Keep these Stupid American Trucks out of Europe
Not Just Bikes
0:00 American SUVs and pickup trucks are dangerous,
0:03 and there is irrefutable evidence of this.
0:06 Their extreme weight and stiff frames make
0:08 them dangerous to other vehicles in a crash,
0:10 which has turned road safety into an arms race
0:13 that favours those who can afford the biggest and heaviest vehicle.
0:16 And their blunt, vertical front-ends,
0:18 designed entirely for aesthetics, are more dangerous to pedestrians.
0:23 When a person is hit by a car, they’re likely to land on the hood.
0:26 Which would not be particularly enjoyable.
0:28 But a person hit by one of these trucks is
0:31 much more likely to be knocked back and impact the ground,
0:35 or be run over by the truck.
0:37 Which is why research has found that people are 44% more likely to die when
0:41 hit by an SUV or light truck than they are if hit by a car,
0:46 for children that number was found to be 82% higher,
0:49 and for children under 10, it’s 130%.
0:52 And pickup trucks are even worse.
0:55 This 2023 Belgian study found that a pedestrian or cyclist hit by a pickup
0:59 had an almost 200% higher risk of fatal injury than if hit by a car.
1:04 What’s worse is that light trucks are also
1:06 more likely to crash in the first place.
1:09 Due to their heavy weight and high centre of gravity,
1:11 SUVs have worse handling than a typical car,
1:15 and they have longer braking distances too.
1:17 And their high centre of gravity also means that they
1:20 are much more likely to roll over, even at low speeds.
1:24 Rollover deaths in light trucks were a major
1:27 problem in the early 2000s and in response,
1:30 automobile manufacturers started making their vehicles stronger to avoid
1:33 crushing the occupants in case of a rollover.
1:36 A major side-effect of this however is that the pillars of the vehicle,
1:39 such as this A-pillar, have become much larger, which reduces visibility.
1:43 And visibility was already terrible on these trucks because,
1:47 due to their high height and excessively large hoods,
1:50 they have insanely huge front blind spots.
1:53 This NBC news investigation showed that nine children can sit in front
1:57 of a typical American SUV and be completely invisible to the driver.
2:01 Which is why there has been a steep increase
2:04 in what are known as “frontover” and “backover” accidents,
2:06 someone hit or run over by a truck moving at slow speeds,
2:11 simply because the driver could not see them.
2:14 And it’s often a parent running over their own child in their driveway.
2:19 Understandably, these kinds of vehicles can’t pass EU safety regulations,
2:23 which is why they’re illegal in Europe, and thankfully they can’t be sold here.
2:28 Or at least, they’re not supposed to be.
2:31 Due to a regulation loophole, thousands of these dangerous American trucks are
2:35 being imported into the European Union each year,
2:38 bypassing safety and emissions standards, and making our roads less safe.
2:42 And even as road safety advocates and city councils across
2:45 Europe are trying get the EU to plug these loopholes,
2:49 Recent trade talks with the US
2:51 threaten to nullify vehicle safety regulations completely,
2:54 which would open the floodgates to these stupid American trucks in Europe.
3:04 [NJB Intro] In October, seventy-five European organisations,
3:06 including the City of Amsterdam,
3:07 where I live, signed a joint letter to the EU parliament entitled,
3:11 “The intention to accept lower US vehicle standards
3:14 risks increasing deaths and pollution on EU roads”.
3:18 Their concern is justified.
3:20 In the EU, road deaths have decreased by 36% since 2010.
3:25 But in the US, road deaths have increased by 30% during the same time period.
3:30 What’s worse is that pedestrian deaths
3:32 in the US have increased by 80% since 2010,
3:36 and they are now at the highest level they’ve been since the 1980s.
3:41 Meanwhile EU pedestrian deaths have dropped 37% since 2010.
3:45 There are several cities in the EU
3:48 that have achieved huge reductions in vehicle fatalities, for example Helsinki,
3:52 which has had zero road deaths over the past twelve months.
3:56 They achieved this through many of the things I talk about on this channel,
4:00 such as safer street design, more automated enforcement systems,
4:03 and most importantly, lower speed limits.
4:05 Which is why many municipalities, including Amsterdam,
4:08 have implemented a city-wide default speed limit of 30 kilometres per hour.
4:14 But even outside of these progressive cities,
4:16 there has also been a general steady reduction
4:19 in road deaths across the entire EU over
4:21 the past fifteen years and the main contributor
4:24 to that is improved safety regulations for motor vehicles.
4:28 This letter to the EU parliament comes in response to the recent
4:32 trade talks underway between the United States and the European Union.
4:36 As part of a joint statement published in August,
4:39 the EU said that, “with respect to automobiles,
4:41 the United States and the European Union intend to accept and provide mutual
4:45 recognition to each other’s standards.” “Mutual recognition”
4:48 is a fundamental principle of EU policy.
4:51 It is how a product certified in one jurisdiction
4:54 can be sold in all other jurisdictions throughout the EU,
4:57 and it’s a necessary component of the EU common market.
5:01 For example, the Good Manufacturing Practice or “GMP” legislation means
5:05 that a drug manufacturer in the US only needs to be
5:09 inspected by the US Food and Drug Administration and then
5:13 that drug can be sold in the EU without re-certification.
5:17 This makes sense, as it’s an effective way to streamline regulations,
5:21 and it works very well,
5:22 provided that all jurisdictions involved have a similar certification
5:26 process for the product that is being mutually recognised.
5:30 But that is not the case for motor vehicles.
5:33 EU safety standards for automobiles are significantly
5:35 higher than they are in the US,
5:38 both in terms of what is tested but also who does the testing.
5:42 US automotive safety testing focuses primarily
5:45 on occupant safety in typical crash scenarios.
5:48 One of the only tests that is more strict
5:50 in the US than in Europe is rollover safety tests,
5:52 due to the entirely manufactured problem of excessive rollover crashes
5:56 as American manufacturers started promoting light trucks in the 90s.
6:00 But if these stupid American trucks weren’t so
6:02 top heavy and regular heavy in the first place,
6:05 these tests wouldn’t be so important,
6:07 and engineering resources could go into other safety features.
6:10 As a result of these testing differences, EU cars are safer than US cars.
6:15 A 2015 report found that a typical EU car on US roads would
6:20 have about a 33% lower risk of serious injury than a typical US model.
6:25 And this doesn’t take into account
6:27 recent improvements in Euro NCAP safety standards.
6:30 Most notably, in 2020 when they introduced
6:33 the “mobile progressive deformable barrier test” for front-end crashes.
6:36 It took me a couple of takes to get that test name right,
6:40 but basically, Instead of crashing a car against a solid wall,
6:43 this test uses a crash between the vehicle and a moving
6:46 trolley to replicate the other car involved in the crash.
6:49 An important aspect of this test is how
6:52 the vehicle manages to share the crash energy.
6:54 In short, if a vehicle is found to be more dangerous to other vehicles,
6:59 it will lose points off of its safety rating.
7:02 Which makes sense.
7:03 Vehicles shouldn’t be able to pass safety tests
7:06 by making the roads more dangerous for everyone else.
7:09 This is a very common theme when comparing EU to US vehicle safety tests.
7:14 US testing is myopically focused on the vehicle and its occupants.
7:18 While Europe tests not just the vehicle,
7:21 but also how it interacts with other road users.
7:24 Which is why the Euro NCAP safety rating has four categories,
7:27 one of them being focused entirely on vulnerable road users.
7:31 Part of this testing involves pedestrian impacts,
7:34 and vehicles are scored on how they impact different parts of a person’s body.
7:39 These kinds of tests have been around for a long time,
7:42 which is why it’s common for cars in Europe
7:45 to have hoods with explosive bolts that pop up on impact,
7:48 or even pedestrian airbags, to protect people hit by cars.
7:52 Notice how on these Tesla cars the hood has
7:55 popped up before the dummy head hits the car.
7:57 They don’t do this on their American
8:00 models… because nobody is making them do it.
8:03 The NHTSA has a proposal for future pedestrian safety tests,
8:06 but today vehicles sold in the US are not required
8:09 to pass any kind of pedestrian safety tests at all,
8:12 which is why their vehicles have been allowed to become
8:16 so ridiculously dangerous to anybody outside of a car.
8:19 But all of that aside,
8:21 even if a crash test in the US is reasonably equivalent to a test in the EU,
8:26 there’s still a massive fundamental difference:
8:29 In the EU, automobile manufacturers are required
8:32 to pass a "Type-Approval" process by independent
8:35 public authorities to certify a specific vehicle
8:38 model before it can be released to market.
8:41 While in the US, all crashworthiness and compliance
8:44 tests are self-certified by the car manufacturer.
8:49 The NHTSA does some spot-checks,
8:51 but the vast majority of motor vehicles enter the US market with a “trust me,
8:56 bro” approach to safety.
8:58 And if you don’t think automobile manufacturers
9:00 are doing everything they can to cut
9:03 corners on those self-certification tests Then I have a Ford Pinto to sell you.
9:08 Incidentally, the Pinto scandal was likely the inspiration
9:11 for the narrator’s job in Fight Club:
9:13 [Take the number of] [vehicles in the field,
9:16 a] [multiply it by the] [probable rate of failure,
9:19 b] [then multiply the result] [by the average] [out of court settlement,
9:23 c] [a times b times c equals x] [if x
9:27 is less than] [the cost of a recall…] [we don’t
9:31 do one] I also think that the already shocking pedestrian
9:35 fatality statistics out of the US are understating the dangers,
9:38 because the US has managed to significantly reduce
9:42 their pedestrian fatalities by just… having fewer pedestrians.
9:45 Can’t have pedestrian deaths if there’s no pedestrians.
9:49 Checkmate, Europe!
9:49 Outside of a small number of urban cores,
9:53 the number of people who walk in American cities is vanishingly small,
9:57 and this is hiding how bad the situation has become.
10:01 But people actually walk in Europe,
10:04 so if these trucks become common here it will be a bloodbath,
10:08 and for no good reason.
10:10 So you might be wondering, who benefits from this trade deal,
10:13 and why is the EU considering it at all?
10:16 Well, first are the American motor vehicle companies who
10:19 would love to sell their high-margin vehicles in Europe.
10:22 The only reason why these vehicles became popular in the US in the first place
10:27 is because automobile manufacturers realised they could bypass
10:30 regulations by selling work vehicles as consumer vehicles.
10:33 Then they funnelled those profits into marketing
10:36 to drive demand for these impractical vehicles.
10:40 Americans didn’t love trucks naturally, they were advertised into it.
10:44 If you want to learn more,
10:46 the history of this is well documented in the book High and Mighty,
10:49 written by a Detroit automobile journalist who was writing
10:52 about the car industry when all of this happened.
10:56 American automakers would love to do the same thing in Europe,
10:59 if only they would eliminate those pesky safety regulations.
11:02 But the real push for this trade deal comes from within the EU itself,
11:08 mostly from German automobile manufacturers.
11:10 In April the US government applied an arbitrary 25
11:13 percent tariff on all cars imported from the European Union,
11:16 which affected any European automobile manufacturer
11:19 who relied heavily on the US market.
11:21 In a recent press release, Volkswagen said that US tariffs would cost
11:25 the company up to 5 billion euros this year,
11:28 and that tariffs have reduced their year-over-year profit by 58%.
11:32 So they are desperate to do literally
11:35 anything they can to have those tariffs reduced,
11:38 even if it means risking the lives of millions of Europeans.
11:42 Plus I’m sure they are salivating at the idea of importing
11:45 their high-margin foreign brands into the EU
11:48 while bypassing safety and emissions regulations.
11:51 As part of these negotiations,
11:52 the EU was able to get the Trump administration to reduce
11:55 the tariff rate from 25% to 15%, at least for now.
11:59 Of course, I don’t know why anybody would trust
12:03 any trade deals out of the US these days.
12:06 The other week Trump arbitrarily increased tariffs
12:08 on all products from Canada by 10 percent,
12:11 simply because the Ontario government aired
12:13 a commercial on right-wing news channels
12:15 that was literally just a segment of a Ronald Regan speech about tariffs.
12:20 It’s not even supposed to be legal
12:23 for a US president to arbitrarily impose tariffs like
12:25 this, but it’s very clear that the American
12:28 government is no longer following their own laws anyway,
12:31 so none of that matters anymore.
12:33 So remind me again why Europe should be willing to cripple
12:36 our vehicle safety regulations for a country which has proven to be lawless,
12:40 arbitrary, and vindictive?
12:42 And it’s not like pickup trucks are fundamentally illegal in Europe
12:45 or something… they just need to pass EU safety testing.
12:50 Which is completely reasonable.
12:51 If you think signing a deal like
12:53 this with the US would be disastrous for Europe,
12:56 I’ll put a link to a site where you
12:58 can find and contact your member of European parliament,
13:00 as well as links to some of the advocacy
13:03 groups who are fighting this proposed trade deal.
13:05 And if you’d like to learn more about American light trucks,
13:08 I have a previous video about how they became popular,
13:11 and the damage they’re causing in North America.
13:15 Thanks for watching.
13:15 If you’d like to support this channel and the work I do,
13:18 consider supporting me on Patreon at patreon.com/notjustbikes.
13:21 Or sign up to Nebula, the independent streaming service,
13:25 where you’ll get early access to my future videos,
13:27 and be able to watch all of my videos ad-free and sponsor-free.
13:31 As well as the videos of over 200 other talented creators,
13:35 and a growing library of Nebula Originals:
13:38 bonus videos, documentaries, and other films that are only available on Nebula.
13:43 But if you’re still a bit unsure, Nebula now has a 3-day free trial.
13:48 Three days isn’t enough time to watch all of the great content on Nebula,
13:52 but we dare you to try.
13:54 They do have a 2 times speed option… When you sign up to Nebula using
13:58 the link go.nebula.tv/notjustbikes you’ll support this channel
14:02 financially and get 40% off an annual subscription.
14:05 Thanks to everyone who supports this channel on Patreon, on Nebula,
14:08 or even on YouTube by watching this video through to the end.
14:13 I appreciate it.