UFO's, Disclosure, and Earthquakes at Area 51 | Redacted News

0:00 Well, in the span of 24 hours, there have been 17 earthquakes near Area 51.

0:04 It started with a 4.4 magnitude quake just two and a half miles underground.

0:08 The area is normally not prone to earthquakes this shallow,

0:12 and it's leading to theories of nuclear testing or even

0:14 UFOs because it all happened after President Trump said this.

0:19 Do you have an update on the UFO files

0:21 and what might be what we're going to be seeing?

0:23 Well, I think we're going to be releasing as much as we can in the near future.

0:28 They want to find out about the UFOs and uh

0:31 anything having to do with UFO or related material and we're

0:35 going to be releasing a lot of things from that we

0:37 have and I think some it's going to be very interesting.

0:42 Very interesting.

0:43 Okay.

0:43 What exactly is going to be said?

0:45 According to UFO researcher George Knapp,

0:47 these earthquakes occurred right after DNI Tulsi Gabbard was on site at Area 51.

0:53 Watch.

0:54 in Nevada.

0:55 I I'd been seeing these hints for a couple of days uh

0:58 that the VIP visitor was going to be out of Groom Lake.

1:02 And apparently yesterday,

1:04 I don't know if Representative Berles was with this VIP,

1:08 but the VIP in question is supposedly Tulsi Gabbard,

1:12 who made a visit, flew into Nellis, then took a little Janet plane, I think,

1:16 and and went to Groom Lake and then came back and left uh Las Vegas yesterday.

1:21 And um I don't know So, was it Area 51?

1:26 Is it S4?

1:28 What exactly is going on here?

1:29 And are we about The bigger question, regardless of these earthquakes,

1:32 though, is are we about to experience disclosure?

1:36 Are we getting very close to that?

1:38 Chris Leato is the host of the Lato Files.

1:41 Joins us now from Portugal to talk about this.

1:44 Um, well, Portugal, uh,

1:48 is used to having some massive earthquakes over the years.

1:51 famously one of the greatest natural

1:53 disasters in world history happened in Lisbon, Portugal um in the 1700s.

1:59 Absolutely devastating.

2:00 Um so, you know, on the surface it seems, Chris,

2:03 like you know, this is just a a random a random occurrence.

2:07 17 earthquakes happening all over this location.

2:10 But when you dig a little bit deeper into this, as Dr.

2:13 Steven Greer has and others who've pointed out that there

2:16 are nuclear deterrent mechanisms that are set about all through

2:21 these locations that can be triggered at a moment's notice

2:24 in order to basically collapse these structures and to hide these structures.

2:28 So anyway, just on the nuclear piece of this and and the earthquake

2:33 piece of this, what do you make of this?

2:34 Yeah, I think as far as the nuclear angle, you know,

2:38 we could tell right away when North Korea detonated a nuke a nuke underground,

2:43 you know, when they did a nuclear test.

2:45 So, you can tell by the just the P waves and the S-waves.

2:48 You have the the compression waves.

2:50 I'm not a seismologist, but they they can easily tell,

2:54 we could tell right away that it was a nuclear test

2:56 because you have so much energy coming from the same single point,

3:00 you know, and that's going to be your compression waves.

3:02 And then you have the S-waves which are, you know, your your sheer waves.

3:07 And so we would know right away if this was nuclear test.

3:10 Like without a doubt all around the world,

3:12 they would have they would have known,

3:13 hey, there's a nuke test going on um under Nevada.

3:18 So I, you know, I can pretty confidently

3:20 say that I don't think it's a nuclear test,

3:23 but you could say like Avi Lobo argued that if it is mundane,

3:27 then it's probably military testing.

3:30 And the military has detonated a lot of weapons underground.

3:35 You know, not necessarily that much under Nevada, but they have detonated,

3:41 you know, 4700 tons of TNT up in White Sands.

3:46 Believe that was in 1984 to do a test.

3:49 So, that is a lot, you know, um that's a lot of explosives.

3:53 And so, you could theoretically that would be

3:56 enough energy to cause a 4.4 magnitude quake.

3:59 you know, they said it was 2.2 kilotons of explosives is what you would need.

4:05 So, theoretically, it could be military testing,

4:08 but then the epicenter is is quite shallow for an earthquake.

4:11 It was 4 km.

4:12 So, that's 2 and 1/2 miles under the ground,

4:14 which is which is, you know, rare for that area.

4:18 That's why it is kind of interesting.

4:20 But even then, 2.5 miles down is still really deep.

4:23 You know, the deepest test that we know about

4:25 was in Russia and that was uh 9,000 ft.

4:29 So that was a mile and a half down.

4:31 So that we do detonate explosives pretty far down,

4:34 but 2.5 mi is still really far.

4:37 So you know, I think the experts are leaning towards this is just a natural,

4:43 you know, natural occurrence of these earthquakes.

4:45 But what is unique is that it is in this test range.

4:49 So this is a very interesting test range like you mentioned there,

4:51 Area 51 is in there.

4:53 They mentioned Groom Lake.

4:55 So you have a lot of very interesting test sites.

5:00 You know, we've detonated it's over 900 nuclear weapons in that area.

5:06 So you have, you know,

5:08 this is where the crown jewels of the US military live, right?

5:15 It's right in the center of the desert.

5:16 It's very hard to get to.

5:18 You know, no one's out there.

5:19 It's easy to to monitor, right?

5:22 There's no trees so you can easily see who's coming.

5:25 Um, so there, you know, there's probably hundreds at least,

5:30 maybe thousands of miles of tunnels underneath Nevada.

5:34 So it is a very interesting site.

5:36 But in this case, you know, really the only thing I could even consider,

5:41 and I say this very hesitantly or with, you know,

5:44 with the warning speculation, conspiracy speculation, um,

5:48 is what could cause earthquakes if it's not weapons.

5:52 And the only thing that came to mind was Eric Hecker, if you remember him.

5:56 He was the fire.

5:57 I'm so glad.

5:58 Yeah, I'm so glad you brought that literally was my next question.

6:00 You must be mind readading me, but go ahead.

6:02 I don't mean to interrupt.

6:03 Eric Hecker, who was stationed at the South Pole

6:06 station in Antarctica at the ice ice cube nutrino detector,

6:11 which was being used in large part and one of the massive

6:15 pieces of this weaponry was that it could cause and create earthquakes.

6:19 That was his main claim and that's that's what I what I thought of.

6:23 You know, what what could this be if if it was causing earthquakes?

6:26 And Hecker said that, you know, they tested the ice cube nutrino.

6:32 it was that you could actually turn it to transmit.

6:35 That's what he's saying.

6:36 So the the scientists all say this is, you know, this is false.

6:40 It's obviously incorrect conspiracy theory.

6:43 Um the scientists argument is that these are receive only detectors.

6:47 So the ice cube nutrino, it's basically a kilometer by kilometer um diodes.

6:53 There's over 5,000 of these receivers in the ice.

6:56 It's very interesting.

6:57 And it picks up uh chirov radiation.

7:00 That's really the radiation that emits when a nutrino

7:03 hits a water particle stuck in the ice.

7:06 So in itself, it's just an amazing scientific experiment.

7:10 And so Eric Hecker was the fire chief there and he said

7:12 he stumbled upon um a very high power uh energy cables essentially.

7:19 So his argument is that they were turning these receiver diodes

7:22 onto transmit and it was some sort of directed energy weapon.

7:26 And so he said in 20 uh 2010 2011 when he was there

7:31 uh this this you know weapon as he argues caused the Christ Church earthquake

7:38 right and so that's the only thing I can think

7:39 of and I I say this again warning you know conspiracy

7:43 speculation u the physicists say it's not possible the only

7:47 thing I could consider is that could you possibly use some

7:50 sort of resonance you know low energy waves to vibrate

7:54 at the exact perfect frequency to cause um you know

7:58 the the the earthquake or the water that's located

8:02 at the fault to actually vibrate to cause some sort of quake.

8:06 But again, I I think this is very speculative.

8:08 So that's all I consider.

8:11 Yeah, I mean you're right about that piece of it.

8:13 But to me, the bigger point now is about

8:15 disclosure and about these VIPs who've been making these trips.

8:18 And we we this is not a conspiracy at all.

8:21 Um, we do know that that Congressman Berles

8:24 and Berett um and now according to George

8:27 Knap's reporting uh DNI Tulsi Gabbard at Area 51 um going to these secret sites.

8:34 So, and then President Trump coming out and making

8:36 his message of course about the coming disclosures.

8:39 So, what do you make about these VIPs,

8:41 members of Congress going to these different locations

8:43 ahead of what the president is set to announce?

8:47 I think first off, it's just amazing to see

8:50 the president saying the word UFO in the Oval Office,

8:53 you know, and it's not a joke and he's serious about it.

8:56 I I think that's just amazing to to watch and every time I see it's amazing.

9:01 And he's asked the Pentagon, the Secretary of War, to release these files on it.

9:05 So, and he said it publicly and the Secretary of War has said it.

9:08 So, this is not like

9:10 20 years ago on TV where they'd make fun of you for bringing it up.

9:14 No.

9:14 So just that is amazing to see.

9:17 You know, I've only been investigating for almost six years now.

9:21 So I can't imagine people have been looking into this topic for decades,

9:25 you know, like George Knap, etc.

9:27 But yeah, I can't imagine even seeing a president say that, say

9:34 the word UFO in the O oval office without making a joke.

9:37 You know, he's saying it seriously.

9:39 And he directed as many organizations as he could.

9:44 it seems like to try and release their files.

9:47 But the question is, is anything going to change?

9:50 You know, that's that's the big question.

9:52 And yes, he's he's said a lot of things, but we've seen no documents.

9:57 Nothing has changed.

9:58 And a lot of the arguments is that, you know,

10:01 they're not going to let the information go up.

10:03 There's there's a need to know.

10:05 And so, you're not going to tell the president

10:08 if they are actually holding this sort of material.

10:10 You're not going to tell him.

10:12 And it's so he can actually deny it, right?

10:15 So he has legitimate deniability.

10:16 So the CIA has has referenced this many

10:19 times in the past that they have legitimate deniability.

10:23 So I think is it actually going to change anything?

10:28 Well, what's definitely changed is um the whole topic

10:31 in general that it's it's now considered a serious topic.

10:35 It's not just laughed about.

10:36 It's not joked about.

10:37 And I think that for sure has changed.

10:40 Will we get disclosure?

10:41 I I would love that to happen.

10:45 Do I think that's gonna happen?

10:46 You know, probably not.

10:48 I just look at the past 80 years.

10:51 You know, look at what happened uh with the Kennedy assassination.

10:55 So that I mean we pretty much know the CIA did it.

10:58 I mean they they were at least complicit.

11:01 Something happened, you know,

11:03 or elements inside the CIA were at least partly involved.

11:08 And yet nothing's come out.

11:09 We still don't know.

11:10 Um I think there's just it's not in any

11:13 interest of the US government to release this information.

11:16 There's no benefit.

11:17 There's no advantage.

11:18 So I think I'm very excited, optimistic,

11:23 and I think it's amazing positive news when people like Berles are so motivated.

11:29 Mosvitz, you know, Burchett, they're still being elected.

11:33 They're still talking about this stuff.

11:34 And I would, yes, I would love for them to go to these secret sites.

11:39 Very excited to hear what they have to report.

11:42 Yeah, we're hoping to get uh Congressman Berles or Berett on the show here

11:45 over the next couple of days um to kind of deep dive what you know,

11:50 their latest revelations, what they've seen,

11:51 what they're allowed to say publicly.

11:53 So, that's something that we are working on wholeheartedly here.

11:56 But I agree with you.

11:57 I mean, given the fact that we haven't received

11:59 the Epstein files in the way that we had hoped,

12:01 we haven't received the JFK files in the way that we were promised,

12:04 there's still all of this holding back of documents,

12:08 um, you know, double the volume.

12:10 You know, they're giving us like 50% of the stuff.

12:12 So, what will President Trump be allowed to say?

12:14 I mean, famously, Bill Clinton was not on a need- to- know basis about Area 51.

12:19 So, the president of the United States is not on a need to- know basis.

12:22 Members of Congress are not Sen famously Senator Patrick Ley, remember?

12:26 I mean of Vermont, he was yelled at by a general.

12:30 Don't ever ask those questions again.

12:31 So he even as a sitting senator not allowed to get these answers, Chris.

12:37 Yeah, exactly.

12:38 Because as soon as you tell them the information is is compromised.

12:46 Yeah.

12:45 It's as simple as that.

12:46 I mean, legitimate deniability.

12:48 You're not going to tell you're not going to tell the president your deepest,

12:51 darkest military technological secrets.

12:55 you know, they're not going to tell them

12:56 how our our nuclear weapons work, you know,

12:59 or how our our best stealth technology works

13:02 or even technology that we don't even know about.

13:05 You're not going to tell the president.

13:07 Um because then it's a risk.

13:09 Why does he need to know?

13:10 He doesn't need to know that to actually enact his duties as the president.

13:16 So, I think they do have legitimate deniability.

13:19 The CIA has said this in the past.

13:21 It's in their operating procedures.

13:23 So, I don't think there's any advantage for them to release this information.

13:28 There's no advantage for the president to know this information.

13:31 And these people aren't stupid.

13:33 Like, you're not going to just write this sort

13:36 of information on electronic documents and, you know,

13:41 store them in a file cabinet, right?

13:43 You know, that's just not how this works.

13:44 I think think about our nuclear facilities, right?

13:48 Did you know inside of a nuclear facility there is nothing digital?

13:52 You cannot use a single digital uh piece of equipment inside of a nuke reactor.

13:58 Like it all has to be analog.

14:00 Yeah.

14:00 There's there's a whole u industry based

14:03 around making these complicated analog only sensors

14:08 um simply because a digital system inside

14:10 of a nuclear reactor can be compromised.

14:14 Yeah.

14:14 Right.

14:14 So there's only analog sensors inside of nuclear reactors.

14:18 So, as we've been told by David Grush, um, other whistleblowers,

14:22 is that this technology,

14:23 this information is kept right next to the nuclear secrets, right?

14:28 It they think it's in the same um

14:30 in the same document protection as your nuclear weapon secrets.

14:35 And so, they're going to treat it just the same.

14:37 You know, they're they're not dumb.

14:39 They're not going to they're not going

14:40 to use a digital sensor in a nuke reactor.

14:42 And they're not just going to put all the documents labeled

14:45 UFO in some file cabinet and then give it to the president.

14:48 You know, it's just it's not going to happen.

14:52 Chris Leato is a host of the Lato Files.

14:54 Thank you so much.

14:55 I mean, I'm hopeful.

14:55 I'm hopeful for disclosure, but uh I I tend to, you know,

14:59 I'm usually a glass half full kind of person,

15:01 but I I tend to agree with you on this that they're

15:03 going to give us just like the Epstein Files, just like JFK.

15:07 Um they're just going to give us little pieces of it,

15:09 just enough to wet our whistle, so to speak, you know.

15:14 Will we see medbeds?

15:16 I don't know.

15:17 Will we see the the time machine technology,

15:20 the uh the jump rooms allowing people to travel

15:23 back to the 1940s and 2050 and all of that?

15:27 I don't know.

15:28 Chris, great to see you.

15:29 Thank you so much for this.

15:30 I appreciate you joining us uh late into the evening over there in Portugal.

15:34 Great to see you.

15:36 Yeah, thank you, Clayton.

15:37 Always great to be on your show.

15:38 Thank you so much for watching Redacted.

15:40 We'd love for you to subscribe to the channel.

15:42 It's totally free if you want to follow us or subscribe.

15:45 And if we brought you any value at all,

15:47 please consider sharing this video with a friend or a loved one on social media.

15:52 Thanks so much and we'll see you next time.