The Degrowth Paradox

0:00 What if saving the planet means giving up on economic growth?

0:03 That's the trade-off now confronting governments, investors,

0:05 and voters worldwide because the global economy is at a crossroads where

0:10 the urgent fight against climate change

0:11 is clashing with economic growth ambitions.

0:14 On one hand, the world has never been more serious about climate change.

0:17 More than 145 countries that together account

0:20 for roughly 77% of global greenhouse gas

0:22 emissions have now set or are exploring net zero goals for the coming decades.

0:26 Cutting pollution has become a global priority,

0:28 not just for preserving the environment,

0:30 but for public health, energy security, and long-term economic stability.

0:34 But there's [music] a problem.

0:35 The quickest way to cut emissions is to reduce the activities that produce them.

0:39 This means using less coal and gas power, steel and cement,

0:42 aviation, shipping, fertilizer, petrochemicals,

0:44 and even parts of industrial agriculture.

0:47 And shrinking those sectors comes with a cost.

0:49 [music] They're some of the largest employers

0:50 and biggest sources of exports in the world.

0:53 So if you shrink them too quickly, you're not just reducing emissions,

0:56 you're also cutting jobs, wage growth,

0:58 and the pathways people use to climb the income ladder.

1:01 That uncomfortable tension is what has pulled degrowth,

1:03 a once academic concept, into mainstream climate discussions.

1:06 Degrowth argues that on a planet with finite resources,

1:09 countries should deliberately scale [music]

1:11 back resource inensive production and consumption.

1:13 In theory, that means smaller, slower,

1:15 and more sustainable economies with less waste,

1:17 reduced emissions, and a tighter focus

1:19 on well-being instead of endless GDP growth.

1:21 And as climate science has become more urgent, the idea has gained momentum.

1:25 Degrowth now shows [music] up in reports

1:27 from the intergovernmental panel on climate change,

1:29 a UN environment program, and the concept is becoming more mainstream.

1:32 Books like Cohido's Capital in the Anthroposine,

1:35 which sold over half a million copies in Japan,

1:37 have helped push degrowth into public conversation.

1:40 But while degrowth has gained attention,

1:41 the trade-offs it entails are becoming increasingly evident as well.

1:45 For example, Europe has cut its emissions

1:47 more than almost any region in the world,

1:48 down roughly 37% between 1990 and 2023, while its economy has almost tripled.

1:54 But the transition hasn't come without its costs.

1:57 Carbon pricing and energy reforms have pushed electricity prices higher,

2:00 squeezed factories, and contributed to protests

2:02 like France's yellow vest movement.

2:04 Japan shows that you can run one

2:05 of the lowest emission economies among advanced industrial nations

2:08 and still face decades of weak growth because

2:10 of deeper structural issues like a rapidly aging population,

2:13 low birth rates, and persistent deflation.

2:15 And all this is happening in a world where

2:17 nearly 700 million people still live in extreme poverty,

2:20 surviving on less than $2.15 a day.

2:23 For these people, talk of degrowth sounds less

2:25 like climate policy and more like a threat.

2:27 If rich countries stop growing,

2:28 does that also close the door on development for everyone else?

2:32 So, we're left with a dilemma.

2:33 We [music] know the planet cannot handle business's usual emissions.

2:36 We know rapid cuts will hit some workers and regions harder than others.

2:40 And we know that telling nearly a billion people who have never experienced

2:43 prosperity to just accept slower growth

2:45 is both tonedeaf and maybe politically explosive.

2:49 So, as always, we've got some important questions to answer.

2:52 If cutting emissions is unavoidable,

2:55 which parts of the economy actually have to shrink and which ones don't?

2:58 How are countries already living these trade-offs today?

3:01 And is there any realistic way to grow and decarbonize at the same time?

3:05 Or is some form of degrowth inevitable?

3:08 When putting together this video and almost every

3:10 other video on this channel covering current events,

3:12 we rely heavily on reporting [music] from The Economist,

3:14 which is why I am so proud to have them as an advertising sponsor.

3:17 The [music] Economist delivers insight that helps

3:19 you see the bigger picture through timely, thoroughly fact-checked,

3:22 and in-depth expert analysis on the big issues around the world,

3:25 like this very timely article about

3:27 the Netflix and Paramount merger from December

3:29 9th that laid out everything going on behind the scenes of this deal.

3:32 The Economist Sack not only covers their daily journalism,

3:35 but also includes subscriberonly podcasts, audio versions of their articles,

3:39 and longer video discussions with their editors.

3:41 As a viewer of Economics Explained, you get a special 35% off discount to enjoy

3:45 The Economist and all it has to offer for less.

3:47 Head over to their website at economist.com/explain to get started.

3:52 If you zoom out and look at where global

3:53 emissions actually come from, the picture is pretty simple.

3:56 Most of the world's emissions don't come

3:58 from plastic bags or people forgetting to recycle.

4:01 They come from the unglamorous backbone of modern life.

4:04 In other words, the stuff we rarely think [music] about,

4:06 energy, concrete, and steel, fuel, and food.

4:08 Together, these sectors account for the vast majority of global emissions.

4:12 [music] As it turns out,

4:13 they're also some of the biggest employers and largest exporters on the planet.

4:16 The heavy industry alone, which includes steel, cement,

4:19 and petrochemicals, produces about 22% of the world's CO2 emissions.

4:23 And if you zoom out further

4:24 and include the entire building and construction sector,

4:26 the share rises to roughly 37%.

4:29 To reach net zero, these industries can't just make a few minor improvements.

4:32 Some of them need to change so

4:34 dramatically that parts of them will inevitably shrink.

4:36 Take electricity.

4:37 If the goal is to fully decarbonize,

4:39 the world has to move away from coal and gas and toward renewables.

4:42 On paper, that sounds straightforward until you remember that in many places,

4:46 those fossil fuel plants are actually the economic anchors of entire regions.

4:50 When a coal plant shuts down early, it's not only workers who lose their jobs.

4:54 Contractors also lose work.

4:56 The local tax base shrinks,

4:57 and the towns built around that plant start to hollow out.

5:00 We can watch that tension playing out across the world in real time.

5:03 In the US, coal heavy states like West Virginia and Wyoming

5:06 face steep job losses as mines and plants scale down.

5:08 In India, coal still puts food on the table for millions of workers.

5:12 And in South Africa, where 80% of electricity still comes from coal,

5:15 [music] rolling blackouts are already a warning

5:16 sign of how fragile the system is.

5:18 In places like these, shutting plants down

5:20 too quickly risks destabilizing an entire region.

5:23 And yes, the energy sector as a whole is still growing.

5:26 Today, it employs around 76 million people with more

5:29 than 5 million new jobs added since 2019.

5:31 [music] But that growth doesn't land where coal plants are closing,

5:34 new energy jobs cluster around manufacturing hubs,

5:37 grid infrastructure, and clean tech supply chains,

5:39 often far from the regions built around fossil [music] fuels.

5:42 So even if renewables look cheaper on paper,

5:44 the real world transition is far from smooth.

5:47 Steel and cement, which account for 14% of the world's CO2,

5:50 are even tougher to decarbonize.

5:52 The problem is that unlike many other sectors,

5:54 they rely on both massive heat inputs

5:56 and [music] chemical processes that release CO2,

5:58 no matter how efficient the factory becomes.

6:00 For example, turning limestone into cement clinker releases about

6:03 0.6 tons of CO2 for every ton of cement produced.

6:07 To put that into perspective, producing enough cement to fill

6:09 an Olympic size swimming pool generates emissions

6:11 that roughly match the annual footprint of a [music] town of about 700 people.

6:15 So, until cleaner technologies scale, and we're not even close to that yet,

6:18 cutting emissions in those sectors often means producing less cement and steel.

6:22 And this has concrete human consequences.

6:25 The world now uses about 4.2 billion tons of cement per year.

6:30 Cut that supply and the effects cascade.

6:32 First, housing projects stall.

6:34 Then, roads and bridges get delayed.

6:36 And before long, contractors start laying people

6:38 off and jobs quietly disappear from supply chains.

6:40 In less developed countries, this has an even bigger impact.

6:43 Many are still in the middle of building the basics.

6:45 Anything from housing and hospitals to power plants and roads.

6:48 So, when materials become harder to get,

6:50 that stalls the infrastructure that's supposed to unlock jobs,

6:53 incomes, and higher living standards in the first place.

6:56 Aviation and shipping.

6:57 There are still no cheap, scalable,

6:59 zerocarbon fuels ready to replace kerosene or bunker fuel at global volumes.

7:03 So cutting emissions in these sectors today

7:05 requires things nobody wants, like flying less.

7:08 Right now, the world operates roughly 35 million commercial flights,

7:11 and the biggest emissions come from long

7:13 haul routes that tie economies together.

7:15 If we pull those back, we reduce emissions,

7:17 yes, but the effects compound quickly.

7:19 Some routes will disappear altogether.

7:21 There will be fewer connections,

7:22 and the flights that remain will become more expensive.

7:25 Shipping is no different.

7:26 More than 80% of global trade moves by sea,

7:28 powered largely by heavy fuel oil, one of the dirtiest fuels in the world.

7:32 Cleaner alternatives exist,

7:33 but they're still too expensive or not available at scale.

7:36 So cutting shipping emissions today mostly means shipping less stuff,

7:40 which raises prices not just for luxury items,

7:42 but for essentials like food, medicine, and building materials.

7:45 That hits developing countries the hardest as they

7:47 rely on maritime trade for the basics.

7:49 For them, higher costs or disrupted routes hit food security,

7:52 access to medicine, and economic stability directly.

7:55 And then there's agriculture.

7:57 On the farm alone, emissions from livestock, methane,

7:59 and fertilizer applied to soils make up almost 12% of global greenhouse gases.

8:04 But once you factor in everything that brings food from the field to your plate,

8:07 the entire agra food system is responsible for roughly 1/3 of global emissions.

8:12 The problem is that cutting these emissions

8:13 almost always makes food more expensive.

8:16 However you do it, using less fertilizer, raising fewer animals,

8:19 or changing how farms operate, food costs rise.

8:22 And no government wants to be blamed for making groceries unaffordable.

8:25 It's true that precision agriculture, regenerative farming,

8:27 and methane reducing cattle feed all show promise in reducing emissions.

8:31 But for now, they're still in early development, unevenly deployed,

8:34 and not yet capable of delivering

8:36 large-scale emissions cuts without higher costs.

8:38 So, this is the core dilemma.

8:40 Short-term affordability is at odds with long-term environmental stability.

8:44 And we've already seen what this looks like in practice.

8:46 In Europe, tighter carbon pricing helped cut emissions dramatically,

8:49 down roughly 37% between 1990 and 2023.

8:54 But the transition came with a price.

8:56 Higher carbon prices pushed up the cost of energy,

8:58 and that pressure landed hardest on industries

9:00 that depend on cheap electricity to stay competitive.

9:03 And yes, Europe's economy still tripled during this period,

9:05 but that headline number hides something important.

9:08 A big part of Europe's emissions drop came from shifting heavy industry abroad.

9:12 The EU still consumes huge amounts of steel, cement, [music] and chemicals.

9:15 it just produces fewer of them at home.

9:18 So those emissions didn't disappear.

9:20 They were just outsourced to countries like Turkey,

9:22 India, or China where production is often dirtier.

9:25 Now, in rich countries with diversified economies,

9:27 some of the changes that come from reducing emissions are manageable.

9:30 A shrinking coal sector in Denmark or the UK, for example,

9:33 can be absorbed by service industries, tech, finance, or renewables.

9:37 But in middle and low-income countries, it's a completely different story.

9:40 [music] Globally, about 8.5% of the world's

9:43 population still lives in extreme poverty.

9:45 Billions of people rely on jobs and the very

9:47 industries that climate policy says need to shrink.

9:50 And for them, any decline in activity is a direct hit to wages,

9:53 food security, and economic mobility.

9:55 So, yes, the world needs to decarbonize quickly.

9:57 But the mechanics of doing that means some sectors will shrink,

10:00 at least for a while,

10:01 and many economies aren't ready for what that actually looks like.

10:04 Some countries are already living different versions of this dilemma,

10:07 and their experiences show just how delicate

10:09 the balance between climate and growth really is.

10:12 Let's look at a couple case studies.

10:14 Take [music] Japan for example.

10:15 The country runs one of the most energy efficient economies in the developed

10:18 world with per capita emissions far lower than those in the US,

10:21 Canada, or Australia.

10:23 Japan has also cut its overall emissions

10:24 to their lowest level since national tracking began in 1990,

10:27 even with a large population and a major industrial base.

10:30 In other words, Japan already looks like the kind

10:32 of lowcarbon society many countries say they want to become.

10:36 So, let's look at the other side of the scale.

10:38 Japan's economy.

10:39 Japan has now lived through three decades of weak economic growth.

10:42 Since the mid1 1990s, wages have barely budged once you adjust for inflation.

10:46 On its own, that's a slow grind.

10:48 But paired with fewer stable career paths for younger workers,

10:51 the pressure starts to build.

10:52 And as the population ages, that pressure only compounds further with fewer

10:56 workers carrying more of the load.

10:58 It's true that Japan's economic challenges have

11:00 nothing to do with its emissions profile,

11:02 but Japan's trajectory does show that running a low emission,

11:05 highly efficient economy doesn't automatically guarantee dynamism,

11:09 rising wages, or upward mobility.

11:11 So, let's look at our second case study.

11:13 Because if Japan shows environmental success with economic stagnation,

11:16 Costa Rica shows environmental success with [music] economic opportunity.

11:20 Instead of shrinking its way to sustainability,

11:22 the Central American country built an economy around it.

11:24 In the 1980s, Costa Rica faced severe deforestation and environmental decline.

11:28 But instead of doubling down on extractive industries, it reversed course.

11:32 It restored its [music] forests, which now cover more than 50% of the country,

11:35 up from around 21% in the 1980s.

11:38 And it turned environmental protection into the backbone of its tourism economy.

11:42 But it didn't stop [music] there.

11:43 It also shifted almost entirely to renewable electricity

11:46 with over 98% of its energy coming from hydropower,

11:48 wind, and geothermal resources.

11:51 [music] Tech firms and service employers were drawn

11:52 to its political stability and clean energy infrastructure.

11:55 And while Costa Rica isn't a rich country by western standards,

11:58 it consistently produces higher life expectancy and stronger

12:01 institutions than many countries at its income level.

12:04 So yes, with early investment and the right strategy,

12:07 you can grow and get greener [music] at the same time.

12:09 But, and this is important,

12:11 Costa Rica is a small country with unique advantages.

12:14 Abundant hydropower, political stability, and a strong service economy.

12:18 Not every nation has those conditions.

12:20 So, you can't simply copy and paste Costa Rica's model onto India,

12:23 Nigeria, or Vietnam and expect the same outcome.

12:26 [music] While Japan and Costa Rica sit at opposite ends of the spectrum,

12:29 most of the world sits somewhere in between.

12:31 The majority of countries are trying

12:32 to transition fast enough to avoid environmental disaster,

12:35 but slowly enough to protect workers and the industries their economies rely on.

12:39 And that brings us to the big question.

12:41 Is there any path where the world can get cleaner without getting poorer?

12:45 The first piece of good news is this.

12:47 Not every part of the economy has to shrink.

12:50 In fact, some sectors will grow enormously.

12:52 Clean energy is now one of the fastest growing industries on Earth.

12:55 Last year alone, the world added a record 585 gawatt of renewable power,

13:00 more than 90% of all new electricity capacity.

13:02 At the same time, lithium ion battery manufacturing

13:05 crossed a milestone that was unthinkable a decade ago, the terowatt hour scale.

13:10 Together, these changes are reshaping how energy is produced,

13:12 stored, and used across entire economies.

13:15 And the money flowing into the space reflects that.

13:17 In 2024, global investment in clean energy hit $2.1 trillion,

13:22 nearly doubling what flowed into fossil fuels.

13:24 This means jobs, supply chains,

13:25 and industrial clusters forming around clean energy.

13:28 And it means parts of the economy really can expand even as emissions fall.

13:32 But growth in one place doesn't guarantee fairness everywhere.

13:35 Countries with cheap capital, strong institutions,

13:37 or advanced manufacturing like the US,

13:39 Europe, China, and South Korea capture most of the upside.

13:42 Meanwhile, countries that rely on legacy industries like steel, cement,

13:45 or fossil fuels face the risk of losing

13:48 jobs faster than new ones [music] arrive.

13:50 To pull off a transition that's both fast and fair, countries need three things.

13:54 First, large-scale retraining.

13:56 Workers in shrinking industries need realistic pathways into rising ones.

13:59 They need actual job placement in industries that pay similar or better wages.

14:03 Germany's Roar Valley, for example,

14:05 managed to replace part of its coal and steel

14:07 employment through decades of investment

14:08 in high-tech manufacturing and services.

14:11 But many regions haven't done that.

14:13 The second thing we need is targeted investment.

14:16 [music] The most successful transitions happen

14:17 when governments concentrate clean energy spending

14:19 in specific places so entire new industries can take root at once.

14:23 When manufacturing, infrastructure, and suppliers grow side by side,

14:27 they create entire local job ecosystems.

14:30 That makes it far easier for displaced workers to retrain,

14:32 switch roles, and stay put instead of starting over somewhere else.

14:35 The US Inflation Reduction Act is one example.

14:38 It poured hundreds of billions into domestic clean energy manufacturing,

14:41 which has already triggered more than

14:43 $110 billion in announced private sector investment.

14:46 China did something similar a decade earlier,

14:48 building a solar and battery industry that now dominates global supply chains.

14:52 But this kind of transition depends on deep capital markets,

14:55 strong institutions,

14:56 and room to absorb short-term pain, which many countries don't have.

14:59 And that brings us to the third requirement,

15:02 support for countries that can't afford slowdowns.

15:04 Low-income nations still need massive growth

15:06 to lift their residents out of poverty.

15:08 Telling them to slow down isn't realistic or fair.

15:11 If the global system demands rapid decarbonization,

15:13 then the global system must also help

15:15 finance it [music] through green infrastructure loans, technology transfers,

15:19 and climate finance commitments that actually get delivered.

15:22 Because without that support,

15:23 the countries least responsible for historical emissions

15:26 become the ones that pay the highest price.

15:28 And that brings us back to the core dilemma.

15:30 A rapid transition is essential for the planet.

15:33 A fair transition is essential for political stability

15:35 and a productive innovative transition is essential for economic opportunity.

15:39 In the end, the real challenge is cutting emissions

15:42 fast enough without breaking economies or leaving whole regions behind.

15:46 If you want to explore this further and see whether saving

15:48 the planet is even worth it from a purely economic perspective,

15:51 we've made an entire video on that exact thought experiment.

15:54 You should be able to click to that on your screen now.

15:56 Thanks for watching, mate.

15:57 Bye.