The challenge of dementia | Nobel Week Dialogue 2025 | Health For All
Nobel Prize
0:00 I wanted to start out with the idea of biomarkers for dementia
0:03 and this topic is really going to be focused on the challenge of dementia.
0:07 And so Henrik, you know,
0:08 you have been central to the revolution in fluid biomarkers.
0:12 Your whole career has really been focused on that to some extent.
0:15 So what do you think is the most transformative advance in the field today?
0:20 Barbara and I don't agree on this.
0:21 That's good.
0:23 The whole concept of dementia has changed during the past 10-20 years.
0:29 Everything 10-20 years back it was regarded as a part of aging.
0:34 Now we know that the dementias are caused
0:36 by many different diseases and they are molecular in essence.
0:40 So there are brain tissue changes that we can
0:42 measure and this is where the biomarkers come in.
0:46 20 years ago one had to do an autopsy
0:49 examining the brain of a dead patient, not very helpful.
0:52 But now we can measure the protein changes that occur
0:56 in Alzheimer's disease in biofluids and treating which is your expertise
1:01 in living people and then it has become clear
1:04 that these are relatively distinct diseases that happen in the aging brain.
1:09 It can also happen early in life if you have genetic susceptibility.
1:13 It's measurable.
1:14 It's not something that just will happen to all of us.
1:19 These are diseases that we should try to diagnose
1:23 and try to treat and optimally this is where we discuss a lot try to prevent
1:29 which I think is almost impossible but that's
1:32 going to talk about that too but he he thinks
1:34 there's some contention here that you don't believe in biomarkers.
1:37 That was the implication.
1:39 no.
1:40 [laughter] No, I do believe in biomarkers just to be clear.
1:42 Um but there has been um as Henrik mentioned a a shift in the field
1:47 with regard to how we think about
1:48 dementia and the pathologies that caused dementia.
1:53 And uh for the first time we also
1:55 have disease modifying medications which is a big
1:58 shift in the field and makes the work
2:00 of of biomarker research so much more important.
2:04 Um for over 20 years we didn't have any new uh medicines for Alzheimer's disease
2:10 and now we have promising new treatments that actually
2:13 target specifically the pathologies that underlie Alzheimer's disease.
2:19 So uh that does give us optimism and it's a really nice compliment to the work
2:25 that you see with regard to diagnosing the disease
2:28 with fluid biomarkers or brain imaging or other methods.
2:31 So do you think there's a lot of barriers?
2:32 I'm going to start with the biomarker issue here though.
2:34 Um moving that from the laboratory to the clinic.
2:37 It seems like it's working now.
2:38 You have a translation of biomarker biology into clinical diagnostics.
2:44 Is that solid?
2:46 Yeah, so the you know,
2:47 with regard to um particularly the work that Henrik's doing
2:51 and now we can compliment each other and not fight.
2:54 But the the work that you're doing um
2:56 has really advanced the field because you can measure
2:59 the pathologies using a blood test which is quite
3:02 different um from what we had 10 years ago even.
3:06 Um and so that makes the clinical care easier.
3:11 On the other hand uh the treatments that we have
3:13 for Alzheimer's disease right now um do require delivery in specialized centers.
3:19 So that can be actually a barrier to treatment.
3:23 Uh the new treatments uh that are being used right
3:25 now they require an infusion um due to some safety monitoring.
3:30 They also require uh brain imaging to make sure that you
3:34 can care for the patient and make sure that they
3:36 don't have any uh vascular injury during the treatment and those are
3:40 the kinds of resources that you don't find um globally.
3:45 So just give us a some sense of how many different
3:47 clinical trials are underway and how many uh treatments are available.
3:53 Now there are hundreds of trials that are ongoing and many have
3:57 been focused on Alzheimer's disease which is the most common dementia causing
4:01 disease where beta amyloid clumps in the brain disturb the neural networks
4:06 and make them dysfunctional and eventually
4:08 neurons die off in a neurodegenerative process.
4:12 And there there are that's where we have seen the big progress lately.
4:16 In the Alzheimer's In the Alzheimer's field.
4:18 For the other dementia causing diseases progress has been slower.
4:22 They are likely a little bit more tricky to to address but we have seen
4:27 breakthroughs the past 10 years in neurodegeneration
4:31 in general and there is a very prominent success story in regards to a rare
4:37 disease called spinal muscular atrophy that kills kids
4:41 with mutations in a gene that helps
4:42 the motor neurons of the spinal cord survive.
4:45 There is a cure for that disease which is amazing.
4:48 So for a while pharma and and also researchers thought
4:52 that neurodegeneration was too difficult and that one should try to many
4:58 of the big pharma companies stepped out from out of neurodegeneration
5:02 research a while ago but now there is much more hope.
5:05 Uh so we've seen it in spinal muscular atrophy.
5:09 We have also seen a couple of new
5:11 interesting treatments against ALS which is a terrible disease.
5:15 Uh but you also seem to be able to modify
5:18 the disease onset by having a molecularly target targeted uh drug.
5:23 And is that partly because the disease classification
5:25 is more clear in these cases you've given now?
5:28 It is partly improved diagnostics so that we measure the underlying pathology.
5:35 Uh with Alzheimer's disease if you have a patient with memory
5:38 complaints there could be many reasons for that apart from Alzheimer's disease
5:43 and when using these biomarkers one has to do a complete medical
5:46 evaluation which any doctor should be able to do to examine bodily functions,
5:52 thyroid hormone levels, calcium, of course type 2 diabetes,
5:56 also looking into psychiatry with depression.
5:58 And then you address the neurodegenerative aspects with imaging and biomarkers.
6:03 Well, I wanted to ask Barb what do you what gives you
6:05 hope in terms of the treatment uh the trials and also the options?
6:09 So I think what again where we have optimism is that it has
6:13 been so many years since we have had new treatments for Alzheimer's disease.
6:18 So having new treatments has now brought fresh momentum to the field.
6:23 Um pharmacy is interested in developing treatments.
6:26 We've had some successes and it's really moving towards
6:30 probably we're going to have more treatments that work better,
6:35 that have better safety profiles and with that momentum
6:38 it's going to become possible I think to cure dementia.
6:43 Right now the treatments aren't curative.
6:44 They really are lifelong therapies.
6:47 Is that correct what we see?
6:49 And also the treatments are not I mean to some extent
6:52 I can't help but thinking they are a little bit of miracle
6:54 drugs because they are very effective at removing the amyloid from the brain
6:59 and most of us think that the amyloid is really important.
7:04 But the the clinical benefit has been discussed.
7:07 Uh so one could say that okay these new treatments might slow down the disease
7:12 by 30% and then there is
7:14 in the interindividual variation also in responders and non-responders.
7:18 But as you said Barb there are some
7:22 now tweaks to these anti-amyloid antibodies that will help
7:27 them to cross the blood-brain barrier more efficiently
7:30 and those drugs might turn out to be very useful.
7:33 But we are very far from health for all in this field.
7:38 Well, I wanted to move to things like you know,
7:39 in that respect modifiable risk factors, lifestyle.
7:43 You know, how much can we prevent uh dementia?
7:48 Yeah.
7:49 So genetics most certainly are important.
7:52 Um but I think so an example that really illustrates
7:55 how modifiable risk factors come into play is when you
7:58 think about for example genetically identical twins and there is
8:02 actually um discordance in genetically identical twins who develop dementia.
8:07 So one twin might develop dementia um and then the other person might
8:12 not develop it till 3-5 up to 18 years discordance has been observed.
8:17 So that tells you that there's something about
8:19 um the exposures over the lifetime perhaps or lifestyle
8:22 which kind of fits into this picture that are
8:25 uh affecting people's uh risk for developing dementia.
8:30 Um Are there clues what if these maybe epigenetic
8:33 factors are how the lifestyle can influence the genome?
8:37 Are there is it diet, smoking?
8:39 well there's a really nice um kind of term for this and it's the exposome.
8:43 So it complements the idea of the genome.
8:46 Uh the exposome is all of your exposures from in utero until later life.
8:52 Um just to stick on the topic of genetic twins,
8:54 there was another study that was done in uh
8:58 middle-aged men where they evaluated their lifestyle factors at midlife.
9:02 So smoking, alcohol, uh physical activity, cardiovascular risk factors.
9:08 And then those same men had brain imaging 20 years later and what
9:12 they saw was among the twin um the twins who had less physical activity,
9:18 more that those individuals showed more brain changes.
9:24 So more shrinkage of the brain, more vascular injury.
9:28 So we know that there are these relationships
9:31 between the modifiable risk factors and brain health.
9:35 And there's now also been some very
9:37 large clinical trials using um multifactorial interventions.
9:42 So not just one modifiable risk factor but multiple risk factors.
9:47 Can we change those in later life?
9:50 And then what you see is actually um maintained and improved cognition.
9:54 So So also now have some gold standard uh clinical trial results.
10:00 I I don't believe in this paper.
10:01 Well, I just before I want to I think it's all genes.
10:04 The more you continue on I want to continue
10:06 on the topic of I do want to continue.
10:08 I'm going to let you unpack that, but just a [laughter] curiosity question.
10:12 How reliable are animal models then
10:14 for for for studying in the clinical condition here?
10:17 Because you you have to imagine that dementia takes
10:19 many years to be able to manifest this disease.
10:22 And sometimes it takes a long time to be able to test your hypothesis.
10:25 So can we use animal models in this case or we're using epidemiological data?
10:30 So um epidemiological data has been very helpful in identifying
10:36 some of these factors that could potentially be modified.
10:40 But then, you know, um what what really has I think changed the field now
10:44 is this idea of doing randomized controlled clinical
10:48 trials just like you do with the drugs,
10:50 but in this sense prescribing a lifestyle.
10:53 the lifestyle or health behaviors.
10:55 But he's skeptical.
10:57 Yeah, I I it's like this.
10:59 I have to of course have to look at the data.
11:03 So and I agree that there seems to be modifiable risk factors.
11:07 Okay.
11:07 A little bit.
11:08 You agree.
11:08 A little bit.
11:09 bit.
11:10 So I think that if you are if you have the genetics that tells
11:14 you that you have if you look in in your family for example,
11:17 if you see that people get old get demented,
11:19 then there is a big genetic risk for aging in that way.
11:22 If you get to live that long, that's another that's another challenge.
11:27 Um and then if you maintain your cardiovascular fit the system fit,
11:33 then you will also maintain your cerebral vascular system in a good
11:37 Everything goes back to the heart.
11:38 Everything goes back to the heart.
11:39 So everything that's good for the heart is good for the brain.
11:41 Okay.
11:42 But that's details to me because then I think you will still if
11:46 you have a high genetic risk get the amyloid process of the brain.
11:50 It's like a if you might remember the mad cow disaster
11:56 that happened with infectious proteins
11:57 that propagate propagate along the brain tissue.
12:00 It's a little bit similar with these types of diseases,
12:03 but then you can resist the process better if you
12:08 have a healthy cerebral vascular system and good brain networks.
12:13 like you agree actually.
12:15 Go ahead, Barb.
12:16 There is another important point to be made and that is
12:18 that you can do everything right and still get dementia.
12:23 And we definitely don't place, you know,
12:26 this idea that you you got dementia because you didn't do things right.
12:31 That's that's absolutely not what we what we think.
12:34 Um but in in that sense as well,
12:37 I think um it's important to also consider that um
12:41 only so much of our behavior is actually under our own
12:43 control because there are factors around us all the time
12:47 that are pressing on us and are modifying our behaviors.
12:51 Um it might be also the case that over
12:53 the lifetime you've been exposed to to toxins or pollution,
12:58 which increases risk for cardiovascular
13:00 windows of time in our life where that's really critical.
13:03 Absolutely.
13:03 we heard a little bit about adolescence earlier here um in the preceding talk.
13:07 You know, could be a window of time where we have
13:09 an exposure that actually manifests uh disease phenotype much later in life.
13:14 Absolutely.
13:14 And there I you know, well, when I started in this field,
13:17 there was an idea that midlife was the critical period.
13:21 That that's when trajectories of aging change.
13:24 But we've now seen that that's backed up even further.
13:27 And there's study now studies now that suggest that even
13:31 early life exposures are influencing brain health tens of, you know,
13:36 decades later, which is pretty fascinating.
13:38 All right, we've got 2 minutes.
13:39 You each get a minute.
13:40 What do you think is sort of the big breakthrough that we're waiting for?
13:44 Yeah, I hope for refined refinement of the existing treatments.
13:48 And since we are in Sweden now,
13:49 these treatments are not in clinical practice yet,
13:52 but they are we're getting a lot of knowledge
13:54 from the US and other countries where they are.
13:56 Uh so I hope that that will happen in the European
13:59 countries and in other countries across across the world.
14:02 I also hope that we will tweak
14:04 these drugs and make them accessible through not infusions,
14:07 but that you can give them yourself sub Or maybe tablets.
14:10 Tablets, that would be wonderful.
14:12 There are also some exciting approaches to develop drugs
14:16 that could that could be taken as a pill
14:19 to modify what types of beta amyloid proteins you
14:22 are secreting and thereby delaying onset of the pro process.
14:26 Then we also need to tackle all the other diseases,
14:29 cardiovascular disease, frontotemporal dementia, Lewy body dementia.
14:32 So Those of you want to enter science That's your 5 seconds left.
14:36 Okay, you got you had your minute.
14:38 That's great.
14:38 Now Barb, you get the last word.
14:40 you know, I'll I'll take up from where you
14:41 left off about if you want to enter science,
14:45 there's still a lot of need, a lot of research that needs to be done.
14:49 And we absolutely need to support the next generation.
14:53 And one of the things that I've observed recently is
14:56 that when there's uncertainty around funding for example for research,
15:01 that individuals who are planning to work in these fields
15:05 sometimes also feel uncertainty and might step back.
15:10 And so we definitely don't want to lose this momentum
15:12 right when all of these exciting things are happening.
15:16 So I also I agree with you.
15:17 We need to encourage the next generation.
15:19 All right.
15:20 Well said.
15:21 Thank you very much for that.
15:22 And it's indeed exciting times.
15:24 Thanks.
15:25 Thank you.
15:27 [applause] That's great.