Who's paying for Trump's White House ballroom? | DW News
DW News
0:00 Donald Trump says it will be the most beautiful ballroom ever built.
0:04 That's likely to be a matter of taste.
0:06 But one thing that is certain,
0:08 the US president's plan to replace the east wing of the White
0:11 House would result in the most expensive ballroom ever built,
0:15 leaving the question of who's going to foot the bill.
0:18 For months, the president has insisted
0:20 that private donors would cover the costs.
0:22 Here's what he said when the plan was announced in July.
0:26 Can you talk about your plans for the new ballroom that was announced today
0:29 and the $200 million that's going to be paid for by yourself as well?
0:33 Private donations.
0:34 It's a private thing.
0:35 Yeah.
0:35 I'll do it and we'll probably have some donors or whatever,
0:37 but it's about 200 million.
0:39 No government dollars at all.
0:41 No government.
0:41 No.
0:43 Since then, estimated costs have ballooned to $400 million.
0:48 Now, Republican senators are seeking a billion
0:51 in taxpayer dollars for the project.
0:54 Republicans insist that money would only be
0:57 spent on security upgrades and that the cost
1:00 of the building that the the building
1:01 itself would still be funded by private donations.
1:05 President Trump has justified the project by saying
1:08 the White House urgently needs a large event space,
1:12 but polls show a large majority of the American public are opposed.
1:16 Ballrooms also facing legal challenges which are
1:19 still making their way through the courts.
1:25 Ethan Bman is a liberal political commentator and talk radio host.
1:29 He's also adjunct professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles.
1:33 So, welcome to DW.
1:35 Um, what's your understanding of what the billion dollars
1:39 being sought by Republican senators would be spent on?
1:45 Well, the argument as of today is for security reasons.
1:49 when uh President Trump tore down the east wing
1:52 of the White House without anybody's knowledge or permission,
1:55 um he also removed certain security apparatuses used by the federal government.
2:00 So, it would be likely used for the security
2:04 reasons and additionally in light of the unknown
2:07 status of so-called private donors funding the ballroom could
2:11 be also used partially to fund the ballroom itself.
2:14 All right, we'll get to those donors shortly,
2:16 but the government's currently trailing debts of around $38 trillion.
2:21 So, an extra billion doesn't sound like an awful lot.
2:24 How do you assess their chances of getting it?
2:29 Well, I think there's a lot of um consternation right
2:32 now amongst the handful of moderate Republicans left in DC,
2:36 let alone the American people.
2:38 Again, this is a this is a a crisis of the president's own doing.
2:43 um he tore it down.
2:44 There was no plan in place to replace it.
2:47 It now suddenly is allegedly a crisis uh that most of us don't agree with.
2:53 Um but we have to look to people like Representative Don Bacon,
2:56 for example, from Nebraska.
2:58 He's one of the moderate Republicans who's retiring.
3:01 Um classic conservative who who sees the problems with a president
3:05 running um with as if he is a king.
3:09 Uh and and that is a major issue here in the United States right now.
3:12 We're going to find out though very shortly if the House
3:15 and or the Senate are actually going to support this.
3:18 And if they don't, I think the bigger question becomes then what?
3:23 What do you think happens then?
3:27 Well, now we have a a genuine crisis that has been
3:30 caused by this president in that he tore down the East Wing.
3:34 He didn't follow things such as the National Historic Preservation Act.
3:39 Um, we also have environmental laws that are involved.
3:42 I I know that it's the White House, so most of those will get bypassed.
3:45 But but there are rules and regulations around modifying major
3:50 national structures such as the White House that were ignored.
3:54 Now it becomes a crisis of we have this entire
3:57 missing east wing that were done uh that was done unilaterally
4:01 by this president and now we really are going to have
4:05 to have a serious congress congressional conversation about what do we do?
4:10 And there is a quite the possibility that in November
4:13 the Republicans are no longer in control of the legislative branch.
4:18 Is it a crisis a billion dollars?
4:22 It's a building.
4:24 Explain to us non-Americans how you know for most
4:28 of us a crisis is a is a natural catastrophe.
4:31 It's a war.
4:32 You're talking about a building being knocked down.
4:34 That doesn't sound like a crisis, right?
4:38 And normally it's not.
4:40 Uh and again, this is in a self-inflicted one.
4:43 I agree with you.
4:44 We have a war in the Middle East of of this president's choosing.
4:47 Um, we have gas prices now in the United States that are causing serious um,
4:52 e- e economic repercussions that are continuing to build by the day,
4:56 let alone our allies,
4:58 at least who most Americans consider our allies in Europe, such as Germany um,
5:03 and France and others who are suffering um,
5:06 heavily economically because of this um,
5:08 unwise approach to war in the Middle East.
5:12 And it is a war regardless of what this war stick with the bill.
5:17 Yeah.
5:17 Yeah, let's do one crisis at a time.
5:21 So, Phil, but but the reason this becomes
5:23 a crisis is it is a national security hub.
5:26 It is a hub of communications that was there in the east
5:30 wing that is now gone and needs to be replaced.
5:34 Uh a and that becomes a serious issue with the ma
5:37 the massive amount of geopolitical unrest that is occurring right now.
5:43 Um, and that's what makes it a crisis ultimately.
5:46 You can't have a missing section of the White House
5:49 and miss a key nerve center for the national security apparatus.
5:53 Okay.
5:53 So, clearly you're not a Trump fan.
5:57 As far as the American people go,
5:59 bearing in mind that they that um the he won the popular vote.
6:02 Do they care about this?
6:04 Is is this what people are talking about
6:06 in in bars and and supermarket cues, this this ballroom?
6:10 Do do people care?
6:12 Is it going to hurt him?
6:15 No.
6:15 Um he's already been hurt.
6:17 His approval ratings are down around the 30%
6:19 mark depending on what you're which poll you're reading.
6:22 Um that this is not hurting him.
6:24 This is not what people are concerned about.
6:26 Comp people presently are concerned about the cost
6:29 of living has just gone up and up and up.
6:32 Uh the average person,
6:34 not the wealthy class in the United States, is is suffering.
6:37 And that's what they're talking about.
6:38 how much it costs to fill up their car at the gas pump, how much groceries cost,
6:42 the fact that they can't afford beef anymore at the grocery store,
6:46 or have to cut way back on normal foods that are part of the American diet.
6:51 Let's talk about these these um donors who may
6:54 or may not may not chip in to fund this extravaganza.
6:59 He he's insisted that that the ballroom will be a gift to the US taxpayers,
7:04 100% funded by private donors.
7:06 What is known of these donors?
7:10 We know very little.
7:12 Uh and what we also don't know is whether or not
7:15 they've actually put up any money or just made verbal commitments,
7:18 which of course can be walked back at any time.
7:21 Uh but what we do know is that it is
7:23 part of the Trump donor class uh who have made
7:27 at least the verbal um this had the verbal discussions
7:31 with the with the sitting president regarding funding this ballroom.
7:34 and that would include um allegedly people like
7:38 Jeff Bezos and others in that billionaire class.
7:42 But we just don't know.
7:43 And that's part of the problem whether or not you're
7:47 a Republican or a Democrat is the fact that there's
7:50 no history for private donors to fund the construction
7:55 of a new ballroom that's attached to the White House.
7:58 There's no history of naming anything after
8:02 a sitting president while he's still a sitting president.
8:04 This is a a chaotic presidency that that uh is unprecedented and pushing
8:11 our system in ways that I don't believe the founding fathers ever expected.
8:15 Okay.
8:15 So, you're the lawyer.
8:16 Let me throw something at you and then you tell me how many ways I'm wrong.
8:21 It doesn't matter.
8:22 None of this matters.
8:23 This is consequencefree for this president.
8:26 If this if the the East Wing stays down if Congress says no,
8:31 you should not have done it,
8:34 nothing comes back to this president because the Supreme Court says he can do
8:38 what he likes so long as he did it as and while he was president.
8:45 Yeah.
8:45 Well, he can't do anything that he would be criminally liable is what they
8:49 ruled and as long as it within that was within his powers as president.
8:53 Now, that was not defined whatsoever in that Supreme Court decision.
8:57 Um, and to your point, I I don't see uh many areas to disagree with you.
9:02 The Supreme Court is not going to rule that he did something,
9:06 at least not according to my interpretation of their their rulings,
9:09 that they would ever find this president for what
9:12 he has done in this situation in particular,
9:15 that's within his powers, they would argue.
9:17 Um, there is no liability back to the president.
9:19 He cannot run for another term under the 22nd amendment,
9:24 which is part of the Constitution.
9:26 And I'm always shocked to hear people talk about
9:28 amendments as if that's not part of the Constitution.
9:31 Amendments become part of the Constitution of the United States.
9:35 The 22nd amendment says he cannot run again in 2028.
9:40 Therefore, what are the what are the ramifications?
9:42 Now, what what we can talk about is things that were done outside
9:46 of the core of his functions as the executive in the United States.
9:52 But but the odds of that happening, slim to none.
9:54 It's going to be those around him who may
9:56 be suffering uh after he's no longer in office.
10:00 But the president himself,
10:01 I see very little uh in ways to hold him accountable, if any.
10:06 Good talking to you.
10:07 Thanks very much, Ethan.
10:08 Ethan Bman, a liberal political commentator and attorney.
10:11 Thank you.
10:13 Thank you, Phil.