A 19-year-old fooled London’s richest people. Then he fell to his death.

A 19-year-old fooled London’s richest people. Then he fell to his death.

On with Kara Swisher

0:00 This is a story about a boy who lies.

0:02 This kid Zach Breler that this book is about starts to tell

0:05 some people that he actually is the son of a Russian oligarch.

0:08 So this boy Zach at 18 starts telling grown-ups in London that he's

0:13 poised to inherit hundreds of millions

0:15 of dollars and he's looking to make investments,

0:16 but he he dies at 19 in very mysterious circumstances

0:20 going off the balcony of this luxury building overlooking the temps.

0:24 You're doing a murder investigation or a suicide investigation.

0:26 And one by one you get these people

0:28 starting to die in mysterious circumstances in London.

0:32 Business people who've had connections with the R

0:34 Russ Russians or cross them in some way.

0:36 And the police rather than be very aggressive and try and get to the bottom

0:40 of it have a tendency to just sort of say nothing to see here.

0:44 Looks like a suicide looks like an accident.

0:46 There's been a kind of decision by the authorities just to look

0:50 the the other way and conclude listen it's good for us.

0:54 London is to the billionaire what the jungles of Sumatra are to the orangutan.

0:58 We're proud of that.

0:59 If you could talk to Zach, what would you have wanted to ask him?

1:04 Oh, wow.

1:05 Cara, nobody's asked me that yet.

1:12 Hi everyone.

1:12 Today I'm talking to award-winning journalist and author Patrick Renkeefe.

1:17 He's got a new book out called London Falling.

1:19 It's truly excellent as usual with Patrick Raden Keefe.

1:22 He tells great stories.

1:24 This one's set in London by someone who pretends to be

1:26 the son of a Russian oligarch and it ends badly for him.

1:30 I of course really enjoy everything Patrick writes

1:32 as well as this book and this conversation.

1:35 So stick around.

1:37 Patrick, thanks for coming on on.

1:39 Great to be with you.

1:40 You're killing me because I came back from San Francisco last night.

1:43 I was there doing some interviews of some public officials.

1:47 Um and I I was going to sleep on the plane, but then I read your book all night.

1:52 just it's fantastic.

1:54 I had already read pieces of it,

1:55 but I read all the way through because it's so good.

1:58 So, thank you.

1:59 You're exhausted me.

2:00 Just so you know,

2:01 this is what I I want a captive audience on a plane with no It was great.

2:04 Anyway, I want to start with a more basic question.

2:07 I was thinking as I was reading because I loved Empire of Pain especially,

2:11 and I think that's the last time you and I talked.

2:13 Um, and you said you're basically fascinated by crime and corruption,

2:16 secrets and lies, the permeable membrane separating listenit and illicit worlds.

2:21 the bonds of family, the power of denial,

2:24 and and one of the interviews you said this is a story about a boy who lies,

2:28 which I loved the way you talked about it.

2:30 So, how come what draws you to dark stories and dangerous people?

2:35 I don't know what it is, honestly.

2:36 It's not I don't really even think of myself as a crime reporter,

2:39 but it is a situation where when I go out

2:41 and I kind of pursue what's interesting to me in the world,

2:45 it's often stories about people transgressing in one way or another.

2:50 It's often stories about people kind of using

2:52 their own charisma to change the world a little bit,

2:56 to find some little wormhole,

2:57 some loophole they can get through or actually to kind

3:00 of reorganize the world in a way that they would want.

3:03 And it's funny because we talk about those stories as if they're outliers,

3:07 but I feel as though that is the era we live in.

3:11 And this kid, Zach Breler, that this book is about,

3:13 you know, he was a 19-year-old fabulist,

3:16 but at the same time, to me, he's the most 21st century creature imaginable

3:21 in this era.

3:22 Although we've been we've had fabulous, right?

3:24 There's been fabulous throughout history.

3:27 We have, but it's different.

3:28 You know, Zach is born in 2000, right?

3:30 So, he kind of perfectly tracks this millennium.

3:34 And he grows up, he's very much on Instagram.

3:37 His favorite movie is The Wolf of Wall Street.

3:39 and he grows up kind of exposed to a kind of hustle culture,

3:44 a real sense that everything's all or nothing.

3:46 You bet big, push all your chips in, tell lies if

3:49 you have to, you kind of fake it till you make it.

3:52 And that's the culture he was immersed in and that's the person he became.

3:56 Or he immersed himself.

3:57 This is you're talking about Zack Bratler.

3:59 He went to a fancy private school in London, not the fanciest.

4:03 Um, his family was welloff but not fabulously wealthy.

4:07 And at school he met kids of actual oligarchs and which

4:10 is kind of a brand for London at a time.

4:12 Although I understand many of them are leaving.

4:15 And he becomes so enamored of extreme wealth that he pretended to be

4:18 the son of a Russian oligarch which seems to be an unusual choice.

4:22 It's super easy to draw parallels with Anna Delvi,

4:25 the fake Russian aerys who scammed people in New York or young

4:28 car con artists like Billy McFarland who co-founded the fire festival.

4:33 talk about why he was going for this con because it's a little different.

4:37 They were they were looking for money really.

4:40 They were your classic con artists like

4:42 any given venture capitalist in Silicon Valley.

4:45 But go ahead.

4:46 Yeah, I mean Zach was, you know, he grew up in an upper middle class family.

4:50 Father does structured finance, mother's a freelance journalist.

4:52 He had a big brother, very loving family.

4:55 Um, and he at 13 he goes to this school

4:59 uh kind of fancy private school on the outskirts of London.

5:02 Not the most academically rigorous place, but an expensive

5:04 His brother went to the better one.

5:06 Correct.

5:06 Exactly.

5:07 So, his brother had gotten into a school called the University College School.

5:10 Um, you know, more rigorous, more elite, and Zach doesn't get in.

5:14 And so, he ends up at this place called Mil Hill at 13.

5:18 And a bunch of the kids who go there are the children of oligarchs,

5:21 really wealthy people who've come in and found a second home in London,

5:25 many of them from the former Soviet Union.

5:28 and he's exposed to, you know, not just great wealth, you know,

5:33 wealth that far exceeds the wealth of his own family,

5:36 but also a kind of attitude, right?

5:38 There's a very sort of English perspective that his parents had,

5:40 which is that it's actually pretty

5:42 unclassy to have extravagant displays of wealth,

5:46 you know, that that there's something a little go about that.

5:49 Um, and these kids at the school are very kind of blingy and braggadocious.

5:56 And as a teenager, he's really taken in by that.

5:58 And so he starts to tell lies about his family, about how much money they make,

6:04 about where they live, about what kind of car they drive.

6:07 and he kind of graduates to a point where when he's out

6:11 of school out in the kind of adult world of London at 18,

6:15 he starts to tell some people that he actually is the son of a Russian oligarch.

6:19 He invents this whole new persona and he's got a whole story.

6:24 Um, crazily, I mean, one of the things that's so bizarre about this story,

6:28 you know, it's it's I I've been on book tour for 3 weeks across the US, and

6:33 one of the things that's fun about it is you go out and you meet people who've

6:36 read the book and sometimes they see things

6:37 that are in it that I didn't even spot,

6:39 but there was a woman who came up to me in um, Nashville.

6:42 She'd finished reading.

6:44 And she said, "You know what's so weird about this book

6:45 is that you have this kid who's kind of a compulsive liar.

6:48 And the kids in this story all see through the lies.

6:51 the kids who've grown up on social media and have

6:53 an idea that there's kind of a that everybody's wearing a mask,

6:56 everybody's putting on a face online,

7:00 they can see through the BS, right?

7:02 But the adults buy it.

7:04 And so this boy, Zach,

7:05 at 18 starts telling grown-ups in London that he's poised to inherit

7:10 hundreds of millions of dollars and he's looking to make investments.

7:13 And a lot of these kind

7:14 of vulturish grown-ups immediately attach themselves to him.

7:19 So, what what was he trying to achieve with the con itself?

7:23 Listen, I mean, the first thing I would say is when you're 18,

7:26 you're you know, you're you're not thinking three

7:28 chess moves ahead a lot of the time.

7:30 I think he was only thinking a step or two ahead.

7:33 And I think in this case, he wanted entree.

7:35 There was a life and a lifestyle.

7:37 It wasn't really no a typical con artist, right?

7:40 It's something else.

7:42 No, it was No.

7:43 And in fact, his his whole con was he was pretending to be the guy

7:46 with the money because I think he wanted

7:47 to he wanted to be driving in nice cars.

7:50 He wanted to get into private clubs and casinos.

7:53 He wanted to sort of be invited to the ball basically.

7:57 And that was as far as he as he'd gotten, I think.

8:00 He, you know, he had a notion of becoming a businessman.

8:02 He was trying to get into deals with oil and gas and and, you know,

8:07 trading cars and so forth.

8:09 And the guys that he became friends with were themselves

8:12 a certain kind of probably familiar to your listeners charlatan just

8:18 like a guy who you know he he was in he's

8:20 in crypto and now he's in AI and he's got

8:23 all these ventures and he's you know a lot of big

8:26 talk a lot of meetings a lot of bluster not

8:29 a huge amount of results to show for any of it

8:32 but um the appearance of of a hustler on the make

8:36 it's a huge part of the manosphere by the way it's that ideas like if

8:39 you just sell this car or do this stock or buy this coin or whatever

8:43 it is and I think some of that is very um is

8:47 in a in a kind of poignant way illustrative of the moment that we're living in.

8:52 I mean some of it is that there's a lot of BS, right?

8:54 That you can you can kind of fake it till you make it

8:58 and rise to the highest levels in this country and in and in business.

9:02 um you know, if you can trick voters, if you can trick uh investors,

9:06 um there's there's no practical limit to how far you can go at this point.

9:12 And so, if you're a young ambitious kid looking around,

9:15 there's a sense in which you probably take note of that and you think,

9:17 okay, this is the way to do it.

9:19 But I think there's another thing too which is that there's a kind of all

9:22 or nothing quality where there's a sense that you you kind of need to always be

9:27 betting the house because the alternative is

9:29 a totally uncertain future in which you probably

9:31 won't own your own home um you know or have a stable job or any shortcut.

9:38 It's the shortcut version of things.

9:39 I'm curious did you ever have a fake personality or did you ever try that?

9:47 I don't think so.

9:47 I mean I had as an got that today on pivot and he hadn't What did he say?

9:52 No, neither have I.

9:55 Yeah, neither have I.

9:55 Or thought about I had I mean in adolescence I think

9:58 we all kind of cycle through different personalities.

10:01 There were times where I was sort of I mean

10:02 for me it was like what kind of music do I like?

10:05 What kind of clothes do I wear?

10:06 What kind of kids do I hang out with?

10:08 I would have these brief phases where I'd

10:09 be really into something and then move on.

10:12 I think the sad thing about Zach's story is he's a kid

10:15 who I mean we haven't mentioned it but he he dies

10:17 at 19 in very mysterious circumstances going off the balcony of this luxury

10:22 building overlooking the temps and so the thing that's so sad

10:25 in his case is that he gets kind of he gets sort

10:27 of trapped in that he's in that sort of confusing phase that a lot

10:30 of us go through in adolescence might even be natural for an adolescent

10:35 I mean he takes it obviously to a very unhealthy extreme

10:38 um and he doesn't make it out you're sort of taking apart the death you're doing

10:43 a murder investigation or a suicide investigation or a death investigation.

10:47 Yeah.

10:48 I mean, it's also I think it's the parents

10:49 also trying to I think the weirdness of it, right, is after he dies,

10:52 his parents have to figure out what happened to him,

10:54 but they also have to figure out who was he.

10:56 I mean, it's that sort of strange experience of um

10:59 there's somebody that you raised, that you gave birth to, that you lived with,

11:03 you don't recognize and suddenly he's gone and you have to Yeah.

11:06 You have to sort of figure out get to the bottom of who he was.

11:09 It's interesting.

11:10 I've done a lot of interviews with the parents of kids who have died when

11:12 these relationships they didn't know with chatbots

11:15 and it's the same thing because these kids changed.

11:19 Yeah.

11:19 It's really interesting these when you

11:21 do these interviews because they thought they

11:23 knew the kid and then the kid was changed by the chatbot or whatever.

11:26 They had no idea they had this other

11:28 life happening to them which is interesting.

11:30 But one of the things that informed Zach in this case as you said

11:33 Wolf of Wall Street which is very resonant with young men I can tell you.

11:37 I had to get my kids off of it.

11:39 Um, and but the movie War Dogs is another one.

11:42 It's about two young That was another of his favorites.

11:44 Yeah.

11:45 Who become unlike

11:46 one of Zach's he was obsessed with with Ephraim Daroli,

11:48 the the Jonah Hill character in that.

11:50 Right.

11:50 Exactly.

11:51 Which who are unlikely arms dealers on the make.

11:53 And you've pointed out in other interviews that he saw the films

11:56 like an instruction manual rather than cautionary tales, which they were.

12:00 And I would agree they sometimes don't see the point of it.

12:04 They sort of think, you know,

12:06 Jordan and Wolf of Wall Street as a hero in some ways.

12:09 Is do a hunger to get rich or appear rich about

12:13 is it reveal something about Britain or the the world in general?

12:16 Because I think it applies very much in the US, too.

12:18 Yeah.

12:18 I don't I mean, it's funny.

12:20 On the one hand, this this is a very specifically English story in the sense

12:23 that Russian oligarchs just play a very particular role in the culture there.

12:30 Zach was obsessed with Roman Abramovich who at the time owned Chelsea Football

12:34 Club and um the aspect of it you don't really see here as much.

12:42 But I'll tell you, I mean I've been

12:43 traveling around talking about the book, you know,

12:45 I was down in Miami talking about the idea

12:48 that Zach growing up in in certain parts of London,

12:52 you know, it's supercars on the street everywhere.

12:55 It's this kind of blingy, ostentatious, sort of over-the-top displays of wealth.

13:00 There's a sense of a kind of roguish wealth,

13:03 a kind of gangster capitalist thing going on.

13:05 And there were all these heads nodding in Miami.

13:08 Oh, yeah.

13:10 Um, that's the dead center of that.

13:10 Yeah.

13:11 You know, I went to Seattle and you go to Seattle

13:13 and you start talking about oligarchs and the way they transform

13:16 a city and you know the oligarchs there aren't Russian

13:19 but uh but boy Bezos and the way in which he has Paul Allen changed that place.

13:25 Paul Allen.

13:26 Yeah, absolutely.

13:26 And so I think there are aspects of it here um as well.

13:32 I think some of it is just the culture and

13:35 and they did in San Francisco until they

13:37 all left which we were thrilled when they did.

13:38 And the the reinvention of London was based

13:41 on a lot of sort of sketchy foreign money.

13:44 Correct.

13:44 Yeah.

13:44 Which they welcomed in.

13:46 I mean this is the thing that's so fascinating about

13:47 the Trump administration now um touting this golden visa program, right?

13:52 Is that London did that two decades ago.

13:54 They did and it did bring billions of dollars

13:56 into the economy which they felt like they really needed.

14:00 Uh, but the upshot is that London's a very eerie place.

14:03 I mean, it's it's gone to an extreme that really no place I mean no place maybe

14:09 bar Miami in the US has gone where if

14:13 you walk around upscale neighborhoods in London after dark.

14:17 The buildings are all dark because nobody's living in the apartments.

14:21 They have these, you know,

14:23 massively expensive apartments which are bought by people

14:27 essentially as a kind of real estate speculation.

14:29 You have another thing going on too,

14:30 which is that there's a kind of criminal class.

14:34 Um, there's a whole story outline in the book

14:36 about how you get all these Russians who come,

14:41 they start buying these big properties,

14:42 they send their kids to the private schools,

14:43 they do things like buy Chelsea Football Club, and then one by one,

14:47 you get these people starting to die in mysterious circumstances in London.

14:51 Business people who've had connections with the R

14:54 Russ Russians or crossed them in some way.

14:56 And you get all these people falling off

14:57 of buildings or falling in front of tube trains.

14:59 And the police rather than be very aggressive and try and get to the bottom

15:03 of it have a tendency to just sort of say nothing to see here.

15:07 Looks like a suicide, looks like an accident.

15:10 And that eerie feeling which Matthew and Michelle, Zach's parents,

15:16 who are really the main characters in the book,

15:18 experience where they're, you know,

15:20 they're these people who sort of grew up in this city.

15:22 They think they know it and then

15:23 suddenly they realize that actually just beneath

15:25 the surface there's all this pretty dodgy stuff going on and there's been a kind

15:30 of decision by the authorities just to look the the other way

15:34 and and and sort of conclude listen it's good for us that all this has happened.

15:38 There's a there's a quote in the book from Boris Johnson when he

15:41 was the mayor of London saying London

15:42 is the the natural habitat for billionaires.

15:45 He said you know London is to the billionaire

15:47 what the jungles of Sumatra are to the orangutan.

15:50 We're proud of that.

15:51 this is where they should feel most at home,

15:54 right?

15:55 And one of the things um in a way also

15:57 this is a story about parenting in the digital age, right?

16:00 Because of the ability to be fake.

16:03 You're the father of two teen boys.

16:05 I have older kids and younger kids,

16:08 but the older ones are in their 20s and their early 20s.

16:11 It must have been first of all tough seeing

16:14 parents dealing with the grief of losing a son.

16:15 I can't even imagine.

16:17 Um talk about you talked about going to therapy for the first time

16:22 um when you were finishing this book although it didn't take long term.

16:25 Talk about this idea of parenting in a digital

16:28 age and how it affected you when you were looking

16:30 at this story because it's sort of like there

16:32 but for the go grace of God kind of thing.

16:34 Yeah, listen it's hard.

16:35 I mean I don't think um I think anyone who's who's a parent these days,

16:40 particularly a parent of an adolescent will relate

16:42 to the sense in which you have these dilemmas, right?

16:44 We I think there's a kind of natural American tendency,

16:48 probably a natural human tendency,

16:50 but particularly pronounced in America because we love a silver bullet.

16:53 We love we love innovation.

16:54 We love a new technology and something comes along and we

16:57 have a tendency just to let it kind of wash over us.

17:00 You know, when there's a new g whiz kind of tech,

17:04 we tend to just kind of adopt it, you know, to sort of swallow without chewing.

17:11 And I think that happened with phones.

17:13 It happened with social media.

17:15 And I, you know, my kids, my older boy was born in 2010, right?

17:19 So I'm sort of I'm right there in the generation

17:22 of parents who at a certain point all the kids had phones.

17:26 And you would really be putting your kid at a a pretty

17:29 significant social disadvantage to um to not let them have phones.

17:34 My kids go to a big public school and um and then

17:38 they get the phones and it's it's really hard to regulate, right?

17:42 And we as adults experience it.

17:43 I mean, they are addictive.

17:45 These technologies are addictive.

17:46 I think what I found with Zach was I guess I'd say two things.

17:50 One is, yeah, for me as a parent of two adolescent boys,

17:54 it took a toll to spend a couple of years talking,

17:57 you know, a few times a week to a couple

18:00 who'd lost a child when he was an adolescent.

18:03 it doesn't, you know,

18:04 there's no way not to open your heart

18:05 to people like that and really try and understand

18:07 their story at a bone deep level and have it not affect you as a parent.

18:11 Um, and yet where where I came out was not with any sort of parenting lesson.

18:18 I think I came out of it more with a sense of humility, honestly,

18:21 a sense that I think it's a fantasy to think

18:25 that our kids are clay and we can completely control who they become.

18:31 I think it is kind of true in a weird way when they're really little,

18:33 which is why, you know,

18:34 you get people obsessing over organic food and all the rest of it.

18:37 There's it's like a little science exper

18:38 it's like a little chemistry experiment, right?

18:40 It's like, I'm going to control all the inputs

18:42 here and then I can maximize the output.

18:45 And I I think in a kind of strange way for a lot of parents,

18:47 there's a sense that people don't usually say it this way,

18:51 but I think it's a little like, you know,

18:52 they're going to be like me, but better.

18:54 I'm gonna I'm gonna I'm gonna kind of tweak the uh the next generation,

18:59 right?

18:59 and they start to change.

19:00 And I think that happened before phones,

19:02 but I think phones really um make it much more dramatic, right?

19:07 But it also in this case allows Zach to um transform himself, right?

19:13 And put on a new suit as you you know,

19:15 which kids tend to do, and so do adults, by the way.

19:17 Everybody has some sort of mask in some way.

19:20 I'm curious if you I know this is going to sound weird,

19:23 but if you could talk to Zach, what would you have wanted to ask him?

19:27 Oh, wow.

19:28 car.

19:29 Nobody's asked me that yet.

19:32 Um, I'm a professional.

19:36 Uh, I mean, there are a bunch of parts

19:40 of this story that I still don't understand even now.

19:43 And so, there are certain details that I'd want to know.

19:45 There are certain deals he was doing, and I still don't understand what was kind

19:49 of happening under the hood of those deals.

19:52 Um, there are certain episodes I'd want to better understand.

19:56 Um, I think the biggest thing,

19:58 and it actually goes to a question you asked earlier,

20:01 would be just what was the plan, you know, where what was the longer term plan?

20:05 Where was this going?

20:06 Cuz there are these moments in this story

20:08 where he seems almost like the talented Mr.

20:10 Ripley.

20:11 It seems like he's playing some kind of slow burn long game con.

20:16 But I don't think he actually had a plan like that.

20:19 I think he was like a lot of kids who are 18, 19 years old.

20:22 I think he was just thinking one or two moves ahead.

20:25 Um, so I think that's what I would want to ask him is,

20:29 you know, where did you see this going?

20:32 Support for this show comes from Non.

20:34 Business trips are great.

20:35 The baggage that comes with them is not the shuffle of paper receipts,

20:39 the dreaded post-trip paperwork.

20:41 Non deletes all the grunt work so employees can

20:43 actually focus on the business part of business trips.

20:46 More than 12,500 companies, including Box, Anthropic,

20:50 and Kraton Barrel, refused to work the old way.

20:52 They choose Non to make the annual expense report extinct.

20:56 So if you want to save 15% on your T& budget, yes 15%, check out non.com.

21:05 Now it doesn't come to a necessarily conclusion but when you think about sort

21:11 of the repercussions because his parents didn't

21:13 I know for people who don't know London

21:16 is a notoriously tabloid place that everything

21:19 goes into these tabloids and this story didn't

21:22 um which is of course it seems like it's fantastic for the tabloids right yeah

21:27 what was the impetus for the parents why did they talk to you and what

21:31 were the tradeoffs you had in that regard

21:34 because I'm assuming it was in your mind.

21:36 Oh, every day.

21:37 Yeah.

21:38 I mean, I So, Zach died in 2019 and his parents kept it quiet.

21:45 You know, I think they're they're both

21:47 very private people and also pretty sophisticated people.

21:50 And I think that they very quickly were able

21:52 to see if the Daily Mail got hold of this story,

21:55 they'd have a field day and it would be really unpleasant for our family.

21:59 And so, when I actually first heard the story, I heard it totally by chance.

22:02 I was producing this Hulu series, Say Nothing, based on my book,

22:06 and I was on set one day and I fell

22:08 into conversation with a guy who knew the family and he said,

22:10 "I might have a story for you." And when I went back to my apartment that night,

22:13 I Googled Zack Breler death balcony and there was nothing.

22:18 So that was, you know, years after his death.

22:20 It had wasn't on the internet anywhere.

22:22 It just interested you.

22:23 The story just interested you like, huh?

22:25 In a in a second.

22:26 I mean, when he when he told me the bare outlines of the story

22:29 that there was this family owed a kid who died in mysterious circumstances,

22:32 and it turned out he'd been pretending he was the son of a Russian oligarch.

22:34 Oh, yeah.

22:35 Hello.

22:36 I was in

22:38 right.

22:37 You know, it was an open question whether the family would talk to me.

22:40 And so, we had a series of conversations totally off the record.

22:43 I didn't even bring a notebook.

22:45 Um, and it was just fortuitous that the police who

22:50 really bungled this investigation had kind of botched the whole thing

22:54 and the formal process had kind of just run its course

22:57 at the point where they happened to meet me and so so they were frustrated.

23:02 Yeah, they were frustrated.

23:03 I think they had an appetite to push a little harder in the investigation.

23:08 And I think they also frankly felt a little gaslit by the police because

23:11 the Metropolitan Police in London had basically

23:13 said you shouldn't expect anything more from us.

23:16 And their perspective was well there all

23:17 these really key people you never called.

23:19 You know there are these rocks you didn't look under.

23:22 And so when I came along they ended up welcoming the idea of me diving into it.

23:28 Now to your to your question,

23:31 um it was a tricky one because I I felt enormous compassion for this family

23:38 and I had a huge amount of access to them,

23:40 not just in conversations, but they gave me

23:43 text messages and emails and all the files that the police

23:46 gave them and they when Zach went missing, they would Matthew,

23:51 Michelle, the parents would record the conversations they had

23:53 in real time with people when they were looking for him.

23:56 They gave me all those recordings,

23:58 but what I said to them from the beginning was, you know,

24:03 I've written a bunch of books and I worked

24:06 for the New Yorker and my north star is always the truth.

24:09 And the truth will probably be somewhat uncomfortable for you.

24:12 It won't be the Daily Mail version of the story,

24:15 but you'll find out what happened.

24:17 Yeah.

24:17 If you let me loose on this story, there will be elements of what I publish

24:22 that in a perfect world you might wish weren't out there.

24:26 And there are, if you read the book,

24:29 there's a bunch of family secrets that come out.

24:32 There's really unpleasant stuff about Zach and his parents

24:36 and his relationship with them and things that happen.

24:39 Um, you know, there are his private Google searches.

24:42 There's there's a lot of stuff in there that um I think

24:46 if Matthew and Michelle had editorial control wouldn't be in the book.

24:50 And so what I had to do was sort

24:51 of manage both my impulse to be compassionate to them

24:55 as people who've lost a child in the terrible

24:57 tragedy very recently and then my impulse as a reporter,

25:01 my imperative as a reporter, which is to get to the bottom of the story

25:04 and tell it in a really wholesome way and write a book,

25:08 you know, that's frankly it's not written for them.

25:10 Um, I'm not in PR and I'm not a therapist.

25:14 I'm, you know, I'm kind of answering to a different master.

25:17 Absolutely.

25:17 And I feel good about where we came out.

25:19 And when we launched the book three weeks ago at the 92nd Street Y in New York,

25:23 they came over as did Joe's ex-bro.

25:25 They were all in New York for the launch.

25:27 So, I feel good about that.

25:28 So, every um episode we get an expert to send us a question.

25:32 Yours comes from Tina Brown, very famous magazine editor.

25:35 Let's listen to it.

25:37 Hi, Cara.

25:38 Hi, Patrick.

25:39 Now, Patrick, I've read your incredible, fascinating, dark book,

25:43 Falling, London Falling, and it really leaves me thinking again,

25:49 as I often do when I read you, just about your methods really in Say Nothing,

25:54 you were able to penetrate the really sort of scary world of the IRA

25:59 and you got deep into those uh relationships

26:02 which were all built on decades of secrets.

26:06 Then in Empire of Pain, your book about the sacloids, you were also again,

26:12 you know, getting extracting information from a world which is was so ligious.

26:17 I mean, there's nobody more difficult and scary

26:20 than the Sacklers because they had an army

26:22 of lawyers and a ton of money and they had suppressed the truth for decades,

26:27 but you they couldn't beat you back.

26:29 And now in this uh London falling,

26:32 you stumbled into this this very uh sinister world of the London

26:36 underground culture that really no none of us had really read about before.

26:41 And I wondered how you got those people.

26:43 Um I wondered how you earned their trust.

26:46 You know, I wondered why they talked to you, frankly,

26:48 because you know, again, they're people who had who held their secrets close.

26:53 uh and that also actually includes the family who

26:56 uh certainly weren't prone to to just chatting to strangers.

26:59 So you have extraordinary way of of getting into people's heads and worlds

27:05 and I was very interested particularly in this new book about how you did that.

27:10 What a good question.

27:11 She is well she's one of the best.

27:13 Right.

27:14 She is she would immediately publish this story.

27:16 She she had her own wrangles with Epstein by the way and others.

27:20 Oh I know.

27:20 I know.

27:21 I know.

27:21 Um and and uh yeah, she's one of the few

27:24 people who comes out of those files smelling good.

27:26 Oh, she kicked him in the nuts is what she did, which is her favorite thing.

27:29 So,

27:31 um yeah, you know, so we we already talked about the Brelers.

27:34 I will say with the underworld folks,

27:36 it's part of what I love about this job is I, you know,

27:40 I I get to sort of move through the world and talk to all kinds

27:45 of different people and I have to find

27:46 a different wavelength to appeal to everyone.

27:49 There is no one approach.

27:51 I will say that sometimes the fact of my earlier work helps.

27:56 The nice thing about doing this work over a period of time,

27:58 you this is my sixth book.

27:59 I've been doing this been writing for the New Yorker for 20 years.

28:02 And so I have a track record.

28:04 You can Google me and get a sense of how I work.

28:07 And that works in funny ways.

28:09 So there's a guy who's a minor character in the book.

28:11 There's a big character in the book who's a gangster named Indian Dave.

28:14 very scary guy who um for a variety of reasons I couldn't talk to Indian Dave

28:21 and um but I I was tracking down people who were associates

28:25 of his in the underworld and there's a guy

28:27 a fairly notorious English gangster named Andy Baker

28:31 and Andy Baker had recently got out of prison

28:34 he's never talked to a journalist before and I made

28:36 an overture to him through intermediaries and he ended up

28:41 agreeing to talk with me and he became a really critical

28:44 source and to this day I don't know why Andy

28:48 decided to talk to me but I think I have

28:50 a theory which is that Andy knew that I had

28:54 written um not once but twice big articles about Chapo

29:00 Guzman

28:59 and I I think there may these guys all have an ego

29:03 I'm sure you've encountered this too car like you know where

29:06 why haven't you called me why haven't you called

29:08 exactly and so I think there was a little bit of a sense maybe

29:10 for Andy of you know finally a journalist

29:12 worthy of my statue in the criminal underworld.

29:17 Sure.

29:16 Uh comes knocking and it's the guy who wrote about El Chapo and um so you know

29:23 story must be told by the finest by somebody who's

29:27 by somebody who was worthy of you know whoever else it is.

29:30 And so um I think it was probably something like that.

29:34 But you know that became a really

29:36 important relationship for the book.

29:37 Andy actually is back in prison now.

29:39 But um but you know he calls me from prison.

29:42 I think I'm going to go.

29:43 He's he's organizing a reading in the prison library.

29:45 I'm going to go and do a book signing in the fall.

29:48 Um but um uh stranger thing.

29:51 It'll be it'll be it'll be a story to tell.

29:54 But um see, no, I'm going to contrast this.

29:56 You're doing that and I was thinking of going I was

29:59 in San Francisco last yesterday and the day before and I

30:02 was thinking of going down to the trial uh and just

30:04 waving at Elon to[ __] with him like, "Hi, hi dude.

30:08 What's up, girl?" You should have done it.

30:10 I know.

30:10 Oh, it would have he would have erupted because we he and I don't speak anymore.

30:14 But imagine the drama.

30:16 Just for me.

30:17 That was just for me.

30:18 That's my inclination.

30:19 So, but go ahead.

30:20 But it would have been for the rest of us had you only gone.

30:23 Correct.

30:23 I thought about it.

30:23 I just thought I just that'll be there's too much swisher out there right now.

30:28 So, anyway, um so go ahead.

30:30 Finish what she was asking.

30:31 Like, so you think Yeah.

30:34 So, you don't I I think that helps sometimes.

30:36 I will often send people articles I've written just to say like here you

30:41 know this will give you a sense of the kind of work that I do.

30:44 But you know I published a piece in the New Yorker um just as the book

30:48 was coming out about this crazy fraud conspiracy

30:51 in New Orleans involving people crashing into tractor trailers.

30:55 Totally different world.

30:56 You know that was the world of um uh

30:59 kind of scuzzy personal injury lawyers in New Orleans.

31:02 Um, and then a lot of people in New Orleans East,

31:05 you know, living in generational poverty and risking their lives to

31:09 make money in these schemes.

31:11 And um, it's just a it's just a different approach.

31:14 That's part of what I like about it is that there is no I don't have a beat.

31:18 I sort of move from one world to the next and I always

31:20 have a little bit of a sense of vertigo trying to figure it out.

31:22 Sure.

31:23 But what what do you do you would you say you do to earn their trust?

31:26 She's asking specifically.

31:27 What do you think you do?

31:30 Uh, I ask good questions.

31:32 I try to um I try to listen well.

31:36 Mhm.

31:37 But honestly, the biggest thing and and this is

31:40 annoying sometimes I think for other journalists

31:42 to hear because I am speaking from a position of um you know what these days

31:49 counts as rare institutional privilege in the sense

31:52 that I can keep coming back because when I'm writing for the New Yorker like

31:55 the piece I just published on New Orleans,

31:57 I started working on that piece in 2021.

32:01 So it just you've got time and um with a book I've got time and I

32:07 keep showing up and that kind of persistence

32:11 and I think in a kind of strange way,

32:12 you know, that sort of novelty of you begins to disappear

32:15 a little bit when they see you keep hanging around.

32:16 Another thing that I've always done is if you won't talk to me,

32:20 I'm going to call the 10 people you talk with all the time and all I

32:25 need is a few of them and if I talk with them for a couple hours,

32:29 they'll come back and say, "Oh, actually he's pretty serious.

32:31 You know, it's not he he's really trying to understand

32:34 this and they'll report back to you." It doesn't always work or it scares them.

32:38 That worked with Steve Case.

32:39 I talked to 25 people around him and he

32:42 he wasn't talking to me and then he's like,

32:44 "I guess I have to talk to you now." And I go, I guess you do.

32:47 I guess you do.

32:48 I mean, I think that's the, you know,

32:50 the line I often use, which is slightly obnoxious,

32:53 but but guess the point across is I'll say the train's leaving the station.

32:57 You get on it or not.

32:58 You know, um I say I'm inevitable, so you might as well.

33:04 Yeah.

33:04 I don't I don't I haven't quite summoned the confidence.

33:07 I'm rudder than you are, Patrick.

33:08 I'm sure you're charming.

33:09 I'm not charming.

33:10 I like it.

33:10 I could learn from you.

33:11 I also I also neg interesting when she was talking about this.

33:15 I find negging a lot of these billionaires

33:18 yields a lot of things, you know, because they're also insecure.

33:22 Yes.

33:22 So they'll go, "Well, you don't ask me about it." I go, "Not really.

33:25 I'm not interested in what you have to say." And then they and then I leave.

33:29 Like I actually go and then they always come back.

33:31 I shouldn't say this because now they'll figure it out.

33:33 But they'll never figure it out.

33:35 The thing is so many of these people, I mean, I don't know.

33:37 I've you you've spent more time around these people than I have,

33:39 but I've written about billionaires over the course of my career.

33:42 And so often, I mean,

33:44 the inherited variety is like a different kind of pathology.

33:47 But the self-made ones, I think almost without exception,

33:52 these are people who have some hole they're

33:54 trying to fill that they're never going to fill.

33:55 I always say their mothers didn't hug them enough,

33:57 but I would say their parents didn't hug them.

33:59 Whatever it is, but there's just

34:01 there's a thing motivating them.

34:03 And um I I wrote a big piece a few years ago for the New Yorker about Larry Gigo

34:08 and the art dealer who who is who you

34:10 know is the dealer for all those types of people.

34:13 And I swear Larry's great genius is realizing that at a certain point you've

34:20 you've got all the boats and all the houses and you're trying to find

34:22 some other way to measure your self-worth visa v your peers and if

34:27 it's you know if it's the best Picasso and you're worried that your rival

34:33 y is going to get it.

34:34 What's happening right now the trial with Musk and opening and Sam Waltman.

34:39 Why are they there?

34:40 Why are they exposing themselves?

34:43 And you think it's that you think it's that it's just a kind of

34:45 It's a dominance of It's a dominance.

34:48 It's a They can't stop the It's not good for anybody.

34:51 They should have settled, you know?

34:53 I I don't know.

34:54 I I think it's a deep deep deep

34:56 insecurity and a sense of victimization then manifests itself.

35:00 But that's another story.

35:01 But you're right, Larry Gagoshian took advantage of that.

35:03 So, one of the things you said after you published,

35:06 the story keeps moving, unfolding, fluttering its wings.

35:09 So, I'm going to check back on some of your other stories.

35:12 Now, I interviewed you for your book in 2022.

35:16 Um, your Empire of Pain about the Sackler

35:18 family that and their role in the opioid crisis.

35:21 I am still incandescent after reading that book, I have to say.

35:25 Not incandescent.

35:26 Someone pointed out I wasn't using it.

35:28 I'm furious.

35:29 Their company Purdue Pharma finally received its sentencing

35:32 in the federal court for fraud and kickback charges.

35:34 They ordered to pay over $8 billion in criminal penalties,

35:37 but none of the Sacklers faced criminal charges, which kills me.

35:43 Yeah.

35:42 How did you react when you heard about the ruling?

35:46 Well, I mean, I knew it was coming.

35:47 It was not a it was it at this point it was sort

35:49 of a formality of something that we that had been uh in the works for years.

35:53 I listen I to me it's

35:55 it is a um really lamentable feature.

36:00 I mean, never mind the fact there was a story, I think,

36:02 in the Financial Times a few weeks ago about how all

36:04 the big white collar criminal defense firms are out of work.

36:07 They're all because because there's no white

36:09 collar criminal defense prosecutions under the Trump administration.

36:12 So, you know, it's open season now, I guess.

36:14 But even in earlier eras, I think there's this crazy thing about

36:18 the way in which we prosecute corporations where you

36:20 can have a situation like this where the corporation

36:22 pleads guilty and pays fines, but no individuals go to prison.

36:27 And it's like you treat the corporation like a driverless car.

36:30 And I just don't know

36:33 as a kind of broad systemic matter that we are going to solve these kinds

36:38 of problems of of like corporate malfeasants of the highest without in this case

36:44 spurs a public health crisis that ends

36:46 up killing hundreds of thousands of people.

36:48 Um I don't know that you're that it's going to end up

36:50 being anything but a speeding ticket if people don't go to jail.

36:53 And so to me it was

36:55 yeah just I mean it was kind of a sad outcome but a sadly predictable one.

37:00 Yeah.

37:00 Do you imagine that will change?

37:02 I mean one of the reason I was interviewing

37:04 all these parents so much as I was hoping

37:06 lawsuits would occur right when people hear

37:09 this or that that federal regulators would finally pay attention or politicians.

37:14 And one of the companies, I think I've done two of the parents,

37:17 but I talk about it a lot.

37:18 Like this was years ago,

37:19 I started doing this on these these chatbot suicide things.

37:23 And one of the companies said to me, "When are you going to stop?" And I said,

37:27 "When you go to jail,

37:28 I'm hoping that's my goal here really for one of you to go to jail."

37:33 But it didn't happen in this case when there's so clear a line,

37:36 a bright line that you drew and many

37:37 others did between the Sacklers and what happened.

37:42 Yeah.

37:42 But but but again I mean I think the thing

37:44 that's so frustrating right is that we have if

37:47 you look at the chat bots right we in theory

37:50 I don't know I want to live in a society in which we in which we sort of learn

37:54 and improve over time and when you have certain forms

37:57 of corporate transgressions in which people are making decisions

38:00 on the basis of you know their their valuation or ROI or

38:07 shareholder value or whatever you know whatever these kind of uh

38:10 these considerations are where they say okay I'm going do the wrong thing.

38:13 I'm We're actually going to sell out the country.

38:15 We're going to sell out families like that um in the interest of

38:20 for King Charles.

38:21 Well, that's the thing.

38:22 But this is it's funny.

38:23 This is a thing I come back to a lot recently.

38:27 There's a um a friend of mine, a guy named David D.

38:30 Young, who wrote a terrific book that came

38:32 out a few years ago called Nazi Billionaires.

38:35 And it kind of is what it says on the tin, right?

38:38 It's like a story about the generation

38:39 of German industrialists who weren't ideological

38:44 Nazis but kind of made peace with the Third Reich because they realized it's

38:50 good for business and they said you know we are running these corporate empires

38:52 and actually that's the first and foremost

38:54 that should be our consideration is we

38:56 need to protect the business and I remember thinking specifically about the tech

39:02 barons when they you know in this new phase when they all started you

39:05 know with the inauguration thinking boy I'd love send them this book just

39:09 to give them a sense of how their grandkids are going to think about them.

39:14 Um, but the irony, right, is that like, well, here's the thing.

39:17 If you read the whole book, those families,

39:20 like the grandkids are now the wealthiest people in Germany.

39:23 That's right.

39:23 They don't That's exactly right.

39:25 I'm going to move on to your other book, Breakout Book, Say Nothing,

39:27 is about a kidnapping that set against

39:29 the backdrop of the troubles in Northern Ireland.

39:31 The political violence we've seen recently,

39:33 United States doesn't come anywhere near

39:34 what happened in Northern Ireland, obviously,

39:36 but it's concerning and the recent the latest assassination attempt of the White

39:40 House correspondents was only a few days ago and feels already like old news.

39:44 Are there any do you find any parallels having

39:47 written about the troubles or in here or not?

39:51 Uh, I do and I don't.

39:53 Yeah, I I it's funny when I was working on the book,

39:56 I guess I started working on the book on the article that became

39:58 the book in 2014 and I finished the book and it came out in 2018

40:03 2019 and during that time I mostly felt like I was writing a period

40:08 piece about a very foreign situation

40:10 that as an American I couldn't particularly relate to.

40:14 Um, but then you know, you got the Black Lives Matter protests and you got

40:19 these militarized cops out on the streets and tear gas and suddenly

40:23 just the kind of visual iconography of American life started

40:27 to look a lot more like the early days of the Troubles.

40:32 Um, I think that the kind of the depths of the division and you know there

40:40 was I I thought about it when when

40:42 ICE killed those two civilians um several months ago.

40:47 the response by people who very quickly

40:52 were looking to dehumanize them in one way, you know, um, oh, he he had a gun,

40:59 you know, he had a concealed carry permit or she was gay or whatever,

41:03 you know, immediately looking for some reason

41:06 not to think of them as human beings, like fellow human beings.

41:09 That's a very Northern Ireland thing.

41:11 the idea that that all deaths are not created equal,

41:14 that they're coded differently, and how you feel about them should be

41:18 really a function of the identity of the person who dies.

41:22 Um, that really worries me.

41:23 You know, I um I was at a thing

41:27 last summer in Maine and I saw George Mitchell speak

41:32 and he was talking about the Good Friday Agreement which

41:37 ended the Troubles and somebody asked him in the Q&A

41:41 if because he was very involved in that decision and ending this, you know,

41:44 three decade conflict.

41:45 Somebody asked him if he thought that there there could have been

41:48 a Good Friday agreement in a world in which social media existed.

41:53 And he said he he thinks he said, "I've thought about it and I don't think so.

41:56 I think if social media had had existed in 1998, we never

42:00 and weaponizes everything even more so because bots are in there.

42:04 Um, you know, and of course it's created out of rage and desperation.

42:09 Support for On with Cara Swisser comes from Zot.

42:12 Take it from me as I recover from a cold right now.

42:14 Health issues don't follow a 9 to-ive schedule.

42:16 Maybe you cut your finger making a midnight snack or you tweak your back

42:20 out at the gym or you get hit with the flu during a busy week.

42:24 You can rely on Zach Do 247 and book a last minute doctor's appointment.

42:28 Zach Do is a free app and website that helps you find

42:31 and book highquality in-et network doctors so you can find someone you love.

42:35 Book in network appointments with more

42:37 than 150,000 providers across all 50 states.

42:40 They offer more than 200 specialties and you can easily filter

42:43 your search to build a care team that's right for you.

42:46 View thousands of verified patient reviews and get

42:48 a real sense of who your doctor is.

42:51 When you're ready, book instantly based on their realtime availability.

42:54 No phone tag, no waiting around.

42:57 Stop putting off those doctor's appointments and go to zoddock.com/swisher

43:01 to find and instantly book a doctor you love today.

43:04 And that's zoodoc.com/swisher.

43:08 zoddock.com/swiss.

43:11 Thanks ZuckDoc for sponsoring this message.

43:18 Now, you you also hosted a podcast called Wind of Change,

43:21 where you dig into the allegation that the CIA ghost wrote

43:24 a song for West German heavy metal band during the Cold War.

43:27 Um, you said that making it was the most fun you've ever had.

43:30 Why did you get out of podcasting?

43:32 Why aren't you doing Are you doing more?

43:34 I've got one in the works actually with the same um Yeah.

43:37 Yeah.

43:37 I mean, in the nature of the messed up podcasting industry,

43:43 the company that made that, Pineapple Street, doesn't exist anymore.

43:46 They were terrific people.

43:48 I did my succession podcast with them.

43:51 So, great.

43:51 And but the two people who I worked

43:54 with most closely on that, Joel Levelvel and Henry Molovski.

43:56 I am um I'm collaborating with again.

43:59 It's very early stages of a new podcast.

44:01 It's not about spying.

44:02 It is about music.

44:04 It's really fun.

44:05 And um yeah, I loved it.

44:07 I loved it and I love working with those guys.

44:09 You know, writing is solitary stuff.

44:13 Make a podcast.

44:13 You're like, it's like running off to join the circus.

44:15 It's really fun.

44:16 I'm having a lot of fun.

44:18 This is the best part of my career, I have to say.

44:20 Um we talked briefly about El Chapo.

44:22 He wanted you to write his memoir and you turned him down, by the way.

44:25 Just Andy Baker.

44:26 Um and you said access is overrated.

44:29 I would completely agree with you and Walter

44:32 Eisen should have agreed with me on that issue.

44:34 Um, where do you draw the line over what stories you'll cover?

44:37 And when it comes to writing someone's memoir,

44:40 would you say yes to someone that might surprise me

44:43 or is there someone you would even with or without access?

44:47 I don't think I would write anybody's memoir.

44:50 Yeah, I wouldn't ghost write anybody's memoir.

44:51 I, you know, um, it's funny.

44:55 I go back to actually a conversation I had with Larry Gozian

44:57 when we were at his beach house in Amagancet and he has all

45:01 these amazing I mean he's got surprise surprise he has an incredible art

45:05 collection and um he's been painted by all kinds of people you know David

45:09 Hawkchney did a portrait of of Gigosian and we were talking about the big

45:14 12,000word piece I was in the process of writing about him and I

45:19 think he was my sense is that he was a little bit uncomfortable

45:22 because he's so used to the art press which is a little bit,

45:25 you know, as you'll relate,

45:26 it's a little bit like parts of the tech press, right?

45:29 Where the the people who are just on the beat are kind

45:31 of really what they're hoping is that they'll they'll get the next interview,

45:34 they'll get invited to the party.

45:35 And um that wasn't me.

45:37 And he was, I think, becoming aware of that.

45:42 Yeah.

45:41 And uh I was trying to sort of prepare him for um my piece.

45:46 And I said, you know, when you when you see the piece,

45:48 it's not going to be like looking at a photo of yourself.

45:50 It's going to be like looking at a at a painting that somebody's painted.

45:55 somebody else's

46:01 I just sat for you know David Hawkchney painting Larry Gigosian doesn't actually

46:06 look like the way Larry Gozian sees himself right it's all filtered through

46:11 Hchney's perception that's the way I I see my writing and and and so I think

46:16 it's one thing to write a story like London falling where I have

46:19 a ton of access to this family it's a very intimate account of the family.

46:22 Um, but I wouldn't make any claim for it being their story.

46:26 Like if their name was on the cover along with mine and it was a memoir,

46:31 it's just that's just not what I do, you know?

46:33 Would there be anyone you might say yes to like in that regard?

46:37 Nobody.

46:37 Nobody.

46:38 I agree.

46:39 Yeah.

46:39 Um, yeah, Access is overrated.

46:41 I did some of that with the journal.

46:42 I hated it.

46:43 I hated it.

46:43 It was so I just I'm so glad I don't I'm so glad they're not talking to me.

46:49 I love it.

46:49 It's the best life.

46:50 I mean I feel I think it's better and I

46:53 think that the the story I always tell is you know

46:55 I find out anyway it doesn't matter.

46:57 Well you get all the and but you get better stuff.

46:59 I mean you know with the Sacklers none of them talk to me

47:02 and so I got you know I got doormen I got administrative assistants.

47:06 I got college roommates.

47:07 I got a yoga instructor who travel because when you're the Sacklers you

47:11 you know you go on vacation and you bring your yoga instructor with you.

47:15 um all those kinds of people, you know, I don't know.

47:18 Would it have been better to have the family

47:20 talking to me with their lawyers and their PR people?

47:23 I don't think so.

47:25 Um I'm always very sincere when I say to people,

47:28 I want to talk, you know, like let's hear.

47:31 I want to hear what you have to say.

47:33 Um but when they say no, that's never the end of the story from

47:38 Especially if you're a good reporter, it doesn't matter.

47:40 That's the one lesson I learned far too late, I think, in some ways.

47:44 Um, let's wrap up with some reflections on larger trends.

47:47 Very quickly, I'm gonna ask you I'm not gonna ask you about your J Crew ad.

47:50 I'm in the Devil Wears Prodatitude, so I can't.

47:52 Um, but you managed to become a famous magazine writer

47:56 at a time when magazines can feel like anacronisms as as you noted,

48:00 with a few exceptions.

48:01 New Yorker, I would say Vogue, a New York magazine is going pretty well.

48:05 Atlantic is.

48:07 Um, Say Nothing was adapted into a TV series uh for FX.

48:11 A24 has already optioned the rights for to your works,

48:14 including the rights to London Falling.

48:16 Obviously, it's such a clear I I was like, "Hello,

48:19 Netflix um before it was even published." How do you

48:23 feel ever feel like an entrepreneur who produces and sells IP?

48:26 I I've sold a lot of rights of stuff, too,

48:28 so I'm super aware of this world, but it's a different world.

48:32 It's sort of an omnimedia world.

48:34 How do you look at it?

48:36 Oh, boy.

48:36 I mean, I have a bunch of feelings about this.

48:40 I uh when I first started writing for the New Yorker,

48:43 I was freelance for six years before they put me on staff.

48:47 And they basically would publish one big piece a year, but nothing more.

48:51 And that forced me to learn how to hustle a little bit.

48:55 And so I started doing some screenwriting.

48:57 I did all kinds of different things.

48:59 I was at a think tank, you know, various things.

49:01 And I never really lost that even after I went on staff at the magazine.

49:06 And I think generally speaking, you'd be crazy in this moment.

49:09 Even if what you love most is magazine journalism, um at least for me,

49:13 just in terms of the economics of it and and the trend lines and so forth,

49:18 um I think it's good for everybody to have some kind of side hustle.

49:20 I do a bunch of things.

49:22 I um you know, I write scripts, I produce TV, I do podcasting.

49:30 Um, and it and and they all actually kind of feed into each

49:34 other creatively in a way that feels pretty healthy and useful to me.

49:38 Strangely enough, my, you know,

49:39 for years I was a an unproduced screenwriter getting paid

49:42 good money to write scripts for studios that they didn't make.

49:45 And all of that all those years in the trenches as a screenwriter actually

49:49 helped my non-fiction writing in all kinds

49:51 of ways that I wouldn't necessarily have predicted.

49:54 Um the the area in which it gets tricky I

50:01 think or the area in which I'm maybe a little

50:03 bit different from other magazine journalists is I think there's

50:07 a kind of sad trend that you've seen with the decline

50:10 of the industry in general which is that a bunch

50:12 of people now when they sit down to write a magazine

50:13 article or they conceive of a magazine article what they're

50:16 really thinking about is can I get an option in Hollywood

50:20 and I've I've been lucky in that regard.

50:23 I've had a lot of stuff optioned and some stuff made,

50:26 but I never ever ever pick a story on that basis.

50:28 I think it's a mistake to do that.

50:31 As a general rule, kind of across life, I think

50:34 you should focus on making the thing you're doing

50:36 be the best version of that thing and not I couldn't imagine honestly

50:41 kind of focusing on a project in front of me,

50:43 but in the back of my mind thinking how

50:46 cool it would be if it was something else.

50:47 If like if that's what you want to do, just go do that other thing.

50:49 In my view, that's a good point.

50:52 I think it leads to a lot of bad magazine writing.

50:54 So yes, I've been fortunate in that regard,

50:57 but I never um I never give any thought to that.

51:02 We never show things to people.

51:04 I mean, there's crazy stuff that happens

51:06 in this business among magazine journalists,

51:08 but there are people who will they'll cut life rights deals

51:12 with the subjects of their stories before they've published, which to me feels

51:15 Oh, wow.

51:16 Like it's just not a thing that I would that I would do personally.

51:21 Um And and some of that, listen, it's a little like the slammers, right?

51:24 Some of that comes from the desperation of people trying to make a living

51:27 in a in an industry that's rapidly contracting.

51:30 And so maybe I'm maybe some of my virtue

51:32 here is just a reflection of the fact that I've

51:34 you know that I've been fortunate that I don't

51:36 um I don't have to make those kinds of concessions.

51:39 But I would it would feel very weird for me if I were um

51:44 it would feel like a a pretty distinct conflict of interest if I were

51:47 trying to sign people up sign up the life rights of people who I

51:50 was then going to write a magazine article about which I hadn't published yet.

51:54 Right.

51:54 But you do have to think about I everything I do I'm like is

51:56 this better as a podcast or should it be a book or should it be Yes.

52:00 I spent a lot of time or maybe I'll do this this way

52:03 and so it's I'm constantly thinking about other ways to tell a story that I

52:07 don't you feel as though

52:08 Yeah I am too but I feel as though that's the the great thing about that is that

52:12 that's right everything has a kind of natural medium in which

52:15 it wants to so so wind change my podcast

52:18 I think would have been it wouldn't have worked as a magazine article.

52:22 You certainly could have done it, but you're right.

52:24 You're right.

52:25 You could, but it comes I'm not I'm spoiling nothing

52:27 here to say it lands in a slightly inconclusive place,

52:31 which I knew would be the case from the get.

52:34 And I felt as though if people listen to if people read a story and it

52:41 takes them hours and hours to read the story and at the end you're inconclusive,

52:45 they will feel frustrated because they've given you

52:48 their whole attention span for a certain amount

52:50 of time and then you've gotten to the end

52:51 and you haven't totally delivered the goods.

52:54 If they're listening to a podcast and they can

52:56 be washing the dishes or walking their dog's music

52:59 or, you know, on the bike or whatever.

53:01 Yeah.

53:01 Exactly.

53:02 And there's music.

53:03 Um, I mean there's a bunch of reasons why it worked better.

53:05 Yeah, there's lots of ways to tell a story.

53:07 Okay, I have two last questions.

53:08 I saw a Tik Tok um from the late show

53:12 Book Club where you said if you're doing your job,

53:14 this is the inevitable AI question, by the way.

53:17 If you're doing your job in a way that AI can easily replicate,

53:20 you're probably not doing your job well.

53:21 I could not agree more.

53:23 Your and I don't think you were saying that in a cavalier way.

53:26 Your point was that journalism unears new information by gumpture reporting,

53:30 making calls, going out in the world to talk to people.

53:32 There's also an element of creativity that is not replicable.

53:36 They can do a very close faximile.

53:38 I just made a version of myself that is pretty close.

53:42 Um, an avatar, a 3D avatar.

53:45 Um, is there a place for AI and journalism?

53:47 Because at some point they could be making calls,

53:50 sending emails, potentially do reporting.

53:53 Um, or it could even involve a con because AI may not identify itself as AI,

53:58 although that would be a good Patrick Raden Keefe story.

54:01 Um, it how do you look at it?

54:04 Everyone sort of has a take right now.

54:06 Do you have one?

54:08 I mean, I don't have a, you know, I don't have a bumper sticker take.

54:11 I do use AI.

54:13 It's been really helpful for me in really narrow ways.

54:17 And so, um, don't use it for anything associated with writing.

54:21 And I should say I I now get, as I'm sure to you, um,

54:25 these kind of clever spam emails that sneak past my filter

54:30 that are you can immediately tell that they're written by AI.

54:34 And, um, I think that a lot of the I think it's it's I think it's

54:38 such a mug's game to think that AI is going to help you with your writing.

54:41 It's it's one of those funny things where I I honestly feel as though

54:44 six months ago there were people who there was a certain kind of person who

54:47 thought that this was a good idea and now we know like in fact

54:50 it sort of flattens everything out and and you you can tell when you're reading.

54:55 Um I don't use it for that stuff.

54:57 I I will tell you the area in which it's been amazingly helpful.

55:00 Um, and I want to kind of pick my words carefully

55:03 because I don't want to tip too much about what this um,

55:06 I was working on a project and uh,

55:10 basically what I said to Claude and Chachi PT was

55:15 there's a certain kind of lawsuit that I'm really interested in.

55:18 And this lawsuit is really only about 10 or 15 years old.

55:21 The law changed and suddenly there started being these new lawsuits.

55:25 And I'll bet that there's the equivalent of like a big-

55:29 time kind of ambulance chaser who does this sort of thing.

55:32 And probably among the many people who started doing this 10 or 15 years ago,

55:36 there are some who are more prominent, have more prominent cases,

55:40 talk to the press and are big characters and I want you to find me those names.

55:46 And it went and gave me the two names.

55:49 And that's the kind of thing that it would have taken me, you know,

55:52 it could have taken me a day or two in the past for that stuff.

55:56 Great.

55:56 I think there are all kinds of uses um for for that's an excellent example

56:02 AI, but the um not in writing,

56:04 but in the actual writing or worse in the um I mean,

56:08 I think the point I was trying to make in that video was

56:11 your job is not to take[ __] that's on the internet and rearrange it.

56:15 But you wouldn't want it to make calls or send emails or do reporting for you.

56:19 You never do that.

56:20 But I mean, why do people trust me?

56:21 Well, part of the reason is that you're never going to I'm

56:24 never going to lay you off on an assistant, much less an AI.

56:27 I am accessible.

56:29 I am reachable.

56:30 I'm pretty straightforward.

56:32 I try and be as transparent as possible.

56:34 So, I don't know.

56:35 I mean, I guess there are some people who are I feel like I'm pretty busy.

56:39 I guess there are some people who are so busy that they need to ridiculous

56:42 outsource in that way.

56:43 But to me, the thing is, what's the world you want to live in?

56:45 I mean, some of this is that I'm you're catching me after 3 weeks of going

56:49 out and talking in rooms with people about

56:52 my book and meeting with people who've read it.

56:56 I just don't think there's I think ultimately as human beings,

57:00 we want to see other humans and read a human face.

57:03 And even in a universe in which you say,

57:06 "Isn't it uncanny the way the the way the avatar

57:09 seems like a real human face?" At a certain point,

57:12 people are going to get pretty icked out by that.

57:15 and want the real thing.

57:16 They do, but the numbers are growing enormously.

57:18 This used to be an outlier.

57:20 All these chat bots used to be an out.

57:21 I just interviewed Cherry Turkl about this.

57:23 It used to be an outlier and strange and now

57:25 it's very common unfortunately and very bad for people's health.

57:29 Um, let me ask you the last question.

57:30 In the recent New York Times profile,

57:32 you said everywhere you looked there were people doing morally grotesque things.

57:37 Um, and that while you may not be part of the solution,

57:39 you're not part of the problem.

57:41 And that's something.

57:42 I know what you mean.

57:43 Um, you got a a law degree from Yale,

57:46 which explains how your interest in your law,

57:48 and had a job lined up at a corporate law firm,

57:51 and but managed to sell a book and a New Yorker

57:53 article in the nick of time and never went down that path.

57:57 What would your life be like if you became a corporate lawyer?

58:00 And can you imagine yourself leading a morally grotesque life?

58:05 Uh, it's hilarious.

58:06 Maybe a sackler lawyer perhaps.

58:08 Yeah, exactly.

58:08 Well, I mean, listen, there's I think about this stuff all the time,

58:10 and if you read Empire of Pain,

58:12 the first person you meet in that book is Mary Joe White.

58:15 Uh, longtime lawyer to the Sacklers.

58:17 Slap her.

58:18 Um, oh, man.

58:19 Um, did I liked her?

58:23 Well, that's the thing.

58:23 She was a hero to a lot of people,

58:25 but but behind the scenes doing some pretty And again, like perfectly,

58:28 you know, her legal right to do that work,

58:30 but the idea that we would celebrate this person seems just gross to me.

58:35 Um, yeah.

58:35 I mean, it's funny.

58:36 I don't I think I would really struggle with it.

58:38 I I didn't want to come off too self-righteous in that times piece.

58:42 The point that I was making was just

58:45 I have no trouble explaining to my kids and I'll have no trouble

58:48 explaining to my grandkids what I was doing at this moment in history.

58:52 And I don't I don't know that I'll be able to boast about having,

58:56 you know, help helped turn the ship around.

58:58 I wish I could.

59:00 Um but I certainly it hasn't, you know, it hasn't been Yeah.

59:03 You know, full full speed ahead.

59:04 let me uh contribute to the you know the the kind

59:08 of um pretty dire direction in which we're going.

59:12 I think what my wife I should say and this is maybe a good place

59:14 to end what my wife would say is I would have been a terrible lawyer.

59:17 I mean leaving aside all the kind of moral choices.

59:20 Right.

59:20 I would have been so bad at it and um leaking everything.

59:24 Oh, let me tell you about Enron reporter.

59:26 Right.

59:26 Right.

59:27 Right.

59:27 So, I mean, hey, I guess I guess in that respect, maybe, yeah,

59:30 maybe um maybe the way in which I would sort of sabotage the machine

59:33 would just to be just be to uh you know, to be incompetent.

59:36 Um yeah, I guess I don't know.

59:37 You might have ended up like the lawyer in the Pelican Brief,

59:40 so be careful about that.

59:42 Exactly.

59:42 You are part of the solution in case

59:43 you're interested just from someone who admires you.

59:47 You're more than just not part of the problem.

59:49 Um in any case, it's a wonderful book.

59:51 It's really a great read.

59:53 It kept me up all night.

59:54 I'm exhausted.

59:55 Um, but I really appreciate it and I'm excited to uh see what you do next.

1:00:00 Oh, what a pleasure.

1:00:01 Thanks, Karen.

1:00:02 Today's show was produced by Christian Castro Rel,

1:00:04 Michelle Aloy, Katherine Milsop, Megan Bernie, and Kayn Lynch.

1:00:08 Nishad Kurwa is Vox Media's executive producer of podcast.

1:00:12 Special thanks to Sam Lee, Katherine Barner, and Julia Sharp Leavine.

1:00:16 Our theme music is by Trackademics.

1:00:19 If you're already following the show,

1:00:20 you get to model in a J Crew ad or be in the Devil Wears Prada, too.

1:00:25 If not, you're part of the problem.

1:00:27 Thanks for watching.

1:00:28 See you on Thursday.

Study with Looplines Download Captions Watch on YouTube