The Story of Galaxy Clusters (and Abell 1) - Deep Sky Videos
DeepSkyVideos
0:00 we are making a video about Abel 1 since
0:03 we finished the messia catalog I thought
0:05 I would follow the lead of my lustrious
0:08 colleague Professor Maryfield who's
0:10 branched out into looking at other
0:13 cataloges the obvious catalog for me to
0:16 talk about is the one that I've probably
0:18 used the most in my career which is the
0:21 Abel catalog of Galaxy clusters and I
0:24 thought I'd go and figure out what Abel
0:26 one was because it wasn't one I was
0:28 familiar with so the a catalog isn't a
0:31 catalog of individual objects it's
0:33 clusters yeah so the cluster is the
0:36 object but it's a concentration of
0:39 objects a concentration of galaxies and
0:41 just like with the Messier catalog if we
0:44 have a list of these things we can go
0:46 off and do exciting things with them
0:48 there's a lot of history in this video
0:52 um and it was really really interesting
0:54 for me to go away and read about this
0:56 because it all starts from the Palomar
1:00 Sky survey so this is a big survey that
1:03 took place at the Palmer observatory in
1:06 Southern California in the 1950s mostly
1:10 and it was at a time where a we had
1:13 photographic plates so we were able to
1:16 take records of large patches of sky and
1:19 B there was a specific kind of telescope
1:21 called a Schmid telescope the design of
1:24 which was optimized for covering wide
1:26 areas of the sky at once so the idea
1:29 here was to put the this technology
1:31 together and do a really big survey of
1:35 as much of the sky as was possible that
1:37 would then act as a repository for
1:39 astronomers to do work on and to
1:43 understand you know what was out there
1:44 basically rather than targeting specific
1:47 objects to look at but no one telescope
1:50 on the surface of the Earth can see the
1:52 whole sky this was a survey that did
1:54 start in the north and they they did
1:55 most of the northern sky down to a
1:58 declination of minus 30° they got quite
2:01 a long way into the South it was
2:02 finished later um by using another
2:05 Schmid telescope in the South and then
2:07 it covered the the entire celestial
2:10 sphere so now let's introduce Abel
2:13 George Abel he was a student at Caltech
2:16 the California Institute of Technology
2:18 and he was employed to work on this
2:19 survey he was one of The Observers his
2:22 job was literally to look at plate after
2:24 plate after plate and note down anything
2:28 interesting he literally had a little
2:29 card file of interesting objects uh that
2:32 came along so actually there are I
2:35 should qualify this video there are two
2:37 objects called Abel one because the
2:40 first thing he did was make a list of
2:42 planetary nebula so he made a list of 86
2:45 of them most of which were later
2:47 confirmed but we're not going to really
2:49 concentrate on that Abel one right now
2:52 if you go and look at it it is kind of
2:54 boring it's a little disc kind of
2:57 reddish in color really featureless just
3:00 marks the end stage of a star's life but
3:04 as he was going through this um this
3:08 project of looking at all these plates
3:10 he noticed that there were a lot of
3:14 clusters of galaxies so the galaxies
3:16 weren't uniformly distributed there were
3:18 very obvious regions where they were
3:20 sort of clumped together and he thought
3:23 this was interesting now here this is
3:26 this is where I had a lot of fun
3:27 researching this video is that we can
3:29 actually go to Abel's words himself to
3:31 hear what he thought about this and how
3:33 he came up with this idea because the
3:36 American Institute of physics has for a
3:39 long time conducted really indepth oral
3:42 histories interviews with prominent
3:44 physicists which are now available the
3:47 transcripts are available and they're
3:48 really long they're really detailed they
3:50 go into everything from their early
3:52 childhood and education to the really
3:55 nitty-gritty of what they were doing but
3:57 also you know why they were doing it
3:59 what it was like the time who else they
4:01 were working with what sort of feuds and
4:03 personalities were involved it's like
4:05 all the gossip so I had a look back at
4:09 Abel's interview which was really
4:11 interesting reading first of all the
4:13 interviewer made a point that is the
4:14 sort of point you might make Brady which
4:16 says it sounds like it must have been a
4:18 very tedious job but Abel said oh no
4:21 it's very exciting to look at the plate
4:23 I was the first person to look at these
4:24 plates and I think that's that's kind of
4:27 neat the idea that you are the first
4:29 person person to see these objects that
4:31 are out there in the universe so that
4:33 must have that sort of motivation must
4:35 have sustained him for a while in terms
4:37 of the idea of the Clusters what he said
4:40 was during that time I was impressed
4:42 with how many clusters of galaxies kept
4:44 showing up I thought this was an
4:45 interesting thing and I was keeping
4:47 lists of them anyway so it occurred to
4:49 me why not make a complete survey of the
4:51 distribution of these rich clusters so I
4:54 organized that thing probably around the
4:56 end of the first year and submitted a
4:58 thesis proposal which got a approved and
5:00 I did it and so that was his his PhD
5:02 work that was his thesis to compile this
5:05 catalog of clusters and to do something like this
5:11 you don't just write down everything you
5:13 see for a catalog to be useful it has to
5:17 have really clear criteria so he set out
5:20 these rules of what a cluster had to be
5:24 in order to make it to this list and
5:27 that allows other astronomers to use
5:30 that list with confidence that they are
5:33 getting a clean sample that they're
5:35 getting a well-described sample and that
5:37 any statistical analysis they do will be
5:40 meaningful and unbiased I'm just going
5:43 to say this that sounds like an easy PhD
5:46 to me am I wrong um well um I don't know
5:51 what the standards of astronomy were
5:54 like at that time I mean nobody had ever
5:56 done this this was new information he
6:00 made some conclusions derived from that
6:02 catalog which Advanced the field
6:04 somewhat but you know the pace of
6:06 astronomy was really really different
6:09 back then and the big work was being
6:11 done at the telescope actually taking
6:14 the data we're so far removed from that
6:16 now even in the the time scale of my
6:18 training in my career we've become quite
6:21 divorced as professional astronomers
6:23 from that staying up all night doing the
6:26 work at the telescope and we download
6:28 cataloges and we play with things and we
6:30 write computer code but they couldn't do
6:32 that we're a really data Rich field
6:35 right now but this was the front line if
6:38 we were going to do astronomy somebody
6:40 had to be up the telescope collecting
6:42 those photons they were they were all
6:44 precious I always feel like one of the
6:46 great insults you can make to a
6:48 scientist or a field of science is to
6:50 call it stamp collecting and this feels
6:52 a lot like stamp collecting don't get me
6:54 wrong it's cool it tickles my brain I no
6:57 one loves lists more than me as
6:58 evidenced by my work
7:00 but it does feel very stamp collecty is
7:02 this thing useful do you still use it I
7:04 still do use it I mean you have to think
7:07 he he started from a position of looking
7:10 at the universe in a way that nobody had
7:13 been able to look at it before because
7:15 we just hadn't have this Widefield view
7:17 of so much of the sky and he made an
7:19 observation he made an observation that
7:22 the the Galaxy seemed to Cluster and
7:24 then beyond that he made an observation
7:27 that he thought there was second order
7:29 clust clustering that the cluster is
7:31 clustered and now we're getting into
7:33 questions of cosmology what kind of
7:35 universe do we live in how does
7:38 structure form in the universe and
7:40 remember this was the 1950s the model of
7:43 cosmology was Far different their
7:46 understanding of what the universe was
7:48 was Far Far different than than the
7:51 detailed understanding we have today so
7:54 no I don't think it's just stamp
7:55 collecting I think it's stamp collecting
7:57 as a first step because that how you
8:00 impose order onto knowledge and then
8:03 it's trying to find patterns and trying
8:05 to find understanding from your stamp
8:07 collection that's cool so we've talked
8:09 about Abel's work as a graduate student
8:11 doing this PhD but he was a very eminent
8:13 American astronomer in the 20th century
8:16 he was chair of the University of
8:18 California Los Angeles astronomy
8:20 Department by selecting among various
8:23 Optical Arrangements the telescope can
8:25 be used in a variety of ways he played a
8:28 big role in both education and public
8:31 understanding of science which I feel is
8:33 kind of meta here because we are having
8:35 an interview about the business of doing
8:37 science using an oral history where
8:39 someone sat down with an interviewer
8:41 talking about the business of doing
8:42 science the photographs taken for this
8:45 poar Sky survey revealed the images of
8:48 hundreds of millions of individual
8:50 galaxies he also had a connection with
8:53 the UK because he worked up in Edinburgh
8:56 quite a bit and he made films with the
8:58 BBC he was an early advocate of doing
9:02 popularization of science because he
9:04 thought it was valuable for the public
9:08 to understand this work so he made a
9:10 series of programs with the open
9:12 University and the BBC and I learned
9:14 that the observatory at the open
9:16 University here in the UK is named after
9:19 him it's the George Abel Observatory
9:21 which I thought was kind of nice we neia
9:23 Abel one um well honestly I don't have
9:26 much to say about Abel one Brady because
9:28 I looked it up
9:30 and there is nothing special about it it
9:32 is a little cluster of galaxies and I
9:34 did the usual thing where there are
9:36 databases where you can say here are all
9:38 of the papers that have referenced this
9:41 object and sometimes it can be hundreds
9:43 and hundreds of entries long there were
9:45 16 most of them it was just it's an
9:49 entry in this catalog here's a catalog
9:51 of clusters here's a compilation of
9:52 something else no one to my knowledge
9:56 has ever looked at it as an individual
9:59 object and studied it in that in that
10:01 perspective which which made me feel
10:03 kind of sad for it to be honest well if
10:05 only you knew an astronomer oh hang
10:08 on why don't you do it so what I did was
10:11 I actually so this this original Sky
10:14 survey that we're talking about it was
10:16 in photographic plates and this is
10:18 something that that big observatories
10:20 used to have a collection like there be
10:22 a room you could go and look at the you
10:25 get the plate out that you wanted to
10:28 this was before my time but you You' go
10:29 to the plate collection get the plate
10:32 out take a Polaroid picture of it and
10:35 then take that with you to the telescope
10:37 as sort of your map of the sky but in
10:39 the 1980s this survey and and there was
10:42 there was a successor survey that was
10:44 that was done again with with better
10:47 technology an all Sky survey in the
10:48 1980s the sort of Mark 2 these two
10:51 surveys all of the photographic plates
10:53 were digitized so they were scanned and
10:56 they were scanned in such a way that the
10:57 digital copies could be used for science
11:00 they weren't just sort of you know take
11:01 a picture and stick it on the wall so we
11:04 can now access these so I thought I
11:05 would download and have a look at the
11:08 actual data there were two plates taken
11:10 of each piece of Sky one in in a blue
11:13 filter one in the red filter he did all
11:15 his work on the red filter so here is
11:17 the digitized scan of the plate that
11:20 Abel would have looked at when he was
11:22 doing his inspection that's Abel one and
11:26 I'm going to change this a little bit
11:28 I'm going to to invert the color map
11:31 because this is what Abel would have
11:32 seen so in this case now dark means
11:35 something that's bright and it's just a
11:37 little bit easier for our eyes to see
11:39 contrast because it's digital I can
11:41 change the color scale and I can bring
11:44 that contrast out so you can see a
11:46 little bit more fuzzy detail Abel
11:47 wouldn't have had that capability and so
11:50 here here's a a Galaxy the thing next to
11:53 it with a little cross indicates that
11:56 that's a star so that's in our galaxy
11:58 and that one's much much further away if
12:00 we zoom out you can sort of see the
12:04 whole plate you can see how big it is
12:07 and yeah perhaps you can guess that
12:10 there is some sort of concentration of
12:12 galaxies here now to get into Abel's
12:15 catalog the criteria he used where there
12:18 had to be at least 50 members they had
12:22 to be within a certain radius that
12:25 depended on the distance to the to the
12:27 cluster but it was quite a general one
12:29 so it's quite out here um and they had
12:32 to be 50 between the brightness of the
12:36 third brightest Galaxy um and two
12:40 magnitudes fainter so magnitudes are a
12:43 funny unit that that astronomers use to
12:45 to measure brightness but essentially
12:47 sort of a factor of six in in flux in
12:51 brightness and so yep so there's there's
12:54 50 of those galaxies in that region 49
12:57 you don't get in you don't get in
13:00 because otherwise you know well to be
13:02 honest I think some of the criteria were
13:04 a little bit uh a little bit generously
13:06 applied um but but generally speaking
13:08 you have these rules for a reason um
13:10 some get in some don't um and then you
13:13 have your your catalog so there you go
13:16 that's just Abel one so we don't know if
13:18 there's spirals or ellipticals or B
13:21 there's no greater zooms that have since
13:23 been done with hubbles and things no
13:25 there's no Hubble data the SLO digital
13:27 Sky survey didn't cover it nobody's gone
13:29 G through and classified those galaxies
13:31 at least not that I could find in the
13:33 literature that's it it was pretty much
13:36 Abel and now us as far as I can tell oh
13:40 we've got to get a closer look can you
13:42 get us some telescope time well to get
13:44 telescope time I'd have to have a reason
13:46 why and so I'd have to build a case as
13:48 to for why it was worth spending
13:51 expensive time to look at this object
13:54 and a better look isn't isn't quite
13:57 going to do it um we could do like a
13:59 Kickstarter or something and and buy the
14:01 time can you buy telescope time um not
14:05 on any of the telescopes that I am
14:07 familiar with um I want to okay now I
14:11 need to pause here i' I've been I've
14:13 been a bit unfair um because of course I've been
14:18 talking about professional astronomers
14:20 I've been talking about the kind of
14:21 telescopes that you know we put on top
14:23 of mountain tops and the results that
14:25 get published in journals that is not
14:27 the only kind of astronomy that that
14:29 gets done here so I want to I want to
14:31 take back that what statement I just
14:34 said because I know I know that there
14:37 are people we might call amateurs but
14:39 are very very skilled who have observed
14:42 AEL one who have beautiful photos of it
14:45 and have probably looked at it and
14:47 thought carefully and deeply about it so
14:49 I don't want to diss the contributions
14:50 of any of those very important people
14:52 but speaking from the the sort of
14:55 professional sphere yeah that that
14:57 that's what we got but I thought this
14:59 would be interesting so the reason I
15:01 started this video is I said I have used
15:03 the Abel catalog many times and that's
15:06 because I study clusters of galaxies and
15:08 the Abel catalog encompasses all of the
15:11 nearby clusters of galaxies okay the
15:14 ones that we've been able to see you
15:16 know for for quite a long time and for
15:18 some of those those are as familiar to
15:20 me as my own address so Abel 2218 Abel
15:23 2219 Abel 1689 if you showed me a
15:26 picture of them I would recognize them
15:28 instantly and so I thought it was quite
15:30 interesting the anonymity of Abel one in
15:34 contrast and I know you can see over my
15:36 shoulder right now that poster which
15:39 we've made a video about before this is
15:41 a patch of sky that has two Abel
15:43 clusters in it so Abel would have gone
15:45 through this patch of sky as well and
15:48 put two different objects in his catalog
15:52 which two Abels are in it well do you
15:53 want to come over and see yeah so this
15:55 is of course not the picture that Abel
15:58 would have had okay and so when he went through this he
16:02 thought there was one cluster of
16:03 galaxies up in this region Abel 901 and
16:07 one cluster down in this region Abel 902
16:11 now this field got the luck of the draw
16:13 unlike Abel 1 because myself and and
16:16 some of my colleagues decided to focus
16:18 on this and we spent 10 15 years working
16:21 on this patch of sky and we've looked at
16:24 it with lots of different telescopes
16:26 including the ones that's that have made
16:27 this image with Hubble we've seen all
16:29 sorts of different wavelengths and we've
16:31 learned so much about the structure and
16:33 all of the individual galaxies here but
16:35 we also learned that Abel didn't see the
16:37 whole story because where he saw one
16:40 collection here we now know that there
16:42 are two very distinct different clusters
16:45 of galaxies and the whole thing makes up
16:48 some sort of super cluster which was
16:50 exactly the sort of thing he was
16:52 pointing out he thought existed so I
16:55 thought i' i' I'd drag out the images
16:58 from the digital Sky survey and and have
17:00 a look at that as well just to see what
17:02 Abel would have seen when he made that
17:05 determination and here I love this
17:08 because you can see it's actually the
17:09 corner of the plate and you can even see
17:11 the label up there it says National
17:13 Geographic Society because the survey
17:16 was funded by a grant from the National
17:18 Geographic society and it says Palmer
17:21 Observatory Sky survey and so right
17:23 there in the middle you can see the same
17:25 region we've just seen up there and this
17:29 is essentially the region he thought was
17:30 one cluster and the region he thought
17:33 was the other is is down off the bottom
17:34 of the screen look how ropey it is you
17:37 can see all these artifacts looks like a
17:39 bit of I don't know dust or or something
17:42 a hair or something a hair or something
17:44 like that you know this is the real deal
17:46 you know this is the actual stuff that
17:48 he would have been looking at and it's
17:49 not that he got it wrong it's just that
17:52 to the level of information that he had
17:56 he made one determination and when we
17:58 looked a little bit more closely we
18:00 could see a lot more richer detail maybe
18:03 that would be the case with Abel one as
18:05 well I'm sure there are lots of
18:06 interesting things lurking there we just
18:08 don't know what they are how did he
18:10 decide it was number one did he start at
18:12 the North Pole like we do with cordwell
18:14 or so they are ordered they are in a
18:17 list which is very pleasing and the
18:19 order is in right Ascension so this is
18:22 the astronomical coordinate that is
18:25 analogous to longitude on the Earth but
18:27 up on the celestial spere it's the one
18:29 with the lowest right Ascension the one
18:31 closest to zero that's it that's why
18:34 it's in there at number one it's not
18:35 grenwich that that we use uh for our
18:39 zero point there it's the uh position of
18:42 the sun at the Spring
18:46 Equinox very arbitrary but this is another thing the
18:50 coordinates he would have been using are
18:52 not the same as the coordinates we use
18:54 now because the orientation of the earth
18:57 is moving relative to the fixed Stars
18:59 There's A procession so every few
19:01 decades we have to sort of update what
19:03 we mean by all of these coordinates so
19:07 that's in the coordinates of the epoch
19:10 that he was working in back in the 1950s
19:13 which might not be the same as the ones
19:14 we use now we we had a conversation
19:17 about whether this was stamp collecting
19:19 or whether he was gleaning some
19:21 understanding of the universe and we
19:22 talked about the super clustering of
19:25 galaxies which we've seen Illustrated
19:27 over here and again again that wasn't uh
19:30 an a widely accepted idea before he
19:33 introduced it and in fact uh one of the
19:38 um big astronomers in in California at
19:40 the time Fritz wikii who we we know as
19:43 as being one of the first people to
19:45 postulate that dark matter existed we
19:47 also know him as someone you you might
19:49 politely refer to as a strong
19:52 personality or a character this is what
19:54 I love about the oral history is because
19:56 it makes all of this human ins side of
19:59 science come alive so Abel
20:03 worked you know in the same sphere as zi
20:07 and Zi was adamant that that clusters
20:09 were uniformly distributed so this idea
20:12 that that there could be super clusters
20:14 of galaxies that clusters could
20:15 themselves be clustered he was dead
20:17 against right from the beginning um and
20:20 it's really interesting to to read how
20:22 that sort of um argument developed and
20:26 and to get a sense of the person ities
20:29 involved um so there's lots of stories
20:32 about zi but I really liked what Abel
20:35 said about him he said I got to know
20:36 zwicki very well I always liked zwicki
20:39 he was a lot of fun but he would be an
20:41 impossible person to take a course with
20:43 he was an ego maniac to be sure but he
20:46 made a lot of contributions a bright guy
20:48 and this phrase is brilliant if you
20:49 could buy zi for what we think he's
20:51 worth and sell him for what he thinks
20:54 he's worth you'd be a
20:56 millionaire but nevertheless that
20:58 doesn't attract back from the fact that
20:59 he was also a great man there you go you
21:02 know these are the these are these are
21:04 people doing science they're not robots
21:07 um and it was clearly a very exciting
21:09 time to be to be part of all of this
21:13 endeavor here's another list we really
21:15 like here at Deep sky videos these are
21:17 most of our patreon supporters people
21:19 who make contributions each month no
21:21 matter how small to help keep our
21:23 Channel going if you'd like to join them go to
21:27 patreon /de skyvideos it means a lot to
21:31 us but no matter what thank you very
21:33 much just for being here and watching
21:35 our videos do share them with your
21:37 friends give us a like make sure you
21:38 subscribe it all helps keep the channel
21:42 going 50 by 100 like years so that
21:45 that's still fairly Hefty as well it's a
21:47 stellar Nursery so it's got all the raw
21:50 materials to form young Stars the reason
21:53 it glows is that it's full of ionized
21:56 hydrogen so there's so much radiation
21:59 from the hot young stars that are being
22:01 born