Everything in the universe might be the same particle from the Big Bang | Michelle Thaller
Big Think Clips
0:00 There are some words that are really easy to throw around.
0:03 And in science, they become interestingly complicated.
0:05 People often say, you know, do you believe such and such is true?
0:09 You know, do you believe the Big Bang is true?
0:11 You know, do you believe that the idea of multiple universes is true?
0:15 You know, a lot of these things.
0:17 And when you're a scientist, you're aware that what what you're doing
0:21 is you're constantly trying to approach reality.
0:24 You're trying to get closer and closer to describing something very well,
0:28 but you know you're not all the way there yet.
0:31 And it's quite possible that we never will be.
0:34 It's quite possible that human beings with our limited senses,
0:37 our limited brains even,
0:39 you know, won't really know what the true nature of reality is.
0:43 It's one of these kind of wonderful things that, you know, truth can change.
0:47 You know, 100 years ago,
0:48 people were certain that the universe was not expanding,
0:51 you know, and of course, we found out that it was.
0:53 And you have to be able sometimes to take your very precious images,
0:57 you know, models of what the universe is like, about what reality is like,
1:01 you know, even about what the definition of truth is,
1:04 you need to make sure that you're ready
1:07 to change when better information comes on board.
1:11 [Narrator] The strange universe astronomy reveals to us.
1:15 There's sort of two words that float about,
1:18 there's astronomer and astrophysicist.
1:19 And, you know, it kind of depends on whether you're trying
1:21 to put on a more friendly or formal vibe, I think.
1:23 They really, these days, mean the same thing.
1:25 I think there was a time when there was sort of a separation of duties.
1:29 There were people that, say, 100 years ago would map the stars
1:32 and create all these wonderful catalogs of stars.
1:35 And you might call those astronomers.
1:36 You know, the, the name is from astronomi, to name the stars.
1:40 And then there were people that tried to figure out what the stars
1:44 were and how they worked and what the science of it was,
1:46 you know, behind all that.
1:48 Those would be the astrophysicists.
1:49 And these days, the two studies are really the same.
1:53 If you're an astronomer or an astrophysicist,
1:54 you pretty much do the same thing these days.
1:56 The word that was probably the best word, astrology,
1:59 to study the stars, that one was already taken.
2:02 A lot of the questions that I get from members
2:05 of the public are these vast conjectural questions like,
2:08 you know, is there a multiverse?
2:09 Or what happened before the Big Bang?
2:11 So from my doctorate, you know, from my research, I studied binary stars.
2:15 You know, I studied two stars that orbit each other,
2:18 and most stars in the universe are like that, by the way.
2:21 And in the case of my stars,
2:23 they had these wonderful colliding winds of high energy
2:26 particles that produced these giant shocks in the sky.
2:29 The fun thing is that, for a while at least, and maybe today,
2:33 there are some stars in the sky that I've probably
2:35 spent more time with than anybody else in the world.
2:37 You know, I observed them for hours and hours
2:40 trying to figure out how these colliding atmospheres worked.
2:43 In the case of myself, I'm an observational astronomer.
2:46 I went to observatories all over the world.
2:49 About 25 years ago when I was most active in research,
2:52 I did a lot of research in Australia,
2:54 in Arizona, the Kitt Peak telescopes, Mount Stromlo in Arizona.
2:57 I also used a lot of satellite data.
3:00 I had data from x-ray satellites and the Hubble Space Telescope.
3:03 I actually got some time.
3:05 You see, as an astronomer, you are allowed to write into these observatories.
3:09 It usually happens once a year.
3:11 And there is a panel that basically assesses, you know,
3:14 what would all these people around the world
3:17 like to do with the Hubble Space Telescope?
3:20 And this panel of astronomers actually decides,
3:22 you know, who should get priority.
3:24 One of the things about being an astronomer
3:26 is you end up doing a lot of writing.
3:28 You end up doing a lot of writing asking for time on these telescopes,
3:32 and then hoping that your proposal gets selected.
3:34 Another thing is you end up asking for a lot
3:37 of time to write grants from money to support your work.
3:39 You know, if you get some time on the Hubble Space Telescope,
3:42 often it comes with an amount of money
3:44 to support the time you're gonna do that research.
3:46 So it turns out that being an astronomer,
3:49 all of the training is about the math and the physics and the computer science.
3:53 And then what you actually do day to day is often a lot of writing and a lot
3:58 of trying to organize proposals and grants
4:00 and how you're gonna support yourself doing your science.
4:03 And then if you work for a large organization like NASA,
4:06 some of your time as well is usually assigned to some specific mission.
4:11 You know, some specific space telescope where you're
4:13 going to be helping clean up the data,
4:15 figure out how we're going to issue a call for proposals,
4:18 organize the panels that are going to vet
4:20 and look at all these different things.
4:23 So in a way, you become kind of an administrator, a lot of meetings.
4:26 I think that, you know,
4:27 the normal life cycle of astronomer's probably 80% like business person,
4:30 a lot of meetings, a lot of grants, a lot of budgets.
4:34 But then, at least for me, there really was this time,
4:38 it doesn't happen so much when you're a more mature astronomer,
4:40 but when you're really young and out
4:42 in the field and making your own discoveries,
4:44 it really does feel like you're sort of alone with the night
4:46 sky all by yourself up on top of that mountain.
4:49 And you're seeing things coming down through your telescope that, you know,
4:53 it's a minor advance, but, you know, no human being has ever seen before.
4:58 And it's a wonderful feeling of empowerment and, sort of, you know,
5:01 kind of collaborating with the sky and seeing what we can figure out.
5:05 One of the things is when you get a doctorate,
5:08 you have to produce some kind of original research,
5:11 something that's never really been done before,
5:13 and that's not as hard as it sounds.
5:15 That sounds very intimidating.
5:16 I mean, how am I gonna think of an idea that nobody's ever thought of before?
5:20 But nothing in astronomy happens alone.
5:21 You know, what happens when you're a graduate student after college is you will
5:26 join a professor doing his or her research with them sort of as an apprentice.
5:30 And then over time, as you get more familiar with the work,
5:34 they will give you a little piece of that research, like, "Hey,
5:36 you go ahead and take this part over yourself."
5:38 You don't really need to think of things entirely,
5:40 you know, just off the top of your head
5:43 and come up with brilliant ideas out of nowhere.
5:45 You start little by little, working with a group of astronomers.
5:48 And then slowly, you start to ask your own questions.
5:51 You know, maybe they've never had time on a telescope
5:53 to look up this little bit of it, you know, or this little bit of it
5:56 over here is a new question nobody thought of.
5:59 And eventually you realize that what you're
6:00 doing is something that hasn't been done before.
6:02 I guess there were probably about a dozen stars in the sky,
6:06 but there were three that I really, really focused on.
6:09 And in every case, these were binary stars,
6:12 and these were stars that were very massive, stars that were,
6:16 say, you know, anywhere between, like,
6:18 15 and 50 times the mass of the sun, big stars.
6:21 They actually only orbit around each other every couple of days,
6:24 or at most, about a week.
6:26 So these are very big stars in very close orbits.
6:29 And so it should make sense, these stars are pouring off, you know,
6:33 not only light, but high-energy particles,
6:35 this winded particles that we call stellar winds.
6:38 And then they collide in between these two stars.
6:41 Sometimes one of their winds will not be as strong as the other.
6:45 So the wind from one sort of overtakes the other one
6:47 and kind of blasts away the wind from the other one.
6:49 And as they turn around each other, you actually sort of have this wonderful,
6:53 kind of, three-dimensional view of how that shockwave goes all the way around.
6:57 And so I use a technique called tomography,
6:59 which is the same sort of thing you use in a CAT scan or, you know,
7:03 something like an MRI where you're trying to produce
7:05 a three-dimensional scan of inside the human body.
7:08 In this case, the instrument goes around you.
7:10 But in the case of the stars, the stars would go around each other.
7:13 And then I could use this sort of software mainly developed
7:16 for medicine to actually try to figure out the structure of these shockwaves.
7:20 This is, you know, just sort of work a day astronomy, you know, nothing,
7:23 you know, all that incredible or sexy about it,
7:26 but it helps you understand stars better.
7:28 It turns out that these shockwaves are responsible for producing
7:31 a lot of the molecules that we find in space.
7:35 You know, stars create, you know, atoms.
7:37 They fuse hydrogen into helium and then
7:40 eventually helium into larger atoms over time.
7:42 But these shockwaves, at least in the cooler parts of them,
7:45 can produce things like water, the water molecule.
7:48 And there are, you know, there are some binary stars, like,
7:51 there are some in the Orion Nebula that are
7:53 producing enough water in a single day along
7:56 these shockwaves to fill the oceans of the earth
7:59 like 60 times over in a single day.
8:01 Now, obviously this isn't liquid water.
8:03 This is water in a molecular form, pretty hot gas actually.
8:06 But that's where a lot of the molecules responsible
8:09 for life can come from, is from these shockwaves.
8:11 So it's a way of trying to figure out just little
8:14 by little how the universe really does work, how stars work.
8:18 So my research is much more observational, much more about stars.
8:22 I certainly took classes in cosmology, the study of the universe as a whole.
8:28 I took classes in quantum mechanics, you know,
8:30 graduate-level quantum mechanics, graduate-level electromagnetism, all of that.
8:33 People often start right off with the, you know, are there parallel universes?
8:37 And I'd rather they sort of ask me,
8:39 you know, what are the importance of binary stars?
8:42 There's honestly not all that many
8:45 astronomers by number that do theoretical cosmology.
8:47 You know, most of us are trying to figure out things like
8:50 how stars are born and how they like live their lives and die.
8:53 We're trying to figure out, what's left over after a star explodes,
8:56 a black hole, a neutron star?
8:58 Or we're trying to figure out how galaxies work, how many galaxies there are,
9:02 how do we observe them, how do they change over time?
9:05 There's only a few of us that are trying to answer questions like,
9:08 you know, what happened before the Big Bang?
9:10 Or, you know, are there multiverses?
9:12 We all study that to an extent.
9:14 And we all go to lectures at the conferences.
9:16 I love going to the ones on, you know, quantum theory and quantum gravity.
9:20 Most astronomers study things that are a bit
9:24 more concrete than that, very far away.
9:27 So it's often the case that, you know,
9:29 I'm giving some lecture on this, you know,
9:31 wonderful new images of Saturn from one of our spacecraft like Cassini,
9:35 and they're so beautiful, and we're learning things about the atmosphere.
9:38 And look at these pictures of these little moons we
9:40 took in the ring system and we're studying the ring system.
9:43 And we have a wonderful lecture, I turn to the audience and say,
9:45 "Hey, any questions?" You know, and somebody raises their hand.
9:48 And the first one is, you know, are there multiple universes?
9:51 Saturn.
9:52 In physics, at least for the last 100 years,
9:56 that has really challenged us to leave behind our human ideas of common sense,
10:03 the very definition and perhaps existence of space and time.
10:08 The whole idea about what is reality, what is existence,
10:12 what am I, is a very, very complex question now to answer.
10:17 I mean, to give you some ideas about
10:20 this, there are some things that are very simple.
10:23 Like, what is the interior of the sun like?
10:26 It's obviously something we've never directly observed,
10:28 but we see energy pouring out of the sun.
10:31 There are actually waves, almost like earthquake waves that go around
10:34 the sun that help us to study the interior, the way those waves travel.
10:38 But do we know exactly how the core of the sun works?
10:41 No, no, we don't.
10:42 There are things that we get pretty close to, but we
10:44 just don't really have the observational ability to do so.
10:47 But then there are questions like, what are space and time really?
10:53 For so long, we've just sort of taken it
10:56 for granted that space and time exist around us.
10:58 Time flows in one direction.
11:00 Space extends perhaps to infinity.
11:01 But then there was also a time when we didn't think that air was anything.
11:06 People didn't realize that we actually live, you know,
11:08 at the bottom of this wonderful ocean of air that is our atmosphere.
11:12 People took it for granted that air existed.
11:14 That was actually, you know,
11:15 proven in the 18th century that this was actually something.
11:18 Einstein showed us that space and time absolutely
11:22 cannot be the simple way we perceive them.
11:25 It all is related around the speed of light.
11:28 The speed of light is always constant to any observer.
11:32 One of the myths about Einstein was that he pulled
11:35 all of these amazing ideas just kind of, you know, out of his head from nowhere,
11:39 that he wasn't part of the scientific establishment.
11:41 Well, in fact.
11:42 He was a professor.
11:43 He was actually a graduate student trying to get
11:45 a job when he was working at that patent office,
11:48 but he had that miracle year where he came up
11:50 with the theories of special and general relativity among other things.
11:54 So here's an example about allowing yourself to define whether something
11:57 is true in kind of a bit more of an active way.
12:01 Isaac Newton was able to describe very, very well how gravity worked.
12:05 He was really one of the first people that said there's this force of gravity.
12:09 And he just said that it's a force.
12:11 This force permeates the universe.
12:12 And this is why the planet's orbit the sun.
12:15 You know, this is why apples fall from trees is they're reacting to this force.
12:19 And by using his equation of gravity,
12:21 you could calculate that force very, very well.
12:24 So you had this, you know, great thing, the force of gravity, the force exists.
12:29 It binds the universe together.
12:31 But then you have to ask the question, okay, what do we mean by that?
12:35 What is the force of gravity?
12:37 What is it really?
12:38 What causes it?
12:39 And it took Albert Einstein to say that what we think
12:42 of as gravity is actually a curvature of space and time.
12:45 Things have to follow space and time.
12:47 We are all embedded in the space and time of the universe.
12:51 So if that space and time has a shape to it,
12:54 a curve to it, we have to follow that.
12:57 Light has to follow that.
12:59 You know, light itself that has no mass
13:01 can actually bend and go into a black hole.
13:03 And that's because the light has to travel through space and time,
13:06 and the space and time itself is bent.
13:08 So all of a sudden there was this answer, what is the force of gravity?
13:13 It's a bending of space and time.
13:15 So is that it?
13:16 Is that the end of those questions that we can ask there?
13:19 Well, how about the rather obvious next one?
13:21 What is space and time?
13:23 Okay, there's this thing that Einstein called space-time,
13:25 that your space and time are sort of mixed together.
13:28 They're two sides of the same coin.
13:30 When you change one, the other has to change.
13:32 If you are in a gravitational field and space is bent, time actually slows down.
13:37 It actually affects time as well.
13:39 We know that these two things are bound together, but what are they?
13:43 Time can be different for different observers depending on your velocity.
13:46 If you're going very close to the speed of light,
13:49 as people observe you going by, they see your time is very slowed down.
13:52 If you're actually a photon going at the speed of light, time stops entirely.
13:56 So what do we mean by this thing called time?
13:59 And this is now what some of the major physicists of the world
14:02 are grappling with, and they're trying
14:03 to come up with some very interesting answers,
14:05 and I think the answers that will be very challenging for us.
14:09 Imagine being a physicist back in the early
14:12 1900s and having this young Albert Einstein tell you,
14:16 space and time are bendable.
14:17 You can change them.
14:18 You can manipulate them.
14:19 You might've thought they were crazy.
14:21 How about looking at space and time
14:25 instead as a consequence of quantum mechanics?
14:28 A lot of people have been saying
14:30 that relativity and quantum mechanics don't match, they don't work together.
14:33 And this is true.
14:34 This has been true since the beginning
14:36 of relativity and quantum mechanics about the same time.
14:38 Relativity says that if you have a certain amount of mass,
14:42 you can actually say space bends this much.
14:45 And quantum mechanics says that everything is down to probabilities.
14:48 The universe never has set answers,
14:50 but maybe the probabilities of a particle being here versus there.
14:55 Even the curvature of gravity must somehow be probabilistic.
14:58 And Einstein didn't like that.
15:00 There was no way to work that into his equations that actually,
15:02 you know, made them both work at the same time.
15:04 What if we were asking the wrong question?
15:07 What if we're not looking at two different things?
15:09 What if we could actually say that space-time
15:12 itself is a consequence of quantum mechanics,
15:15 not something separate from it, not two things that are clashing together?
15:19 And this is the idea now that perhaps quantum entanglement,
15:24 if you look at it correctly, is space-time.
15:28 Now, quantum entanglement isn't just a term you can throw off very, very easily,
15:32 but this is something that we have now observed
15:34 and been able to replicate in laboratories all across the world,
15:38 even in space actually.
15:40 If two objects interact together, they can actually sort of become,
15:43 in a sense, the same system under the laws of quantum mechanics.
15:47 So lemme just give you a very simple example of this.
15:50 A lot of people know the model of an atom
15:53 where you have this nucleus of protons and neutrons,
15:55 and the electrons can be in different orbits around there.
15:59 In fact, in a single orbit around the nucleus,
16:02 there can be two electrons, but those electrons can't be exactly the same.
16:06 You can't have two that are identical.
16:08 They have to have opposing spins, angular momentum.
16:11 It turns out you can have two electrons in each one of these orbits,
16:15 but the electrons can't be identical.
16:16 They have to be spinning in opposite directions.
16:19 It's a strange idea that electrons spin,
16:22 but at least you can say that there's some kind of intrinsic angular momentum.
16:25 What we think of as something spinning,
16:27 that's actually a property that a particle can have
16:29 whether or not there's actually like a physical little ball.
16:32 Electrons are not little balls,
16:33 but they do have a property of spin, of angular momentum.
16:36 You could have two of them in the same
16:38 orbit as long as they have opposing spins,
16:40 one spinning one way the other, there's spinning the other way.
16:42 So say that one is spinning, you know,
16:44 up and one is spinning down, the way my thumbs are pointing.
16:47 You know that these two electrons have to have different spins.
16:51 So what happens if you actually take them out of that system,
16:54 you take them away from the atom entirely?
16:55 And now you've got these two little electrons somewhere in space,
16:57 and you know that they have to have opposing
17:00 spins because they once were in that same orbit.
17:03 Well, okay, so now separate them.
17:05 Separate them by a couple of feet, maybe a couple of miles.
17:09 How about a couple hundreds of miles?
17:11 Maybe there's no limit.
17:12 We found out that if you use some sort
17:15 of energy to change the spin of one of these electrons,
17:18 the other one basically instantly knows that that's happened.
17:21 And it's not that there is a signal passing between one
17:25 of these to another because it doesn't travel even at the speed of light.
17:29 It's an instantaneous flip.
17:30 It's not a signal traveling because these two
17:33 things are basically the same quantum system.
17:35 In the rules of quantum mechanics, they are the same object.
17:39 So there's no signal really to travel.
17:41 To a quantum system, there really isn't any such thing as space or time.
17:45 It will adjust instantaneously because it's the same system,
17:49 whether it's microscopic or whether it's many thousands of miles apart.
17:54 They're the same thing.
17:56 Could it be that everything is entangled to everything else in some way?
18:00 Well, I mean, there once was a time when the universe was very small, you know,
18:05 the time right after the Big Bang where,
18:07 in a way, we were all kind of the same particle.
18:09 That particle has changed and expanded,
18:11 but is it possible to think that, in some way,
18:14 we're actually the same quantum system to everything in the universe and what
18:18 we perceive of as space and time is the degree to which we're entangled?
18:23 We're entangled more to things that are closer to us,
18:26 that have a chance to interact with us,
18:28 the air in this room, the space that's only outside in my yard.
18:31 I'm less entangled to things that I've not been
18:34 able to interact with much for a long time, things like distant galaxies.
18:37 I haven't been close to them since the beginning of the universe.
18:40 Einstein asked, what is gravity, really?
18:44 And now we have to ask, what is space-time really?
18:49 And we know it can't be as simple as the way we perceive it.
18:54 Maybe the underlying quantum reality of the universe is that everything,
18:57 in a way, really is still the same quantum system.
19:01 I've always thought when people think about alien civilizations
19:04 and they say they flying saucers and UFOs and spaceships,
19:06 I kind of wonder if the next step in really
19:09 understanding reality is that there's no such thing as distance.
19:13 And maybe a very advanced civilization that can somehow manipulate
19:17 that, you don't have to travel anywhere in a spaceship.
19:20 You simply figure out how you access
19:23 this entanglement of the rest of the universe.
19:25 Could it be that you are really
19:27 the same quantum system as everything in the universe
19:30 at once and that degree of entanglement is what we think of as space,
19:36 as time, as gravity?
19:38 That's an amazing idea,
19:39 and it's one that more and more people are starting to look at.
19:43 Do we know this is true yet?
19:45 No, this is still conjectural, but the physics is working very well.
19:48 And one of the promising things is
19:51 that the equations of gravity emerge now from quantum mechanics.
19:55 They're no longer general relativity, quantum mechanics.
19:58 They don't mix.
19:59 You start with quantum mechanics,
20:01 and gravity emerges from it, from the degree of entanglement.
20:05 So stay put for a couple more decades.
20:08 And like I said, maybe someday we're actually gonna
20:10 figure out what the underlying structure of this entanglement is,
20:13 and then we can actually move outside of space and time.
20:17 When you are pure energy, you have to travel at the speed of light.
20:22 A photon has to travel at the speed of light.
20:24 It can't go any other speed.
20:25 A photon can't exist in a state where
20:27 it's only moving at, say, 20 miles an hour.
20:30 It has to travel at the speed of light.
20:32 And when you're traveling at the speed of light,
20:35 you don't experience space or time.
20:37 You're probably familiar with Einstein's idea that as you go faster and faster,
20:40 closer to the speed of light,
20:42 time slows down for you compared to an observer watching you.
20:45 If I'm sitting here still on the Earth and I watch
20:48 somebody in a spaceship whizzing by at half the speed of light,
20:51 I see them very, very slowed down compared to me.
20:54 And when you're actually going at the speed of light itself, time stops.
20:57 That means that light does not experience space
21:01 or time in any kind of extended way.
21:04 All points in space are one, and all time, all points in time are one.
21:09 Time and space don't exist to a photon the way it does to us.
21:13 And yet I am made of something that you
21:16 can convert to photons and back and forth.
21:18 And I experience space and time.
21:21 I experience those as extended properties.
21:23 There's a duality to the universe, and I think this is going to become
21:27 one of the most important things for modern physics,
21:29 the next revolutions in physics.
21:30 Light around us, I mean, it's coming from the sun through my windows.
21:34 It's coming at me through, you know, the lights that we have in the studio,
21:37 doesn't experience the same universe I do.
21:40 To it, in a real way, the universe never expanded.
21:44 All points of time and space are still one from the perspective of a photon.
21:49 And I'm made of photons, kind of, but why do I experience space and time?
21:55 Space and time as we perceive them cannot be the end story.
22:00 There has to be a different perspective that shows
22:03 us a reality that our human brains don't perceive yet.
22:07 But the physics all around us, something as simple as light demands it.
22:13 The things that kind of give me chills is
22:15 just how little we understand the nature of reality itself.
22:17 If something bouncing off me right now
22:20 doesn't experience the universe as having even expanded, what does that mean?
22:24 So that equation, e= mc squared, I mean, it's useful.
22:28 You can use it to power nuclear reactions.
22:30 You can use it for particle accelerators,
22:32 but it actually sort of claws away the fabric
22:36 of reality itself and challenges us to ask what's underneath.
22:41 [Narrator] Wanna support the channel?
22:42 Join the Big Think members community where
22:44 you get access to videos early, ad-free.