?
1:09 He has a tube down his throat.
1:10 He can't breathe on his poking holes in my son's spine.
1:14 Wow.
1:15 What the hell is this?
1:16 These are the people from the Pitfest shooting that we couldn't save today.
1:21 We couldn't save them.
1:23 But we can still save your son.
1:27 You're an[ __] Dad calls Dr.
1:28 Robbie an[ __] but he changed his mind.
1:30 When the boy's mother leaves the room,
1:32 the father consents to the procedure, and the ER team springs into action.
1:36 And here we hit our first legal question.
1:38 Can one parent consent over the other parents objection?
1:41 Here's the rule.
1:42 In most states, including Pennsylvania,
1:43 either parent can independently consent to medical treatment for a minor child.
1:47 This is called the one parent consent rule.
1:49 It exists for an extremely practical reason.
1:51 If you needed both parents to sign off on every medical decision,
1:54 every divorced couple in America would be creating a medical emergency.
1:57 Every time their kid needed stitches at 2 a.m.
1:59 and one parent wasn't answering the phone.
2:01 So, when dad overrides mom and consents to the spinal tap,
2:04 he's on solid legal ground.
2:05 One parents yes is legally sufficient,
2:08 even when the other parent is actively saying no.
2:10 The exception would be if there's a custody order
2:12 that specifically allocates medical decision-making authority to one parent,
2:15 but unless they have that kind of order, either parent can authorize treatment.
2:19 The spinal tap happens.
2:20 The child survives the immediate crisis, but mom is not happy.
2:24 If you think the malpractice case is messy,
2:26 wait until the family court filing lands.
2:28 Paging divorce lawyers stat.
2:30 There's potential criminal liability, too.
2:32 A parent commits the crime of endangering the welfare of a child in Pennsylvania
2:35 when they knowingly endanger the welfare of a child by violating a duty of care,
2:39 protection, or support.
2:40 This shows up most prominently in the medical context with faith healing,
2:43 parents who refuse to give needed medical care to a child who then dies.
2:47 This can also happen specifically in Pennsylvania with certain groups like
2:50 the Amish who don't actually have a religious objection to modern medical care.
2:54 Instead, for them, it's more about cultural and religious mores
2:57 and folkways about reaching outside of the community for medical care.
3:00 Either way, there's no religious
3:02 or cultural exemption to Pennsylvania's criminal law.
3:05 But in The Pit, Dad ends up bailing himself and his wife
3:08 out because the threatened harm is eliminated by dad choosing the spinal tab.
3:12 This job's really important to me and my sister unites to support both of us.
3:16 It's going to go great.
3:17 Just tell him what happened.
3:18 You're not at fault.
3:19 Your job's not in jeopardy.
3:20 I mean, the lawyer said that I can
3:23 lawyer's job is to try and shake your confidence, so don't let them.
3:25 You're a very good doctor.
3:27 I have been training residents for years.
3:29 You are one of the very best.
3:31 When we get to season 2,
3:32 we find out mom has sued the hospital and the doctors who performed
3:34 the spinal tap in a civil malpractice suit because her son has brain damage.
3:38 Dr.
3:38 Mel King and Dr.
3:39 Ellis are named as defendants.
3:41 We don't know much about the nature of his brain
3:43 damage except for the warnings the doctors gave during season 1,
3:46 but I'm skeptical about the merits of the underlying claim.
3:49 Did the lumbar puncture cause the injury?
3:51 And would we even know for sure less than a year later?
3:54 A spinal tap has known risks and you generally can't
3:56 sue for a known inherent risk that was properly disclosed.
3:59 Now, a person can argue that a medical procedure caused
4:02 harm even when that procedure was the standard of care.
4:05 They can argue that it was performed negligently or that this particular
4:08 patient wasn't a good candidate or that something went wrong in execution.
4:11 This is harder than it sounds.
4:13 In Pennsylvania, as in most states,
4:15 you need a certificate of merit from a physician verifying that there
4:18 is a legitimate basis for the claim before it can proceed.
4:21 While you may think that it's easy to find
4:22 some quack doctor to give a certificate of merit, it's actually not that simple.
4:26 Medical malpractice cases are complex and timeconuming.
4:29 The medmal lawyer that has to foot the bill for that.
4:31 And if the doctor charges $750 an hour, the charges rack up quickly.
4:35 But here's the part that is going to haunt me.
4:37 I'm looking for Dr.
4:38 Mel King.
4:42 Yes.
4:42 I'm Morgan Styles, one of the hospital's attorneys.
4:44 I'm here to escort you upstairs for your deposition.
4:46 The deposition is scheduled for July 4th.
4:49 July 4th during her shift.
4:52 Nobody in the legal profession is working on the 4th of July except possibly
4:55 to write strongly worded emails about why they
4:57 shouldn't be working on the 4th of July.
4:59 And let's talk about the timeline.
5:00 It's been compressed to the point of legal fantasy.
5:03 The injury manifested in September of 2025.
5:06 The depositions are happening less than a year later.
5:09 That's way too soon.
5:10 Realistically, we're talking 2 years before deposition.
5:13 Hey, just wanted to let you know that Scout filmed an entire
5:15 segment about the most talked about scene in season 2 of The Pit.
5:18 That is of course charged nurse Dana performing a forensic
5:21 rape kit procedure on a victim of sexual assault.
5:24 And yes, we are worried that even
5:26 accurately describing that scene will get this entire
5:28 video demonetized because we don't pull punches
5:30 and we don't use euphemisms around here.
5:32 So our legal analysis is often something
5:34 we cannot actually talk about on YouTube.
5:36 But you can watch all of it plus hours of additional
5:38 exclusive content ad free and early by signing up for Nebula,
5:41 the sponsor of today's video.
5:43 Nebula is the streaming service that my friends and I built where
5:45 you can watch all the content from your favorite creators like Jetlag,
5:48 Maggie May Fish, Real Engineering, Philosophy Tube,
5:50 Real Life Lore, and of course, Legal Eagle.
5:52 All adree and early.
5:54 Plus, watch countless Nebula exclusive videos made with love, time,
5:57 effort, and increased budgets that you won't find on YouTube.
6:00 I highly recommend you check out Lindsay Ellis's original documentary,
6:02 The Macob World of Police Body Cam YouTube.
6:05 It's a fascinating expose on how this wildly popular genre
6:08 of true crime content is altering social attitudes about law and policing.
6:12 and check out our exclusive videos about how to abolish ICE,
6:14 the wild and forgotten attempts to ban booze in America, and how RFK Jr.
6:18 can and cannot legally ban vaccines.
6:20 But the only place you can watch these videos is on Nebula.
6:22 In fact, every Legal Eagle video we make is an extended cut on Nebula,
6:26 like the legal analysis of improv comedy scenes I did with Brennan Lee
6:29 Mulligan or my beatdown of Kim
6:30 Kardashian's hilariously bad legal drama All's Fair.
6:33 Both contain a ton of more insight and hilarious
6:35 moments that we had to cut from the YouTube version.
6:37 And if you use my link or code, you can get 50% off an annual subscription.
6:41 So, that's a year's worth of the best content for only $30,
6:43 or you can get 40% off a lifetime of Nebula.
6:46 Pay once for $300 and then never again.
6:48 It truly is the best deal of all.
6:50 Either way, you can click or scan
6:51 now to continue watching Legal Eagle on Nebula, or I'll see you in court.
6:55 But season 2, episode 7,
6:57 Mel waits pensively for her deposition scheduled for 2028
7:00 while concerning noises come from her sister's bedroom,
7:03 is not the television anyone wants to make or watch.
7:06 Working on the 4th of July, though, eh, that's a doctor thing.
7:09 But after her deposition, Dr.
7:10 Ellis finds Dr.
7:11 Mel and they have this critical exchange.
7:13 I just finished my deposition.
7:16 Oh.
7:16 Um, should I go up now?
7:18 Yeah, just wait until you get a call.
7:21 Okay.
7:21 Well, I'd ask how it went, but we're not supposed to discuss the case.
7:25 This isn't a discussion.
7:26 It's a monologue.
7:27 So, shut up and listen.
7:30 The malpractice case is frivolous.
7:32 The mother of the misel's kid claims we
7:33 caused intellectual decline by performing a spinal tap,
7:37 but the tap was perfect with no complications.
7:40 Her son presented with altered mental status
7:42 due to low oxygen from measles pneumonia.
7:45 Any change in intellect was due to hypoxic brain injury.
7:48 It had nothing to do with your spinal tap.
7:51 End of monologue.
7:53 We never discussed the case.
7:56 I got to get some sleep.
7:58 Thanks, I guess.
8:02 So, did either of these doctors commit a crime?
8:04 A few things here.
8:06 There's no absolute prohibition on witnesses discussing depositions,
8:09 but it is standard practice for attorneys to instruct clients
8:12 not to do exactly this before the other witnesses testified.
8:15 The reason is exactly what you'd expect.
8:17 If witness A tells witness B what she was asked,
8:20 witness B can shape her own answers so they align.
8:22 But in Dr.
8:23 Ellis's defense, Dr.
8:24 Mel's own attorneys would have prepared her before her deposition.
8:27 They would have walked her through the allegations, the theory of the case,
8:30 what the plaintiff is trying to prove in the defense's theory of the case.
8:33 So Ellis telling her that the spinal tap was
8:35 perfectly executed and that any change in the child's
8:37 intellect was caused by hypoxic brain injury rather
8:40 than the spinal tap isn't exactly a revelation.
8:42 It's their legal defense and the lawyers
8:44 would have already prepared her for that.
8:46 At least we hope that's what they did.
8:49 Excuse me.
8:51 Um, she took a nasty fall.
8:53 Her shoulder screamed in pain when we put the ties on.
8:55 Hello, I'm Dr.
8:56 Rabinovich.
8:56 This is Dr.
8:57 McKay.
8:58 Agents Koreah and Russo.
9:00 She needs to be looked at before we process her.
9:03 What's your name, ma'am?
9:07 Anita, we're going to take care of you.
9:09 Okay.
9:09 What's that mean?
9:10 That means that she's going to require an X-ray.
9:12 It's most likely a rotator cuff tear,
9:14 which sometimes could come with a fracture.
9:15 We need an X-ray to rule it out.
9:17 How long's that going to take?
9:19 Our computers are down today.
9:21 Everything's moving a little slower than usual, but we will fasttrack her.
9:24 Is there anyone you want us to call?
9:26 Anita,
9:26 no phone calls.
9:31 I do not want these guys here any longer than they need to be.
9:33 So, let's find X-ray and fast track this one.
9:35 Her family might be worried.
9:36 Maybe I can call them.
9:37 No, no, no.
9:38 Just stay with her.
9:39 Make sure she has everything she needs.
9:40 We treat her injury and that's it.
9:42 Okay.
9:42 This is unfortunately a realistic portrayal of what's
9:45 happening in hospitals all over the country right now.
9:47 On January 20th, 2025, the Trump administration rescended biden
9:51 era policies that protected sensitive locations,
9:53 including hospitals, clinics, schools,
9:55 and places of worship from routine immigration enforcement.
9:58 ICE agents were previously instructed to avoid
10:00 conducting arrests and raids in those areas.
10:03 After the policies were rescended,
10:04 hospitals became battlegrounds for immigration enforcement.
10:08 ICE agents in plain clothes have arrested patients inside hospitals and clinics.
10:11 They've handcuffed public officials like Chicago City Councilman Jesse Fuentes,
10:15 who is seen here asking whether they have a warrant.
10:17 They arrested two California hospital workers
10:19 and accused them of interfering with ICE.
10:21 So, how did the show handle the legal issues?
10:23 We just need to treat her, even if she's undocumented.
10:26 All patients, regardless of immigration status,
10:28 have the right to emergency care under MTA.
10:31 Dana accurately described the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act or MTA,
10:35 which requires any hospital receiving Medicare funding,
10:37 which is essentially every hospital in the country,
10:40 to provide stabilizing care to anyone who comes through the door,
10:42 regardless of immigration status, regardless of insurance,
10:45 regardless of ability to pay.
10:47 So, Prrenita has a legal right to be treated.
10:50 Okay, time for you to go.
10:52 I was just having to chat when Spear's here.
10:55 You can see how busy this department is, right?
10:57 You've been nothing but a distraction and a disruption since you've been here.
10:59 I'm already short staffed and I just lost five nurses
11:02 and half my environmental services team because you walked in.
11:05 You know, patients come in here for help, right?
11:07 Because they're either sick or they're injured and documented or undocumented.
11:10 They have a right to emergency care.
11:12 TB, measles, fractures,
11:14 none of us getting treated cuz everybody's too scared to come in.
11:16 But then they end up here anyway.
11:17 But then it's too[ __] late.
11:18 So please, for the love of God, can you just go wait over there in the room
11:21 with your detainees so I don't lose any more patients or staff?
11:25 The interaction between Agent Russo and the hospital clerk is a HIPPA minefield.
11:29 Hospital staff cannot disclose patient information to ICE without something,
11:33 a subpoena or warrant, patient consent, a written administrative request,
11:37 or a specific exception for imminent serious harm.
11:40 An immigration status does not qualify as imminent serious harm.
11:43 So, if the agent is trying to get information about her medical status,
11:46 the staff has a legal obligation to refuse
11:48 unless one of those conditions are met.
11:50 They can discharge her or notify the agent that she's being discharged,
11:54 but that's really it.
11:56 Come on, she's cleared to go.
11:59 But hold on.
12:00 She needs a slave.
12:01 This only take a minute.
12:02 We're leaving.
12:03 Hey, man.
12:03 You're hurting her.
12:07 Jesus Christ.
12:07 What's going on now?
12:10 Robbie, get your HEARD HER AND JESSE STEPPED IN.
12:13 I DIDN'T DO[ __] The writers probably base this event
12:16 on the two California healthcare workers
12:17 who are facing felony obstruction charges.
12:19 In this episode, the conflict started when the doctor
12:22 and nurse indicate that the treatment wasn't complete.
12:24 Jesse stepped in, but they didn't show us what happened after he said,
12:27 "You're hurting her." Whether Jesse was obstructing
12:29 ICE and the legitimate performance of their duties
12:31 is a fact-specific inquiry that the writers chose to leave to our imagination.
12:35 In the United States,
12:36 nearly 2.8 million healthcare workers are legal immigrants.
12:39 Of that group, tens of thousands are in the US on temporary protected status.
12:43 That means they are in the country
12:44 legally and shouldn't be detained or deported.
12:47 But in 2025 and 2026,
12:49 ISIS detained people on TPS and some of them are held for weeks.
12:53 So, it's not far-fetched for the show to depict
12:55 fear by the staff as well as the patients.
12:57 And it's not illegal for them to walk
12:59 away from their workplace because they're afraid of ICE.
13:01 It's no different from taking a long lunch or smoking break in the parking lot.
13:05 Of course, the hospital could fire them,
13:07 but the healthcare industry faces a real shortage of skilled workers.
13:10 So, hospitals don't have much room to terminate staff under those circumstances.
13:14 Now, for a story line with two distinct
13:16 legal problems layered on top of each other.
13:18 The patient here is Christy,
13:20 a 17-year-old from Tennessee who's traveled to Pittsburgh
13:22 with her aunt Lynette to get a medication abortion.
13:25 No, what would have been helpful is TELLING ME THAT MY DAUGHTER IS PREGNANT.
13:28 INSTEAD, I FIND OUT FROM A CONFUSED teenage boy.
13:31 Jackson told you?
13:32 Yeah, he did.
13:33 Oh, everything okay in here?
13:34 This is Mrs.
13:35 Wheeler, Christiey's mother.
13:36 Lynette is Christiey's aunt.
13:38 She doesn't want to have THIS BABY.
13:40 THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU.
13:42 NO, I CALLED.
13:44 OKAY.
13:44 I don't want to be a teen mom.
13:47 You're going to what?
13:47 Give my daughter the abortion I've forbidden.
13:50 Hey, what's going on?
13:50 And she is at that moment legally correct.
13:53 Pennsylvania requires parental consent for a minor's abortion.
13:56 There is an exception called a judicial bypass,
13:59 which allows a minor to petition a judge
14:01 privately for permission to proceed without parental involvement.
14:04 But Christy didn't do that.
14:05 her aunt brought her in and the aunt would have to falsify
14:08 legal forms claiming to be her mother for this to work.
14:10 The show acknowledges the parental consent requirement directly
14:13 when the mother arrives and Collins confirms it.
14:15 When the mother ultimately changes her mind and gives consent,
14:18 the immediate legal problem resolves.
14:20 So, the show papers over the falsification
14:22 issue by making it unnecessary in hindsight.
14:24 But everything that happened before the mother consented was proceeding
14:27 on falsified documentation or false
14:29 info and without legal parental authorization.
14:32 And the legal ramifications don't stop there.
14:34 Christy is from Tennessee,
14:35 which has one of the strictest abortion bans in the country.
14:38 Parts of the law are being challenged in court, but as it stands right now,
14:42 it is still illegal to physically help a minor go
14:44 across state lines to obtain an abortion without parental consent.
14:47 Tennessee calls this abortion trafficking.
14:50 Someone convicted could face nearly a year in jail,
14:52 fines, and a civil lawsuit on top of it.
14:54 If you want to know more about abortion laws and a real
14:56 doctor's take on abortion and the pit, check out Mama Dr.
14:59 Jones's video about this episode.
15:01 These are Abbott's fetal measurements from yesterday, and these are mine.
15:06 105 and 112.
15:08 Well, ultrasound is an art, not a science.
15:10 Even in the very best hands,
15:12 the EGA differential can be within 3 to 5 days in the first trimester.
15:15 Definitely room for error.
15:16 Not if you're here for a medication abortion,
15:18 you're past the mandated 11we cut off.
15:21 I didn't get a single measurement under 11 weeks.
15:23 So, what are you saying?
15:24 That Abbott lowballed his measurements to help
15:26 a teen get the abortion that she wants?
15:29 Maybe.
15:30 Well, then you've got two choices.
15:31 You can go with Abbott's measurements, or you can redo your measurements,
15:34 go back in and pick an angle that shows 11 weeks or less.
15:37 Please tell me you're joking.
15:38 I love you, Dr.
15:39 Robbie, but falsifying medical records is a serious state and federal crime,
15:42 and he could lose his license because of it.
15:44 Dr.
15:45 Collins refuses precisely because she understands the stakes.
15:48 Does the audience sympathize with him?
15:50 Well, of course.
15:50 The show frames it that way deliberately.
15:52 Abbott falsifies records the night before.
15:54 Robbie falsified records again in the morning.
15:57 and Collins eventually deleted her own documentation on Robbie's instruction.
16:00 That's three physicians exposed to criminal liability
16:03 and medical board proceedings on a single patient.
16:06 They created a lot of evidence that could come back to haunt them.
16:09 But one more thing the show gets wrong is in the specifics.
16:11 It says 11 weeks is the Pennsylvania limit for medication abortion.
16:15 In reality, Pennsylvania law at the time
16:17 permitted surgical abortion up to 24 weeks.
16:20 So that was still a potential option for this patient.
16:22 The FDA approved limit for medication abortion is
16:24 10 weeks with some clinical guidelines extending to 11.
16:28 Either way, the 11we figure is simply
16:30 a clinical guideline for medication abortion specifically,
16:32 not a statutory limit.
16:34 A surgical abortion at 12 or 13 weeks would have been entirely legal.
16:38 Nobody in that hospital mentions this option.
16:40 Do you know where your son is now?
16:43 No, but he hasn't done anything.
16:45 Officer, why are you here?
16:46 We received the call that her son David has
16:48 created a list of girls he would like to eliminate.
16:51 Who called you?
16:53 Do you know anything about this list?
16:55 Somebody called you.
16:56 Who?
16:56 Somebody from my hospital.
17:00 Uh, Dr.
17:00 McKay.
17:01 This thread plays out in the background of season 1,
17:04 and the show manages to get the nuances just right.
17:07 What happens when someone makes written threats in a private diary?
17:10 Legally, it's a gray area.
17:12 The starting point is Terasoft V.
17:14 regents of the University of California,
17:15 which says clinicians may have a duty to warn or protect
17:18 when a patient poses a credible threat to identifiable victims.
17:22 On paper, this looks like a clean case.
17:24 A list of names likely satisfies the identifiable victim's requirement.
17:28 But that's only half the test.
17:30 The legal question isn't whether someone is threatened.
17:32 It's whether a reasonable clinician would believe harm is serious
17:35 and imminent based on what they know at that moment,
17:38 which requires them to think about things like how specific the threat is,
17:41 whether the person has access to weapons, and their immediate behavior.
17:45 When we're talking about a teenager drawing up a hit list,
17:47 it's often hard to know whether the person is making a real actionable
17:51 threat or just trying their hand at edging some bad edge lord poetry.
17:55 You might say common sense dictates we heir on the side of caution,
17:58 but that's not what the law says.
18:00 I talked about this in my video
18:01 about the Michigan teenager who killed four students.
18:03 There were serious issues in that case about
18:05 whether his parents or teachers should have intervened.
18:08 The more important consideration for the doctors of the pit,
18:10 is who actually has the duty.
18:12 Terasoft comes out of mental health treatment.
18:15 ER physicians are in a more ambiguous position,
18:17 especially under Pennsylvania law,
18:19 which generally requires a specific and immediate
18:21 threat before a duty to warn is triggered.
18:23 That arguably gives Robbie some legal cover for hesitating.
18:27 So, what are they supposed to do?
18:28 Well, there are a number of steps they
18:30 can take from warning potential victims to contacting police.
18:33 They landed on a temporary psychiatric hold,
18:35 which is legally defensible because it removes
18:37 the immediate risk without breaching confidentiality more than necessary.
18:41 To call a 302 in the state of Pennsylvania,
18:44 the petitioner needs to admit to having witnessed the concerning behavior.
18:47 And you need a physician and a social worker to sign off,
18:51 which both Kar and I can do.
18:54 What if I'm wrong?
18:56 then you apologize and we will help you
18:59 explain that this came from concern for his safety.
19:01 The show did a good job of illustrating the legal
19:03 tension here because both acting and not acting carry risk.
19:07 Move too slowly and you risk liability if harm was foreseeable.
19:10 Act too aggressively and you risk violating Dr.
19:12 patient confidentiality or overreacting to a threat that wasn't real.
19:16 Hi David, I didn't shoot anybody.
19:24 I wouldn't do that.
19:25 I know.
19:33 Did you make a list of girls you wanted to hurt?
19:38 Where's my mom?
19:39 Did you make a list?
19:40 I want to go home.
19:42 You're going to get to go home.
19:44 But first, we have to keep you here for a mandatory 72-hour hold.
19:48 What?
19:48 The show's final twist is I'll give you 3 seconds to click
19:51 way to this time code if you don't want it spoiled.
19:54 We good?
19:54 Our adorable little edge lord David is not the pitfest shooter.
19:58 Robbiey's caution looks vindicated.
20:00 Legally though, the outcome doesn't matter.
20:02 The law doesn't judge outcomes.
20:03 It judges whether the response was reasonable given what was known at the time.
20:07 But you'd be hardressed to find a prosecutor willing to go
20:09 after a doctor for not detaining a potential mass shooter who wasn't.
20:12 Which is why the story line perfectly illustrates why
20:15 mandatory disclosure cases are so difficult in real life.
20:18 It's not about who was right.
20:20 It's about how hard it is to evaluate whether someone
20:22 poses an imminent credible threat to the safety of others.
20:25 Now, let's talk about Dr.
20:27 Langden.
20:27 Because this storyline is a legal onion,
20:30 every layer you peel back reveals another layer, and all of them sting.
20:34 I heard there's been some inconsistencies with meds intended for your patients.
20:41 What?
20:42 Frank, have you been helping yourself to benzo from the ER?
20:47 Yeah, I've been stealing blood, too.
20:53 I asked you a question.
20:55 Wait, are you serious?
20:57 What are you doing?
21:00 Really?
21:02 Santos?
21:04 Whatever the hell she told you is[ __] I didn't mention Santos.
21:10 You didn't have to.
21:12 I told you she is trouble.
21:15 Have you ever taken a patient's medication?
21:18 This is insane.
21:19 This is completely[ __] insane.
21:20 I need you to open your locker.
21:21 Yeah, right.
21:22 Open your locker.
21:23 You're going to rig.
21:24 Open your[ __] locker or I will have security smash it open.
21:49 Is the imprint code on these pills going to match Louis lirium?
21:59 Go home, Frank.
22:00 Dr.
22:00 Langden stealing a patient's benzoazipene pills
22:02 leads us in five different directions simultaneously.
22:06 One, is the hospital required to report the theft to police?
22:08 Well, under Pennsylvania law, a hospital is not automatically required
22:12 to report employee theft to law enforcement.
22:14 It's not like mandated reporting for child
22:16 abuse where the law creates an affirmative obligation.
22:19 We saw that in season 1 when a child ate dad's cannabis gummies,
22:22 the hospital had to report.
22:23 However, if those pills are controlled substances,
22:26 we've entered federal territory.
22:27 The Controlled Substances Act creates DEA reporting obligations.
22:31 Hospitals are registered with the DEA to handle controlled substances,
22:34 and significant discrepancies in controlled substance inventories,
22:37 like drugs going missing because a physician helped himself,
22:40 trigger mandatory reporting to the DEA.
22:42 And if they fail, fines can be steep.
22:44 Two California medical centers had to fork over
22:46 $2.2 million in fines for over 600 recordkeeping discrepancies.
22:51 The hospital doesn't have to call local police,
22:53 but they have to account for the missing medications in their DEA records.
22:56 And once the DEA is involved, law enforcement is effectively in the picture
23:00 whether the hospital wanted it or not.
23:02 Short answer, the hospital probably doesn't have to call 911,
23:05 but it absolutely cannot pretend this didn't happen.
23:07 Two, are they required to report to the state medical board?
23:10 Well, this one is clearer.
23:11 Pennsylvania's medical practice act requires institutions
23:14 to report disciplinary actions taken against physicians.
23:17 If the hospital took any action against Langden,
23:19 like suspension or mandatory leave,
23:21 that action itself triggers a report to the board.
23:23 A doctor stealing patient medication checks that box with a Sharpie.
23:27 Probably one of those extra fat Sharpies.
23:29 And once the board knows, Langden is looking at a formal investigation.
23:33 Potential outcomes range from a reprimand
23:35 to suspension to full license revocation.
23:37 Three, what about the physician health program?
23:39 But here's where it gets so much more interesting than most people realize.
23:42 If Langden's pill theft is connected to a substance abuse issue,
23:45 and a physician stealing control substances from a patient
23:47 is a blazing neon sign pointing toward addiction,
23:50 then there's a parallel track that exists specifically for this situation,
23:54 the Physician Health Program, or PHP.
23:56 Every state has some version of a PHP.
23:59 In Pennsylvania, it's called the Professional Health Monitoring Program.
24:02 These programs exist because the medical profession decided
24:04 that criminalizing addiction wasn't always the best practice.
24:07 Sometimes impaired physicians need a pathway back to safe practice.
24:11 So, this program gets the doctor into treatment
24:13 where they're rigorously monitored before and after treatment.
24:15 The PHP happens outside the public disciplinary process.
24:19 A PHP doesn't immunize a doctor from criminal liability.
24:22 If a doctor isn't ruled,
24:23 compliance with the program can mitigate criminal penalties.
24:26 It cuts the other way, too.
24:27 If the doctor doesn't comply or continues to practice while impaired,
24:30 prosecutors could ask for more severe penalties.
24:33 Four, does the hospital have to tell his colleagues?
24:36 Santos and Langdon have beef because she's
24:37 the one who turned him for taking meds.
24:39 I'm sorry, what?
24:41 Short answer, no.
24:42 Because PHP participation is confidential.
24:45 When Langden entered the PHP,
24:46 he became a patient receiving treatment for substance use.
24:49 HIPPA protections apply to Langden.
24:51 So, a physician who voluntarily enters a PHP before formal
24:54 board action can avoid having the matter become a public record.
24:57 But this conversation was about him stealing pills from a patient, which Dr.
25:00 Robbie probably shouldn't have blurted out.
25:02 What he did was confirm that Langden committed a crime,
25:05 which doesn't go to his treatment status.
25:07 So when a colleague asks,
25:08 "Why wasn't I told?" The frustrating but legally correct answer
25:11 is because you don't have a right to be told.
25:13 The hospital's obligation is to ensure
25:15 patient safety through appropriate restrictions,
25:17 not to circulate the details of why those restrictions exist.
25:20 Maddening from a collegial trust standpoint, absolutely.
25:24 Legally correct, also absolutely.
25:26 But there's one really important exception.
25:28 If Langden's impairment creates a patient safety risk,
25:31 the hospital must restrict his practice.
25:33 So that brings us to legal issue number five.
25:35 Can he ethically treat the same patient he stole from 10 months ago?
25:39 I'm sorry.
25:39 It was uh was not only wrong and utterly unprofessional,
25:44 but it was a betrayal of my hypocratic oath, and it was a[ __] crime.
25:49 This is an almost textbook conflict of interest.
25:51 The ethical answer is no.
25:53 He can't treat Lewis, even if he apologized and confessed.
25:55 That might be one of the 12 steps, but it doesn't erase the ethical problem.
25:59 The AMA code of medical ethics is clear that physicians must avoid
26:02 situations where personal interests compromise
26:04 or even appear to compromise patient care.
26:07 A physician who stole medication from a specific patient
26:10 has fundamentally breached the trust relationship with that patient.
26:13 The doctor patient relationship is basically fiduciary.
26:16 You owe your patient loyalty, honesty, and care.
26:18 You cannot simultaneously be the person who violated that trust
26:22 and the person they're supposed to trust with their health.
26:24 Beyond the ethics, there's a practical legal exposure.
26:26 If anything goes wrong with that patient's care,
26:29 even something completely unrelated to the theft,
26:31 the fact that Langden stole from this patient and then continued treating them,
26:34 becomes exhibit A in the malpractice case.
26:37 Ladies and gentlemen of the jury,
26:39 this is the doctor who stole my client's medication
26:41 and then continued treating her as though nothing happened.
26:44 The hospital should have reassigned the patient immediately.
26:46 Langdon continuing to treat the same patient he stole from is
26:49 a failure of institutional safeguards
26:51 on top of the individual ethical violation.
26:54 Lastly, when Langden took the benzo pills,
26:56 he committed two misdemeanors under Pennsylvania law.
26:58 First, possession of a controlled substance,
27:00 and second, theft by unlawful taking.
27:02 Now, being charged with and convicted of misdemeanor isn't good for a doctor,
27:06 but it may not be as professionally and personally devastating as a felony.
27:10 And he probably avoids a felony.
27:12 There is a felony for acquiring a controlled substance through subtuge.
27:16 And that sounds like it might capture Langden's theft.
27:19 But in a 2002 case, the Pennsylvania Superior Court held that a pharmacist who
27:23 secretly pocketed some hydrocodone isn't acquiring that controlled
27:26 substance by subtrauge or deception or fraud.
27:28 It's just plain old theft.
27:30 So, good for Langden, I guess.
27:45 In the state of Pennsylvania,
27:46 it's not illegal to drive a motorcycle without a helmet so
27:48 long as you're 21 or older and you have either been licensed
27:51 to operate a motorcycle for at least two full calendar years
27:53 or have completed a pendot or motorcycle
27:56 safety foundation approved motorcycle safety course.
27:58 But you should always wear one.
28:00 You're not Dr.
28:01 Robbie or Maverick.
28:07 So, here's where I come down.
28:08 Dr.
28:08 Mike called The Pit the most legally accurate medical show of all time.
28:11 It also happens to be by a significant margin
28:14 the most legally literate medical drama currently on television.
28:17 It's not perfect that July 4th deposition is going to follow me to my grave.
28:21 But it names real statutes.
28:23 It depicts genuine tensions between patient rights,
28:25 institutional obligations, and law enforcement authority.
28:28 It reflects the current legal reality we all now live
28:30 in as experienced by real world doctors and healthcare workers.
28:34 And it does all of it without preaching
28:35 a message or nagging the audience to do better.
28:38 Hell, most legal dramas treat the law as an obstacle
28:41 the writers and producers have to heroically overcome.
28:43 I'm looking at you, Ryan Murphy, and all fair.
28:45 But The Pit treats law as part of the actual environment these people work in.
28:49 The law protects them, fails them,
28:50 and often forces them into choices that don't have any good answers.
28:54 That's reality.
28:55 And that's why I'm giving the show
28:56 an overall legal accuracy score of a not perfect,
29:00 but the fact that I'm even grading it
29:02 on a curve with reality instead of just laughing at it,
29:05 that tells you something.
29:06 Now, all this highlights why it's so important to get
29:08 a great lawyer when you're dealing with your own case.
29:10 Now, after I started this channel,
29:11 every week I'd get hundreds of comments and emails
29:13 from viewers who are dealing with legal problems,
29:15 and they'd ask, "Can you help me find a lawyer?
29:18 How do I know if this attorney is any
29:19 good?" And there's a massive gap in our justice system.
29:21 is that people don't know how to find
29:22 the right lawyer for their specific situation.
29:25 They're scared.
29:26 They're overwhelmed.
29:26 And they end up doing nothing or hiring the first attorney who calls them back.
29:30 And that really bothered me.
29:31 So, I started to wonder, what if there was a different way?
29:34 What if we could build a law firm that actually lived
29:35 up to the values that I talk about on this channel?
29:38 Transparency, accessibility,
29:39 and putting clients first instead of chasing billable hours.
29:42 A firm where you don't need to pay anything upfront and your lawyers
29:44 only get paid if you do to maximize your opportunity for justice.
29:47 So, a few years ago, I decided to fix that problem.
29:49 I decided to start my own personal injury law firm.
29:52 And honestly, it wasn't an easy choice.
29:54 But I realized I was in this unique position.
29:56 I had this platform, this community, and the experience.
29:58 Not to get rich.
29:59 Trust me, there are easier ways to make money than starting a law practice.
30:03 But we did it because access to justice shouldn't be a luxury.
30:06 Because finding the right legal representation shouldn't
30:08 feel like playing Russian roulette with your future.
30:10 And when you work with my firm, you're not just getting a lawyer.
30:12 You're getting a team that understands that behind
30:13 every case is a real person with real stakes.
30:15 If we can't represent you or you're in a state where we don't practice,
30:18 we'll take the time to try to match you
30:19 with an attorney in my personal network of lawyers.
30:21 A national network of some of the best lawyers
30:23 in the country who actually specialize in what you're going through,
30:26 located right where you are, not just whoever happens to be available.
30:29 So, if you're dealing with a personal injury,
30:31 a car crash, a data breach, sexual harassment,
30:33 a social security or workers comp issue,
30:35 give us a call at the number on screen or click on the link below.
30:38 Now, I can't represent everyone that watches this channel.
30:40 I wish I could, but what I can do is make sure that when you need legal help,
30:43 you have somewhere to turn to that you can trust.
30:46 So whether it's me handling your case
30:47 or the incredible attorneys we partnered with, you'll
30:49 get the same principles of honesty and education that we bring to every video.
30:52 And if you're dealing with a legal issue and you're not sure where to start,
30:55 check out the link in the description.
30:56 Let's have a conversation about how we can help you find not just a lawyer,
30:59 but the right lawyer for your situation.
31:01 Because at the end of the day, that's what this is all about.
31:03 Making sure that when life gets complicated, you don't have to face it alone.
31:06 Which is why when you need a lawyer,
31:07 you don't just need legal team, you need the Eagle