Nicolle: 'Bezos making CAPITULATION look like an ART FORM' explains Met Gala sponsorship backlash
MS NOW
0:02 right now.
0:03 Some of the world's biggest names
0:05 in entertainment and culture attend the Met Gala.
0:07 But this year's event has been overshadowed
0:10 by the presence of Jeff Bezos and his wife, Lauren Sanchez-Bezos.
0:15 They are serving as the honorary chairs of the event,
0:18 and it is not going over very well.
0:20 The New York Times reports this, quote,
0:22 opposition to the Bezoses started almost immediately after
0:25 they were announced as financial sponsors in February.
0:29 It comes amid a surging anti-rich sentiment nationwide and in New York City.
0:34 In the weeks leading up to the event,
0:36 the streets of New York City have been peppered with protests of Bezos
0:39 and their presence at the gala calling for a boycott of the Bezos Met Gala.
0:44 And it might have to do with Bezos making capitulation look
0:47 like an art form during Donald Trump's second term in office.
0:51 Jeff Bezos donated $1 million to Donald Trump's inauguration,
0:55 which earned him a prominent seat on the stage during the inauguration ceremony.
1:00 And his company, Amazon,
1:01 spent $40 million making Melania Trump's self-titled documentary,
1:06 with The Wall Street Journal reporting the company paid three times
1:10 more than the next highest bitter in what was essentially a gift.
1:15 The backlash to Bezos and his wife at tonight's gala
1:19 is just another reminder of how Donald Trump's deeply unpopular
1:23 presidency is now starting to stain the brands of those who
1:27 have cowered and capitulated to him since he took office.
1:30 I want to bring in domestic correspondent for the style
1:33 section of The New York Times, Jesse McKinley,
1:35 his byline on that Times reporting we read from, and with me at the table,
1:39 political analyst, Molly Jong-Fast.
1:41 She's the host of Fast Politics
1:43 and a New York Times contributing opinion writer.
1:46 I guess I want to understand, Jesse, how this came to be.
1:51 So how does, how do, is it all about money?
1:54 Is the Met Gala for sale?
1:57 Well, that's probably, that's probably a little too simplistic.
2:00 But the short answer is sort of yes.
2:03 I mean, Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez Bezos
2:05 probably contributed somewhere in the neighborhood of $10 million,
2:08 low weight figures in order to become
2:10 the hosts and sponsors of this event tonight.
2:12 And that event, the Met Gala, is at its heart a fundraiser.
2:17 You know, the money goes to the costume of the Met itself, devoted to fashion.
2:23 And for many, many decades, I mean, this dates back to the 1940s,
2:27 this is kind of a clubby, upper east side kind of event.
2:30 You know, you'd have patrons of the arts people like Mark Zuckerberg,
2:47 who's going to be there tonight,
2:48 apparently, you know, buying their way into these events,
2:52 not by dint of, you know, a special, you know, interest in fashion necessarily,
2:57 but by dint of being, you know, an exceptional person in the world
3:00 that seems to kind of value financial success.
3:04 Jesse, The New York Times reports this.
3:07 On Friday, in a nod to complaints by Amazon workers
3:10 of having to skip bathroom breaks and urinate in bottles instead,
3:14 the group placed close to 300 bottles
3:17 of fake urine inside the Metropolitan Museum of Art.
3:20 And on Sunday, the eve of the gala,
3:22 the anti-billionaire group projected video interviews
3:25 with Amazon workers onto the Empire State Building,
3:27 the Chrysler building, and the Bezos' penthouse near Madison Square Park.
3:31 I mean, you and your colleagues have sort of reported on the front-end backlash.
3:37 What is the lasting brand damage to this embrace
3:40 of Bezos and his wife, Laurence Sanchez?
3:45 WILLIAM BRANGHAM, President of the United that's going
3:46 to be an interesting thing to delve into.
3:47 I mean, one of the things we'll be looking at tonight
3:50 is if not only who shows up but who DOESN'T SHOW UP.
3:52 THERE HAVE BEEN REPORTS THAT SOME CELEBRITIES
3:55 LIKE ZANDAIA ET CETERA ARE NOT GOING
3:56 TO THESE ARE PEOPLE THAT KIND OF ADD A CERTAIN LUSTER AND BRAND TO THIS EVENT.
4:05 I MEAN, THAT BEING SAID YOU STILL HAVE NICOLE KIDMAN, YOU HAVE VENUS WILLIAMS,
4:09 YOU HAVE YOU HAVE ANNA WINTOUR HERSELF ALREADY ON THE CARPET.
4:12 YOU HAVE LAWRENCE SANCHEZ ON THE CARPET.
4:14 BUT THERE WILL BE QUESTIONS EITHER AT THE EVENT TONIGHT
4:16 OR IN THE AFTERPARTIES OR IN THE DAYS TO COME WHETHER OR NOT PEOPLE,
4:21 PEOPLE, YOU KNOW, BASICALLY GOT THE ICH FACTOR
4:22 OF BEING THERE WITH JEFF BEZOS WHO, YOU KNOW, HAS REALLY DRIFTED TO THE GIVEN
4:28 THE RIGHT POLITICALLY WITH THE INAUGURAL THAT YOU
4:32 MENTIONED IN THE INTRO AS WELL AS SOME OF THE CUTBACKS OF THE WASHINGTON POST,
4:35 SOME OF THE EDITORIAL DECISIONS HE'S made at the Washington Post, which he owns.
4:39 I think all of that has given it,
4:41 given some liberals pause, most primarily Governor, I mean rather Mayor Mandami,
4:48 who said a month ago that he would not go to this EVENT,
4:50 YOU KNOW, AS A DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST, THAT'S NOT A BIG SURPRISE,
4:54 BUT I THINK THAT WAS A REAL SIGNAL TO PEOPLE
4:56 THAT THIS WAS NOT A PLACE THAT GOOD LIBERALS SHOULD GO.
4:59 I THINK THE RISK IS BROADER THAN AMONG LIBERALS.
5:03 I MEAN, I THINK BEZOS HAS STAKED OUT A POSITION THAT IS ANTI-DEMOCRATIC.
5:07 AND I DON'T KNOW HOW QUICKLY AN ORBON-LIKE FALL OF TRUMPISM IS GOING TO COME,
5:11 BUT IT'S COMING AND BEZOS IS ON THE WRONG SIDE OF THAT.
5:13 OH, YEAH.
5:15 I MEAN, THERE WILL BE A time sooner rather than later
5:17 that Jeff Bezos pretends he was never for any of this.
5:19 But he is pretty much a case study in obeying in advance.
5:23 And I'm just going to tick off some of the things that my man did here.
5:27 We had the Melania GENERAL MOVIE, REMEMBER THAT?
5:30 WE HAD, HE'S TOYING WITH AN APPRENTISCH SHOW WITH DON JUNIOR.
5:35 FRONT ROW AT the inauguration with the wife, this guy has,
5:41 he's a case study in obeying in advance and he's also been,
5:45 I mean there are many reasons,
5:47 look, I come from a world, I grew up in the city, you know,
5:50 there was a nobly, there was a noble, Nobel, I'm sorry, the noble obler.
5:56 Yeah.
5:57 You know, where people, right.
5:59 And also people who had means use those means to take care of the community.
6:03 That was part of the deal.
6:05 And you had, you know, even in the Gilded Ages,
6:07 you had people building museums and, you know, that was kind of the job.
6:11 This crew of these tech bros, they are not so interested in that.
6:15 They're not building anything.
6:15 Right.
6:16 And you see that they have foundations that, you know,
6:18 don't give enough money away to get the tax statuses they're supposed to have.
6:22 And look, this is an administration filled with that.
6:25 Remember, it started with the richest man in the world
6:27 saying that he was going to cut socials, you know,
6:30 cut all sorts of NIH grants and stuff like
6:33 that so that he could end waste fraud and abuse.
6:36 And, of course, that was never really true.
6:39 And he's, you know, no longer in the government.
6:41 But it was It's just, you know,
6:43 to look at this and to see this as anything but really anti-democratic
6:47 and also just morally bankrupt in a moment
6:50 when the American people are really hurting,
6:53 when affordability is like number one for you know,
6:56 Republicans, Democrats, gas prices are high.
6:59 And we're looking, you know,
7:01 and we're watching this just grotesque show of wealth.
7:05 And it's just I think it's morally really dicey.
7:08 It is not a good look.
7:08 No one's going anywhere.